A density functional theory study of methane activation on MgO supported Ni₉M₁ cluster: role of M on C–H activation

Abstract

Methane activation is a pivotal step in the application of natural gas converting into high-value added chemicals via methane steam/dry reforming reactions. Ni element was found to be the most widely used catalyst. In present work, methane activation on MgO supported Ni–M (M = Fe, Co, Cu, Pd, Pt) cluster was explored through detailed density functional theory calculations, compared to pure Ni cluster. CH₄ adsorption on Cu promoted Ni cluster requires overcoming an energy of 0.07 eV, indicating that it is slightly endothermic and unfavored to occur, while the adsorption energies of other promoters M (M = Fe, Co, Pd and Pt) are all higher than that of pure Ni cluster. The role of M on the first C–H bond cleavage of CH₄ was investigated. Doping elements of the same period in Ni cluster, such as Fe, Co and Cu, for C–H bond activation follows the trend of the decrease of metal atom radius. As a result, Ni–Fe shows the best ability for C–H bond cleavage. In addition, doping the elements of the same family, like Pd and Pt, for CH₄ activation is according to the increase of metal atom radius. Consequently, C–H bond activation demands a lower energy barrier on Ni–Pt cluster. To illustrate the adsorptive dissociation behaviors of CH₄ at different Ni–M clusters, the Mulliken atomic charge was analyzed. In general, the electron gain of CH₄ binding at different Ni–M clusters follows the sequence of Ni–Cu (–0.02 e) < Ni (–0.04 e) < Ni–Pd (–0.08 e) < Ni–Pt (–0.09 e) < Ni–Co (–0.10 e) < Ni–Fe (–0.12 e), and the binding strength between catalysts and CH ₄ raises with the CH₄ electron gain increasing. This work provides insights into understanding the role of promoter metal M on thermal-catalytic activation of CH₄ over Ni/MgO catalysts, and is useful to interpret the reaction at an atomic scale.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

CH₄ dissociation / Ni–M / C–H bond activation / charge transfer

References

[1] Lin B, Kuang Y. Natural gas subsidies in the industrial sector in China: national and regional perspectives. Applied Energy, 2020, 260 : 114329

[2] Dale S. BP Energy Outlook 2018. BP Website, 2018

[3] Taifan W, Baltrusaitis J. CH₄ conversion to value added products: potential, limitations and extensions of a single step heterogeneous catalysis. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 198 : 525– 547

[4] Schwach P, Pan X, Bao X. Direct conversion of methane to value-added chemicals over heterogeneous catalysts: challenges and prospects. Chemical Reviews, 2017, 117( 13): 8497– 8520

[5] Song Y, Ozdemir E, Ramesh S, Adishev A, Subramanian S, Harale A, Albuali M, Fadhel B A, Jamal A, Moon D, Choi S H, Yavuz C T. Dry reforming of methane by stable Ni-Mo nanocatalysts on single-crystalline MgO. Science, 2020, 367( 6479): 777– 781

[6] Buelens L C, Galvita V V, Poelman H, Detavernier C, Marin G B. Super-dry reforming of methane intensifies CO₂ utilization via Le Chatelier’s principle. Science, 2016, 354( 6311): 449– 452

[7] Liu H, Wierzbicki D, Debek R, Motak M, Grzybek T, Da Costa P, Gálvez M E. La-promoted Ni-hydrotalcite-derived catalysts for dry reforming of methane at low temperatures. Fuel, 2016, 182 : 8– 16

[8] Wang H, Blaylock D W, Dam A H, Liland S E, Rout K R, Zhu Y A, Green W H, Holmen A, Chen D. Steam methane reforming on a Ni-based bimetallic catalyst: density functional theory and experimental studies of the catalytic consequence of surface alloying of Ni with Ag. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2017, 7( 8): 1713– 1725

[9] Niu J, Wang Y, Qi Y, Dam A H, Wang H, Zhu Y A, Holmen A, Ran J, Chen D. New mechanism insights into methane steam reforming on Pt/Ni from DFT and experimental kinetic study. Fuel, 2020, 266 : 117143

[10] Niu J, Ran J, Chen D. Understanding the mechanism of CO₂ reforming of methane to syngas on Ni@Pt surface compared with Ni(111) and Pt(111). Applied Surface Science, 2020, 513 : 145840

[11] Niu J, Du X, Ran J, Wang R. Dry (CO₂) reforming of methane over Pt catalysts studied by DFT and kinetic modeling. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 376 : 79– 90

[12] Dębek R, Motak M, Duraczyska D, Launay F, Galvez M E, Grzybek T, Da Costa P. Methane dry reforming over hydrotalcite-derived Ni–MgAl mixed oxides: the influence of Ni content on catalytic activity, selectivity and stability. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2016, 6( 17): 6705– 6715

[13] Li S, Gong J. Strategies for improving the performance and stability of Ni-based catalysts for reforming reactions. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43( 21): 7245– 7256

[14] Niu J, Liland S E, Yang J, Rout K R, Ran J, Chen D. Effect of oxide additives on the hydrotalcite derived Ni catalysts for CO₂ reforming of methane. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 377 : 119763

[15] Wei J M, Iglesia E. Isotopic and kinetic assessment of the mechanism of reactions of CH₄ with CO₂ or H₂O to form synthesis gas and carbon on nickel catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 2004, 224( 2): 370– 383

[16] Foppa L, Margossian T, Kim S M, Müller C, Copéret C, Larmier K, Comas-Vives A. Contrasting the role of Ni/Al₂O₃ interfaces in water-gas shift and dry reforming of methane. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017, 139( 47): 17128– 17139

[17] Niu J, Liu H, Jin Y, Fan B, Qi W, Ran J. Comprehensive review of Cu-based CO₂ hydrogenation to CH₃OH: insights from experimental work and theoretical analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47( 15): 9183– 9200

[18] Marcinkowski M D, Darby M T, Liu J, Wimble J M, Lucci F R, Lee S, Michaelides A, Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M, Stamatakis M, Sykes E C H. Pt/Cu single-atom alloys as coke-resistant catalysts for efficient C–H activation. Nature Chemistry, 2018, 10( 3): 325– 332

[19] Huang Y, Du J, Ling C, Zhou T, Wang S. Methane dehydrogenation on Au/Ni surface alloys—a first-principles study. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2013, 3( 5): 1343– 1354

[20] Liu H, Yan R, Zhang R, Wang B, Xie K. A DFT theoretical study of CH₄ dissociation on gold-alloyed Ni(111) surface. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 2011, 20( 6): 611– 617

[21] Niu J, Ran J, Du X, Qi W, Zhang P, Yang L. Effect of Pt addition on resistance to carbon formation of Ni catalysts in methane dehydrogenation over Ni–Pt bimetallic surfaces: a density functional theory study. Molecular Catalysis, 2017, 434 : 206– 218

[22] Zhang M, Yang K, Zhang X, Yu Y. Effect of Ni(111) surface alloying by Pt on partial oxidation of methane to syngas: a DFT study. Surface Science, 2014, 630 : 236– 243

[23] Bothra P, Pati S K. Improved catalytic activity of rhodium monolayer modified nickel (110) surface for the methane dehydrogenation reaction: a first-principles study. Nanoscale, 2014, 6( 12): 6738– 6744

[24] Zhao Y, Li S, Sun Y. Theoretical study on the dissociative adsorption of CH₄ on Pd-doped Ni surfaces. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2013, 34( 5): 911– 922

[25] Li K, Li M, Wang Y, Wu Z. Theoretical study on the effect of Mn promoter for CO₂ reforming of CH₄ on the Ni(111) surface. Fuel, 2020, 274 : 117849

[26] Fan C, Zhu Y A, Xu Y, Zhou Y, Zhou X G, Chen D. Origin of synergistic effect over Ni-based bimetallic surfaces: a density functional theory study. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2012, 137( 1): 014703

[27] Roy G, Chattopadhyay A P. Dissociation of methane on Ni₄ cluster—a DFT study. Computational & Theoretical Chemistry, 2017, 1106 : 7– 14

[28] Jackson B, Nave S. The dissociative chemisorption of methane on Ni(100): reaction path description of mode-selective chemistry. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2011, 135( 11): 114701

[29] Cataphan R C, Oliveira A A M, Chen Y, Vlachos D G. DFT study of the water-gas shift reaction and coke formation on Ni(111) and Ni(211) surfaces. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116( 38): 20281– 20291

[30] Wang Z, Cao X M, Zhu J, Hu P. Activity and coke formation of nickel and nickel carbide in dry reforming: a deactivation scheme from density functional theory. Journal of Catalysis, 2014, 311 : 469– 480

[31] Payne M C, Teter M P, Allan D C, Arias T A, Joannopoulos J D. Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total-energy calculations: molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1992, 64( 4): 1045– 1097

[32] Delley B. Fast calculation of electrostatics in crystals and large molecules. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1996, 100( 15): 6107– 6110

[33] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 77( 18): 3865– 3868

[34] Niu J, Ran J, Qi W, Ou Z, He W. Identification of active sites in CO₂ activation on MgO supported Ni cluster. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45( 19): 11108– 11115

[35] Monkhorst H J, Pack J D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Physical Review. B, Solid State, 1976, 13( 12): 5188– 5192

[36] Halgren T A, Lipscomb W N. The synchronous-transit method for determining reaction pathways and locating molecular transition states. Chemical Physics Letters, 1977, 49( 2): 225– 232

[37] Niu J, Guo F, Ran J, Qi W, Yang Z. Methane dry (CO₂) reforming to syngas (H₂/CO) in catalytic process: from experimental study and DFT calculations. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45( 55): 30267– 30287

[38] Pan C, Guo Z, Dai H, Ren R, Chu W. Anti-sintering mesoporous Ni–Pd bimetallic catalysts for hydrogen production via dry reforming of methane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45( 32): 16133– 16143

[39] Chaichi A, Sadrnezhaad S K, Malekjafarian M. Synthesis and characterization of supportless Ni–Pd–CNT nanocatalyst for hydrogen production via steam reforming of methane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43( 3): 1319– 1336

[40] Niu J, Wang Y, Liland S E, Regli S K, Yang J, Rout K R, Luo J, Rønning M, Ran J, Chen D. Unraveling enhanced activity, selectivity, and coke-resistance of Pt–Ni bimetallic clusters in dry reforming. ACS Catalysis, 2021, 11( 4): 2398– 2411

[41] Xie Z, Yan B, Lee J H, Wu Q, Li X, Zhao B, Su D, Zhang L, Chen J G. Effects of oxide supports on the CO₂ reforming of ethane over Pt–Ni bimetallic catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 245 : 376– 388

[42] Turap Y, Wang I, Fu T, Wu Y, Wang Y, Wang W. Co–Ni alloy supported on CeO₂ as a bimetallic catalyst for dry reforming of methane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45( 11): 6538– 6548

[43] Qiu H, Ran J, Niu J, Guo F, Ou Z. Effect of different doping ratios of Cu on the carbon formation and the elimination on Ni(111) surface: a DFT study. Molecular Catalysis, 2021, 502 : 111360

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the projects supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52106179), the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province, China (Grant No. 20210302124017), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China (Grant No. cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0454), the Scientific and Technological Activities for Overseas Students of Shanxi Province, China (Grant No. 20200016).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2169-8 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press