Computational design of heterogeneous catalysts and gas separation materials for advanced chemical processing

Abstract

Functional materials are widely used in chemical industry in order to reduce the process cost while simultaneously increase the product quality. Considering their significant effects, systematic methods for the optimal selection and design of materials are essential. The conventional synthesis-and-test method for materials development is inefficient and costly. Additionally, the performance of the resulting materials is usually limited by the designer’s expertise. During the past few decades, computational methods have been significantly developed and they now become a very important tool for the optimal design of functional materials for various chemical processes. This article selectively focuses on two important process functional materials, namely heterogeneous catalyst and gas separation agent. Theoretical methods and representative works for computational screening and design of these materials are reviewed.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

heterogeneous catalyst / gas separation / solvent / porous adsorbent / material screening and design

References

[1] Bartholomew C H, Farrauto R J. Fundamentals of Industrial Catalytic Processes. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience, 2006, 1–59

[2] Dumesic J A, Milligan B A, Greppi L A, Balse V R, Sarnowski K T, Beall C E, Kataoka T, Rudd D F, Trevino A A. A kinetic modeling approach to the design of catalysts—formulation of a catalyst design advisory program. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1987, 26(7): 1399–1407

[3] Bligaard T, Nørskov J K, Dahl S, Matthiesen J, Christensen C H, Sehested J. The Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relation and the volcano curve in heterogeneous catalysis. Journal of Catalysis, 2004, 224(1): 206–217

[4] Katare S, Caruthers J M, Delgass W N, Venkatasubramanian V. An intelligent system for reaction kinetic modeling and catalyst design. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2004, 43(14): 3484–3512

[5] Linic S, Jankowiak J, Barteau M A. Selectivity driven design of bimetallic ethylene epoxidation catalysts from first principles. Journal of Catalysis, 2004, 224(2): 489–493

[6] Lee C J, Yang Y, Prasad V, Lee J M. Sample-based approaches to decision making problems under uncertainty. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2012, 90(2): 385–395

[7] Xu Y, Lausche A C, Wang S G, Khan T S, Abild-Pedersen F, Studt F, Norskov J K, Bligaard T. In silico search for novel methane steam reforming catalysts. New Journal of Physics, 2013, 15(12): 125021

[8] Herron J A, Mavrikakis M, Maravelias C T. Optimization methods for catalyst design. Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering, 2016, 38: 295–300

[9] Rangarajan S, Maravelias C T, Mavrikakis M. Sequential-optimization-based framework for robust modeling and design of heterogeneous catalytic systems. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(46): 25847–25863

[10] Wang Z Y, Hu P. Towards rational catalyst design: a general optimization framework. Philosophical Transactions−Royal Society. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 2016, 374(2061): 20150078

[11] Jacobsen C J H, Dahl S, Clausen B S, Bahn S, Logadottir A, Norskov J K. Catalyst design by interpolation in the periodic table: bimetallic ammonia synthesis catalysts. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2001, 123(34): 8404–8405

[12] Jacobsen C J H, Dahl S, Boisen A, Clausen B S, Topsoe H, Logadottir A, Norskov J K. Optimal catalyst curves: connecting density functional theory calculations with industrial reactor design and catalyst selection. Journal of Catalysis, 2002, 205(2): 382–387

[13] Nørskov J K, Abild-Pedersen F, Studt F, Bligaard T. Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(3): 937–943

[14] Thybaut J W, Sun J, Olivier L, Van Veen A C, Mirodatos C, Marin G B. Catalyst design based on microkinetic models: oxidative coupling of methane. Catalysis Today, 2011, 159(1): 29–36

[15] Huang K, Zhan X L, Chen F Q, Lu D W. Catalyst design for methane oxidative coupling by using artificial neural network and hybrid genetic algorithm. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58(1): 81–87

[16] Baumes L, Farrusseng D, Lengliz M, Mirodatos C. Using artificial neural networks to boost high-throughput discovery in heterogeneous catalysis. QSAR & Combinatorial Science, 2004, 23(9): 767–778

[17] Baumes L A, Serra J M, Serna P, Corma A. Support vector machines for predictive modeling in heterogeneous catalysis: a comprehensive introduction and overfitting investigation based on two real applications. Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry, 2006, 8(4): 583–596

[18] Corma A, Serra J M, Serna P, Moliner M. Integrating high-throughput characterization into combinatorial heterogeneous catalysis: unsupervised construction of quantitative structure/property relationship models. Journal of Catalysis, 2005, 232(2): 335–341

[19] Fernandez M, Barron H, Barnard A S. Artificial neural network analysis of the catalytic efficiency of platinum nanoparticles. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(77): 48962–48971

[20] Li Z, Ma X F, Xin H L. Feature engineering of machine-learning chemisorption models for catalyst design. Catalysis Today, 2017, 280: 232–238

[21] Goldsmith B R, Esterhuizen J, Liu J X, Bartel C J, Sutton C. Machine learning for heterogeneous catalyst design and discovery. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2018, 64(7): 2311–2323

[22] Zhou T, McBride K, Linke S, Song Z, Sundmacher K. Computer-aided solvent selection and design for efficient chemical processes. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2020, 27: 35–44

[23] Ng L Y, Chong F K, Chemmangattuvalappil N G. Challenges and opportunities in computer-aided molecular design. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2015, 81: 115–129

[24] Struebing H, Ganase Z, Karamertzanis P G, Siougkrou E, Haycock P, Piccione P M, Armstrong A, Galindo A, Adjiman C S. Computer-aided molecular design of solvents for accelerated reaction kinetics. Nature Chemistry, 2013, 5(11): 952–957

[25] Zhou T, Wang J Y, McBride K, Sundmacher K. Optimal design of solvents for extractive reaction processes. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2016, 62(9): 3238–3249

[26] Zhou T, Lyu Z X, Qi Z W, Sundmacher K. Robust design of optimal solvents for chemical reactions—a combined experimental and computational strategy. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 137: 613–625

[27] Song Z, Zhang C Y, Qi Z W, Zhou T, Sundmacher K. Computer-aided design of ionic liquids as solvents for extractive desulfurization. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2018, 64(3): 1013–1025

[28] Zhou T, Song Z, Zhang X, Gani R, Sundmacher K. Optimal solvent design for extractive distillation processes: a multiobjective optimization-based hierarchical framework. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(15): 5777–5786

[29] Bardow A, Steur K, Gross J. Continuous-molecular targeting for integrated solvent and process design. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(6): 2834–2840

[30] Burger J, Papaioannou V, Gopinath S, Jackson G, Galindo A, Adjiman C S. A hierarchical method to integrated solvent and process design of physical CO₂ absorption using the SAFT-Mie approach. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2015, 61(10): 3249–3269

[31] Zhou T, McBride K, Zhang X, Qi Z W, Sundmacher K. Integrated solvent and process design exemplified for a Diels-Alder reaction. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2015, 61(1): 147–158

[32] Zhou T, Zhou Y, Sundmacher K. A hybrid stochastic-deterministic optimization approach for integrated solvent and process design. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 159: 207–216

[33] Chong F K, Foo D C Y, Eljack F T, Atilhan M, Chemmangattuvalappil N G. A systematic approach to design task-specific ionic liquids and their optimal operating conditions. Molecular Systems Design & Engineering, 2016, 1(1): 109–121

[34] Papadopoulos A I, Badr S, Chremos A, Forte E, Zarogiannis T, Seferlis P, Papadokonstantakis S, Galindo A, Jackson G, Adjiman C S. Computer-aided molecular design and selection of CO₂ capture solvents based on thermodynamics, reactivity and sustainability. Molecular Systems Design & Engineering, 2016, 1(3): 313–334

[35] Ahmad M Z, Hashim H, Mustaffa A A, Maarof H, Yunus N A. Design of energy efficient reactive solvents for post combustion CO₂ capture using computer aided approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 176: 704–715

[36] Jensen N, Coll N, Gani R. An integrated computer aided system for generation and evaluation of sustainable process alternatives. Technological Choices for Sustainability, 2004, 183–214

[37] Chong F K, Foo D C Y, Eljack F T, Atilhan M, Chemmangattuvalappil N G. Ionic liquid design for enhanced carbon dioxide capture by computer-aided molecular design approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2015, 17(5): 1301–1312

[38] Lei Z G, Dai C N, Wang W, Chen B H. UNIFAC model for ionic liquid-CO₂ systems. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2014, 60(2): 716–729

[39] Valencia-Marquez D, Flores-Tlacuahuac A, Vasquez-Medrano R. An optimization approach for CO₂ capture using ionic liquids. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 168: 1652–1667

[40] Peng D L, Zhang J A, Cheng H Y, Chen L F, Qi Z W. Computer-aided ionic liquid design for separation processes based on group contribution method and COSMO-SAC model. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 159: 58–68

[41] Lin S T, Sandler S I. A priori phase equilibrium prediction from a segment contribution solvation model. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002, 41(5): 899–913

[42] Mortazavi-Manesh S, Satyro M A, Marriott R A. Screening ionic liquids as candidates for separation of acid gases: solubility of hydrogen sulfide, methane, and ethane. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2013, 59(8): 2993–3005

[43] Klamt A, Eckert F. COSMO-RS: a novel and efficient method for the a priori prediction of thermophysical data of liquids. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2000, 172(1): 43–72

[44] Zhao Y S, Gani R, Afzal R M, Zhang X P, Zhang S J. Ionic liquids for absorption and separation of gases: an extensive database and a systematic screening method. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2017, 63(4): 1353–1367

[45] Hasan M M F, First E L, Floudas C A. Cost-effective CO₂ capture based on in silico screening of zeolites and process optimization. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2013, 15(40): 17601–17618

[46] First E L, Gounaris C E, Wei J, Floudas C A. Computational characterization of zeolite porous networks: an automated approach. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2011, 13(38): 17339–17358

[47] First E L, Hasan M M F, Floudas C A. Discovery of novel zeolites for natural gas purification through combined material screening and process optimization. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2014, 60(5): 1767–1785

[48] Liu T T, First E L, Hasan M M F, Floudas C A. Discovery of new zeolites for H₂S removal through multi-scale systems engineering. Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering, 2015, 37: 1025–1030

[49] Erucar I, Keskin S. High-throughput molecular simulations of metal organic frameworks for CO₂ separation: opportunities and challenges. Frontiers in Materials, 2018, 5: 4

[50] Willems T F, Rycroft C H, Kazi M, Meza J C, Haranczyk M. Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2012, 149(1): 134–141

[51] Bae Y S, Snurr R Q. Development and evaluation of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2011, 50(49): 11586–11596

[52] Wu D, Yang Q Y, Zhong C L, Liu D H, Huang H L, Zhang W J, Maurin G. Revealing the structure-property relationships of metal-organic frameworks for CO₂ capture from flue gas. Langmuir, 2012, 28(33): 12094–12099

[53] Wu D, Wang C C, Liu B, Liu D H, Yang Q Y, Zhong C L. Large-scale computational screening of metal-organic frameworks for CH₄/H₂ separation. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2012, 58(7): 2078–2084

[54] Haldoupis E, Nair S, Sholl D S. Finding MOFs for highly selective CO₂/N₂ adsorption using materials screening based on efficient assignment of atomic point charges. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012, 134(9): 4313–4323

[55] Li Z J, Xiao G, Yang Q Y, Xiao Y L, Zhong C L. Computational exploration of metal-organic frameworks for CO₂/CH₄ separation via temperature swing adsorption. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014, 120: 59–66

[56] Qiao Z W, Zhang K, Jiang J W. In silico screening of 4764 computation-ready, experimental metal-organic frameworks for CO₂ separation. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2016, 4(6): 2105–2114

[57] Qiao Z W, Peng C W, Zhou J, Jiang J W. High-throughput computational screening of 137953 metal-organic frameworks for membrane separation of a CO₂/N₂/CH₄ mixture. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2016, 4(41): 15904–15912

[58] Wilmer C E, Farha O K, Bae Y S, Hupp J T, Snurr R Q. Structure-property relationships of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(12): 9849–9856

[59] Li S, Chung Y G, Simon C M, Snurr R Q. High-throughput computational screening of multivariate metal-organic frameworks (MTV-MOFs) for CO₂ capture. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2017, 8(24): 6135–6141

[60] Chung Y G, Gomez-Gualdron D A, Li P, Leperi K T, Deria P, Zhang H D, Vermeulen N A, Stoddart J F, You F Q, Hupp J T, Farha O K, Snurr R Q. In silico discovery of metal-organic frameworks for precombustion CO₂ capture using a genetic algorithm. Science Advances, 2016, 2(10): e1600909

[61] Gurdal Y, Keskin S. Atomically detailed modeling of metal organic frameworks for adsorption, diffusion, and separation of noble gas mixtures. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(21): 7373–7382

[62] Erucar I, Keskin S. Computational modeling of bio-MOFs for CO₂/CH₄ separations. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 130: 120–128

[63] Altintas C, Keskin S. Computational screening of MOFs for C₂H₆/C₂H₄ and C₂H₆/CH₄ separations. Chemical Engineering Science, 2016, 139: 49–60

[64] Sumer Z, Keskin S. Ranking of MOF adsorbents for CO₂ separations: a molecular simulation study. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(39): 10404–10419

[65] Azar A N V, Keskin S. Computational screening of MOFs for acetylene separation. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2018, 6: 36

Funding Information

Open access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn