Theoretical study on Janus graphene oxide membrane for water transport

Quan Liu, Mingqiang Chen, Yangyang Mao, Gongping Liu

PDF(1989 KB)
PDF(1989 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4) : 913-921. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-020-1954-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Theoretical study on Janus graphene oxide membrane for water transport

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) membranes have received considerable attention owing to their outstanding water-permeation properties; however, the effect of the membrane’s microstructures (such as the distribution of oxidized and pristine regions) on the transport mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we performed molecular simulations to explore the permeation of a water–ethanol mixture using a new type of Janus GO membranes with different orientations of oxidized and pristine surfaces. The results indicate that the oxidized upper surface endows the GO membrane with considerable water-capture capability and the in-built oxidized interlayer promotes the effective vertical diffusion of water molecules. Consequently, using the optimized Janus GO membrane, infinite water selectivity and outstanding water flux (~40.9 kg⋅m2⋅h1) were achieved. This study contributes to explaining the role of oxidized regions in water permeation via GO membranes and suggests that Janus GO membranes could be used as potential candidates for water–ethanol separation.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

graphene oxide membrane / molecular dynamics simulation / water permeation / water-ethanol separation / oxidized and pristine regions

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Quan Liu, Mingqiang Chen, Yangyang Mao, Gongping Liu. Theoretical study on Janus graphene oxide membrane for water transport. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 913‒921 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1954-5

References

[1]
Nair R R, Wu H A, Jayaram P N, Grigorieva I V, Geim A K. Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak-tight graphene-based membranes. Science, 2012, 335(6067): 442–444
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Wei N, Peng X, Xu Z. Understanding water permeation in graphene oxide membranes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(8): 5877–5883
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chen B, Jiang H, Liu X, Hu X. Water transport confined in graphene oxide channels through the rarefied effect. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20(15): 9780–9786
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Chen B, Jiang H, Liu H, Liu K, Liu X, Hu X. Thermal-driven flow inside graphene channels for water desalination. 2D Materials, 2019, 6(3): 035018
[5]
Joshi R K, Carbone P, Wang F C, Kravets V G, Su Y, Grigorieva I V, Wu H A, Geim A K, Nair R R. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science, 2014, 343(6172): 752–754
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Chen B, Jiang H, Liu X, Hu X. Molecular insight into water desalination across multilayer graphene oxide membranes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(27): 22826–22836
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Yuan Z, Benck J D, Eatmon Y, Blankschtein D, Strano M S. Stable, temperature-dependent gas mixture permeation and separation through suspended nanoporous single-layer graphene membranes. Nano Letters, 2018, 18(8): 5057–5069
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
He G, Huang S, Villalobos L F, Zhao J, Mensi M, Oveisi E, Rezaei M, Agrawal K V. High-permeance polymer-functionalized single-layer graphene membranes that surpass the postcombustion carbon capture target. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(11): 3305–3312
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Devanathan R, Chase-Woods D, Shin Y, Gotthold D W. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that water diffusion between graphene oxide layers is slow. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 29484
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Yang E, Ham M H, Park H B, Kim C M, Song J, Kim I S. Tunable semi-permeability of graphene-based membranes by adjusting reduction degree of laminar graphene oxide layer. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 547: 73–79
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Zolezzi C, Ihle C F, Angulo C, Palma P, Palza H. Effect of the oxidation degree of graphene oxides on their adsorption, flocculation, and antibacterial behavior. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(46): 15722–15730
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Balapanuru J, Manga K K, Fu W, Abdelwahab I, Zhou G, Li M, Lu H, Loh K P. Desalination properties of a free-standing, partially oxidized few-layer graphene membrane. Desalination, 2019, 451: 72–80
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Wei Y, Zhang Y, Gao X, Ma Z, Wang X, Gao C. Multilayered graphene oxide membranes for water treatment: a review. Carbon, 2018, 139: 964–981
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Lee B, Suh D W, Hong S P, Yoon J. A surface-modified EDTA-reduced graphene oxide membrane for nanofiltration and anti-biofouling prepared by plasma post-treatment. Environmental Science. Nano, 2019, 6(7): 2292–2298
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Ban S, Xie J, Wang Y, Jing B, Liu B, Zhou H. Insight into the nanoscale mechanism of rapid H2O transport within a graphene oxide membrane: impact of oxygen functional group clustering. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(1): 321–332
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Willcox J A, Kim H J. Molecular dynamics study of water flow across multiple layers of pristine, oxidized, and mixed regions of graphene oxide. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(2): 2187–2193
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Chen B, Jiang H, Liu X, Hu X. Observation and analysis of water transport through graphene oxide interlamination. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(2): 1321–1328
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Huang K, Liu G, Lou Y, Dong Z, Shen J, Jin W. A graphene oxide membrane with highly selective molecular separation of aqueous organic solution. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 2014, 53(27): 6929–6932
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Yang J Z, Liu Q L, Wang H T. Analyzing adsorption and diffusion behaviors of ethanol/water through silicalite membranes by molecular simulation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 291(1): 1–9
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Lee W, Kang P K, Kim A S, Lee S. Impact of surface porosity on water flux and structural parameter in forward osmosis. Desalination, 2018, 439: 46–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
David C T, Grossman J C. Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. Nano Letters, 2012, 12(7): 3602–3608
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Liu Q, Wu Y, Wang X, Liu G, Zhu Y, Tu Y, Lu X, Jin W. Molecular dynamics simulation of water–ethanol separation through monolayer graphene oxide membranes: significant role of O/C ratio and pore size. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 224: 219–226
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Peng P, Shi B, Lan Y. A review of membrane materials for ethanol recovery by pervaporation. Separation Science and Technology, 2010, 46(2): 234–246
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Khoonsap S, Rugmai S, Hung W S, Lee K R, Klinsrisuk S, Amnuaypanich S. Promoting permeability-selectivity anti-trade-off behavior in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) nanocomposite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 544: 287–296
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Delley B. An all-electron numerical method for solving the local density functional for polyatomic molecules. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1990, 92(1): 508–517
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Wang Y, He Z, Gupta K M, Shi Q, Lu R. Molecular dynamics study on water desalination through functionalized nanoporous graphene. Carbon, 2017, 116: 120–127
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Xu X L, Lin F W, Du Y, Zhang X, Wu J, Xu Z K. Graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes stabilized by cationic porphyrin for high salt rejection. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(20): 12588–12593
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Sun H. COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications—overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1998, 102(38): 7338–7364 doi:10.1021/jp980939v
[29]
Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2008, 4(3): 435–447
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Yang X, Yang X, Liu S. Molecular dynamics simulation of water transport through graphene-based nanopores: flow behavior and structure characteristics. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(10): 1587–1592
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Liu Q, Gupta K M, Xu Q, Liu G, Jin W. Gas permeation through double-layer graphene oxide membranes: the role of interlayer distance and pore offset. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 209: 419–425
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Jorgensen W L, Chandrasekhar J, Madura J D, Impey R W, Klein M L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1983, 79(2): 926–935
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Jorgensen W L, Maxwell D S, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1996, 118(45): 11225–11236
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Wennberg C L, Murtola T, Páll S, Abraham M J, Hess B, Lindahl E. Direct-space corrections enable fast and accurate lorentz-berthelot combination rule lennard-jones lattice summation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2015, 11(12): 5737–5746
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz M L, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen L G. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1995, 103(19): 8577–8593
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Vane L M. Review: membrane materials for the removal of water from industrial solvents by pervaporation and vapor permeation. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2019, 94(2): 343–365
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Gui T, Zhang F, Li Y Q, Cui X, Wu X W, Zhu M H, Hu N, Chen X S, Kita H, Kondo M. Scale-up of NaA zeolite membranes using reusable stainless steel tubes for dehydration in an industrial plant. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 583: 180–189
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Zhao D, Zhao J, Ji Y, Liu G, Liu S, Jin W. Facilitated water-selective permeation via PEGylation of graphene oxide membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 567: 311–320
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Huang K, Liu G, Lou Y, Dong Z, Shen J, Jin W. A graphene oxide membrane with highly selective molecular separation of aqueous organic solution. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2014, 53(27): 6929–6932
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Chang X, Zhu L, Xue Q, Li X, Guo T, Li X, Ma M.Charge controlled switchable CO2/N2 separation for g-C10N9 membrane: insights from molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2018, 26: 294–301
[41]
Obst S, Bradaczek H. Molecular dynamics study of the structure and dynamics of the hydration shell of alkaline and alkaline-earth metal cations. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1996, 100(39): 15677–15687
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Chen B, Jiang H, Liu X, Hu X. Observation and analysis of water transport through graphene oxide interlamination. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(2): 1321–1328
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Ye H, Zhang H, Zheng Y, Zhang Z. Nanoconfinement induced anomalous water diffusion inside carbon nanotubes. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2011, 10(6): 1359–1364
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21922805, 21776125). We are grateful to the High-Performance Computing Center of Nanjing Tech University for supporting the computational resources.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1954-5 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1989 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/