Membrane bioreactors for hospital wastewater treatment: recent advancements in membranes and processes

Yan Zhao, Yangbo Qiu, Natalie Mamrol, Longfei Ren, Xin Li, Jiahui Shao, Xing Yang, Bart van der Bruggen

PDF(2576 KB)
PDF(2576 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (5) : 634-660. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-021-2107-1
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

Membrane bioreactors for hospital wastewater treatment: recent advancements in membranes and processes

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Discharged hospital wastewater contains various pathogenic microorganisms, antibiotic groups, toxic organic compounds, radioactive elements, and ionic pollutants. These contaminants harm the environment and human health causing the spread of disease. Thus, effective treatment of hospital wastewater is an urgent task for sustainable development. Membranes, with controllable porous and nonporous structures, have been rapidly developed for molecular separations. In particular, membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology demonstrated high removal efficiency toward organic compounds and low waste sludge production. To further enhance the separation efficiency and achieve material recovery from hospital waste streams, novel concepts of MBRs and their applications are rapidly evolved through hybridizing novel membranes (non hydrophilic ultrafiltration/microfiltration) into the MBR units (hybrid MBRs) or the MBR as a pretreatment step and integrating other membrane processes as subsequent secondary purification step (integrated MBR-membrane systems). However, there is a lack of reviews on the latest advancement in MBR technologies for hospital wastewater treatment, and analysis on its major challenges and future trends. This review started with an overview of main pollutants in common hospital wastewater, followed by an understanding on the key performance indicators/criteria in MBR membranes (i.e., solute selectivity) and processes (e.g., fouling). Then, an in-depth analysis was provided into the recent development of hybrid MBR and integrated MBR-membrane system concepts, and applications correlated with wastewater sources, with a particular focus on hospital wastewaters. It is anticipated that this review will shed light on the knowledge gaps in the field, highlighting the potential contribution of hybrid MBRs and integrated MBR-membrane systems toward global epidemic prevention.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

membrane technology / membrane bioreactor / hospital wastewater / hybrid MBR / integrated MBR-membrane system

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan Zhao, Yangbo Qiu, Natalie Mamrol, Longfei Ren, Xin Li, Jiahui Shao, Xing Yang, Bart van der Bruggen. Membrane bioreactors for hospital wastewater treatment: recent advancements in membranes and processes. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 634‒660 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-021-2107-1

References

[1]
Wolfel R, Corman V M, Guggemos W, Seilmaier M, Zange S, Muller M A, Niemeyer D, Jones T C, Vollmar P, Rothe C, . Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature, 2020, 581(7809): 465–469
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen Y M, Wang W, Song Z G, Hu Y, Tao Z W, Tian J H, Pei Y Y, . A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature, 2020, 579(7798): 265–269
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Wu J T, Leung K, Bushman M, Kishore N, Niehus R, de Salazar P M, Cowling B J, Lipsitch M, Leung G M. Estimating clinical severity of COVID-19 from the transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China. Nature Medicine, 2020, 26(4): 506–510
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Qu G, Li X, Hu L, Jiang G. An imperative need for research on the role of environmental factors in transmission of novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(7): 3730–3732
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Liu Y, Gu P, Yang Y, Jia L, Zhang M, Zhang G. Removal of radioactive iodide from simulated liquid waste in an integrated precipitation reactor and membrane separator (PR-MS) system. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 171: 221–228
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Feng X, Zong Z, Elsaidi S K, Jasinski J B, Krishna R, Thallapally P K, Carreon M A. Kr/Xe separation over a chabazite zeolite membrane. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(31): 9791–9794
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Liu Y J, Lo S L, Liou Y H, Hu C Y. Removal of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) by electrocoagulation-flotation with a cationic surfactant. Separation and Purification Technology, 2015, 152: 148–154
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Xu Y, Li X, Zhu B, Liang H, Fang C, Gong Y, Guo Q, Sun X, Zhao D, Shen J, et al. Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding. Nature Medicine, 2020, 26(4): 502–505
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Luo Y, Feng L, Liu Y, Zhang L. Disinfection by-products formation and acute toxicity variation of hospital wastewater under different disinfection processes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 238: 116405
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Liu Q, Zhou Y, Chen L, Zheng X. Application of MBR for hospital wastewater treatment in China. Desalination, 2010, 250(2): 605–608
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Gautam A K, Kumar S, Sabumon P C. Preliminary study of physico-chemical treatment options for hospital wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 83(3): 298–306
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Watson K, Shaw G, Leusch F D, Knight N L. Chlorine disinfection by-products in wastewater effluent: bioassay-based assessment of toxicological impact. Water Research, 2012, 46(18): 6069–6083
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Chen W, Su Y, Peng J, Zhao X, Jiang Z, Dong Y, Zhang Y, Liang Y, Liu J. Efficient wastewater treatment by membranes through constructing tunable antifouling membrane surfaces. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(15): 6545–6552
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Zhao Y, Liu Y, Wang C, Ortega E, Wang X, Xie Y F, Shen J, Gao C, Van der Bruggen B. Electric field-based ionic control of selective separation layers. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2020, 8(8): 4244–4251
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Tang Y P, Luo L, Thong Z, Chung T S. Recent advances in membrane materials and technologies for boron removal. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 541: 434–446
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Nunes S P, Culfaz-Emecen P Z, Ramon G Z, Visser T, Koops G H, Jin W, Ulbricht M. Thinking the future of membranes: perspectives for advanced and new membrane materials and manufacturing processes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 598: 117761
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Li X, Mo Y, Qing W, Shao S, Tang C Y, Li J. Membrane-based technologies for lithium recovery from water lithium resources: a review. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 591: 117317
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Li P, Wang Z, Qiao Z, Liu Y, Cao X, Li W, Wang J, Wang S. Recent developments in membranes for efficient hydrogen purification. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 495: 130–168
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Uliana A A, Bui N T, Kamcev J, Taylor M K, Urban J J, Long J R. Ion-capture electrodialysis using multifunctional adsorptive membranes. Science, 2021, 372(6539): 296–299
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Chaudhry R M, Nelson K L, Drewes J E. Mechanisms of pathogenic virus removal in a full-scale membrane bioreactor. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(5): 2815–2822
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Bodzek M, Konieczny K, Rajca M. Membranes in water and wastewater disinfection—review. Archives of Environmental Protection, 2019, 45: 3–18
[22]
Vieira W T, de Farias M B, Spaolonzi M P, Carlos da Silva M G, Adeodato Vieira M G. Removal of endocrine disruptors in waters by adsorption, membrane filtration and biodegradation. A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2020, 18(4): 1113–1143
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Bradshaw J L, Ashoori N, Osorio M, Luthy R G. Modelingcost, energy, and total organic carbon trade-offs for stormwater spreading basin systems receiving recycled water produced using membrane-based, ozone-based, and hybrid advanced treatment trains. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(6): 3128–3139
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Carolin C F, Kumar P S, Joshiba G J, Kumar V V. Analysis and removal of pharmaceutical residues from wastewater using membrane bioreactors: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2021, 19(1): 329–343
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Yin X, Li J, Li X, Hua Z, Wang X, Ren Y. Self-generated electric field to suppress sludge production and fouling development in a membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Chemosphere, 2020, 261: 128046
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Hu Y, Cheng H, Ji J, Li Y Y. A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment with a focus on multicomponent biogas and membrane fouling control. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 2020, 6(10): 2641–2663
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Tiwari B, Sellamuthu B, Piche-Choquette S, Drogui P, Tyagi R D, Vaudreuil M A, Sauve S, Buelna G, Dube R. Acclimatization of microbial community of submerged membrane bioreactor treating hospital wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 319: 124223
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Taoufik N, Boumya W, Janani F Z, Elhalil A, Mahjoubi F Z, Barka N. Removal of emerging pharmaceutical pollutants: a systematic mapping study review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(5): 104251
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Qin L, Gao M, Zhang M, Feng L, Liu Q, Zhang G. Application of encapsulated algae into MBR for high-ammonia nitrogen wastewater treatment and biofouling control. Water Research, 2020, 187: 116430
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Xu Z, Song X, Xie M, Wang Y, Huda N, Li G, Luo W. Effects of surfactant addition to draw solution on the performance of osmotic membrane bioreactor. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 618: 118634
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Wang S, Chew J W, Liu Y. Development of an integrated aerobic granular sludge MBR and reverse osmosis process for municipal wastewater reclamation. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 748: 141309
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Song W, Xu D, Bi X, Ng H Y, Shi X. Intertidal wetland sediment as a novel inoculation source for developing aerobic granular sludge in membrane bioreactor treating high-salinity antibiotic manufacturing wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 314: 123715
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Pervez M N, Balakrishnan M, Hasan S W, Choo K H, Zhao Y, Cai Y, Zarra T, Belgiorno V, Naddeo V. A critical review on nanomaterials membrane bioreactor (NMs-MBR) for wastewater treatment. npj Clean Water, 2020, 3: 43
[34]
Verlicchi P, Galletti A, Petrovic M, Barceló D. Hospital effluents as a source of emerging pollutants: an overview of micropollutants and sustainable treatment options. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 389(3-4): 416–428
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Wiedenheft B, Sternberg S H, Doudna J A. RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature, 2012, 482(7385): 331–338
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Paez-Espino D, Eloe-Fadrosh E A, Pavlopoulos G A, Thomas A D, Huntemann M, Mikhailova N, Rubin E, Ivanova N N, Kyrpides N C. Uncovering Earth’s virome. Nature, 2016, 536(7617): 425–430
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Schulz F, Roux S, Paez-Espino D, Jungbluth S, Walsh D A, Denef V J, McMahon K D, Konstantinidis K T, Eloe-Fadrosh E A, Kyrpides N C, . Giant virus diversity and host interactions through global metagenomics. Nature, 2020, 578(7795): 432–436
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Casanova L, Rutala W A, Weber D J, Sobsey M D. Survival of surrogate coronaviruses in water. Water Research, 2009, 43(7): 1893–1898
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Carraro E, Bonetta S, Bertino C, Lorenzi E, Bonetta S, Gilli G. Hospital effluents management: chemical, physical, microbiological risks and legislation in different countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 168: 185–199
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Hai F, Riley T, Shawkat S, Magram S, Yamamoto K. Removal of pathogens by membrane bioreactors: a review of the mechanisms, influencing factors and reduction in chemical disinfectant dosing. Water, 2014, 6(12): 3603–3630
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Yates M V. Adenovirus. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 471–477
[42]
Elmahdy E M, Ahmed N I, Shaheen M N F, Mohamed E C B, Loutfy S A. Molecular detection of human adenovirus in urban wastewater in Egypt and among children suffering from acute gastroenteritis. Journal of Water and Health, 2019, 17(2): 287–294
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Yates M V. Astroviruses. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 479–491
[44]
He X Q, Cheng L, Zhang D Y, Xie X M, Wang D H, Wang Z. One-year monthly survey of rotavirus, astrovirus and norovirus in three sewage treatment plants in Beijing, China and associated health risk assessment. Water Science and Technology, 2011, 63(1): 191–198
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Wathore R, Gupta A, Bherwani H, Labhasetwar N. Understanding air and water borne transmission and survival of coronavirus: insights and way forward for SARS-CoV-2. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 749: 141486
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Kataki S, Chatterjee S, Vairale M G, Sharma S, Dwivedi S K. Concerns and strategies for wastewater treatment during COVID-19 pandemic to stop plausible transmission. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 164: 105156
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Yates M V. Enterovirus. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 493–504
[48]
La Rosa G, Pourshaban M, Iaconelli M, Muscillo M. Quantitative real-time PCR of enteric viruses in influent and effluent samples from wastewater treatment plants in Italy. Environmental Issues of Health Concern, 2010, 46: 266–273
[49]
Yates M V. Hepatitis A Virus (HAV). In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 505–513
[50]
Yates M V. Norovirus. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 515–522
[51]
Okoh A I, Sibanda T, Gusha S S. Inadequately treated wastewater as a source of human enteric viruses in the environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2010, 7(6): 2620–2637
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Yates M V. Emerging Viruses. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 529–533
[53]
Ibrahim C, Hammami S, Chérif N, Mejri S, Pothier P, Hassen A. Detection of sapoviruses in two biological lines of Tunisian hospital wastewater treatment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 29(4): 400–413
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Chalmers R M. Cryptosporidium. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 287–326
[55]
Jiang W, Roellig D M, Li N, Wang L, Guo Y, Feng Y, Xiao L. Contribution of hospitals to the occurrence of enteric protists in urban wastewater. Parasitology Research, 2020, 119(9): 3033–3040
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Chalmers R M. Entamoeba histolytica. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 355–373
[57]
Berglund B, Dienus O, Sokolova E, Berglind E, Matussek A, Pettersson T, Lindgren P E. Occurrence and removal efficiency of parasitic protozoa in Swedish wastewater treatment plants. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 598: 821–827
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Robertson L J. Giardia duodenalis. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 375–405
[59]
Percival S L, Williams D W. Campylobacter. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 65–78
[60]
Rinsoz T, Hilfiker S, Oppliger A. Quantification of thermotolerant campylobacter in Swiss water treatment plants, by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Water Environment Research, 2009, 81(9): 929–933
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Percival S L, Williams D W. Escherichia coli. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2014, 89–117
[62]
Kristanto G A, Koven W. Preliminary study of antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in hospital wastewater treatment plants in Indonesia. International Journal of Technology, 2019, 10(4): 765
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Percival S L, Williams D W. Legionella. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 155–175
[64]
Huang S W, Hsu B M, Ma P H, Chien K T. Legionella prevalence in wastewater treatment plants of Taiwan. Water Science and Technology, 2009, 60(5): 1303–1310
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Nuñez L, Moretton J. Disinfectant-resistant bacteria in Buenos Aires city hospital wastewater. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2007, 38(4): 644–648
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Percival S L, Williams D W. Salmonella. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 209–222
[67]
Fekadu S, Merid Y, Beyene H, Teshome W, Gebre-Selassie S. Assessment of antibiotic- and disinfectant-resistant bacteria in hospital wastewater, south Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 2015, 9(02): 149–156
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Tsai C T, Lai J S, Lin S T. Quantification of pathogenic micro-organisms in the sludge from treated hospital wastewater. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 1998, 85(1): 171–176
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Percival S L, Williams D W. Shigella. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 223–236
[70]
Percival S L, Williams D W. Vibrio. In: Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, 237–248
[71]
Nongogo V, Okoh A. Occurrence of vibrio pathotypes in the final effluents of five waste water treatment plants in Amathole and Chris Hani District Municipalities in South Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2014, 11(8): 7755–7766
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Leekha S, Terrell C L, Edson R S. General principles of antimicrobial therapy. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2011, 86(2): 156–167
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Singer A C, Jarhult J D, Grabic R, Khan G A, Lindberg R H, Fedorova G, Fick J, Bowes M J, Olsen B, Soderstrom H. Intra- and inter-pandemic variations of antiviral, antibiotics and decongestants in wastewater treatment plants and receiving rivers. PLoS One, 2014, 9(9): 108621
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Senta I, Kostanjevecki P, Krizman-Matasic I, Terzic S, Ahel M. Occurrence and behavior of macrolide antibiotics in municipal wastewater treatment: possible importance of metabolites, synthesis byproducts, and transformation products. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(13): 7463–7472
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Zhang H C, Zhang M Q, Yuan L, Zhang X, Sheng G P. Synergistic effect of permanganate and in situ synthesized hydrated manganese oxide for removing antibiotic resistance genes from wastewater treatment plant effluent. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(22): 13374–13381
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Nannou C, Ofrydopoulou A, Evgenidou E, David H, Heath E, Lambropoulou D. Antiviral drugs in aquatic environment and wastewater treatment plants: a review on occurrence, fate, removal and ecotoxicity. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 699: 134322
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Frederic O, Yves P. Pharmaceuticals in hospital wastewater: their ecotoxicity and contribution to the environmental hazard of the effluent. Chemosphere, 2014, 115: 31–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Prasse C, Schlusener M P, Ralf S, Ternes T A. Antiviral drugs in wastewater and surface waters: a new pharmaceutical class of environmental relevance? Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(5): 1728–1735
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Accinelli C, Sacca M L, Batisson I, Fick J, Mencarelli M, Grabic R. Removal of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and other selected pharmaceuticals from wastewater using a granular bioplastic formulation entrapping propagules of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Chemosphere, 2010, 81(3): 436–443
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Slater F R, Singer A C, Turner S, Barr J J, Bond P L. Pandemic pharmaceutical dosing effects on wastewater treatment: no adaptation of activated sludge bacteria to degrade the antiviral drug oseltamivir (Tamiflu(R)) and loss of nutrient removal performance. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2011, 315(1): 17–22
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Fugere V, Hebert M P, da Costa N B, Xu C C Y, Barrett R D H, Beisner B E, Bell G, Fussmann G F, Shapiro B J, Yargeau V, Gonzalez A. Community rescue in experimental phytoplankton communities facing severe herbicide pollution. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 4(4): 578–588
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Berendonk T U, Manaia C M, Merlin C, Fatta-Kassinos D, Cytryn E, Walsh F, Burgmann H, Sorum H, Norstrom M, Pons M N, . Tackling antibiotic resistance: the environmental framework. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 2015, 13(5): 310–317
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Chamorro S, Marti E, Huerta B, Gros M, Sànchez-Melsió A, Borrego C M, Barceló D, Balcázar J L. Occurrence of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in hospital and urban wastewaters and their impact on the receiving river. Water Research, 2015, 69: 234–242
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Wang Y, Wang X, Li M, Dong J, Sun C, Chen G. Removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) from municipal waste water with integrated membrane systems, MBR-RO/NF. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(2): 269
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Lien L, Hoa N, Chuc N, Thoa N, Phuc H, Diwan V, Dat N, Tamhankar A, Lundborg C. Antibiotics in wastewater of a rural and an urban hospital before and after wastewater treatment, and the relationship with antibiotic use-A one year study from Vietnam. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016, 13(6): 588
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Kümmerer K. Drugs in the environment: emission of drugs, diagnostic aids and disinfectants into wastewater by hospitals in relation to other sources: a review. Chemosphere, 2001, 45(6-7): 957–969
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Kovalova L, Siegrist H, Singer H, Wittmer A, Mcardell C S. Hospital wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor: performance and efficiency for organic micropollutant elimination. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(3): 1536–1545
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Moradali M F, Rehm B H A. Bacterial biopolymers: from pathogenesis to advanced materials. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 2020, 18(4): 195–210
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Reurink D M, Te Brinke E, Achterhuis I, Roesink H D W, de Vos W M. Nafion-based low-hydration polyelectrolyte multilayer membranes for enhanced water purification. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2019, 1(9): 2543–2551
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Amaral-Zettler L A, Zettler E R, Mincer T J. Ecology of the plastisphere. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 2020, 18(3): 139–151
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Barry M C, Hristovski K, Westerhoff P. Membrane fouling by vesicles and prevention through ozonation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(13): 7349–7356
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Wang L, Li Y, Ben W, Hu J, Cui Z, Qu K, Qiang Z. In-situ sludge ozone-reduction process for effective removal of fluoroquinolone antibiotics in wastewater treatment plants. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 213: 419–425
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Loeb S K, Alvarez P J J, Brame J A, Cates E L, Choi W, Crittenden J, Dionysiou D D, Li Q, Li-Puma G, Quan X, et al. The Technology horizon for photocatalytic water treatment: sunrise or sunset? Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(6): 2937–2947
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Lienert J, Koller M, Konrad J, McArdell C S, Schuwirth N. Multiple-criteria decision analysis reveals high stakeholder preference to remove pharmaceuticals from hospital wastewater. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(9): 3848–3857
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Kosma C I, Lambropoulou D A, Albanis T A. Occurrence and removal of PPCPs in municipal and hospital wastewaters in Greece. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 179(1-3): 804–817
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Gurung K, Ncibi M C, Thangaraj S K, Jänis J, Seyedsalehi M, Sillanpää M. Removal of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) from real membrane bioreactor (MBR) effluents by photocatalytic degradation using composite Ag2O/P-25 photocatalyst. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 215: 317–328
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Dong X, Ge Q. Metal ion-bridged forward osmosis membranes for efficient pharmaceutical wastewater reclamation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(40): 37163–37171
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Kramer M, Scifoni E, Schuy C, Rovituso M, Tinganelli W, Maier A, Kaderka R, Kraft-Weyrather W, Brons S, Tessonnier T, et al. Helium ions for radiotherapy? Physical and biological verifications of a novel treatment modality. Medical Physics, 2016, 43(4): 1995–2004
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Soyekwo F, Liu C, Zhao L, Wen H, Huang W, Cai C, Kanagaraj P, Hu Y. Nanofiltration membranes with metal cation-immobilized aminophosphonate networks for efficient heavy metal ion removal and organic dye degradation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2019, 11(33): 30317–30331
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Sepehr M N, Nasseri S, Zarrabi M, Samarghandi M R, Amrane A. Removal of Cr(III) from tanning effluent by Aspergillus niger in airlift bioreactor. Separation and Purification Technology, 2012, 96: 256–262
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Saitoh T, Shibata K, Fujimori K, Ohtani Y. Rapid removal of tetracycline antibiotics from water by coagulation-flotation of sodium dodecyl sulfate and poly(allylamine hydrochloride) in the presence of Al(III) ions. Separation and Purification Technology, 2017, 187: 76–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Zhao Y, Zhou C, Wang J, Liu H, Xu Y, Seo J W, Shen J, Gao C, Van der Bruggen B. Formation of morphologically confined nanospaces via self-assembly of graphene and nanospheres for selective separation of lithium. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2018, 6(39): 18859–18864
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Zhao Y, Qiu Y, Mai Z, Ortega E, Shen J, Gao C, van der Bruggen B. Symmetrically recombined nanofibers in a high-selectivity membrane for cation separation in high temperature and organic solvent. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2019, 7(34): 20006–20012
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Zhao Y, Tang K, Liu H, van der Bruggen B, Sotto Díaz A, Shen J, Gao C. An anion exchange membrane modified by alternate electro-deposition layers with enhanced monovalent selectivity. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 520: 262–271
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Helmi A, Gallucci F. Latest developments in membrane (bio)reactors. Processes (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, 8(10): 1239
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Gunder B, Krauth K. Replacement of secondary clarification by membrane separation-results with plate and hollow fibre modules. Water Science and Technology, 1998, 40(4-5): 311–320
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Lv W, Xiang Z, Min Y, Yu Z, Ying L, Liu J. Virus removal performance and mechanism of a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochemistry, 2006, 41(2): 299–304
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Stuckey D C. Recent developments in anaerobic membrane reactors. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 122: 137–148
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Ahmad A L, Abdulkarim A A, Ooi B S, Ismail S. Recent development in additives modifications of polyethersulfone membrane for flux enhancement. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 223: 246–267
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
Meng F, Chae S R, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin H S, Yang F. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Research, 2009, 43(6): 1489–1512
CrossRef Google scholar
[111]
Samaei S M, Gato-Trinidad S, Ali A. The application of pressure-driven ceramic membrane technology for the treatment of industrial wastewaters: a review. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 200: 198–220
CrossRef Google scholar
[112]
Mbaab C, Zzab C. Ceramic membrane technology for water and wastewater treatment: a critical review of performance, full-scale applications, membrane fouling and prospects. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 418: 129418
[113]
Zhang S, Qu Y, Liu Y, Yang F, Yamada Y. Experimental study of domestic sewage treatment with a metal membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 2005, 177(1-3): 83–93
CrossRef Google scholar
[114]
Xie Y H, Zhu T, Xu C H, Nozaki T, Furukawa K. Treatment of domestic sewage by a metal membrane bioreactor. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 65(6): 1102–1108
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
Dumée L, Li H, Bao L, Ailloux F M, Kong L. The fabrication and surface functionalization of porous metal frameworks—a review. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2013, 1(48): 15185
CrossRef Google scholar
[116]
Dlamini D S, Li J, Mamba B B. Critical review of montmorillonite/polymer mixed-matrix filtration membranes: possibilities and challenges. Applied Clay Science, 2019, 168: 21–30
CrossRef Google scholar
[117]
Bilad M R, Marbelia L, Laine C, Vankelecom I. A PVC-silica mixed-matrix membrane (MMM) as novel type of membrane bioreactor (MBR) membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 493: 19–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[118]
Mathioudakis V L, Soares A, Briers H, Martin-Garcia I, Jefferson B. Treatment and energy efficiency of a granular sludge anaerobic membrane reactor handling domestic sewage. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 44: 1977–1979
CrossRef Google scholar
[119]
Lin H J, Xie K, Mahendran B, Ba Gley D M, Leung K T, Liss S N, Liao B Q. Sludge properties and their effects on membrane fouling in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (SAnMBRs). Water Research, 2009, 43(15): 3827–3837
CrossRef Google scholar
[120]
Lin H, Chen J, Wang F, Ding L, Hong H. Feasibility evaluation of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal secondary wastewater treatment. Desalination, 2011, 280(1-3): 120–126
CrossRef Google scholar
[121]
Chen R, Nie Y, Kato H, Wu J, Utashiro T, Lu J, Yue S, Jiang H, Zhang L, Li Y Y. Methanogenic degradation of toilet-paper cellulose upon sewage treatment in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor at room temperature. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 228: 69–76
CrossRef Google scholar
[122]
Nie Y, Kato H, Sugo T, Hojo T, Tian X, Li Y Y. Effect of anionic surfactant inhibition on sewage treatment by a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor: efficiency, sludge activity and methane recovery. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 315: 83–91
CrossRef Google scholar
[123]
Hui C, Yutaka H, Toshimasa H, Li Y Y. Upgrading methane fermentation of food waste by using a hollow fiber type anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 267: 386–394
CrossRef Google scholar
[124]
Trzcinski A P, Stuckey D C. Continuous treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste in an anaerobic two-stage membrane process with liquid recycle. Water Research, 2009, 43(9): 2449–2462
CrossRef Google scholar
[125]
Akram A, Stuckey D C. Flux and performance improvement in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) using powdered activated carbon (PAC). Process Biochemistry, 2008, 43(1): 93–102
CrossRef Google scholar
[126]
Nie Y, Chen R, Tian X, Li Y Y. Impact of water characteristics on the bioenergy recovery from sewage treatment by anaerobic membrane bioreactor via a comprehensive study on the response of microbial community and methanogenic activity. Energy, 2017, 139(15): 459–467
CrossRef Google scholar
[127]
Jang D, Hwang Y, Shin H, Lee W. Effects of salinity on the characteristics of biomass and membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 141: 50–56
CrossRef Google scholar
[128]
Tan S, Cui C, Chen X, Li W. Effect of bioflocculation on fouling-related biofoulants in a membrane bioreactor during saline wastewater treatments. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 224: 285–291
CrossRef Google scholar
[129]
Biesheuvel P M, Verweij H. Design of ceramic membrane supports: permeability, tensile strength and stress. Journal of Membrane Science, 1999, 156(1): 141–152
CrossRef Google scholar
[130]
Sownya S A, Madhu G M, Raizada A, Madhusoodana C D. Studies on effective treatment of waste water using submerged ceramic membrane bioreactor. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, 24: 1251–1262
CrossRef Google scholar
[131]
Trouve E, Urbain V, Manem J. Treatment of municipal wastewater by a membrane bioreactor: results of a semi-industrial pilot-scale study. Water Science and Technology, 1994, 30(4): 151–157
CrossRef Google scholar
[132]
Zhang S, Yang F, Liu Y, Zhang X, Yamada Y, Furukawa K. Performance of a metallic membrane bioreactor treating simulated distillery wastewater at temperatures of 30 to 45 °C. Desalination, 2006, 194(1-3): 146–155
CrossRef Google scholar
[133]
Reif R, Besancon A, Le Corre K, Jefferson B, Lema J M, Omil F.Comparison of PPCPs removal on a parallel-operated MBR and AS system and evaluation of effluent post-treatment on vertical flow reed beds. Water ence & Technology, 2011, 63: 2411–2417
[134]
Wang J, Wang S. Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) from wastewater: a review. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 182: 620–640
CrossRef Google scholar
[135]
Ng A, Kim A S. A mini-review of modeling studies on membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment for municipal wastewaters. Desalination, 2007, 212(1-3): 261–281
CrossRef Google scholar
[136]
Yurtsever A, Sahinkaya E, Akta Z, Uar D, Wang Z. Performances of anaerobic and aerobic membrane bioreactors for the treatment of synthetic textile wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 192: 564–573
CrossRef Google scholar
[137]
Smith A L, Stadler L B, Cao L, Love N G, Raskin L, Skerlos S J. Navigating wastewater energy recovery strategies: a life cycle comparison of anaerobic membrane bioreactor and conventional treatment systems with anaerobic digestion. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(10): 5972–5981
CrossRef Google scholar
[138]
Liu W, Song X, Huda N, Xie M, Li G, Luo W. Comparison between aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for trace organic contaminant removal in wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2020, 17: 100564
CrossRef Google scholar
[139]
Monteoliva-Garcia A, Martin-Pascual J, Munio M M, Poyatos J M. Effects of carrier addition on water quality and pharmaceutical removal capacity of a membrane bioreactor—advanced oxidation process combined treatment. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 708: 135104
CrossRef Google scholar
[140]
Xiao K, Liang S, Wang X, Chen C, Huang X. Current state and challenges of full-scale membrane bioreactor applications: a critical review. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 271: 473–481
CrossRef Google scholar
[141]
Blandin G, Gautier C, Sauchelli Toran M, Monclús H, Rodriguez-Roda I, Comas J. Retrofitting membrane bioreactor (MBR) into osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR): a pilot scale study. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 339: 268–277
CrossRef Google scholar
[142]
Li X, Liu Y, Wang J, Gascon J, Li J, van der Bruggen B. Metal-organic frameworks based membranes for liquid separation. Chemical Society Reviews, 2017, 46(23): 7124–7144
CrossRef Google scholar
[143]
Chen X, Selloni A. Introduction: titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanomaterials. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(19): 9281–9282
CrossRef Google scholar
[144]
Tiwari J N, Tiwari R N, Kim K S. Zero-dimensional, one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional nanostructured materials for advanced electrochemical energy devices. Progress in Materials Science, 2012, 57(4): 724–803
CrossRef Google scholar
[145]
Sutisna B, Musteata V, Pulido B, Puspasari T, Smilgies D M, Hadjichristidis N, Nunes S P. High flux membranes, based on self-assembled and H-bond linked triblock copolymer nanospheres. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 585: 10–18
CrossRef Google scholar
[146]
Yan W, Shi M, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Liu L, Zhao S, Ji Y, Wang J, Gao C. Amino-modified hollow mesoporous silica nanospheres-incorporated reverse osmosis membrane with high performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 581: 168–177
CrossRef Google scholar
[147]
Zou D, Chen X, Drioli E, Ke X, Qiu M, Fan Y. Facile co-sintering process to fabricate sustainable antifouling silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)-enhanced tight ceramic ultrafiltration membranes for protein separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 593: 117402
CrossRef Google scholar
[148]
Hinds B J, Chopra N, Rantell T, Andrews R, Gavalas V, Bachas L G. Aligned multiwalled carbon nanotube membranes. Science, 2004, 303(5654): 62–65
CrossRef Google scholar
[149]
Sholl D S, Johnson J K. Making high-flux membranes with carbon nanotubes. Science, 2006, 312(5776): 1003–1004
CrossRef Google scholar
[150]
Zhao X, Cheng L, Wang R, Jia N, Liu L, Gao C. Bioinspired synthesis of polyzwitterion/titania functionalized carbon nanotube membrane with superwetting property for efficient oil-in-water emulsion separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 589: 117257
CrossRef Google scholar
[151]
Li J, Li X, van der Bruggen B. An MXene-based membrane for molecular separation. Environmental Science. Nano, 2020, 7(5): 1289–1304
CrossRef Google scholar
[152]
Zhao Y, Wu M, Guo Y, Mamrol N, Yang X, Gao C, van der Bruggen B. Metal-organic framework based membranes for selective separation of target ions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 634: 119407
CrossRef Google scholar
[153]
Yang H, Yang L, Wang H, Xu Z, Zhao Y, Luo Y, Nasir N, Song Y, Wu H, Pan F, Jiang Z. Covalent organic framework membranes through a mixed-dimensional assembly for molecular separations. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 2101
CrossRef Google scholar
[154]
Gao Z F, Feng Y, Ma D, Chung T S. Vapor-phase crosslinked mixed matrix membranes with UiO-66-NH2 for organic solvent nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 574: 124–135
CrossRef Google scholar
[155]
Gao Z F, Naderi A, Wei W, Chung T S. Selection of crosslinkers and control of microstructure of vapor-phase crosslinked composite membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 616: 118582
CrossRef Google scholar
[156]
Lee T H, Oh J Y, Hong S P, Lee J M, Roh S M, Kim S H, Park H B. ZIF-8 particle size effects on reverse osmosis performance of polyamide thin-film nanocomposite membranes: importance of particle deposition. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 570–571: 23–33
CrossRef Google scholar
[157]
Zhao D L, Zhao Q, Chung T S. Fabrication of defect-free thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes for reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination, 2021, 516: 115230
CrossRef Google scholar
[158]
Zhang Z, Li P, Kong X Y, Xie G, Qian Y, Wang Z, Tian Y, Wen L, Jiang L. Bioinspired heterogeneous ion pump membranes: unidirectional selective pumping and controllable gating properties stemming from asymmetric ionic group distribution. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140(3): 1083–1090
CrossRef Google scholar
[159]
Yan S, Luan S, Shi H, Xu X, Zhang J, Yuan S, Yang Y, Yin J. Hierarchical polymer brushes with dominant antibacterial mechanisms switching from bactericidal to bacteria repellent. Biomacromolecules, 2016, 17(5): 1696–1704
CrossRef Google scholar
[160]
Shahid M K, Choi Y G. The comparative study for scale inhibition on surface of RO membranes in wastewater reclamation: CO2 purging versus three different antiscalants. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 546: 61–69
CrossRef Google scholar
[161]
Wang Z, Wu Z, Yin X, Tian L. Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) under sub-critical flux operation: membrane foulant and gel layer characterization. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 325(1): 238–244
CrossRef Google scholar
[162]
Mikhaylin S, Bazinet L. Fouling on ion-exchange membranes: classification, characterization and strategies of prevention and control. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2016, 229: 34–56
CrossRef Google scholar
[163]
Firouzjaei M D, Seyedpour S F, Aktij S A, Giagnorio M, Bazrafshan N, Mollahosseini A, Samadi F, Ahmadalipour S, Firouzjaei F D, Esfahani M R, . Recent advances in functionalized polymer membranes for biofouling control and mitigation in forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 596: 117604
CrossRef Google scholar
[164]
Malaeb L, Le-Clech P, Vrouwenvelder J S, Ayoub G M, Saikaly P E. Do biological-based strategies hold promise to biofouling control in MBRs? Water Research, 2013, 47(15): 5447–5463
CrossRef Google scholar
[165]
Bogler A, Lin S, Bar-Zeev E. Biofouling of membrane distillation, forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis: principles, impacts and future directions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 542: 378–398
CrossRef Google scholar
[166]
Sánchez O. Microbial diversity in biofilms from reverse osmosis membranes: a short review. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 545: 240–249
CrossRef Google scholar
[167]
Bar-Zeev E, Passow U, Castrillon S R, Elimelech M. Transparent exopolymer particles: from aquatic environments and engineered systems to membrane biofouling. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(2): 691–707
CrossRef Google scholar
[168]
Oh H S, Lee C H. Origin and evolution of quorum quenching technology for biofouling control in MBRs for wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 554: 331–345
CrossRef Google scholar
[169]
Ridgway H F, Orbell J, Gray S. Molecular simulations of polyamide membrane materials used in desalination and water reuse applications: recent developments and future prospects. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 524: 436–448
CrossRef Google scholar
[170]
Kochkodan V, Johnson D J, Hilal N. Polymeric membranes: surface modification for minimizing (bio)colloidal fouling. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2014, 206: 116–140
CrossRef Google scholar
[171]
Dickhout J M, Moreno J, Biesheuvel P M, Boels L, Lammertink R G H, de Vos W M. Produced water treatment by membranes: a review from a colloidal perspective. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2017, 487: 523–534
CrossRef Google scholar
[172]
Al Mamun M A, Sadrzadeh M, Chatterjee R, Bhattacharjee S, De S. Colloidal fouling of nanofiltration membranes: a novel transient electrokinetic model and experimental study. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 138: 153–163
CrossRef Google scholar
[173]
Dersoir B, Schofield A B, de Saint Vincent M R, Tabuteau H. Dynamics of pore fouling by colloidal particles at the particle level. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 573: 411–424
CrossRef Google scholar
[174]
Lohaus J, Perez Y M, Wessling M. What are the microscopic events of colloidal membrane fouling? Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 553: 90–98
CrossRef Google scholar
[175]
Haddad M, Bazinet L, Savadogo O, Paris J. Electrochemical acidification of Kraft black liquor: impacts of pulsed electric field application on bipolar membrane colloidal fouling and process intensification. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 524: 482–492
CrossRef Google scholar
[176]
Lin Y L. Effects of organic, biological and colloidal fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 542: 342–351
CrossRef Google scholar
[177]
Mi B, Elimelech M. Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 348(1-2): 337–345
CrossRef Google scholar
[178]
Wang X M, Waite T D. Role of gelling soluble and colloidal microbial products in membrane fouling. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(24): 9341–9347
CrossRef Google scholar
[179]
Wang Q, Wang Z, Wu Z, Ma J, Jiang Z. Insights into membrane fouling of submerged membrane bioreactors by characterizing different fouling layers formed on membrane surfaces. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 179: 169–177
CrossRef Google scholar
[180]
Zhao Y, Liu H, Tang K, Jin Y, Pan J, Van der Bruggen B, Shen J, Gao C. Mimicking the cell membrane: bio-inspired simultaneous functions with monovalent anion selectivity and antifouling properties of anion exchange membrane. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 37285
CrossRef Google scholar
[181]
Amy G. Fundamental understanding of organic matter fouling of membranes. Desalination, 2008, 231(1-3): 44–51
CrossRef Google scholar
[182]
Tong T, Wallace A F, Zhao S, Wang Z. Mineral scaling in membrane desalination: mechanisms, mitigation strategies, and feasibility of scaling-resistant membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 579: 52–69
CrossRef Google scholar
[183]
Zhao Y, Yao M, Shen P, Uytterhoeven C, Marmrol N, Shen J, Gao C, Van der Bruggen B. Composite anti-scaling membrane made of interpenetrating networks of nanofibers for selective separation of lithium. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 618: 118668
CrossRef Google scholar
[184]
Tinggang L I, Liu J, Bai R, Wong F S. Membrane-aerated biofilm reactor for the treatment of acetonitrile wastewater. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(6): 2099–2104
CrossRef Google scholar
[185]
Tian H, Hu Y, Xu X, Hui M, Li B. Enhanced wastewater treatment with high o-aminophenol concentration by two-stage MABR and its biodegradation mechanism. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 289: 121649
CrossRef Google scholar
[186]
Tian H, Xu X, Qu J, Li H, Hu Y, Huang L, He W, Li B. Biodegradation of phenolic compounds in high saline wastewater by biofilms adhering on aerated membranes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 392: 122463
CrossRef Google scholar
[187]
Livingston A G. Extractive membrane bioreactors: a new process technology for detoxifying chemical industry wastewaters. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 1994, 60(2): 117–124
CrossRef Google scholar
[188]
Yeo B J, Goh S, Livingston A G, Fane A G. Controlling biofilm development in the extractive membrane bioreactor. Separation and Purification Technology, 2017, 52: 113–121
[189]
Skouteris G, Saroj D, Melidis P, Hai F I, Ouki S. The effect of activated carbon addition on membrane bioreactor processes for wastewater treatment and reclamation—A critical review. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 185: 399–410
CrossRef Google scholar
[190]
Yeo B J, Goh S, Zhang J, Livingston A G, Fane A G. Novel MBRs for the removal of organic priority pollutants from industrial wastewaters: a review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2015, 90(11): 1949–1967
CrossRef Google scholar
[191]
Busca G, Berardinelli S, Resini C, Arrighi L. Technologies for the removal of phenol from fluid streams: a short review of recent developments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 160(2-3): 265–288
CrossRef Google scholar
[192]
Livingston A G, Arcangeli J P, Boam A T, Zhang S, Marangon M, Santos L M F D. Extractive membrane bioreactors for detoxification of chemical industry wastes: process development. Journal of Membrane Science, 1998, 151(1): 29–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[193]
Livingston A G. A novel membrane bioreactor for detoxifying industrial wastewater: I. Biodegradation of phenol in a synthetically concocted wastewater. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1993, 41(10): 915–926
CrossRef Google scholar
[194]
Xiao M, Zhou J, Tan Y, Zhang A, Xia Y, Ji L. Treatment of highly-concentrated phenol wastewater with an extractive membrane reactor using silicone rubber. Desalination, 2006, 195(1-3): 281–293
CrossRef Google scholar
[195]
Ren L F, Adeel M, Li J, Xu C, Xu Z, Zhang X, Shao J, He Y. Phenol separation from phenol-laden saline wastewater by membrane aromatic recovery system-like membrane contactor using superhydrophobic/organophilic electrospun PDMS/PMMA membrane. Water Research, 2018, 135: 31–43
CrossRef Google scholar
[196]
Ren L F, Ngo H H, Bu C, Ge C, Ni S Q, Shao J, He Y. Novel external extractive membrane bioreactor (EMBR) using electrospun polydimethylsiloxane/polymethyl methacrylate membrane for phenol-laden saline wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 383: 123179
CrossRef Google scholar
[197]
Liao Y, Goh S, Tian M, Wang R, Fane A G. Design, development and evaluation of nanofibrous composite membranes with opposing membrane wetting properties for extractive membrane bioreactors. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 551: 55–65
CrossRef Google scholar
[198]
Jin M Y, Liao Y, Loh C H, Tan C H, Wang R. Preparation of polydimethylsiloxane-polyvinylidene fluoride composite membranes for phenol removal in extractive membrane bioreactor. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(12): 3436–3445
CrossRef Google scholar
[199]
Freitas Santos L M D, Hömmerich U, Livingston A G. Dichloroethane removal from gas streams by an extractive membrane bioreactor. Biotechnology Progress, 1995, 11(2): 194–201
CrossRef Google scholar
[200]
Dos Santos L F, Biundo G L. Treatment of pharmaceutical industry process wastewater using the extractive membrane bioreactor. Environment and Progress, 1999, 18(1): 34–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[201]
Chuichulcherm S, Nagpal S, Peeva L, Livingston A. Treatment of metal—containing wastewaters with a novel extractive membrane reactor using sulfate—reducing bacteria. Environmental & Clean Technology, 2001, 76(1): 61–68
CrossRef Google scholar
[202]
Luo W, Hai F I, Price W E, Guo W, Ngo H H, Yamamoto K, Nghiem L D. High retention membrane bioreactors: challenges and opportunities. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 167: 539–546
CrossRef Google scholar
[203]
Liu Y L, Wang X M, Yang H W, Xie Y F, Huang X. Preparation of nanofiltration membranes for high rejection of organic micropollutants and low rejection of divalent cations. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 572(15): 152–160
CrossRef Google scholar
[204]
Choi J H, Fukushi K, Yamamoto K. A submerged nanofiltration membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment: the performance of cellulose acetate nanofiltration membranes for long-term operation. Separation and Purification Technology, 2007, 52(3): 470–477
CrossRef Google scholar
[205]
Zaviska F, Drogui P, Grasmick A, Azais A, Héran M. Nanofiltration membrane bioreactor for removing pharmaceutical compounds. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 429: 121–129
CrossRef Google scholar
[206]
Li D, Wang H. Recent developments in reverse osmosis desalination membranes. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2010, 20(22): 4551–4566
CrossRef Google scholar
[207]
Ming F T, Lee S, Xu H, Jeong K, Chong T H. Impact of salt accumulation in the bioreactor on the performance of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR) + reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation. Water Research, 2019, 170: 115352
[208]
Waszak M, Markowska-Szczupak A, Gryta M. Application of nanofiltration for production of 1,3-propanediol in membrane bioreactor. Catalysis Today, 2016, 268(15): 164–170
CrossRef Google scholar
[209]
Snowdon J, Singh K S, Zanatta G. Optimization of an external nanofiltration anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating a high-strength starch-based wastewater. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018, 144(6): 04018032
CrossRef Google scholar
[210]
Cornelissen E R, Harmsen D, Korte K, Ruiken C J, Qin J J, Oo H, Wessels L P. Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 319(1-2): 158–168
CrossRef Google scholar
[211]
Holloway R W, Achilli A, Cath T Y. The osmotic membrane bioreactor: a critical review. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 1: 581–605
[212]
Wang X, Chang V, Tang C Y. Osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: advances, challenges, and prospects for the future. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 504: 113–132
CrossRef Google scholar
[213]
Achilli A, Cath T Y, Marchand E A, Childress A E. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination, 2009, 239(1-3): 10–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[214]
Wei J Y, Zhang J, Lay W, Cao B, Fane A G, Yu L. State of the art of osmotic membrane bioreactors for water reclamation. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 122: 217–222
CrossRef Google scholar
[215]
Lay W C L, Zhang Q, Zhang J, McDougald D, Tang C, Wang R, Liu Y, Fane A G. Effect of pharmaceuticals on the performance of a novel osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR). Separation Science and Technology, 2012, 47(4): 543–554
CrossRef Google scholar
[216]
Alturki A, Mcdonald J, Khan S J, Hai F I, Long D N. Performance of a novel osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) system: flux stability and removal of trace organics. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 113: 201–206
CrossRef Google scholar
[217]
Kwon D, Kwon S J, Kim J, Lee J H. Feasibility of the highly-permselective forward osmosis membrane process for the post-treatment of the anaerobic fluidized bed bioreactor effluent. Desalination, 2020, 485: 114451
CrossRef Google scholar
[218]
Tan S, Acquah I, Li W. Cultivation of marine activated sludge to treat saline wastewater. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 2016, 25: 3134–3141
[219]
Lu Y, He Z. Mitigation of salinity buildup and recovery of wasted salts in a hybrid osmotic membrane bioreactor-electrodialysis system. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(17): 10529–10535
CrossRef Google scholar
[220]
Viet N D, Cho J, Yoon Y, Jang A. Enhancing the removal efficiency of osmotic membrane bioreactors: a comprehensive review of influencing parameters and hybrid configurations. Chemosphere, 2019, 236: 124363
CrossRef Google scholar
[221]
Geng Y K, Wang Y, Pan X R, Sheng G P. Electricity generation and in situ phosphate recovery from enhanced biological phosphorus removal sludge by electrodialysis membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 247: 471–476
CrossRef Google scholar
[222]
Wang Y K, Geng Y K, Pan X R, Sheng G P. In situ utilization of generated electricity for nutrient recovery in urine treatment using a selective electrodialysis membrane bioreactor. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 171(2): 451–458
CrossRef Google scholar
[223]
Mamo J, García-Galán M J, Stefani M, Rodríguez-Mozaz S, Barceló D, Monclús H, Rodriguez-Roda I, Comas J. Fate of pharmaceuticals and their transformation products in integrated membrane systems for wastewater reclamation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 331: 450–461
CrossRef Google scholar
[224]
Racar M, Dolar D, Karadakić K, Čavarović N, Glumac N, Ašperger D, Košutić K. Challenges of municipal wastewater reclamation for irrigation by MBR and NF/RO: physico-chemical and microbiological parameters, and emerging contaminants. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 722: 137959
CrossRef Google scholar
[225]
Díaz O, Gonzalez E, Vera L, Porlán L, Rodríguez-Sevilla J, Afonso-Olivares C, Ferrera Z, Santana Rodriguez J J. Nanofiltration/reverse osmosis as pretreatment technique for water reuse: ultrafiltration versus tertiary membrane reactor. Clean (Weinheim), 2017, 45(5): 1600014
CrossRef Google scholar
[226]
Dhangar K, Kumar M. Tricks and tracks in removal of emerging contaminants from the wastewater through hybrid treatment systems: a review. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 738: 140320
CrossRef Google scholar
[227]
Beier S, Köster S, Veltmann K, Schröder H, Pinnekamp J. Treatment of hospital wastewater effluent by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Water Science and Technology, 2010, 61(7): 1691–1698
CrossRef Google scholar
[228]
Tam L S, Tang T W, Lau G N, Sharma K R, Chen G H. A pilot study for wastewater reclamation and reuse with MBR/RO and MF/RO systems. Desalination, 2007, 202(1-3): 106–113
CrossRef Google scholar
[229]
Comerton A M, Andrews R C, Bagley D M. Evaluation of an MBR-RO system to produce high quality reuse water: microbial control, DBP formation and nitrate. Water Research, 2005, 39(16): 3982–3990
CrossRef Google scholar
[230]
Prado T, De Castro Bruni A, Barbosa M R F, Garcia S C, De Jesus Melo A M, Sato M I Z. Performance of wastewater reclamation systems in enteric virus removal. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 678: 33–42
CrossRef Google scholar
[231]
Prado T, De Castro Bruni A, Barbosa M R F, Garcia S C, Moreno L Z, Sato M I Z. Noroviruses in raw sewage, secondary effluents and reclaimed water produced by sand-anthracite filters and membrane bioreactor/reverse osmosis system. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 646: 427–437
CrossRef Google scholar
[232]
Plevri A, Noutsopoulos C, Mamais D, Makropoulos C, Andreadakis A, Lytras E, Samios S. Priority pollutants and other micropollutants removal in an MBR-RO wastewater treatment system. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2018, 127: 121–131
CrossRef Google scholar
[233]
Plevri A, Mamais D, Noutsopoulos C, Makropoulos C, Andreadakis A, Rippis K, Smeti E, Lytras E, Lioumis C. Promoting on-site urban wastewater reuse through MBR-RO treatment. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2017, 91: 2–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[234]
Li C, Cabassud C, Guigui C. Evaluation of membrane bioreactor on removal of pharmaceutical micropollutants: a review. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2014, 55(4): 845–858
CrossRef Google scholar
[235]
Sahar E, David I, Gelman Y, Chikurel H, Aharoni A, Messalem R, Brenner A. The use of RO to remove emerging micropollutants following CAS/UF or MBR treatment of municipal wastewater. Desalination, 2011, 273(1): 142–147
CrossRef Google scholar
[236]
Dolar D, Gros M, Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Moreno J, Comas J, Rodriguez-Roda I, Barceló D. Removal of emerging contaminants from municipal wastewater with an integrated membrane system, MBR-RO. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 239–240: 64–69
CrossRef Google scholar
[237]
Aziz M, Ojumu T. Exclusion of estrogenic and androgenic steroid hormones from municipal membrane bioreactor wastewater using UF/NF/RO membranes for water reuse application. Membranes, 2020, 10(3): 37
CrossRef Google scholar
[238]
Wu B, Kitade T, Chong T H, Uemura T, Fane A G. Impact of membrane bioreactor operating conditions on fouling behavior of reverse osmosis membranes in MBR-RO processes. Desalination, 2013, 311(15): 37–45
CrossRef Google scholar
[239]
Wang G, Fan Z, Wu D, Qin L, Zhang G, Gao C, Meng Q. Anoxic/aerobic granular active carbon assisted MBR integrated with nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for advanced treatment of municipal landfill leachate. Desalination, 2014, 349: 136–144
CrossRef Google scholar
[240]
Wang J, Li K, Wei Y, Cheng Y, Wei D, Li M. Performance and fate of organics in a pilot MBR-NF for treating antibiotic production wastewater with recycling NF concentrate. Chemosphere, 2015, 121: 92–100
CrossRef Google scholar
[241]
Hacıfazlıoğlu M C, Parlarİ, Pek T Ö, Kabay N. Evaluation of chemical cleaning to control fouling on nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes after desalination of MBR effluent. Desalination, 2019, 466: 44–51
CrossRef Google scholar
[242]
Rautenbach R, Mellis R. Waste water treatment by a combination of bioreactor and nanofiltration. Desalination, 1994, 95(2): 171–188
CrossRef Google scholar
[243]
Tran T, Nguyen T, Ho H, Le D, Lam T, Nguyen D, Hoang A, Do T, Hoang L, Nguyen T, et al. Integration of membrane bioreactor and nanofiltration for the treatment process of real hospital wastewater in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Processes (Basel, Switzerland), 2019, 7(3): 123
CrossRef Google scholar
[244]
Parlar I, Hacıfazlıoğlu M, Kabay N, Pek T Ö, Yüksel M. Performance comparison of reverse osmosis (RO) with integrated nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis process for desalination of MBR effluent. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2019, 29: 100640
CrossRef Google scholar
[245]
Lan Y, Groenen-Serrano K, Coetsier C, Causserand C. Fouling control using critical, threshold and limiting fluxes concepts for cross-flow NF of a complex matrix: membrane bioreactor effluent. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 524: 288–298
CrossRef Google scholar
[246]
Lan Y, Groenen-Serrano K, Coetsier C, Causserand C. Nanofiltration performances after membrane bioreactor for hospital wastewater treatment: fouling mechanisms and the quantitative link between stable fluxes and the water matrix. Water Research, 2018, 146: 77–87
CrossRef Google scholar
[247]
Geoswami L, Kumar R V, Borah S N, Manikandan N A, Pakshirajan K, Pugazhenthi G. Membrane bioreactor and integrated membrane bioreactor systems for micropollutant removal from wastewater: A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2018, 26: 314–328
CrossRef Google scholar
[248]
Arola K, Hatakka H, Mänttäri M, Kallioinen M. Novel process concept alternatives for improved removal of micropollutants in wastewater treatment. Separation and Purification Technology, 2017, 186: 333–341
CrossRef Google scholar
[249]
Alturki A A, Tadkaew N, Mcdonald J A, Khan S J, Price W E, Nghiem L D. Combining MBR and NF/RO membrane filtration for the removal of trace organics in indirect potable water reuse applications. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 365(1-2): 206–215
CrossRef Google scholar
[250]
Chon K, Sarp S, Lee S, Lee J H, Lopez-Ramirez J A, Cho J. Evaluation of a membrane bioreactor and nanofiltration for municipal wastewater reclamation: trace contaminant control and fouling mitigation. Desalination, 2011, 272(1-3): 128–134
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

Yan Zhao would like to acknowledge the support provided by the China Scholarship Council (CSC) of the Ministry of Education, China (CSC No. 201708330281).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2576 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/