Market analysis and trends for products deriving from the biochemical and thermal treatment of multi-dispersed agricultural residues
Vasiliki P. Aravani, Shiya Wang, Wen Wang, Vagelis G. Papadakis
Market analysis and trends for products deriving from the biochemical and thermal treatment of multi-dispersed agricultural residues
Rapid population growth, economic development, resource constraints and various geopolitical problems, as well as intensifying environmental issues are leading to a worsening energy crisis. Oil, natural gas and coal are still the main sources of primary energy. Biofuels, such as biochar, bio-oil, biogas, and hydrogen, are one of the most significant renewable and sustainable energy sources. Their use can reduce net greenhouse gas emissions as well as dependence on imported fossil fuels, in response to the above, while the production and exploitation of biomass mainly from agricultural residues can also create jobs in rural and depopulated areas. In this study, a market analysis for biochar, bio-oil, biogas, and hydrogen was conducted worldwide intending to provide detailed information for the economic viability of sustainable agricultural systems and to specify the prospects for an economically viable introduction of each of the bio-products into the energy market. The results revealed that indeed these biofuels are one of the most significant and energy sources offering sustainability by reducing gas emissions into the atmosphere but also by managing residual biomass, thus contributing to waste management. A rapid acceleration is expected in the next years followed by price reduction.
biochar / biofuels / biogas / bio-oil / hydrogen / market analysis
[1] |
Guedes R E , Luna A S , Torres A R . Operating parameter for bio-oil production in biomass pyrolysis: a review. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2018, 129: 134–149
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Farghali M , Osman A I , Mohamed I M A , Chen Z , Chen L , Ihara I , Yap P S , Rooney D W . Strategies to save energy in the context of the energy crisis: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2023, 21(4): 2003–2039
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
IEA
|
[4] |
Bórawski P , Bełdycka-Bórawska A , Szymańska E J , Jankowski K J , Dubis B , Dunn J W . Development of renewable energy sources market and biofuels in the European union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 228: 467–484
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Zieliński M , Dębowski M , Kisielewska M , Nowicka A , Rokicka M , Szwarc K . Cavitation-based pretreatment strategies to enhance biogas production in a small-scale agricultural biogas plant. Energy for Sustainable Development, 2019, 49: 21–26
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Aravani V P , Sun H , Yang Z , Liu G , Wang W , Anagnostopoulos G , Syriopoulos G , Charisiou N D , Goula M A , Kornaros M .
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Ramos J L , Pakuts B , Godoy P , García-Franco A , Duque E . Addressing the energy crisis: using microbes to make biofuels. Microbial Biotechnology, 2022, 15(4): 1026–1030
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
No S Y . Application of bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass to transportation, heat and power generation—a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 40: 1108–1125
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Spencer T , Pierfederici R , Sartor O , Berghmans N , Samadi S , Fischedick M , Knoop K , Pye S , Criqui P , Mathy S .
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Panoutsou C , Germer S , Karka P , Papadokostantakis S , Kroyan Y , Wojcieszyk M , Maniatis K , Marchand P , Landalv I . Advanced biofuels to decarbonise European transport by 2030: markets, challenges, and policies that impact their successful market uptake. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2021, 34: 100633–100655
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
EPA
|
[12] |
Hu X , Gholizadeh M . Progress of the applications of bio-oil. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 134: 110124
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Singh B , Macdonald L M , Kookana R S , van Zwieten L , Butler G , Joseph S , Weatherley A , Kaudal B B , Regan A , Cattle J .
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
JirkaSTomlinsonT. State of the biochar industry. International Biochar Initiative Website, 2013
|
[15] |
Abhishek K , Shrivastava A , Vimal V , Gupta A K , Bhujbal S K , Biswas J K , Singh L , Ghosh P , Pandey A , Sharma P .
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Danesh P , Niaparast P , Ghorbannezhad P , Ali I . Biochar production: recent developments, applications, and challenges. Fuel, 2023, 337: 126889–126897
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
WeiS Y. Influence of biomass feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures on physical and chemical properties of biochar. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Guangzhou: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 15–16
|
[18] |
Huang Y F , Chiueh P T , Lo S L . A review on microwave pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Sustainable Environment Research, 2016, 26(3): 103–109
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Chen B , Gu Z , Wu M , Ma Z , Lim H R , Khoo K S , Show P L . Advancement pathway of biochar resources from macroalgae biomass: a review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2022, 167: 106650–106660
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
LiJ YChenLYuJDaiZ QZhangZWangN. Research progress on the preparation methods and applications of biochar. Guangzhou Chemical, 2019, 47(7): 22–24 (in Chinese)
|
[21] |
Chen W , Meng J , Han X , Lan Y , Zhang W . Past, present, and future of biochar. Biochar, 2019, 1(1): 75–87
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Hammes K , Torn M S , Lapenas A G , Schmidt M W I . Centennial black carbon turnover observed in a Russian steppe soil. Biogeosciences, 2008, 5(5): 1339–1350
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Leng L , Huang H , Li H , Li J , Zhou W . Biochar stability assessment methods: a review. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 647: 210–222
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Sun X , Han X , Ping F , Zhang L , Zhang K , Chen M , Wu W . Effect of rice-straw biochar on nitrous oxide emissions from paddy soils under elevated CO2 and temperature. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 628–629: 1009–1016
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Yuan J H , Xu R K , Zhang H . The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(3): 3488–3497
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Antón-Herrero R , García-Delgado C , Alonso-Izquierdo M , García-Rodríguez G , Cuevas J , Eymar E . Comparative adsorption of tetracyclines on biochars and stevensite: looking for the most effective adsorbent. Applied Clay Science, 2018, 160: 162–172
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Hassan M , Liu Y , Naidu R , Parikh S J , Du J , Qi F , Willett I R . Influences of feedstock sources and pyrolysis temperature on the properties of biochar and functionality as adsorbents: a meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 744: 140714–140729
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Kumar A , Saini K , Bhaskar T . Hydochar and biochar: production, physicochemical properties and techno-economic analysis. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 310: 123442–123455
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Kazemi Shariat Panahi H , Dehhaghi M , Ok Y S , Nizami A S , Khoshnevisan B , Mussatto S I , Aghbashlo M , Tabatabaei M , Lam S S . A comprehensive review of engineered biochar: production, characteristics, and environmental applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 270: 122462–122491
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Guo S , Dong X , Wu T , Zhu C . Influence of reaction conditions and feedstock on hydrochar properties. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 123: 95–103
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Leng L , Huang H . An overview of the effect of pyrolysis process parameters on biochar stability. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 270: 627–642
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Al-Wabel M I , Al-Omran A , El-Naggar A H , Nadeem M , Usman A R A . Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 131: 374–379
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Kumar A , Kumar J , Bhaskar T . High surface area biochar from sargassum tenerrimum as potential catalyst support for selective phenol hydrogenation. Environmental Research, 2020, 186: 109533–109542
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Antal M J , Grønli M . The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2003, 42(8): 1619–1640
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Tripathi M , Sahu J N , Ganesan P . Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 55: 467–481
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
TaoSXiangSSangWShenZWangDYuanJ. Research progress of the effects of biochar on soil heavy metals. Modern Chemical Industry, 2017, 37(1): 45–49 (in Chinese)
|
[37] |
Mohan D , Sarswat A , Ok Y S , Pittman C U Jr . Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent—a critical review. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 160: 191–202
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Novak J , Ro K , Ok Y S , Sigua G , Spokas K , Uchimiya S , Bolan N . Biochars multifunctional role as a novel technology in the agricultural, environmental, and industrial sectors. Chemosphere, 2016, 142: 1–3
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Thomazini A , Spokas K , Hall K , Ippolito J , Lentz R , Novak J . GHG impacts of biochar: predictability for the same biochar. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015, 207: 183–191
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Cheng C H , Lehmann J , Engelhard M H . Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils: changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2008, 72(6): 1598–1610
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Kuzyakov Y , Subbotina I , Chen H , Bogomolova I , Xu X . Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2009, 41(2): 210–219
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
WangYLiSYaoZZhaoLQiuL. Study advances regarding production technology of biochar and effects of its returning to field. Modern Chemical Industry, 2017, 37(05): 17–20 (in Chinese)
|
[43] |
Cong H B , Zhao L X , Meng H B , Yao Z L , Huo L L , Ji J X , Wu Y N . Applicability evaluation of biomass pyrolytic poly-generation technology on clean heating in northern rural of China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(1): 8–14
|
[44] |
Hu Q , Jung J , Chen D , Leong K , Song S , Li F , Mohan B C , Yao Z , Prabhakar A K , Lin X H .
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Uday V , Harikrishnan P S , Deoli K , Zitouni F , Mahlknecht J , Kumar M . Current trends in production, morphology, and real-world environmental applications of biochar for the promotion of sustainability. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 359: 127467–127480
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
The European Biochar Certificate (EBC). European Biochar Website
|
[47] |
FortuneBusiness Insights. Biochar market size, share & covid-19 impact analysis, by technology (pyrolysis and gasification), by application (farming, livestock, power generation, and others) and regional forecasts, 2023–2030. Fortune Business Insights Website, 2024
|
[48] |
Mordorintelligence. Analysis of market size and share of biochar—growth trends and forecasts (2023–2028). Mordor Intelligence Website, 2023
|
[49] |
Lefebvre D , Fawzy S , Aquije C A , Osman A I , Draper K T , Trabold T A . Biomass residue to carbon dioxide removal: quantifying the global impact of biochar. Biochar, 2023, 5(1): 65
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[50] |
Campbell R M , Anderson N M , Daugaard D E , Naughton H T . Financial viability of biofuel and biochar production from forest biomass in the face of market price volatility and uncertainty. Applied Energy, 2018, 230: 330–343
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[51] |
Thengane S K , Kung K , York R , Sokhansanj S , Lim C J , Sanchez D L . Technoeconomic and emissions evaluation of mobile in-woods biochar production. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 223: 113305–113320
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[52] |
Keske C , Godfrey T , Hoag D L K , Abedin J . Economic feasibility of biochar and agriculture coproduction from Canadian black spruce forest. Food and Energy Security, 2020, 9(1): e188
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[53] |
Kim D , Anderson N , Chung W . Financial performance of a mobile pyrolysis system used to produce biochar from sawmill residues. Forest Products Journal, 2015, 65(5–6): 189–197
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[54] |
Maroušek J , Trakal L . Techno-economic analysis reveals the untapped potential of wood biochar. Chemosphere, 2022, 291: 133000–133013
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[55] |
Durana P , Michalkova L , Přívara A , Maroušek J , Tumpach M . Does the life cycle affect earnings management and bankruptcy. Oeconomia Copernicana, 2021, 12(2): 425–461
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[56] |
Riley C , Vrbka J , Rowland Z . Internet of things-enabled sustainability, big data-driven decision-making processes, and digitized mass production in industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 2021, 9: 42–52
|
[57] |
Puettmann M , Sahoo K , Wilson K , Oneil E . Life cycle assessment of biochar produced from forest residues using portable systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 250: 119564–119576
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[58] |
Hamedani S R , Kuppens T , Malina R , Bocci E , Colantoni A , Villarini M . Life cycle assessment and environmental valuation of biochar production: two case studies in Belgium. Energies, 2019, 12(11): 2166–2187
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
KochanekJFlemattiG RCoxJBraunigJDrageDMuellerJGeorgeC. Closing the ‘green city loop’—green organics for urban green environments. Hort Innovation Website, 2015
|
[60] |
Kochanek J , Soo R M , Martinez C , Dakuidreketi A , Mudge A M . Biochar for intensification of plant-related industries to meet productivity, sustainability and economic goals: a review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 179: 106109
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[61] |
Wrobel-Tobiszewska A , Boersma M , Sargison J , Adams P , Jarick S . An economic analysis of biochar production using residues from eucalypt plantations. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2015, 81: 177–182
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[62] |
Maroušek J , Strunecký O , Stehel V . Biochar farming: defining economically perspective applications. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2019, 21(7): 1389–1395
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[63] |
Nematian M , Keske C , Ng’ombe J N . A techno-economic analysis of biochar production and the bioeconomy for orchard biomass. Waste Management, 2021, 135: 467–477
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[64] |
Sahoo K , Bilek E , Bergman R , Mani S . Techno-economic analysis of producing solid biofuels and biochar from forest residues using portable systems. Applied Energy, 2019, 235: 578–590
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[65] |
Jin Q , O’Keefe S F , Stewart A C , Neilson A P , Kim Y T , Huang H . Techno-economic analysis of a grape pomace biorefinery: production of seed oil, polyphenols, and biochar. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 2021, 127: 139–151
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[66] |
JirkaSTomlinsonT. State of the biochar industry 2014. International Biochar Initiative Website, 2015
|
[67] |
Bhatnagar A , Khatri P , Krzywonos M , Tolvanen H , Konttinen J . Techno-economic and environmental assessment of decentralized pyrolysis for crop residue management: rice and wheat cultivation system in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 367: 132998–133008
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[68] |
Robb S , Dargusch P . A financial analysis and life-cycle carbon emissions assessment of oil palm waste biochar exports from indonesia for use in Australian broad-acre agriculture. Carbon Management, 2018, 9(2): 105–114
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[69] |
Fawzy S , Osman A I , Mehta N , Moran D , Al-Muhtaseb A H , Rooney D W . Atmospheric carbon removal via industrial biochar systems: a techno-economic-environmental study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 371: 133660–133674
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[70] |
González-Pernas F M , Grajera-Antolín C , García-Cámara O , González-Lucas M , Martín M T , González-Egido S , Aguirre J L . Effects of biochar on biointensive horticultural crops and its economic viability in the mediterranean climate. Energies, 2022, 15(9): 3407–3423
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[71] |
Saharudin D M , Jeswani H K , Azapagic A . Biochar from agricultural wastes: environmental sustainability, economic viability and the potential as a negative emissions technology in Malaysia. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 919: 170266–170292
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[72] |
UnitedNations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). Market analysis of biochar produced in small scale pyrolysis units in Vietnam. UNIDO Website, 2021
|
[73] |
Pandit N R , Mulder J , Hale S E , Zimmerman A R , Pandit B H , Cornelissen G . Multi-year double cropping biochar field trials in Nepal: finding the optimal biochar dose through agronomic trials and cost-benefit analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 637–638: 1333–1341
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[74] |
Liu Y , Yang X , Zhang J , Zhu Z . Process simulation of preparing biochar by biomass pyrolysis via aspen plus and its economic evaluation. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2022, 13(5): 2609–2622
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[75] |
MarketData Forecast. Europe biochar market size. Market Data Forecast Website, 2024
|
[76] |
Xiu S , Shahbazi A . Bio-oil production and upgrading research: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(7): 4406–4414
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[77] |
Baloch H A , Nizamuddin S , Siddiqui M T H , Riaz S , Jatoi A S , Dumbre D K , Mubarak N M , Srinivasan M P , Griffin G J . Recent advances in production and upgrading of bio-oil from biomass: a critical overview. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2018, 6(4): 5101–5118
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[78] |
Liu W J , Yu H Q . Thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into mass-producible fuels: emerging technology progress and environmental sustainability evaluation. ACS Environmental Au, 2022, 2(2): 98–114
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[79] |
Rogers J G , Brammer J G . Estimation of the production cost of fast pyrolysis bio-oil. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012, 36: 208–217
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[80] |
IEA
|
[81] |
REN21Renewables Now. Renewables global status report. REN21 Website, 2022
|
[82] |
IEA
|
[83] |
Hu Y , Chen B . Development trends and policy suggestions for biodiesel in China. New Economy Guide, 2023, 2023(4): 61–68
|
[84] |
Bp
|
[85] |
YangY M. Analysis and reflection on the development of global fuel ethanol industry. New Energy Website, 2021
|
[86] |
Xue J , Wang H A , Wang S Q . Function and outlook of biology liquid fuel in future energy system. Petroleum and New Energy, 2022, 34(3): 60–65
|
[87] |
Mizik T , Gyarmati G . Economic and sustainability of biodiesel production—a systematic literature review. Cleanroom Technology, 2021, 3(1): 19–36
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[88] |
Zhu Q . Economic study on China’s liquid bio-fuels. Petroleum & Petrochemical Today, 2017, 25(12): 5–10
|
[89] |
RingerMPutscheVScahillJ. Large-scale pyrolysis oil production: a technology assessment and economic analysis. Semantic Scholar Website, 2006
|
[90] |
Gupta S , Mondal P , Borugadda V B , Dalai A K . Advances in upgradation of pyrolysis bio-oil and biochar towards improvement in bio-refinery economics: a comprehensive review. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021, 21: 101276–101312
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[91] |
Wang W C , Jan J J . From laboratory to pilot: design concept and techno-economic analyses of the fluidized bed fast pyrolysis of biomass. Energy, 2018, 155: 139–151
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[92] |
Rafiee A , Khalilpour K R , Prest J , Skryabin I . Biogas as an energy vector. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2021, 144: 105935–105955
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[93] |
Rabii A , Aldin S , Dahman Y , Elbeshbishy E . A review on anaerobic co-digestion with a focus on the microbial populations and the effect of multi-stage digester configuration. Energies, 2019, 12(6): 1106–1131
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[94] |
Moustakas K , Parmaxidou P , Vakalis S . Anaerobic digestion for energy production from agricultural biomass waste in Greece: capacity assessment for the region of Thessaly. Energy, 2020, 191: 116556–116565
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[95] |
LohaniS PHavukainenJ. Anaerobic Digestion: Factors Affecting Anaerobic Digestion Process. Waste Bioremediation. Singapore: Springer, 2018, 343–359
|
[96] |
Aravani V P , Tsigkou K , Papadakis V G , Wang W , Kornaros M . Anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural residues produced in Southern Greece during the spring/summer season. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 192: 108826–108834
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[97] |
Feng Q , Lin Y . Integrated processes of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for higher bioenergy recovery from lignocellulosic biomass: a brief review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 77: 1272–1287
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[98] |
Tsigkou K , Zagklis D , Parasoglou M , Zafiri C , Kornaros M . Proposed protocol for rate-limiting step determination during anaerobic digestion of complex substrates. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 361: 127660–127669
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[99] |
Tsigkou K , Tsafrakidou P , Kopsahelis A , Zagklis D , Zafiri C , Kornaros M . Used disposable nappies and expired food products valorisation through one- & two-stage anaerobic co-digestion. Renewable Energy, 2020, 147: 610–619
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[100] |
Aravani V P , Tsigkou K , Papadakis V G , Kornaros M . Biochemical methane potential of most promising agricultural residues in Northern and Southern Greece. Chemosphere, 2022, 296: 133985–133993
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[101] |
Georgiadis A G , Charisiou N D , Goula M A . Removal of hydrogen sulfide from various industrial gases: a review of the most promising adsorbing materials. Catalysts, 2020, 10(5): 521
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[102] |
YousufAKhanM RPirozziDWahidZ AAtnawS M. Economic and Market Value of Biogas Technology. Waste biomass management—a holistic approach. Cham: Springer, 2017, 137–158
|
[103] |
Scarlat N , Dallemand J F , Fahl F . Biogas: developments and perspectives in Europe. Renewable Energy, 2018, 129: 457–472
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[104] |
Lu J , Gao X . Biogas: potential, challenges, and perspectives in a changing China. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2021, 150: 106127
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[105] |
ZafirisC. Energy exploitation of biogas. CRES Website, 2009
|
[106] |
Huang X , Wang S , Shi Z , Fang L , Yin C . Challenges and strategies for biogas production in the circular agricultural waste utilization model: a case study in rural China. Energy, 2022, 241: 122889–122902
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[107] |
NationalBureau of Statistics. China Environmental Statistics Yearbook 1999–2023. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2024, 131–132
|
[108] |
Li J M , Xu W Y , Li B F , Zhang D L . The development dilemma and way out of China’s biogas industry. Renewable Energy, 2020, 38(12): 1563–1568
|
[109] |
DirectorateGeneral for Energy. Optimal use of biogas from waste streams—an assessment of the potential of biogas from digestion in the EU beyond 2020. European Commission Website, 2016
|
[110] |
Lawson N , Alvarado-Morales M , Tsapekos P , Angelidaki I . Techno-economic assessment of biological biogas upgrading based on Danish biogas plants. Energies, 2021, 14(24): 8252–8270
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[111] |
EuropeanBiogas Association. Biogas & biomethane in a nutshell. European Biogas Association Website
|
[112] |
ChineseBiogas Association. The China biogas industry development report: peaking carbon emissions 2030 and carbon neutrality 2060. Chinese Biogas Association, 2021, 56–57
|
[113] |
Bakenne A , Nuttall W , Kazantzis N . Sankey-diagram-based insights into the hydrogen economy of today. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(19): 7744–7753
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[114] |
Marinelli M , Santarelli M . Hydrogen storage alloys for stationary applications. Journal of Energy Storage, 2020, 32: 101864–101876
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[115] |
Dincer I , Aydin M I . New paradigms in sustainable energy systems with hydrogen. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 283: 116950–116964
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[116] |
Li W , Zheng X . Development mechanism and technological innovation of hydrogen energy: evaluating collaborative innovation based on hydrogen patent data. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 52: 415–427
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[117] |
KayfeciMKeçebaşABayatM. Chapter 3—Hydrogen production. In: Solar Hydrogen Production. Massachusetts: Academic Press, 2019, 45–83
|
[118] |
Ajanovic A , Sayer M , Haas R . The economics and the environmental benignity of different colors of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(57): 24136–24154
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[119] |
Incer-Valverde J , Korayem A , Tsatsaronis G , Morosuk T . “Colors” of hydrogen: definitions and carbon intensity. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 291: 117294–117305
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[120] |
Ishaq H , Dincer I , Crawford C . A review on hydrogen production and utilization: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(62): 26238–26264
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[121] |
Wang Y , Xu Z , Zhang C , Liu L . Combustion optimization of a hydrogen free-piston engine with high-energy ignition. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 49: 483–494
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[122] |
Li D J , Zhang D G . LI H J, Zhu J J. Development status and suggestion of biodiesel industry in China. International Petroleum Economics, 2021, 29(8): 91–98
|
[123] |
HydrogenCouncil. Path to hydrogen competitiveness: a cost perspective. China Hydrogen Energy Alliance Website, 2020
|
[124] |
IEA
|
[125] |
UnitedStates Department of Energy. National clean hydrogen strategy and roadmap. Hydrogen Energy Website, 2023
|
[126] |
Zheng Z . Re-calculation of responsibility distribution and spatiotemporal patterns of global production carbon emissions from the perspective of global value chain. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 773: 145065–145075
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[127] |
MurrayJ. How the hydrogen industry could be worth more than EUR120bn in Europe by 2050. NS Energy Website, 2020
|
[128] |
EuropeanCommission. Communication COM/2020/301: a hydrogen strategy for a climate-neutral Europe. European Commission Website, 2020
|
[129] |
NationalEnergy Administration of China. Medium- and long-term plan for the development of hydrogen energy industry (2021–2035). NEA Website, 2023
|
[130] |
NationalDevelopmentReformCommission. Global competition for hydrogen energy development and utilization is underway. NEA Website, 2023
|
[131] |
Sadeq A M , Homod R Z , Hussein A K , Togun H , Mahmoodi A , Isleem H F , Patil A R , Moghaddam A H . Hydrogen energy systems: technologies, trends, and future prospects. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 939: 173622–173650
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[132] |
InternationalRenewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Green hydrogen: a guide to policy making. IRENA Website, 2020
|
[133] |
Abdalla A M , Hossain S , Nisfindy O B , Azad A T , Dawood M , Azad A K . Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: a review. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 165: 602–627
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[134] |
Barthelemy H , Weber M , Barbier F . Hydrogen storage: recent improvements and industrial perspectives. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(11): 7254–7262
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[135] |
WangZ YOuX MZhouS. Future cost trend of hydrogen production in China based on learning curve. Progress in Climate Change Research, 2022, 18(3): 283–293 (in Chinese)
|
[136] |
Aravani V P , Papadakis V G . Technoeconomic assessment for the viable exploitation of biomass residues by an innovative pyrolysis-anaerobic digestion processing plant. Environmental Research, 2024, 243: 117835
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[137] |
AravaniV P. Integrated management and exploitation of agricultural residues: application to energy production. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Greece: University of Patras, 2023, 241
|
/
〈 | 〉 |