A “Sequential Design of Simulations” approach for exploiting and calibrating discrete element simulations of cohesive powders
Xizhong Chen, Chunlei Pei, James A. Elliott
A “Sequential Design of Simulations” approach for exploiting and calibrating discrete element simulations of cohesive powders
The flow behaviours of cohesive particles in the ring shear test were simulated and examined using discrete element method guided by a design of experiments methodology. A full factorial design was used as a screening design to reveal the effects of material properties of partcles. An augmented design extending the screening design to a response surface design was constructed to establish the relations between macroscopic shear stresses and particle properties. It is found that the powder flow in the shear cell can be classified into four regimes. Shear stress is found to be sensitive to particle friction coefficient, surface energy and Young’s modulus. A considerable fluctuation of shear stress is observed in high friction and low cohesion regime. In high cohesion regime, Young’s modulus appears to have a more significant effect on the shear stress at the point of incipient flow than the shear stress during the pre-shear process. The predictions from response surface designs were validated and compared with shear stresses measured from the Schulze ring shear test. It is found that simulations and experiments showed excellent agreement under a variety of consolidation conditions, which verifies the advantages and feasibility of using the proposed “Sequential Design of Simulations” approach.
discrete element method / cohesive materials / parameter calibration / ring shear cell / design of experiments
[1] |
Sakai M. How should the discrete element method be applied in industrial systems?: a review. Kona Powder and Particle Journal, 2016, 33: 169–178
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Guo Y, Curtis J S. Discrete element method simulations for complex granular flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 47(1): 21–46
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Zhu H, Zhou Z, Yang R, Yu A. Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: a review of major applications and findings. Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, 63(23): 5728–5770
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Jarray A, Habibi M, Scheper B J, Shi H, Luding S. Mixing of bidisperse cohesive granular materials in food processes. International Journal of Food Engineering, 2019, 5(3): 195–199
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Coetzee C J. Review: calibration of the discrete element method. Powder Technology, 2017, 310: 104–142
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Marigo M, Stitt E H. Discrete element method (DEM) for industrial applications: comments on calibration and validation for the modelling of cylindrical pellets. Kona Powder and Particle Journal, 2015, 32(0): 236–252
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Roessler T, Katterfeld A. Scaling of the angle of repose test and its influence on the calibration of DEM parameters using upscaled particles. Powder Technology, 2018, 330: 58–66
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Combarros M, Feise H, Zetzener H, Kwade A. Segregation of particulate solids: experiments and DEM simulations. Particuology, 2014, 12: 25–32
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Yan Z, Wilkinson S, Stitt E, Marigo M. Discrete element modelling (DEM) input parameters: understanding their impact on model predictions using statistical analysis. Computational Particle Mechanics, 2015, 2(3): 283–299
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Alizadeh M, Asachi M, Ghadiri M, Bayly A, Hassanpour A. A methodology for calibration of DEM input parameters in simulation of segregation of powder mixtures, a special focus on adhesion. Powder Technology, 2018, 339: 789–800
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Wensrich C, Katterfeld A. Rolling friction as a technique for modelling particle shape in DEM. Powder Technology, 2012, 217: 409–417
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Simons T A, Weiler R, Strege S, Bensmann S, Schilling M, Kwade A. A ring shear tester as calibration experiment for DEM simulations in agitated mixers—a sensitivity study. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 102: 741–748
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Bednarek X, Martin S, Ndiaye A, Peres V, Bonnefoy O. Calibration of DEM parameters on shear test experiments using Kriging method. Powders and Grains 2017. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences, 2017, 15016
|
[14] |
Schulze D. Powders and Bulk Solids: Behavior, Characterization, Storage and Flow. 1st ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, 35–74
|
[15] |
Huang H, Tutumluer E. Discrete element modeling for fouled railroad ballast. Construction & Building Materials, 2011, 25(8): 3306–3312
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Rackl M, Hanley K J. A methodical calibration procedure for discrete element models. Powder Technology, 2017, 307: 73–83
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Figard S D. The basics of experimental design for multivariate analysis. In: SAS Global Forum. Buckinghamshire: SAS Institute Inc., 2009, 284
|
[18] |
Hanley K J, O’Sullivan C, Oliveira J C, Cronin K, Byrne E P. Application of Taguchi methods to DEM calibration of bonded agglomerates. Powder Technology, 2011, 210(3): 230–240
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Johnstone M, Ooi J. Calibration of DEM models using rotating drum and confined compression measurements. In: 6th World Congress on Particle Technology. Nuremberg, 2010
|
[20] |
Kloss C, Goniva C, Hager A, Amberger S, Pirker S. Models, algorithms and validation for opensource DEM and CFD-DEM. Progress in Computational Fluid Dynamics, an International Journal, 2012, 12(2-3): 140–152
|
[21] |
Chen X, Elliott J A. On the scaling law of JKR contact model for coarse-grained cohesive particles. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 227: 115906
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Johnson K, Kendall K, Roberts A. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. London: The Royal Society, 1971, 301–313
|
[23] |
Version J M P. 15. Buckinghamshire: SAS Institute Inc., 2019
|
[24] |
Ajmal M, Roessler T, Richter C, Katterfeld A. Calibration of cohesive DEM parameters under rapid flow conditions and low consolidation stresses. Powder Technology, 2020, 374: 22–32
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Pachón-Morales J, Do H, Colin J, Puel F, Perre P, Schott D. DEM modelling for flow of cohesive lignocellulosic biomass powders: model calibration using bulk tests. Advanced Powder Technology, 2019, 30(4): 732–750
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Bulk Solids Using Schulze Ring Shear Tester. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2016
|
[27] |
Proust M. Design of Experiments Guide. 1st ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2010, 298–300
|
[28] |
Box G E, Hunter W G, Hunter J S. Statistics for Experimenters. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978, 173–200
|
[29] |
Johnson P A, Savage H, Knuth M, Gomberg J, Marone C. Effects of acoustic waves on stick-slip in granular media and implications for earthquakes. Nature, 2008, 451(7174): 57–60
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Dorostkar O, Carmeliet J. Potential energy as metric for understanding stick-slip dynamics in sheared granular fault gouge: a coupled CFD-DEM study. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(10): 3281–3294
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Lieou C K, Daub E G, Guyer R A, Ecke R E, Marone C, Johnson P A. Simulating stick‐slip failure in a sheared granular layer using a physics‐based constitutive model. Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth, 2017, 122(1): 295–307
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Klaumünzer D N M. Stick-slip shear banding in metallic glasses. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Zurich: Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, 2012, 25–56
|
[33] |
Cabiscol R, Finke J, Zetzener H, Kwade A. Characterization of mechanical property distributions on tablet surfaces. Pharmaceutics, 2018, 10(4): 184
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Guo Y, Buettner K, Lane V, Wassgren C, Ketterhagen W, Hancock B, Curtis J. Computational and experimental studies of flexible fiber flows in a normal‐stress‐fixed shear cell. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2019, 65(1): 64–74
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Aigner A, Schneiderbauer S, Kloss C, Pirker S. Determining the coefficient of friction by shear tester simulation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Particle-Based Methods. Barcelona: CIMNE, 2013, 335–342
|
[36] |
Ketterhagen W R, Curtis J S, Wassgren C R, Hancock B C. Predicting the flow mode from hoppers using the discrete element method. Powder Technology, 2009, 195(1): 1–10
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |