Integrated adsorption and absorption process for post-combustion CO2 capture

Gongkui Xiao, Penny Xiao, Andrew Hoadley, Paul Webley

PDF(484 KB)
PDF(484 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 483-492. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-020-1964-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Integrated adsorption and absorption process for post-combustion CO2 capture

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This study explored the feasibility of integrating an adsorption and solvent scrubbing process for post-combustion CO2 capture from a coal-fired power plant. This integrated process has two stages: the first is a vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) process using activated carbon as the adsorbent, and the second stage is a solvent scrubber/stripper system using monoethanolamine (30 wt-%) as the solvent. The results showed that the adsorption process could enrich CO2 in the flue gas from 12 to 50 mol-% with a CO2 recovery of >90%, and the concentrated CO2 stream fed to the solvent scrubber had a significantly lower volumetric flowrate. The increased CO2 concentration and reduced feed flow to the absorption section resulted in significant reduction in the diameter of the solvent absorber, bringing the size of the absorber from uneconomically large to readily achievable domain. In addition, the VSA process could also remove most of the oxygen initially existed in the feed gas, alleviating the downstream corrosion and degradation problems in the absorption section. The findings in this work will reduce the technical risks associated with the state-of-the art solvent absorption technology for CO2 capture and thus accelerate the deployment of such technologies to reduce carbon emissions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

vacuum swing adsorption / monoethanolamine / post-combustion / CO2 capture / integrated process

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Gongkui Xiao, Penny Xiao, Andrew Hoadley, Paul Webley. Integrated adsorption and absorption process for post-combustion CO2 capture. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 483‒492 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1964-3

References

[1]
Markewitz P, Kuckshinrichs W, Leitner W, Linssen J, Zapp P, Bongartz R, Schreiber A, Muller T E. Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(6): 7281–7305
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
IEA. Transforming Industry through CCUS. 2019
[3]
Rochelle G T. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science, 2009, 325(5948): 1652–1654
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Ye B, Jiang J, Zhou Y, Liu J, Wang K. Technical and economic analysis of amine-based carbon capture and sequestration at coal-fired power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 222: 476–487
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Oko E, Wang M, Joel A S. Current status and future development of solvent-based carbon capture. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2017, 4(1): 5–14
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Campbell K L S, Zhao Y, Hall J J, Williams D R. The effect of CO2-loaded amine solvents on the corrosion of a carbon steel stripper. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 47: 376–385
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Krzemień A, Więckol-Ryk A, Smoliński A, Koteras A, Więcław-Solny L. Assessing the risk of corrosion in amine-based CO2 capture process. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 43: 189–197
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Fredriksen S B, Jens K J. Oxidative degradation of aqueous amine solutions of MEA, AMP, MDEA, Pz: a review. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 1770–1777
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Kimura H, Kubo T, Shimada M, Kitamura H, Fujita K, Suzuki K, Yamamoto K, Akai M. Environmental risk assessment of MEA and its degradation products from post-combustion CO2 capture pilot plant: drafting technical guidelines. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 6490–6500
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Saiwan C, Supap T, Idem R O, Tontiwachwuthikul P. Part 3: corrosion and prevention in post-combustion CO2 capture systems. Carbon Management, 2011, 2(6): 659–675
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Moser P, Wiechers G, Schmidt S, Garcia Moretz-Sohn Monteiro J, Charalambous C, Garcia S, Sanchez Fernandez E. Results of the 18-month test with MEA at the post-combustion capture pilot plant at Niederaussem—new impetus to solvent management, emissions and dynamic behaviour. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 95: 102945
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Rezakazemi M, Heydari I, Zhang Z.Hybrid systems: combining membrane and absorption technologies leads to more efficient acid gases (CO2 and H2S) removal from natural gas. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2017, 18: 362–369
[13]
Belaissaoui B, Le Moullec Y, Willson D, Favre E. Hybrid membrane cryogenic process for post-combustion CO2 capture. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 415-416: 424–434
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Liu K, Neathery J K, Remias J E, Li X. Method for removing CO2 from coal-fired power plant flue gas using ammonia as the scrubbing solution, with a chemical additive for reducing NH3 losses, coupled with a membrane for concentrating the CO2 stream to the gas stripper. US Patent, 8328911, 2011
[15]
Webley P A, Qader A, Ntiamoah A, Ling J, Xiao P, Zhai Y. A new multi-bed vacuum swing adsorption cycle for CO2 capture from flue gas streams. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114(Suppl C): 2467–2480
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Webley P A. Adsorption technology for CO2 separation and capture: a perspective. Adsorption, 2014, 20(2-3): 1–7
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Saeed I M, Alaba P, Mazari S A, Basirun W J, Lee V S, Sabzoi N. Opportunities and challenges in the development of monoethanolamine and its blends for post-combustion CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 79: 212–233
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Mazari S A, Alaba P, Saeed I M. Formation and elimination of nitrosamines and nitramines in freshwaters involved in post-combustion carbon capture process. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2019, 7(3): 103111
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Yi H, Li F, Ning P, Tang X, Peng J, Li Y, Deng H. Adsorption separation of CO2, CH4 and N2 on microwave activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 215-216: 635–642
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Vargas D, Giraldo L, Moreno-Piraján J C. Carbon dioxide and methane adsorption at high pressure on activated carbon materials. Adsorption, 2013, 19(6): 1075–1082
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Idris I, Abdullah A, Shamsudin I K, Othman M R. Optimizing purity and recovery of hydrogen from syngas by equalized pressure swing adsorption using palm kernel shell activated carbon adsorbent. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2019, 2124(1): 020059
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Zhang X X, Xiao P, Sun C Y, Luo G X, Ju J, Wang X R, Wang H X, Yang H. Optimal activated carbon for separation of CO2 from (H2 + CO2) gas mixture. Petroleum Science, 2018, 15(3): 625–633
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Xu D, Xiao P, Zhang J, Li G, Xiao G, Webley P A, Zhai Y. Effects of water vapour on CO2 capture with vacuum swing adsorption using activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 230: 64–72
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
You Y Y, Liu X J. Modeling of CO2 adsorption and recovery from wet flue gas by using activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 369: 672–685
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Raganati F, Chirone R, Ammendola P. CO2 capture by temperature swing adsorption: working capacity as affected by temperature and CO2 partial pressure. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(8): 3593–3605
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
The world biggest water ring vacuum pump is made by Huacheng. 2011, Zibo Water Ring Vacuum Pump Factory Co. Ltd. website
[27]
Xiao G, Saleman T L, Zou Y, Li G, May E F. Nitrogen rejection from methane using dual-reflux pressure swing adsorption with a kinetically-selective adsorbent. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 372: 1038–1046
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zou Y, Xiao G, Li G, Lu W, May E F. Advanced non-isothermal dynamic simulations of dual reflux pressure swing adsorption cycles. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2017, 126: 76–88
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
May-Vázquez M M, Gómez-Castro F I, Rodríguez-Ángeles M A. Rate-based modelling and simulation of pilot scale distillation column. In: Kiss A A, Zondervan E, Lakerveld R, Özkan L, eds. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019, 625–630
[30]
Zhang Y, Chen H, Chen C C, Plaza J M, Dugas R, Rochelle G T. Rate-based process modeling study of CO2 capture with aqueous monoethanolamine solution. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(20): 9233–9246
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Lawal A, Wang M, Stephenson P, Obi O. Demonstrating full-scale post-combustion CO2 capture for coal-fired power plants through dynamic modelling and simulation. Fuel, 2012, 101: 115–128
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Ramezan M, Skone T J, ya Nsakala N, Liljedahl G N. Carbon dioxide capture from existing coal-fired power plants. Report DOE/NETL-401/110907. 2007
[33]
Li L, Maeder M, Burns R, Puxty G, Clifford S, Yu H. The Henry coefficient of CO2 in the MEA-CO2-H2O system. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 1841–1847
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Wu X, Wang M, Liao P, Shen J, Li Y. Solvent-based post-combustion CO2 capture for power plants: a critical review and perspective on dynamic modelling, system identification, process control and flexible operation. Applied Energy, 2020, 257: 113941
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Li K, Leigh W, Feron P, Yu H, Tade M. Systematic study of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA)-based CO2 capture process: techno-economic assessment of the MEA process and its improvements. Applied Energy, 2016, 165: 648–659
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Vega F, Sanna A, Maroto-Valer M M, Navarrete B, Abad-Correa D. Study of the MEA degradation in a CO2 capture process based on partial oxy-combustion approach. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 54: 160–167
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Morken A K, Pedersen S, Nesse S O, Flø N E, Johnsen K, Feste J K, de Cazenove T, Faramarzi L, Vernstad K. CO2 capture with monoethanolamine: solvent management and environmental impacts during long term operation at the Technology Centre Mongstad (TCM). International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2019, 82: 175–183
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Fang M, Yi N, Di W, Wang T, Wang Q. Emission and control of flue gas pollutants in CO2 chemical absorption system: a review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 93: 102904
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Hammond G P, Spargo J. The prospects for coal-fired power plants with carbon capture and storage: a UK perspective. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 86: 476–489
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge financial assistance provided to the CO2CRC by the Australian Government through its CRC program and through Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research and Development (ANLEC R&D). ANLEC R&D is supported by Australian Coal Association Low Emissions Technology Limited and the Australian Government through the Clean Energy Initiative.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(484 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/