Optimising the oil phases of aluminium hydrogel-stabilised emulsions for stable, safe and efficient vaccine adjuvant

Lili Yuan, Xiao-Dong Gao, Yufei Xia

PDF(6929 KB)
PDF(6929 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 973-984. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-021-2123-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Optimising the oil phases of aluminium hydrogel-stabilised emulsions for stable, safe and efficient vaccine adjuvant

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To increase antibody secretion and dose sparing, squalene-in-water aluminium hydrogel (alum)-stabilised emulsions (ASEs) have been developed, which offer increased surface areas and cellular interactions for higher antigen loading and enhanced immune responses. Nevertheless, the squalene (oil) in previous attempts suffered from limited oxidation resistance, thus, safety and stability were compromised. From a clinical translational perspective, it is imperative to screen the optimal oils for enhanced emulsion adjuvants. Here, because of the varying oleic to linoleic acid ratio, soybean oil, peanut oil, and olive oil were utilised as oil phases in the preparation of aluminium hydrogel-stabilised squalene-in-water emulsions, which were then screened for their stability and immunogenicity. Additionally, the underlying mechanisms of oil phases and emulsion stability were unravelled, which showed that a higher oleic to linoleic acid ratio increased anti-oxidative capabilities but reduced the long-term storage stability owing to the relatively low zeta potential of the prepared droplets. As a result, compared with squalene-in-water ASEs, soybean-in-water ASEs exhibited comparable immune responses and enhanced stability. By optimising the oil phase of the emulsion adjuvants, this work may offer an alternative strategy for safe, stable, and effective emulsion adjuvants.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

pickering emulsion / vaccine adjuvant / alum-stabilised emulsion / oleic to linoleic acid ratio / stability

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lili Yuan, Xiao-Dong Gao, Yufei Xia. Optimising the oil phases of aluminium hydrogel-stabilised emulsions for stable, safe and efficient vaccine adjuvant. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 973‒984 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-021-2123-1

References

[1]
Bosch F X, Robles C, Díaz M, Arbyn M, Baussano I, Clavel C, Ronco G, Dillner J, Lehtinen M, Petry K U, . HPV-Faster: broadening the scope for prevention of HPV-related cancer. Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology, 2016, 13(2): 119–132
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Zhao H, Zhou X Y, Zhou Y H. Hepatitis B vaccine development and implementation. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 2020, 16(7): 1533–1544
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Zeng Z, Cheng L, Chen X. Progress in research on polio vaccine. Chinese Journal of Biologicals, 2019, 32(6): 713–716, 720 (in Chinese)
[4]
Bellini C, Horvati K. Recent advances in the development of protein-and peptide-based subunit vaccines against tuberculosis. Cells, 2020, 9(12): 2673
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Cossette B, Kelly S H, Collier J H. Intranasal subunit vaccination strategies employing nanomaterials and biomaterials. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 2021, 7(5): 1765–1779
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Do Tien D, Kim H, Jeong J, Park K H, Yang S, Oh T, Kim S, Kang I, Chae C. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of commercial and prototype PRRS subunit vaccines against an HP-PRRSV challenge. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 2018, 80(9): 1463–1467
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Nevagi R J, Skwarczynski M, Toth I. Polymers for subunit vaccine delivery. European Polymer Journal, 2019, 114: 397–410
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Chao L, Xu L, Song G, Zhuang L. Emerging nanomedicine approaches fighting tumor metastasis: animal models, metastasis-targeted drug delivery, phototherapy, and immunotherapy. Chemical Society Reviews, 2016, 45(22): 6250–6269
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Dupuis M, Denis-Mize K, Labarbara A, Peters W, Charo I, Mcdonald D, Ott G. Immunization with the adjuvant MF59 induces macrophage trafficking and apoptosis. European Journal of Immunology, 2015, 31(10): 2910–2918
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Bui C, Bethmont A, Chughtai A, Gardner L, Sarkar S, Hassan S, Seale H, Macintyre C R. A systematic review of the comparative epidemiology of avian and human influenza A H5N1 and H7N9—essons and unanswered questions. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 2016, 63(6): 602–620
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Shah R R, Taccone M, Monaci E, Brito L A, Bonci A, O’Hagan D T, Amiji M M, Seubert A. The droplet size of emulsion adjuvants has significant impact on their potency, due to differences in immune cell-recruitment and-activation. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 11520
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Singh Y, Meher J G, Raval K, Khan F A, Chaurasia M, Jain N K, Chourasia M K. Nanoemulsion: concepts, development and applications in drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release, 2017, 252: 28–49
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Xia Y, Wu J, Du Y, Miao C, Ma G. Bridging systemic immunity with gastrointestinal immune responses via oil-in-polymer capsules. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(31): 1801067
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Peng S, Cao F, Xia Y, Gao X, Dai L, Yan J, Ma G. COVID-19 vaccines: particulate alum via Pickering emulsion for an enhanced COVID-19 vaccine adjuvant. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(40): e2004210
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Song T, Xia Y, Du Y, Chen M W, Qing H, Ma G. Engineering the deformability of albumin-stabilized emulsions for lymph-node vaccine delivery. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(26): e2100106
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Xia Y, Jie W, Wei W, Du Y, Tao W, Ma X, An W, Guo A, Miao C, Hua Y. Exploiting the pliability and lateral mobility of Pickering emulsion for enhanced vaccination. Nature Materials, 2018, 17(2): 187–194
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Shimizu N, Ito J, Kato S, Eitsuka T, Nakagawa K. Significance of squalene in rice bran oil and perspectives on aqualene oxidation. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, 2019, 65(Suppl.): S62–S66
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Larsson K, Istenic K, Wulff T, Jonsdottir R, Kristinsson H, Freysdottir J, Undeland I, Jamnik P. Effect of in vitro digested cod liver oil of different quality on oxidative, proteomic and inflammatory responses in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2015, 95(15): 3096–3106
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Castelli G, Bianco I D, Kiyomi Mizutamari R. Polyphenol content in argentinean commercial extra virgin olive oil. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 2018, 120(12): 1800124
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Li Q, Tang X, Lu S, Wu J. Composition and tocopherol, fatty acid, and phytosterol contents in micro-endosperm ultra-high oil corn. Grasas y Aceites, 2019, 70(3): e311
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Zhang T, Wang T, Liu R, Chang M, Jin Q, Wang X. Chemical characterization of fourteen kinds of novel edible oils: a comparative study using chemometrics. LWT, 2020, 118: 108725
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Combs R, Bilyeu K. Novel alleles of FAD2-1A induce high levels of oleic acid in soybean oil. Molecular Breeding, 2019, 39(6): 79–90
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Davis J P, Price K, Dean L L, Sweigart D S, Cottonaro J, Sanders T H. Peanut oil stability and physical properties across a range of industrially relevant oleic acid/linoleic acid ratios. Peanut Science, 2016, 43(1): PS14–17.1
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Gnoni A, Longo S, Damiano F, Gnoni G V, Giudetti A M. Oleic acid and olive oil polyphenols downregulate fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis in brain and liver cells. In: Olives and Olive Oil in Health and Disease Prevention. London: Elsevier, 2021, 651–657
[25]
Cooper J F, Weary C E, Jordan F T. The impact of non-endotoxin LAL-reactive materials on Limulus amebocyte lysate analyses. PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, 1997, 51(1): 2–6
[26]
Symoniuk E, Ratusz K, Krygier K. Oxidative stability and the chemical composition of market cold-pressed linseed oil. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 2017, 119(11): 1700055
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Siegler A J, Wiatrek S, Mouhanna F, Amico K R, Dominguez K, Jones J, Patel R R, Mena L A, Mayer K H. Validation of the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis stigma scale: performance of Likert and semantic differential scale versions. AIDS and Behavior, 2020, 24(9): 2637–2649
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Fan B, Fenton O, Daly K, Ding J, Chen Q, Chen Q. Alum split applications strengthened phosphorus fixation and phosphate sorption in high legacy phosphorus calcareous soil. Journal of Enviromental Sciences, 2021, 101: 87–97
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Tan H, Han L, Yang C. Effect of oil type and β-carotene incorporation on the properties of gelatin nanoparticle-stabilized pickering emulsions. LWT, 2021, 141: 110903
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Yao X X, Liu Z, Ma M Z, Chao Y C, Gao Y X, Kong T T. Control of particle adsorption for stability of Pickering emulsions in microfluidics. Small, 2018, 14(37): e1802902
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Ghimire T R, Benson R A, Garside P, Brewer J M. Alum increases antigen uptake, reduces antigen degradation and sustains antigen presentation by DCs in vitro. Immunology Letters, 2012, 147(1-2): 55–62
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Carrillo J, Izquierdo-Useros N, Vila-Nieto C, Pradenas E, Blanco J. Humoral immune responses and neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2: implications in pathogenesis and protective immunity. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2021, 538: 187–191
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Lin J Z, Xu R, Tian X H. Threshold dynamics of an HIV-1 model with both viral and cellular infections, cell-mediated and humoral immune responses. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(1): 292–319
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Jalkanen S, Salmi M. Lymphatic endothelial cells of the lymph node. Nature Reviews. Immunology, 2020, 20(9): 566–578
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Koksel Y, Gencturk M, Spano A, Reynolds M, Roshan S, Caycı Z. Utility of Likert scale (Deauville criteria) in assessment of chemoradiotherapy response of primary oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer site. Clinical Imaging, 2019, 55: 89–94
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Krzych L J, Lach M, Joniec M, Cisowski M, Bochenek A. The Likert scale is a powerful tool for quality of life assessment among patients after minimally invasive coronary surgery. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol, 2018, 15(2): 130–134
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Project supported by Beijing Nova Program of Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Grant No. Z201100006820139), the CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (YSBR-010), the Pilot Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB29040303), the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21821005), “From 0 to 1” Original Innovation Project of Basic Frontier Scientific Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 2020000071), Youth Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21908229), Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 2020000053).

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

All animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use. Committees at the Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences (approval ID: IPEAECA20210402). This study was performed in strict accordance with the Regulations for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and Guideline for Ethical Review of Animal (China, GB/T35892-2018). The authors modified all the techniques and procedures to provide for maximum comfort and minimal stress to the animals.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-021-2123-1 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(6929 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/