Theoretical and experimental study on the fluidity performance of hard-to-fluidize carbon nanotubes-based CO₂ capture sorbents

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes-based materials have been identified as promising sorbents for efficient CO₂ capture in fluidized beds, suffering from insufficient contact with CO₂ for the high-level CO₂ capture capacity. This study focuses on promoting the fluidizability of hard-to-fluidize pure and synthesized silica-coated amine-functionalized carbon nanotubes. The novel synthesized sorbent presents a superior sorption capacity of about 25 times higher than pure carbon nanotubes during 5 consecutive adsorption/regeneration cycles. The low-cost fluidizable-SiO₂ nanoparticles are used as assistant material to improve the fluidity of carbon nanotubes-based sorbents. Results reveal that a minimum amount of 7.5 and 5 wt% SiO₂ nanoparticles are required to achieve an agglomerate particulate fluidization behavior for pure and synthesized carbon nanotubes, respectively. Pure carbon nanotubes + 7.5 wt% SiO₂ and synthesized carbon nanotubes + 5 wt% SiO₂ indicates an agglomerate particulate fluidization characteristic, including the high-level bed expansion ratio, low minimum fluidization velocity (1.5 and 1.6 cm·s^–1), high Richardson−Zakin index (5.2 and 5.3 > 5), and low Π value (83.2 and 84.8 < 100, respectively). Chemical modification of carbon nanotubes causes not only enhanced CO ₂ uptake capacity but also decreases the required amount of silica additive to reach a homogeneous fluidization behavior for synthesized carbon nanotubes sorbent.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

CO ₂ capture / CNT-based sorbents / fluidization / SiO ₂ nanoparticles / fluidized bed reactors

References

[1] SattariF, TahmasebpoorM, ValverdeJ M, OrtizC, MohammadpourfardM. Modelling of a fluidized bed carbonator reactor for post-combustion CO₂ capture considering bed hydrodynamics and sorbent characteristics. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 406 : 126762

[2] RoussanalyS, VitvarovaM, AnantharamanR, BerstadD, HagenB, JakobsenJ, NovotnyV, SkaugenG. Techno-economic comparison of three technologies for pre-combustion CO₂ capture from a lignite-fired IGCC. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020, 14( 3): 436– 452

[3] HafeezS, SafdarT, PallariE, ManosG, AristodemouE, ZhangZ, Al-SalemS, ConstantinouA. CO₂ capture using membrane contactors: a systematic literature review. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2021, 15( 4): 720– 754

[4] RamaS, ZhangY, Tchuenbou-MagaiaF, DingY, LiY. Encapsulation of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol with tetraethyl orthosilicate for CO₂ capture. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2019, 13( 4): 672– 683

[5] XiaoG, XiaoP, HoadleyA, WebleyP. Integrated adsorption and absorption process for post-combustion CO₂ capture. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2021, 15( 3): 483– 492

[6] GhahramaninezhadM, MohajerF, ShahrakM N. Improved CO₂ capture performances of ZIF-90 through sequential reduction and lithiation reactions to form a hard/hard structure. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020, 14( 3): 425– 435

[7] XuZ, Jiang T, ZhangH, ZhaoY, MaX, Wang S. Efficient MgO-doped CaO sorbent pellets for high temperature CO₂ capture. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2021, 15( 3): 698– 708

[8] XiaoQ, TangX, LiuY, Zhong Y, ZhuW. Comparison study on strategies to prepare nanocrystalline Li₂ZrO₃-based absorbents for CO₂ capture at high temperatures. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2013, 7( 3): 297– 302

[9] NobarzadM J, TahmasebpoorM, ImaniM, PevidaC, HerisS Z. Improved CO₂ adsorption capacity and fluidization behavior of silica-coated amine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9( 4): 105786

[10] HeidariM, TahmasebpoorM, MousaviS B, PevidaC. CO₂ capture activity of a novel CaO adsorbent stabilized with (ZrO₂ + Al₂O₃ + CeO₂)-based additive under mild and realistic calcium looping conditions. Journal of CO₂ Utilization , 2021, 53 : 101747

[11] GuC, Liu Y, WangW, LiuJ, Hu J. Effects of functional groups for CO₂ capture using metal organic frameworks. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2021, 15( 2): 437– 449

[12] BanY, Zhao M, YangW. Metal-organic framework-based CO₂ capture: from precise material design to high-efficiency membranes. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020, 14( 2): 188– 215

[13] KellerL, OhsB, Lenhart J, AbdulyL, BlankeP, WesslingM. High capacity polyethylenimine impregnated microtubes made of carbon nanotubes for CO₂ capture. Carbon, 2018, 126 : 338– 345

[14] LuC, Bai H, WuB, SuF, Hwang J F. Comparative study of CO₂ capture by carbon nanotubes, activated carbons, and zeolites. Energy & Fuels, 2008, 22( 5): 3050– 3056

[15] MousaviS B, Zeinali HerisS. Experimental investigation of ZnO nanoparticles effects on thermophysical and tribological properties of diesel oil. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45( 43): 23603– 23614

[16] SeyediS S, ShabgardM R, MousaviS B, HerisS Z. The impact of SiC, Al₂O₃, and B₂O₃ abrasive particles and temperature on wear characteristics of 18Ni (300) maraging steel in abrasive flow machining (AFM). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46( 68): 33991– 34001

[17] MousaviS B, ZeinaliHeris S, EstelléP. Viscosity, tribological and physicochemical features of ZnO and MoS₂ diesel oil-based nanofluids: an experimental study. Fuel, 2021, 293 : 120481

[18] HuS, Liu X. Development of a hydrodynamic model and the corresponding virtual software for dual-loop circulating fluidized beds. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2021, 15( 3): 579– 590

[19] HeidariM, TahmasebpoorM, AntzarasA, LemonidouA A. CO₂ capture and fluidity performance of CaO-based sorbents: effect of Zr, Al and Ce additives in tri-, bi- and mono-metallic configurations. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 144 : 349– 365

[20] AzimiB, TahmasebpoorM, Sanchez-JimenezP E, PerejonA, ValverdeJ M. Multicycle CO₂ capture activity and fluidizability of Al-based synthesized CaO sorbents. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 358 : 679– 690

[21] AtifR, InamF. Reasons and remedies for the agglomeration of multilayered graphene and carbon nanotubes in polymers. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 2016, 7( 1): 1174– 1196

[22] YaoW, Guangsheng G, FeiW, JunW. Fluidization and agglomerate structure of SiO₂ nanoparticles. Powder Technology, 2002, 124( 1): 152– 159

[23] AmjadiO, TahmasebpoorM. Improving fluidization behavior of cohesive Ca(OH)₂ adsorbent using hydrophilic silica nanoparticles: parametric investigation. Particuology, 2018, 5 : 52– 61

[24] KimS W. Effect of particle size on carbon nanotube aggregates behavior in dilute phase of a fluidized bed. Processes, 2018, 6( 8): 121

[25] AmjadiO, TahmasebpoorM, AghdasiniaH. Fluidization behavior of cohesive Ca(OH)₂ powders mixed with hydrophobic silica nanoparticles. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2019, 42( 2): 287– 296

[26] Rahimvandi NoupoorY, TahmasebpoorM. A novel internal assistance method for enhanced fluidization of nanoparticles. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 36( 8): 1377– 1387

[27] TahmasebpoorM, NoupoorY R, BadamchizadehP. Fluidity enhancement of hard-to-fluidize nanoparticles by mixing with hydrophilic nanosilica and fluid catalytic cracking particles: experimental and theoretical study. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31( 7): 073301

[28] YuH, Zhang Q, GuG, WangY, LuoG, Wei F. Hydrodynamics and gas mixing in a carbon nanotube agglomerate fluidized bed. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2006, 52( 12): 4110– 4123

[29] LeeM S, ParkS J. Silica-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes impregnated with polyethyleneimine for carbon dioxide capture under the flue gas condition. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2015, 226 : 17– 23

[30] TahmasebpoorM, Ghasemi Seif AbadiR, Rahimvandi NoupoorY, BadamchizadehP. Model based on electrostatic repulsion and hydrogen bond forces to estimate the size of nanoparticle agglomerates in fluidization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55( 50): 12939– 12948

[31] ShaoY, LiZ, Zhong W, BianZ, YuA. Minimum fluidization velocity of particles with different size distributions at elevated pressures and temperatures. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 216 : 115555

[32] RichardsonJ F, ZakiW N. Sedimentation and fluidisation: Part I. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1997, 75 : S82– S100

[33] HakimL F, PortmanJ L, CasperM D, WeimerA W. Aggregation behavior of nanoparticles in fluidized beds. Powder Technology, 2005, 160( 3): 149– 160

[34] YangJ, ZhouT, SongL. Agglomerating vibro-fluidization behavior of nano-particles. Advanced Powder Technology, 2009, 20( 2): 158– 163

[35] RomeroJ B, JohansonL N. Factors affecting fluidized bed quality. Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, 1958, 58 : 28– 37

[36] ZhuC, Yu Q, DaveR N, PfefferR. Gas fluidization characteristics of nanoparticle agglomerates. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2005, 51( 2): 426– 439

[37] AljerfL. High-efficiency extraction of bromocresol purple dye and heavy metals as chromium from industrial effluent by adsorption onto a modified surface of zeolite: kinetics and equilibrium study. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 225 : 120– 132

[38] doAmaral Montanheiro T L, CristóvanF H, MachadoJ P B, TadaD B, DuránN, LemesA P. Effect of MWCNT functionalization on thermal and electrical properties of PHBV/MWCNT nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Research, 2015, 30( 1): 55– 65

[39] HsuS C, LuC, Su F, ZengW, ChenW. Thermodynamics and regeneration studies of CO₂ adsorption on multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65( 4): 1354– 1361

[40] JanakiramanN, JohnsonM. Functional groups of tree ferns (Cyathea) using FTIR: chemotaxonomic implications. Romanian Journal of Biophysics, 2015, 25( 2): 131– 141

[41] SianiparM, KimS H, IskandarF, WentenI G. Functionalized carbon nanotube (CNT) membrane: progress and challenges. RSC Advances, 2017, 7( 81): 51175– 51198

[42] PumeraM, AmbrosiA, ChngE L K. Impurities in graphenes and carbon nanotubes and their influence on the redox properties. Chemical Science (Cambridge), 2012, 3( 12): 3347– 3355

[43] TasisD, TagmatarchisN, BiancoA, PratoM. Chemistry of carbon nanotubes. Chemical Reviews, 2006, 106( 3): 1105– 1136

[44] YangJ, XuY, Su C, NieS, LiZ. Synthesis of hierarchical nanohybrid CNT@Ni-PS and its applications in enhancing the tribological, curing and thermal properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2021, 15( 5): 1– 15

[45] BergerA H, BhownA S. Comparing physisorption and chemisorption solid sorbents for use separating CO₂ from flue gas using temperature swing adsorption. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4 : 562– 567

[46] Sánchez-ZambranoK S, LimaDuarte L, SoaresMaia D A, Vilarrasa-GarcíaE, Bastos-NetoM, Rodríguez-CastellónE, Silvade Azevedo D C. CO₂ capture with mesoporous silicas modified with amines by double functionalization: assessment of adsorption/desorption cycles. Materials, 2018, 11( 6): 887

[47] KruppH, SperlingG. Theory of adhesion of small particles. Journal of Applied Physics, 1966, 37( 11): 4176– 4180

[48] ZhuX, Zhang Q, HuangC, WangY, YangC, WeiF. Validation of surface coating with nanoparticles to improve the flowability of fine cohesive powders. Particuology, 2017, 30 : 53– 61

[49] XuC, Zhu J-X. Effects of gas type and temperature on fine particle fluidization. China Particuology, 2006, 4( 3−4): 114– 121

[50] GuoQ, Zhang J, HaoJ. Flow characteristics in an acoustic bubbling fluidized bed at high temperature. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2011, 50( 3): 331– 337

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2022. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn