RESEARCH ARTICLE

Numerical simulation of fluid dynamics in the stirred tank by the SSG Reynolds Stress Model

  • Nana QI 1,2 ,
  • Hui WANG 1,3 ,
  • Kai ZHANG , 1,4 ,
  • Hu ZHANG , 2
Expand
  • 1. State Key Lab of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
  • 2. School of Chemical Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia
  • 3. Beijing Aerospace WanYuan Coal Chemical Engineering Technology CO., Ltd, Beijing 100176, China
  • 4. National Engineering Lab for Biomass Power Generation Equipment, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Received date: 16 Jan 2010

Accepted date: 09 Apr 2010

Published date: 05 Dec 2010

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

The Speziale, Sarkar and Gatski Reynolds Stress Model (SSG RSM) is utilized to simulate the fluid dynamics in a full baffled stirred tank with a Rushton turbine impeller. Four levels of grid resolutions are chosen to determine an optimised number of grids for further simulations. CFD model data in terms of the flow field, trailing vortex, and the power number are compared with published experimental results. The comparison shows that the global fluid dynamics throughout the stirred tank and the local characteristics of trailing vortices near the blade tips can be captured by the SSG RSM. The predicted mean velocity components in axial, radial and tangential direction are also in good agreement with experiment data. The power number predicted is quite close to the designed value, which demonstrates that this model can accurately calculate the power number in the stirred tank. Therefore, the simulation by using a combination of SSG RSM and MRF impeller rotational model can accurately model turbulent fluid flow in the stirred tank, and it offers an alternative method for design and optimisation of stirred tanks.

Cite this article

Nana QI , Hui WANG , Kai ZHANG , Hu ZHANG . Numerical simulation of fluid dynamics in the stirred tank by the SSG Reynolds Stress Model[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2010 , 4(4) : 506 -514 . DOI: 10.1007/s11705-010-0508-7

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program, Grant No. 2005CB221205) was gratefully acknowledged. Ms. Qi would like to acknowledge financial support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) during her stay at the University of Adelaide, Australia.
Nomenclature
Bsum of body force, N/m3
cµRsϵRSconstants in the SSG RSM
csconstant in the SSG RSM
cϵ1,cϵ2constants in the SSG RSM
Cs1,Cs2Constants in the SSG RSM
Cr1~Cr5constants in the SSG RSM
ddiameter of the impeller, m
Ddiameter of Rushton turbine, m
Fexternal force, N/m3
Hheight of the tank, m
Idefdefault turbulent intensity of 5%, m2/s2
Nrotation speed, 1/s
Nppower number
ppressure, Pa
Rdiameter of the tank, m
Tinner diameter of the tank, m
Tqtotal torque, N·m
uturbulent velocity, m/s
Uaverage velocity, m/s
wbaffle width, m
Greek letters
δKronecker delta, when i=j, δ=1; when i≠j, δ=0
eturbulence dissipation rate, m2/s3
κturbulence kinetic energy per unit mass, m2/s2
µviscosity, Pa ·s
ξbulk viscosity, Pa ·s
rdensity, kg/m3
ϕijpressure-strain correlation in the SSG model, kg · m /s3
Subscripts
i, j, kCartesian coordinate direction vector
1
Buwa V, Dewan A, Nassar A F, Durst F. Fluid dynamics and mixing of single-phase flow in a stirred vessel with a grid disc impeller: experimental and numerical investigations. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(9): 2815–2822

DOI

2
Montante G, Lee K C, Brucato A, Yianneskis M. Numerical simulations of the dependency of flow pattern on impeller clearance in stirred vessels. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(12): 3751–3770

DOI

3
Khopkar A R, Mavros P, Ranade V V, Bertrand J. Simulation of flow generated by an axial-flow impeller: batch and continuous operation. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2004, 82(6 A6): 737–751

4
Li M, White G, Wilkinson D, Roberts K J. LDA measurements and CFD modeling of a stirred vessel with a retreat curve impeller. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(20): 6534–6547

DOI

5
Panneerselvam R, Savithri S, Surender G D. CFD modeling of gas-liquid-solid mechanically agitated contactor. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2008, 86(12): 1331–1344

DOI

6
Murthy B N, Joshi J B. Assessment of standard k-epsilon, RSM and LES turbulence models in a baffled stirred vessel agitated by various impeller designs. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63(22): 5468–5495

DOI

7
Deglon D A, Meyer C J. CFD modeling of stirred tanks: numerical considerations. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19(10): 1059–1068

DOI

8
Han L C. Numerical simulation of fluid flow in stirred tank reactors using CFD method. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Xiangtan: Xiangtan University, 2005 (in Chinese)

9
Speziale C G, Sarkar S, Gatski T. Modeling the pressure strain of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1991, 227(-1): 245–272

10
Wu H, Patterson G K. Laser-Doppler measurements of turbulent flow parameters in a stirred mixer. Chemical Engineering Science, 1989, 44(10): 2207–2221

DOI

11
ANSYS Incorporated. ANSYS CFX-Solver Release 10.0: Modeling. Canada: Ansys Canada Ltd., 2005

12
Rhie C M, Chow W L. Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA Journal, 1983, 21(11): 1525–1532

DOI

13
Ranade V V, Joshi J B. Flow generated by a disc turbine. Part II: mathematical modelling and comparison with experimental data. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1990, 68A: 34–50

14
Zhang H, Lamping S R, Ayazi S P. Numerical simulation of mixing in a micro-well scale bioreactor by computational fluid dynamics. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2002, 18(2): 113–116

15
Ranade V V, Dommeti S M S. Computational snapshot of flow fenerated by axial impellers in baffled stirred vessels. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1996, 74: 476–484

16
Brucato A, Ciofalo M, Grisafi F, Micale G. Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: a comparison of alternative modeling approaches. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(21): 3653–3684

DOI

17
Luo J Y, Gosman A D, Issa R I, Middleton J C, Fitzgerald M K. Full flow field computation of mixing in baffled stirred vessel. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1993, 71: 342–344

18
Dong L, Johansen S T, Engh T A. Flow induced by an impeller in an unbaffled tank-II numerical modeling. Chemical Engineering Science, 1994, 49(20): 3511–3518

DOI

19
Koh P T L, Schwarz M P. CFD Modelling of bubble-particle attachments in a flotation cell. In: Proc. Centenary of Flotation Symposium, Brisbane, 2005, 201–207

20
Koh P T L, Schwarz M P, Zhu Y, Bourke P, Peaker R, Franzidis J P. Development of CFD models of mineral flotation cells. In: Proc. Third International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries. Melbourne, 2003, 171–175

21
Deglon D A, Meyer C J. CFD modelling of stirred tanks: numerical considerations. Minerals Engineering, 2006, 19(10): 1059–1068

DOI

22
Escudié R, Bouyer D, Liné A. Characterization of trailing vortices generated by a Rushton turbine. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2004, 50(1): 75–86

DOI

23
Zhu X Z, Miao Y, Xie Y J. Three-dimensional flow numerical simulation of double turbine impellers. Petro-Chem Equip, 2005, 34(4): 26–29 (in Chinese)

24
Chen Y C. Design of agitating equipment. Shanghai: Shanghai scientific & Technical Publishers, 1990 (in Chinese)

25
Kshatriya S S, Patwardhan A W, Eaglesham A. Experimental and CFD characterization of gas dispersing asymmetric parabolic blade impellers. Int J Chem Reactor Eng, 2007, 5(1): A1

DOI

Outlines

/