Carbon capture for decarbonisation of energy-intensive industries: a comparative review of techno-economic feasibility of solid looping cycles

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage will play a crucial role in industrial decarbonisation. However, the current literature presents a large variability in the techno-economic feasibility of CO₂ capture technologies. Consequently, reliable pathways for carbon capture deployment in energy-intensive industries are still missing. This work provides a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art CO₂ capture technologies for decarbonisation of the iron and steel, cement, petroleum refining, and pulp and paper industries. Amine scrubbing was shown to be the least feasible option, resulting in the average avoided CO₂ cost of between 62.7 {{\text{€·t}}_{{\text{CO}}_2}}^{-1} for the pulp and paper and 104.6 {{\text{€·t}}_{{\text{CO}}_2}}^{-1} for the iron and steel industry. Its average equivalent energy requirement varied between 2.7 (iron and steel) and 5.1 {{\text{MJ}}_{\text{th}}\cdot {\text{kg}}_{{\text{CO}}_2}}^{-1} (cement). Retrofits of emerging calcium looping were shown to improve the overall viability of CO₂ capture for industrial decarbonisation. Calcium looping was shown to result in the average avoided CO₂ cost of between 32.7 (iron and steel) and 42.9 {{\text{€·t}}_{{\text{CO}}_2}}^{-1} (cement). Its average equivalent energy requirement varied between 2.0 (iron and steel) and 3.7 {{\text{MJ}}_{\text{th}}\cdot {\text{kg}}_{{\text{CO}}_2}}^{-1} (pulp and paper). Such performance demonstrated the superiority of calcium looping for industrial decarbonisation. Further work should focus on standardising the techno-economic assessment of technologies for industrial decarbonisation.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

industrial CO₂ emissions / CCS deployment / carbonate looping / net-zero industry / carbon capture benchmarks

References

[1] GriffinP W, HammondG P. Industrial energy use and carbon emissions reduction in the iron and steel sector: a UK perspective. Applied Energy, 2019, 249 : 109– 125

[2] RogeljJ, PoppA, CalvinK V, LudererG, EmmerlingJ, GernaatD, FujimoriS, StreflerJ, HasegawaT, MarangoniG. . Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8( 4): 325– 332

[3] McGrailB P, FreemanC J, BrownC F, SullivanE C, WhiteS K, ReddyS, GarberR D, TobinD, GilmartinJ J, SteffensenE J. Overcoming business model uncertainty in a carbon dioxide capture and sequestration project: case study at the Boise White Paper Mill. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012, 9 : 91– 102

[4] IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers and Technical Summary, 2015

[5] GerresT, ChavesÁvila J P, LlamasP L, SanRomán T G. A review of cross-sector decarbonisation potentials in the European energy intensive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 210 : 585– 601

[6] IEA. Industry Direct CO₂ Emissions in the Sustainable Development Scenario, 2000–2030 . Paris: IEA Publications, 2020

[7] BatailleC. Low and Zero Emissions in the Steel and Cement Industries: Barriers, Technologies and Policies. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2019, 2– 42

[8] BatailleC, ÅhmanM, NeuhoffK, NilssonL J, FischedickM, LechtenböhmerS, Solano-RodriquezB, Denis-RyanA, StiebertS, WaismanH. . A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energy-intensive industry production consistent with the Paris Agreement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 187 : 960– 973

[9] YangF, MeermanJ C, FaaijA P C. Carbon capture and biomass in industry: a techno-economic analysis and comparison of negative emission options. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 144 : 111028

[10] FennellP S, FlorinN, NappT, HillsT. CCS from Industrial Sources. Sustainable Technologies, Systems and Policies, 2012, 2012 : 17

[11] KoytsoumpaE I, BerginsC, KakarasE. The CO₂ economy: review of CO₂ capture and reuse technologies. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2018, 132 : 3– 16

[12] KuramochiT, RamírezA, TurkenburgW, FaaijA. Comparative assessment of CO₂ capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012, 38( 1): 87– 112

[13] LeesonD, Mac DowellN, ShahN, PetitC, FennellP S. A techno-economic analysis and systematic review of carbon capture and storage (CCS) applied to the iron and steel, cement, oil refining and pulp and paper industries, as well as other high purity sources. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 61 : 71– 84

[14] MarkewitzP, KuckshinrichsW, LeitnerW, LinssenJ, ZappP, BongartzR, SchreiberA, MüllerT E. Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO₂. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5( 6): 7281– 7305

[15] NappT A, GambhirA, HillsT P, FlorinN, FennellP. A review of the technologies, economics and policy instruments for decarbonising energy-intensive manufacturing industries. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 30 : 616– 640

[16] RissmanJ, BatailleC, MasanetE, AdenN, MorrowW R III, ZhouN, ElliottN, DellR, HeerenN, HuckesteinB. . Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Applied Energy, 2020, 266 : 114848

[17] NurdiawatiA, UrbanF. Towards deep decarbonisation of energy-intensive industries: a review of current status, technologies and policies. Energies, 2021, 14( 9): 2408

[18] HanakD P, AnthonyE J, ManovicV. A review of developments in pilot-plant testing and modelling of calcium looping process for CO₂ capture from power generation systems. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015, 8( 8): 2199– 2249

[19] TianS, JiangJ, ZhangZ, ManovicV. Inherent potential of steelmaking to contribute to decarbonisation targets via industrial carbon capture and storage. Nature Communications, 2018, 9( 1): 1– 8

[20] De LenaE, SpinelliM, GattiM, ScaccabarozziR, CampanariS, ConsonniS, CintiG, RomanoM C. Techno-economic analysis of calcium looping processes for low CO₂ emission cement plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 82 : 244– 260

[21] SantosM P S, ManovicV, HanakD P. Unlocking the potential of pulp and paper industry to achieve carbon-negative emissions via calcium looping retrofit. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 280 : 124431

[22] YunS, Jang M G, KimJ K. Techno-economic assessment and comparison of absorption and membrane CO₂ capture processes for iron and steel industry. Energy, 2021, 229 : 120778

[23] Ramírez-SantosÁ A, BozorgM, AddisB, PiccialliV, CastelC, FavreE. Optimization of multistage membrane gas separation processes. Example of application to CO₂ capture from blast furnace gas. Journal of Membrane Science , 2018, 566 : 346– 366

[24] BakerR W, FreemanB, KniepJ, HuangY I, MerkelT C. CO₂ capture from cement plants and steel mills using membranes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57( 47): 15963– 15970

[25] VoldsundM, GardarsdottirS O, DeLena E, Pérez-CalvoJ F, JamaliA, BerstadD, FuC, Romano M, RoussanalyS, AnantharamanR. . Comparison of technologies for CO₂ capture from cement production—Part 1: Technical evaluation. Energies, 2019, 12( 3): 559

[26] GardarsdottirS, DeLena E, RomanoM, RoussanalyS, VoldsundM, Pérez-CalvoJ F, BerstadD, FuC, Anantharaman R, SutterD. . Comparison of technologies for CO₂ capture from cement production—Part 2: Cost analysis. Energies, 2019, 12( 3): 542

[27] FerrariM C, AmelioA, NardelliG M, CostiR. Assessment on the application of facilitated transport membranes in cement plants for CO₂ capture. Energies, 2021, 14( 16): 1– 15

[28] IRENA. Renewable Energy in Manufacturing—a Technology Roadmap for REmap 2030. Technical Report, 2014

[29] DeanC C, BlameyJ, FlorinN H, Al-JebooriM J, FennellP S. The calcium looping cycle for CO₂ capture from power generation, cement manufacture and hydrogen production. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2011, 89( 6): 836– 855

[30] HillsT, FlorinN, FennellP S. Decarbonising the cement sector: a bottom-up model for optimising carbon capture application in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 139 : 1351– 1361

[31] DamenK, TroostM V, FaaijA, TurkenburgW. A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO₂ capture and storage. Part A: review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2006, 32( 2): 215– 246

[32] van StraelenJ, GeuzebroekF, GoodchildN, ProtopapasG, MahonyL. CO₂ capture for refineries, a practical approach. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1( 1): 179– 185

[33] FeronP H M, HendriksC A. CO₂ capture process principles and costs. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 2005, 60( 3): 451– 459

[34] BottomsR. Process for separating acidic gases. US Patent, 1783901, 1930-12-02

[35] RaoA B, RubinE S. A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO₂ capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36( 20): 4467– 4475

[36] ShaoR StangelandA. Amines Used in CO₂ Capture—Health and Environmental Impacts . Bellona Report, 2009

[37] XuG, Jin H, YangY, XuY, Lin H, DuanL. A comprehensive techno-economic analysis method for power generation systems with CO₂ capture. International Journal of Energy Research, 2010, 34( 4): 321– 332

[38] NurrokhmahL, MezherT, Abu-ZahraM R M. Evaluation of handling and reuse approaches for the waste generated from MEA-based CO₂ capture with the consideration of regulations in the UAE. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47( 23): 13644– 13651

[39] FarlaJ C M, HendriksC A, BlokK. Carbon dioxide recovery from industrial processes. Climatic Change, 1995, 29( 4): 439– 461

[40] WileyD E, HoM T, BustamanteA. Assessment of opportunities for CO₂ capture at iron and steel mills: an Australian perspective. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4 : 2654– 2661

[41] ArastoA, TsupariE, KärkiJ, PisiläE, SorsamäkiL. Post-combustion capture of CO₂ at an integrated steel mill—Part I: technical concept analysis. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 16 : 271– 277

[42] TsupariE, KärkiJ, ArastoA, PisiläE. Post-combustion capture of CO₂ at an integrated steel mill—Part II: economic feasibility. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 16 : 278– 286

[43] OnarheimK, SantosS, KangasP, HankalinV. Performance and cost of CCS in the pulp and paper industry part 2: economic feasibility of amine-based post-combustion CO₂ capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 66 : 60– 75

[44] NwaohaC, TontiwachwuthikulP. Carbon dioxide capture from pulp mill using 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and monoethanolamine blend: techno-economic assessment of advanced process configuration. Applied Energy, 2019, 250 : 1202– 1216

[45] HanK, Ahn C K, LeeM S, RheeC H, KimJ Y, ChunH D. Current status and challenges of the ammonia-based CO₂ capture technologies toward commercialization. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 14 : 270– 281

[46] RodríguezN, MurilloR, AbanadesJ C. CO₂ capture from cement plants using oxyfired precalcination and/or calcium looping. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46( 4): 2460– 2466

[47] BlameyJ, AnthonyE J, WangJ, FennellP S. The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO₂ capture. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2010, 36( 2): 260– 279

[48] AnthonyE J. Solid looping cycles: a new technology for coal conversion. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47( 6): 1747– 1754

[49] Morin J X, Béal C. Chapter 37: chemical looping combustion of refinery fuel gas with CO₂ Capture. In: Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations, Volume 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005, 647–654

[50] AdánezJ, AbadA, MendiaraT, GayánP, deDiego L F, García-LabianoF. Chemical looping combustion of solid fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2018, 65 : 6– 66

[51] VilchesT B, LindF, RydénM, ThunmanH. Experience of more than 1000 h of operation with oxygen carriers and solid biomass at large scale. Applied Energy, 2017, 190 : 1174– 1183

[52] FernándezJ R, SpallinaV, AbanadesJ C. Advanced packed-bed Ca−Cu looping process for the CO₂ capture from steel mill off-gases. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2020, 8( 146): 1– 13

[53] deDiego L F, García-LabianoF, GayánP, CelayaJ, PalaciosJ M, AdánezJ. Operation of a 10 kW_th chemical-looping combustor during 200 h with a CuO-Al₂O₃ oxygen carrier. Fuel, 2007, 86( 7-8): 1036– 1045

[54] ZafarQ, MattissonT, GevertB. Integrated hydrogen and power production with CO₂ capture using chemical-looping reforming redox reactivity of particles of CuO, Mn₂O₃, NiO, and Fe₂O₃ using SiO₂ as a support. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005, 44( 10): 3485– 3496

[55] ZhaoX, ZhouH, SikarwarV S, ZhaoM, ParkA H A, FennellP S, ShenL, FanL S. Biomass-based chemical looping technologies: the good, the bad and the future. Energy & Environmental Science, 2017, 10( 9): 1885– 1910

[56] WangP, MeansN, ShekhawatD, BerryD, MassoudiM. Chemical-looping combustion and gasification of coals and oxygen carrier development: a brief review. Energies, 2015, 8( 10): 10605– 10635

[57] DarmawanA, AjiwibowoM W, YoshikawaK, AzizM, TokimatsuK. Energy-efficient recovery of black liquor through gasification and syngas chemical looping. Applied Energy, 2018, 219 : 290– 298

[58] DarmawanA, AjiwibowoM W, BiddinikaM K, TokimatsuK, AzizM. Black liquor-based hydrogen and power co-production: combination of supercritical water gasification and syngas chemical looping. Applied Energy, 2019, 252 : 113446

[59] MattissonT, JärdnäsA, LyngfeltA. Reactivity of some metal oxides supported on alumina with alternating methane and oxygen-application for chemical-looping combustion. Energy & Fuels, 2003, 17( 3): 643– 651

[60] HossainM M, de LasaH I. Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO₂ separations—a review. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63 : 4433– 4451

[61] ShimizuT, HiramaT, HosodaH, KitanoK, InagakiM, TejimaK. A twin fluid-bed reactor for removal of CO₂ from combustion processes. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 1999, 77( 1): 62– 68

[62] HilzJ, HelbigM, HaafM, DaikelerA, StröhleJ, EppleB. Long-term pilot testing of the carbonate looping process in 1 MW_th scale. Fuel, 2017, 210 : 892– 899

[63] RolfeA, HuangY, HaafM, PitaA, RezvaniS, DaveA, HewittN J. Technical and environmental study of calcium carbonate looping versus oxy-fuel options for low CO₂ emission cement plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 75 : 85– 97

[64] OzcanD C, MacchiA, LuD, Kierzkowska A, AhnH, MüllerC, BrandaniS. Ca−Cu looping process for CO₂ capture from a power plant and its comparison with Ca-looping, oxy-combustion and amine-based CO₂ capture processes. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 43 : 198– 212

[65] CuencaM A AnthonyE J. Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustion of Coal. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 1995

[66] AriasB, DiegoM E, AbanadesJ C, LorenzoM, DiazL, MartínezD, AlvarezJ, Sánchez-BiezmaA. Demonstration of steady state CO₂ capture in a 1.7 MW_th calcium looping pilot. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 18 : 237– 245

[67] EransM, BeisheimT, ManovicV, JeremiasM, PatchigollaK, DieterH, DuanL, AnthonyE J. Effect of SO₂ and steam on CO₂ capture performance of biomass-templated calcium aluminate pellets. Faraday Discussions, 2016, 192 : 97– 111

[68] GrasaG S, AbanadesJ C. CO₂ capture capacity of CaO in long series of carbonation/calcination cycles. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45( 26): 8846– 8851

[69] BorgwardtR H. Sintering of nascent calcium oxide. Chemical Engineering Science, 1989, 44 : 53– 60

[70] SunP, Grace J R, LimC J, AnthonyE J. The effect of CaO sintering on cyclic CO₂ capture in energy systems. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2007, 53( 9): 2432– 2442

[71] PerejónA, RomeoL M, LaraY, LisbonaP, MartínezA, ValverdeJ M. The calcium-looping technology for CO₂ capture: on the important roles of energy integration and sorbent behavior. Applied Energy, 2016, 162 : 787– 807

[72] BakerE H. 87. The calcium oxide-carbon dioxide system in the pressure range 1–300 atmospheres. Journal of the Chemical Society, 1962, 0( 0): 464– 470

[73] LyonR K. Method and apparatus for unmixed combustion as an alternative to fire. US Patent, 5509362, 1996-04-23

[74] AbanadesJ C, MurilloR, FernandezJ R, GrasaG, MartínezI. New CO₂ capture process for hydrogen production combining Ca and Cu chemical loops. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44( 17): 6901– 6904

[75] DieterH, BidweA R, Varela-DuelliG, CharitosA, HawthorneC, ScheffknechtG. Development of the calcium looping CO₂ capture technology from lab to pilot scale at IFK, University of Stuttgart. Fuel, 2014, 127 : 23– 37

[76] StröhleJ, JunkM, KremerJ, GalloyA, EppleB. Carbonate looping experiments in a 1 MW_th pilot plant and model validation. Fuel, 2014, 127 : 13– 22

[77] ChangM H, ChenW C, HuangC M, LiuW H, ChouY C, ChangW C, ChenW, ChengJ Y, HuangK E, HsuH W. Design and experimental testing of a 1.9 MW_th calcium looping pilot plant. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63 : 2100– 2108

[78] MayerK, SchanzE, PröllT, HofbauerH. Performance of an iron based oxygen carrier in a 120 kW_th chemical looping combustion pilot plant. Fuel, 2018, 217 : 561– 569

[79] LyngfeltA, LinderholmC. Chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels—status and recent progress. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114 : 371– 386

[80] AbdulallyI, BealC, AndrusH E, EppleB, LyngfeltA, WhiteB. Alstom’s chemical looping technology, program update. In 11^th Annual Conference on Carbon Capture Utilization & Sequestration Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2014,

[81] YazdanpanahM, GuillouF, BertholinS, ZhangA. Demonstration of chemical looping combustion (CLC) with petcoke feed for refining industry in a 3 MW_th pilot plant. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019, 33 : 1– 8

[82] CroezenH KortelandM. Technological Developments in Europe. A Long-Term View of CO₂ Efficient Manufacturing in the European Region . Technical Report, 2010

[83] IEA. Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap. Paris: IEA Publications, 2020

[84] HoM T, AllinsonG W, WileyD E. Comparison of MEA capture cost for low CO₂ emissions sources in Australia. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5( 1): 49– 60

[85] WorldSteelAssociation. About steel. WorldSteel Website, 2021

[86] BenderM, RoussiereT, SchellingH, SchusterS, SchwabE. Coupled production of steel and chemicals. Chemieingenieurtechnik (Weinheim), 2018, 90( 11): 1782– 1805

[87] EUROFER:the European steel association. A Steel Roadmap for a Low Carbon Europe 2050. Technical Report, 2013

[88] van der StelJ, LouwerseG, SertD, HirschA, EklundN, PetterssonM. Top gas recycling blast furnace developments for ‘green’ and sustainable ironmaking. Ironmaking & Steelmaking, 2013, 40( 7): 483– 489

[89] HoM T, BustamanteA, WileyD E. Comparison of CO₂ capture economics for iron and steel mills. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 19 : 145– 159

[90] DreillardM, BroutinP, BriotP, HuardT, LettatA. Application of the DMXTM CO₂ capture process in steel industry. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114 : 2573– 2589

[91] GarðarsdóttirS Ó, NormannF, SkagestadR, JohnssonF. Investment costs and CO₂ reduction potential of carbon capture from industrial plants—a Swedish case study. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 76 : 111– 124

[92] CormosA M, DraganS, PetrescuL, SanduV, CormosC C. Techno-economic and environmental evaluations of decarbonized fossil-intensive industrial processes by reactive absorption & adsorption CO ₂ capture systems. Energies, 2020, 13( 5): 1268

[93] TianS, JiangJ, YanF, Li K, ChenX, ManovicV. Highly efficient CO₂ capture with simultaneous iron and CaO recycling for the iron and steel industry. Green Chemistry, 2016, 18( 14): 4022– 4031

[94] TianS, LiK, Jiang J, ChenX, YanF. CO₂ abatement from the iron and steel industry using a combined Ca-Fe chemical loop. Applied Energy, 2016, 170 : 345– 352

[95] FernándezJ R, MartínezI, AbanadesJ C, RomanoM C. Conceptual design of a Ca−Cu chemical looping process for hydrogen production in integrated steelworks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42( 16): 11023– 11037

[96] MartínezI, FernándezJ R, AbanadesJ C, RomanoM C. Integration of a fluidised bed Ca−Cu chemical looping process in a steel mill. Energy, 2018, 163 : 570– 584

[97] GazzaniM, RomanoM C, ManzoliniG. CO₂ capture in integrated steelworks by commercial-ready technologies and SEWGS process. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 41 : 249– 267

[98] ManzoliniG, GiuffridaA, CobdenP D, van DijkH A J, RuggeriF, ConsonniF. Techno-economic assessment of SEWGS technology when applied to integrated steel-plant for CO₂ emission mitigation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 94 : 102935

[99] BarkerD J, TurnerS A, Napier-MooreP A, ClarkM, DavisonJ E. CO₂ capture in the cement industry. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1( 1): 87– 94

[100] FavierA, ScrivenerK, HabertG. Decarbonizing the cement and concrete sector: integration of the full value chain to reach net zero emissions in Europe. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 225( 1): 012009

[101] IEA. Cement. Paris: IEA Publications, 2020

[102] AtsoniosK, GrammelisP, AntiohosS K, NikolopoulosN, KakarasE. Integration of calcium looping technology in existing cement plant for CO₂ capture: process modeling and technical considerations. Fuel, 2015, 153 : 210– 223

[103] GomezA, BriotP, RaynalL, BroutinP, GimenezM, SoazicM, CessatP, SayssetS. ACACIA project—development of a post-combustion CO₂ capture process. Case of the DMXTM process. Oil & Gas Science and Technology—Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles, 2014, 69( 6): 1121– 1129

[104] ZhouW, JiangD, ChenD, Griffy-BrownC, JinY, Zhu B. Capturing CO₂ from cement plants: a priority for reducing CO₂ emissions in China. Energy, 2016, 106 : 464– 474

[105] MarkewitzP, ZhaoL, RysselM, MouminG, WangY. Carbon capture for CO₂ emission reduction in the cement industry in Germany. Energies, 2019, 12( 12): 2432

[106] ECRA. ECRA CCS Project—Report on Phase III. Technical Report TR- ECRA119/2012, 2012

[107] Carrasco-MaldonadoF, SpörlR, FleigerK, HoenigV, MaierJ, ScheffknechtG. Oxy-fuel combustion technology for cement production—state of the art research and technology development. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 45 : 189– 199

[108] RomeoL M, CatalinaD, LisbonaP, LaraY, MartinezA. Ca looping technology: current status, developments and future directions. Greenhouse Gases. Science And Technology, 2011, 1 : 72– 82

[109] DiegoM E, AriasB, AbanadesJ C. Analysis of a double calcium loop process configuration for CO₂ capture in cement plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 117 : 110– 121

[110] JohanssonD, RootzénJ, BerntssonT, JohnssonF. Assessment of strategies for CO₂ abatement in the European petroleum refining industry. Energy, 2012, 42( 1): 375– 386

[111] van StraelenJ, GeuzebroekF, GoodchildN, ProtopapasG, MahonyL. CO₂ capture for refineries, a practical approach. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4( 2): 316– 320

[112] BainsP, PsarrasP, WilcoxJ. CO₂ capture from the industry sector. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2017, 63 : 146– 172

[113] IEA. Chemicals. Paris: IEA Publications, 2020

[114] BerghoutN, van den BroekM, FaaijA. Techno-economic performance and challenges of applying CO₂ capture in the industry: a case study of five industrial plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 17 : 259– 279

[115] Fernández-DacostaC, vander Spek M, HungC R, OregionniG D, SkagestadR, PariharP, GokakD T, StrømmanA H, RamirezA. Prospective techno-economic and environmental assessment of carbon capture at a refinery and CO₂ utilisation in polyol synthesis. Journal of CO₂ Utilization , 2017, 21 : 405– 422

[116] MöllerstenK, YanJ, Westermark M. Potential and cost-effectiveness of CO₂ reductions through energy measures in Swedish pulp and paper mills. Energy, 2003, 28( 7): 691– 710

[117] OnarheimK, SantosS, KangasP, HankalinV. Performance and costs of CCS in the pulp and paper industry part 1: performance of amine-based post-combustion CO₂ capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 59 : 58– 73

[118] IEA. Pulp and Paper. Paris: IEA Publications, 2020

[119] HektorE, BerntssonT. Reduction of greenhouse gases in integrated pulp and paper mills: possibilities for CO₂ capture and storage. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2009, 11( 1): 59– 65

[120] GarciaM, BerghoutN. Toward a common method of cost-review for carbon capture technologies in the industrial sector: cement and iron and steel plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 87 : 142– 158

[121] RoussanalyS, BerghoutN, FoutT, GarciaM, GardarsdottirS, NazirS M, RamirezA, RubinE S. Towards improved cost evaluation of carbon capture and storage from industry. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2021, 106 : 103263

Acknowledgements

This publication is based on research conducted within the “Clean heat, power and hydrogen from biomass and waste” project funded by UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC reference: EP/R513027/1).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2151-5 and is accessible for authorized users.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 The Author(s). This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn