Development of an in-situ H₂ reduction and moderate oxidation method for 3,5-dimethylpyridine hydrogenation in trickle bed reactor

Abstract

The Ru/C catalyst prepared by impregnation method was used for hydrogenation of 3,5-dimethylpyridine in a trickle bed reactor. Under the same reduction conditions (300 °C in H₂), the catalytic activity of the non-in-situ reduced Ru/C-n catalyst was higher than that of the in-situ reduced Ru/C-y catalyst. Therefore, an in-situ H₂ reduction and moderate oxidation method was developed to increase the catalyst activity. Moreover, the influence of oxidation temperature on the developed method was investigated. The catalysts were characterized by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, hydrogen temperature programmed reduction H₂-TPR, hydrogen temperature-programmed dispersion (H₂-TPD), X-ray diffraction, energy dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, O₂ chemisorption and oxygen temperature-programmed dispersion (O₂-TPD) analyses. The results showed that there existed an optimal Ru/RuO_x ratio for the catalyst, and the highest 3,5-dimethylpyridine conversion was obtained for the Ru/C-i1 catalyst prepared by in-situ H₂ reduction and moderate oxidation (oxidized at 100 °C). Excessive oxidation (200 °C) resulted in a significant decrease in the Ru/RuO_x ratio of the in-situ H₂ reduction and moderate oxidized Ru/C-i2 catalyst, the interaction between RuO_x species and the support changed, and the hard-to-reduce RuO_x species was formed, leading to a significant decrease in catalyst activity. The developed in-situ H₂ reduction and moderate oxidation method eliminated the step of the non-in-situ reduction of catalyst outside the trickle bed reactor.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Ru/C catalyst / in-situ H₂ reduction and moderate oxidation / in-situ reduction / non-in-situ reduction / hydrogenation of 3,5-dimethylpyridine

References

[1] Sridharan V, Suryavanshi P A, Menéndez J C. Advances in the chemistry of tetrahydroquinolines. Chemical Reviews, 2011, 111(11): 7157–7259

[2] Scott J D, Williams R M. Chemistry and biology of the tetrahydroisoquinoline antitumor antibiotics. Chemical Reviews, 2002, 102(5): 1669–1730

[3] Creemer L C, Kirst H A, Shryock T R, Campbell J B, Webb A G. Synthesis, antimicrobial activity and in vivo fluorine NMR of a hex fluorinated derivative of tilmicosin. Journal of Antibiotics, 1995, 48(7): 671–675

[4] WanK RLinTChenJLiLZengY KZengL HZhangZ X. The preparation method and application of the catalyst used for continuous preparation of 3,5-dimethyl piperidine. Chinese Patent, 201611126557.5, 2016-12-09

[5] Beier R C, Creemer L C, Ziprin R L, Nisbet D J. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against the antibiotic tilmicosin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005, 53(25): 9679–9688

[6] ZonesS INakagawaYEvansS TLeeG S. Zeolite SSZ-39. US Patent, 5958370A, 1999-09-28

[7] Xu H, Zhang J, Wu Q M, Chen W, Lei C, Zhu Q Y, Han S C, Fei J H, Zheng A M, Zhu L F, Meng X, Maurer S, Dai D, Parvulescu A N, Müller U, Xiao F S. Direct synthesis of aluminosilicate SSZ-39 aeolite using colloidal ailica as a starting source. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(26): 23112–23117

[8] Lin T, Ma X X. Development of a new continuous process for the production of 3,5-dimethylpiperidine. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2021, 41: 374–383

[9] Ranade V V. Trickle bed reactors: reactor engineering & applications. Chemical Industry Press, 2003, 205–215

[10] Takasaki M, Motoyama Y, Higashi K, Yoon S H, Mochida I, Nagashima H. Ruthenium nanoparticles on nano-level-controlled carbon supports as highly effective catalysts for arene hydrogenation. ChemInform, 2007, 39(12): 1524–1533

[11] Zhao H, Song H, Zhao J, Yang J, Yan L, Chou L. The reactivity and deactivation mechanism of Ru@C catalyst over hydrogenation of aromatics to cyclohexane derivatives. ChemistrySelect, 2020, 5(14): 4316–4327

[12] Wang Y, Rong Z M, Wang Y, Qu J P. Ruthenium nanoparticles loaded on functionalized graphene for liquid-phase hydrogenation of fine chemicals: comparison with carbon nanotube. Journal of Catalysis, 2016, 333: 8–16

[13] Wang Y, Rong Z M, Wang Y, Zhang P, Wang Y, Qu J P. Ruthenium nanoparticles loaded on multiwalled carbon nanotubes for liquid-phase hydrogenation of fine chemicals: an exploration of confinement effect. Journal of Catalysis, 2015, 329: 95–106

[14] Ban C, Yang S, Kim H, Kim D H. Effect of Cu addition to carbon-supported Ru catalysts on hydrogenation of alginic acid into sugar alcohols. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2019, 578(25): 98–104

[15] Ban C, Yang S, Kim H, Kim D H. Catalytic hydrogenation of alginic acid into sugar alcohols over ruthenium supported on nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbons. Catalysis Today, 2020, 352(1): 66–72

[16] Liang C H, Wei Z B, Xin Q, Li C. Ammonia synthesis over Ru/C catalysts with different carbon supports promoted by barium and potassium compounds. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2000, 208(1–2): 193–201

[17] Upare P P, Lee J M, Hwang D W, Halligudi S B, Hwang Y K, Chang J S. Selective hydrogenation of levulinic acid to γ-valerolactone over carbon-supported noble metal catalysts. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2011, 17(2): 287–292

[18] Song W, Chen Z, Lai W, Rodríguez-Ramos I, Yi X, Weng W, Fang W. Effect of lanthanum promoter on the catalytic performance of levulinic acid hydrogenation over Ru/carbon fiber catalyst. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2017, 540(25): 21–30

[19] Ma Y C, Lan G J, Fu W Z, Lai Y, Han W F, Tang H D, Liu H Z, Li Y. Role of surface defects of carbon nanotubes on catalytic performance of barium promoted ruthenium catalyst for ammonia synthesis. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2020, 29(2): 79–86

[20] Guerrero-Ruiz A, Bachiller-Baeza B, Rodríguez-Ramos I. RodríGuez-Ramos I. Catalytic properties of carbon-supported ruthenium catalysts for n-hexane conversion. Applied Catalysis A: General, 1998, 173(2): 231–238

[21] Ma Y, Cheng S Q, Wu X D, Ma T X, Liu L P, Jin B F, Liu M H, Liu J B, Ran R, Si Z, Weng D. Improved hydrothermal durability of Cu-SSZ-13 NH₃-SCR catalyst by surface Al modification: affinity and passivation. Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 405: 199–211

[22] Tong Q, Cai T, Chen X T, Xu P, Ma Y L, Zhao K, He D. In-situ reduction-passivation synthesis of magnetic octahedron accumulated by Fe@Fe₃O₄-C core@complex-shell for the activation of persulfate. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(4): 108116

[23] Birke P, Geyer R, Hoheisel K, Keck M, Pachulski A R, Schödel R. Stability of Ni/SiO₂ catalysts. Chemieingenieurtechnik (Weinheim), 2012, 84(1–2): 165–168

[24] Franz R, Tichelaar F D, Uslamin E A, Pidko E A. Dry reforming of methane to test passivation stability of Ni/Al₂O₃ catalysts. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2021, 612(25): 117987

[25] Wolf M, Fischer N, Claeys M. Effectiveness of catalyst passivation techniques studied in situ with a magnetometer. Catalysis Today, 2016, 275(15): 135–140

[26] Fratalocchi L, Groppi G, Visconti C G, Lietti L, Tronconi E. On the passivation of platinum promoted cobalt-based Fischer–Tropsch catalyst. Catalysis Today, 2020, 342(15): 79–87

[27] Wyvratt B M, Gaudet J R, Thompson L T. Effects of passivation on synthesis, structure and composition of molybdenum carbide supported platinum water–gas shift catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 2015, 330: 280–287

[28] Hammache S, Goodwin J G Jr, Oukaci R. Passivation of a Co-Ru/γ-Al₂O₃ Fischer–Tropsch catalyst. Catalysis Today, 2002, 71(3): 361–367

[29] Moreno-Castilla C, López-Ramón M V, Carrasco-Marín F. Changes in surface chemistry of activated carbons by wet oxidation. Carbon, 2000, 38(14): 1995–2001

[30] Collins J, Ngo T, Qu D, Foster M. Spectroscopic investigations of sequential nitric acid treatments on granulated activated carbon: effects of surface oxygen groups on π density. Carbon, 2013, 57: 174–183

[31] LinTWanK RChenJZhangZ XZengY KZengL HGaoW. An online device used for evaluating the fixed bed catalyst performance. Chinese patent, 201520609359.9, 2015-08-13

[32] Gao P, Wang A, Wang X, Zhang T. Synthesis and catalytic performance of highly ordered Ru-containing mesoporous carbons for hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde. Catalysis Letters, 2008, 125(3–4): 289–295

[33] Su F, Lv L, Lee F Y, Liu T, Cooper A I, Zhao X S. Thermally reduced ruthenium nanoparticles as a highly active heterogeneous catalyst for hydrogenation of monoaromatics. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007, 129(46): 14213–14223

[34] Lozano-Castelló D, Calo J M, Cazorla-Amorós D, Linares-Solano A. Carbon activation with KOH as explored by temperature programmed techniques, and the effects of hydrogen. Carbon, 2007, 45(13): 2529–2536

[35] Veerakumar P, Dhenadhayalan N, Lin K C, Liu S B. Highly stable ruthenium nanoparticles on 3D mesoporous carbon: an excellent opportunity for reduction reactions. Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2015, 3(46): 23448–23457

[36] Li Y, Pan C, Han W, Chai H, Liu H. An efficient route for the preparation of activated carbon supported ruthenium catalysts with high performance for ammonia synthesis. Catalysis Today, 2011, 174(1): 97–105

[37] Panagiotopoulou P, Vlachos D G. Liquid phase catalytic transfer hydrogenation of furfural over a Ru/C catalyst. ChemSusChem, 2014, 480: 17–24

[38] Jae J, Zheng W, Karim A M, Guo W, Lobo R F, Vlachos D G. The role of Ru and RuO₂ in the catalytic transfer hydrogenation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural for the production of 2,5-dimethylfuran. ChemCatChem, 2014, 6(3): 848–856

[39] Li C, Shao Z, Pang M, Williams C, Zhang X F, Liang C H. Carbon nanotubes supported mono- and bimetallic Pt and Ru catalysts for selective hydrogenation of phenylacetylene. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(13): 4934–4941

[40] Martínez-Prieto L M, Puche M, Cerezo-Navarrete C, Chaudret B. Uniform Ru nanoparticles on N-doped graphene for selective hydrogenation of fatty acids to alcohols. Journal of Catalysis, 2019, 377: 429–437

[41] Hossain M A, Phung T K, Rahaman M S, Tulaphol S, Jasinski J B, Sathitsuksanoh N. Catalytic cleavage of the β-O-4 aryl ether bonds of lignin model compounds by Ru/C catalyst. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2019, 582(25): 117100

[42] Li Z Q, Lu C J, Xia Z P, Zhou Y, Luo Z. X-ray diffraction patterns of graphite and turbostratic carbon. Carbon, 2007, 45(8): 1686–1695

[43] Kerdi F, Rass H A, Pinel C, Besson M, Peru G, Leger B, Rio S, Monflier E, Ponchel A. Evaluation of surface properties and pore structure of carbon on the activity of supported Ru catalysts in the aqueous-phase aerobic oxidation of HMF to FDCA. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2015, 506(5): 206–219

[44] Zanutelo C, Landers R, Carvalho W A, Cobo A J G. Carbon support treatment effect on Ru/C catalyst performance for benzene partial hydrogenation. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2011, 409–410(15): 174–180

[45] Taboada C D, Batista J, Pintar A, Levec J. Preparation, characterization and catalytic properties of carbon nanofiber-supported Pt, Pd, Ru monometallic particles in aqueous-phase reactions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2009, 89(3–4): 375–382

[46] Lin B, Guo Y, Lin J, Ni J, Lin J, Jiang L, Wang Y. Deactivation study of carbon-supported ruthenium catalyst with potassium promoter. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2017, 541(5): 1–7

[47] Huang H, Dai Q, Wang X Y. Morphology effect of Ru/CeO₂ catalysts for the catalytic combustion of chlorobenzene. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 158–159: 96–105

[48] Rossetti I, Pernicone N, Forni L. Characterisation of Ru/C catalysts for ammonia synthesis by oxygen chemisorption. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2003, 248(1–2): 97–103

[49] Michel C, Gallezot P. Why is ruthenium an efficient catalyst for the aqueous-phase hydrogenation of bio-sourced carbonyl compounds?. ACS Catalysis, 2015, 5(7): 4130–4132

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press