The effect of altering crosslinker chemistry during interfacial polymerization on the performance of nanofiltration membranes for desalination, organic, and micropollutants removal
Jamilu Usman, Abdul Waheed, Umair Baig, Isam H. Aljundi
The effect of altering crosslinker chemistry during interfacial polymerization on the performance of nanofiltration membranes for desalination, organic, and micropollutants removal
Chemistry of the polyamide active layer of a desalination membrane is critical in determining both its physical and chemical properties. In this study, we designed and fabricated three novel membranes with different active layers using the crosslinkers: terephthaloyl chloride, isophthaloyl chloride, and trimesoyl chloride. The crosslinkers were reacted with an aqueous solution of an aliphatic tetra-amine. Because these crosslinkers differ in their structures and crosslinking mechanisms during interfacial polymerization, the resultant membranes also possess different structural properties. The water contact angle of the fabricated membranes also varies; the water contact angles of 4A-3P-TPC@PSF/PET, 4A-3P-TMC@PSF/PET, and 4A-3P-IPC@PSF/PET, are 68.9°, 65.6°, and 53.9°, respectively. Similarly, the desalination performance of resultant membranes also showed variations, with 4A-3P-TPC@PSF/PET, 4A-3P-IPC@PSF/PET, and 4A-3P-TMC@PSF/PET having a permeate flux of 17.14, 25.70, and 30.90 L·m−2·h−1, respectively, at 2.5 MPa. The 4A-3P-TPC@PSF/PET membrane exhibited extensive crosslinking with aliphatic linear amine, and cationic dye rhodamine B, MgCl2, and amitriptyline rejection rates of 98.6%, 92.7% and 80.9%, respectively. The 4A-3P-TMC@PSF/PET membrane showed mediocre performance, while 4A-3P-IPC@PSF/PET membrane showed even lower performance, with a 35% rejection of methyl orange dye.
acid chlorides / covalent crosslinking / desalination / linear aliphatic amine / micropollutant removal / thin film composite membranes
[1] |
Kumar V, Shahi S K, Romanholo Ferreira L F, Bilal M, Biswas J K, Bulgariu L. Detection and characterization of refractory organic and inorganic pollutants discharged in biomethanated distillery effluent and their phytotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity assessment using Phaseolus aureus L. and Allium cepa L. Environmental Research, 2021, 201: 111551
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
RizwanKRasheedTBilalMIqbalH M N. Pulp and Paper Industry-Based Pollutants, and Their Adverse Impacts in Nanotechnology in Paper and Wood Engineering: Fundamentals, Challenges and Applications. Cambridge: Elsevier, 2022, 143–160
|
[3] |
Wang W, Hong G, Zhang Y, Yang X, Hu N, Zhang J, Sorokin P, Shao L. Designing an energy-efficient multi-stage selective electrodialysis process based on high-performance materials for lithium extraction. Journal of Membrane Science, 2023, 675: 121534
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Song Y, Fan J B, Wang S. Recent progress in interfacial polymerization. Materials Chemistry Frontiers, 2017, 1(6): 1028–1040
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
BakerR W. Membrane Technology and Applications. 3rd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2012
|
[6] |
Esmaeilzadeh P, Sadeghi M T, Bahramian A, Fakhroueian Z, Zarbakhsh A. Superamphiphobic surfaces prepared by coating multifunctional nanofluids. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(46): 32011–32020
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Saha N K, Joshi S V. Performance evaluation of thin film composite polyamide nanofiltration membrane with variation in monomer type. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 342(1-2): 60–69
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Sun J, Zhu L P, Wang Z H, Hu F, Zhang P B, Zhu B K. Improved chlorine resistance of polyamide thin-film composite membranes with a terpolymer coating. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 157: 112–119
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Lee J Y, Huang T Y, Belle Marie Yap Ang M, Huang S H, Tsai H A, Jeng R J. Effects of monomer rigidity on microstructures and properties of novel polyamide thin-film composite membranes prepared through interfacial polymerization for pervaporation dehydration. Journal of Membrane Science, 2022, 657: 120702
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Zeng H, Guo J, Zhang Y, Xing D, Yang F, Huang J, Huang S, Shao L. Green glycerol tailored composite membranes with boosted nanofiltration performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 2022, 663: 121064
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Guo J, Zhang Y, Yang F, Mamba B B, Ma J, Shao L, Liu S. Ultra-permeable dual-mechanism-driven graphene oxide framework membranes for precision ion separations. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2023, 23: e202302931
|
[12] |
An Q F, Sun W D, Zhao Q, Ji Y L, Gao C J. Study on a novel nanofiltration membrane prepared by interfacial polymerization with zwitterionic amine monomers. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 431: 171–179
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Li Y, Su Y, Dong Y, Zhao X, Jiang Z, Zhang R, Zhao J. Separation performance of thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane through interfacial polymerization using different amine monomers. Desalination, 2014, 333(1): 59–65
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Gupta K C. Synthesis and evaluation of aromatic polyamide membranes for desalination in reverse-osmosis technique. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1997, 66(4): 643–653
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Baig U, Waheed A. Exploiting interfacial polymerization to fabricate hyper-cross-linked nanofiltration membrane with a constituent linear aliphatic amine for freshwater production. npj Clean Water, 2022, 5: 1–13
|
[16] |
Baig U, Jillani S M S, Waheed A, Ansari M A. Exploring a combination of unconventional monomers for fabricating a hyper-cross-linked polyamide membrane with anti-fouling properties for production of clean water. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 165: 496–504
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Singh K, Devi S, Bajaj H C, Ingole P, Choudhari J, Bhrambhatt H. Optical resolution of racemic mixtures of amino acids through nanofiltration membrane process. Separation Science and Technology, 2014, 49(17): 2630–2641
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Tang C Y, Kwon Y N, Leckie J O. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes: I. FTIR and XPS characterization of polyamide and coating layer chemistry. Desalination, 2009, 242(1-3): 149–167
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Kumar R, Ismail A F. Fouling control on microfiltration/ultrafiltration membranes: effects of morphology, hydrophilicity, and charge. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2015, 132(21): 42042
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Li C, Zhang J, Han J, Yao B. A numerical solution to the effects of surface roughness on water-coal contact angle. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 459
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Oatley-RadcliffeD LAl-AaniSWilliamsP MHilalN. Mass Transport in Porous Liquid Phase Membranes in Membrane Characterization. Cambridge: Elsevier B.V., 2017, 337–358
|
/
〈 | 〉 |