Highly hydrophobic oil−water separation membrane: reutilization of waste reverse osmosis membrane

Abstract

The increasing applications of seawater desalination technology have led to the wide usage of polyamide reverse osmosis membranes, resulting in a large number of wasted reverse osmosis membranes. In this work, the base nonwoven layer of the wasted reverse osmosis membrane was successfully modified into the hydrophobic membrane via surface deposition strategy including TiO₂ and 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyltrichlorosilane (PFOTS), respectively. Various techniques were applied to characterize the obtained membranes, which were then used to separate the oil–water system. The optimally modified membrane displayed good hydrophobicity with a contact angle of 135.2° ± 0.3°, and its oil–water separation performance was as high as 97.8%. After 20 recycle tests, the oil–water separation performance remained more than 96%, which was attributed to the film adhesion of the anchored TiO₂ and PFOTS layer on the surface. This work might provide a new avenue for recycling the wasted reverse osmosis membrane used in oily wastewater purification.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

oil–water separation / wasted reverse osmosis membrane / hydrophobic modification

References

[1] Stefano C, Mirko F, Francesca M, Enrico D. A review on membrane distillation in process engineering: design and exergy equations, materials and wetting problems. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 592–613

[2] UNESCO . UN-Water. United Nations World Water Development Report 2020: Water and Climate Change. Paris: UNESCO, 2020, 46–57

[3] Lejarazu-Larraaga A, Molina S, Ortiz J M, Riccardelli G, García-Calvo E. Influence of acid/base activation treatment in the performance of recycled electromembrane for fresh water production by electrodialysis. Chemosphere, 2020, 248: 126027

[4] Jeffrey J M, Gina M V. Framework for Direct Potable Re-use. Alexandria: Water Reuse Research Foundation, 2015,

[5] Guo H, Li X H, Yang W L, Yao Z K, Mei Y, Peng L E, Yang Z, Shao S L, Tang C Y. Nanofiltration for drinking water treatment: a review. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 681–698

[6] García-Pachecoa R, Landaburu-Aguirrea J, Terrero-Rodríguezc P, Camposc E, Molina-Serranoc F, Rabadána J, Zarzoc D, García-Calvo E. Validation of recycled membranes for treating brackish water at pilot scale. Desalination, 2018, 433: 199–208

[7] Zhao Y, Qiu Y B, Mamrol N, Ren L F, Li X, Shao J H, Yang X, Bart V D B. Membrane bioreactors for hospital wastewater treatment: recent advancements in membranes and processes. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 634–660

[8] Chen R Z, Dong X F, Ge Q C. Lithium-based draw solute for forward osmosis to treat wastewater discharged from lithium-ion battery manufacturing. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 755–763

[9] Jorge S S, Alberto B, Raquel G P, Junkal L A, Eloy G C. Prospective life cycle assessment and economic analysis of direct recycling of wasted reverse osmosis membranes based on geographic information systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 282: 124400

[10] Liyanaarachchi S, Shu L, Muthukumaran S, Jegatheesan V, Baskaran K. Problems in seawater industrial desalination processes and potential sustainable solutions: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 2014, 13(2): 203–214

[11] Ismail A F, Padaki M, Hilal N, Matsuura T, Lau W J. Thin film composite membrane: recent development and future potential. Desalination, 2015, 356: 140–148

[12] Shenvi S S, Isloor A M, Ismail A F. A review on RO membrane technology: developments and challenges. Desalination, 2015, 368: 10–26

[13] Greenlee L F, Lawler D F, Freeman B D, Marrot B, Moulin P. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Research, 2009, 43(9): 2317–2348

[14] YearbookI D A. Topsfield. Water Desalination Report, 2018–2019, 2019

[15] Ziolkowska J R. Is desalination affordable?—regional cost and price analysis.. Water Resources Management, 2015, 29(5): 1385–1397

[16] Junkal L A, Raquel G P, Serena M, Laura R S, Javier R, Eloy G C. Fouling prevention, preparing for re-use and membrane recycling. Towards circular economy in RO desalination. Desalination, 2016, 393: 16–30

[17] Jorge S S, Raquel G P, Junkal L A, Eloy G C. Recycling of wasted reverse osmosis membranes: comparative LCA and cost-effectiveness analysis at pilot scale. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 150: 104423

[18] Li W C, Tse H F, Fok L. Plastic waste in the marine environment: a review of sources, occurrence and effects. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 566: 333–349

[19] Raquel G P, Junkal L A, Amaia L L, Laura R S, Serena M, Thomas R, Eloy G C. Free chlorine exposure dose (ppm∙h) and its impact on RO membranes ageing and recycling potential. Desalination, 2019, 457: 133–143

[20] Paula E C D, Amaral M C S. Extending the life-cycle of reverse osmosis membranes: a review. Waste Management & Research, 2017, 35(5): 456–470

[21] Goosen M F A, Sablani S S, Al-Hinai H, Al-Obeidani S, Al-Belushi R, Jackson D. Fouling of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration membranes: a critical review. Separation Science and Technology, 2005, 39(10): 2261–2297

[22] Mohammad R M, Arto P, Mehrdad H, Jonni A, Mika M. Wasted RO membranes recycling: re-use as NF membranes by polyelectrolyte layer-by-layer deposition. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 584: 300–308

[23] Jesús M L, Lucía N R, Jorge S S, Serena M, Rehab E S. Recycled desalination membranes as a support material for biofilm development: a new approach for microcystin removal during water treatment. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 647: 785–793

[24] Jesús M L, Serena M. Optimization of recycled-membrane biofilm reactor (R-MBfR) as a sustainable biological treatment for microcystins removal. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 153: 107422

[25] Will L, Zenah B H, Marlene J C, Mikel D, Greg L, Bradley P L, Pierre L C. Towards new opportunities for re-use, recycling and disposal of used reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination, 2012, 299: 103–112

[26] Eduardo C D P, Míriam C S A. Environmental and economic evaluation of wasted reverse osmosis membranes recycling by means of chemical conversion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 194: 85–93

[27] Hou L, Zhang Y Q. Research status on the system of spiralwound reverse osmosis membrane module for sea water desalination. Technology of Water Treatment, 2015, 41(10): 21–25

[28] Goh P S, Wong K C, Wong T W, Ismail A F. Surface-tailoring chlorine resistant materials and strategies for polyamide thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 564–591

[29] Plopeanu M C, Dascalescu L, Yahiaoui B, Antoniu A, Hulea M, Notingher P V. Repartition of electric potential at the surface of nonwoven fabrics for air filtration. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2012, 48(3): 851–856

[30] Anandjiwala R D, Boguslavsky L. Development of needle-punched nonwoven fabrics from flax fibers for air filtration applications. Textile Research Journal, 2008, 78(7): 614–624

[31] Sugioka M, Yoshida N, Yamane T, Kakihana Y, Higa M, Matsumura T, Sakoda M, Iida K. Long-term evaluation of an air-cathode microbial fuel cell with an anion exchange membrane in a 226 L wastewater treatment reactor. Environmental Research, 2022, 205: 112416

[32] Zhao P, Qin N, Ren C L, Wen J Z. Surface modification of polyamide meshes and nonwoven fabrics by plasma etching and a PDA/cellulose coating for oil/water separation. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 481: 883–891

[33] Yuan Z S, Ke Z W, Qiu Y H, Zheng L J, Yang Y, Gu Q S, Wang C Y. Prewetting polypropylene-wood pulp fiber composite nonwoven fabric for oil–water separation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(41): 46923–46932

[34] Babiker D M D, Zhu L P, Yagoub H, Lin F, Altam A A, Liang S M, Jin Y, Yang S G. The change from hydrophilicity to hydrophobicity of HEC/PAA complex membrane for water-in-oil emulsion separation: thermal versus chemical treatment. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2020, 241: 116343

[35] Sun F, Li T T, Zhang X Y, Shiu B C, Zhang Y, Lou C W, Lin J H. Preparation and oil–water separation evaluations of polypropylene/low-melt-point polyester composites reinforced by thermal bonding and one-step solution immersion. Polymer International, 2020, 69(9): 752–762

[36] Pandit S K, Tudu B K, Mishra I M, Kumar A. Development of stain resistant, superhydrophobic and self-cleaning coating on wood surface. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2020, 139: 105453

[37] Nanda D, Swetha T, Varshney P, Gupta P K, Mohapatra S S, Kumar A. Temperature dependent switchable superamphiphobic coating on steel alloy surface. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 727: 1293–1301

[38] Ma Z, Shu G M, Lu X L. Preparation of an antifouling and easy cleaning membrane based on amphiphobic fluorine island structure and chemical cleaning responsiveness. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 611: 118403

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21576205), the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 18JCTPJC48600), and the Training Project of Innovation Team of Colleges and Universities in Tianjin (Grant No. TD13-5020).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2200-0 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press