Linking renewables and fossil fuels with carbon capture via energy storage for a sustainable energy future
Dawid P. Hanak, Vasilije Manovic
Linking renewables and fossil fuels with carbon capture via energy storage for a sustainable energy future
Renewable energy sources and low-carbon power generation systems with carbon capture and storage (CCS) are expected to be key contributors towards the decarbonisation of the energy sector and to ensure sustainable energy supply in the future. However, the variable nature of wind and solar power generation systems may affect the operation of the electricity system grid. Deployment of energy storage is expected to increase grid stability and renewable energy utilisation. The power sector of the future, therefore, needs to seek a synergy between renewable energy sources and low-carbon fossil fuel power generation. This can be achieved via wide deployment of CCS linked with energy storage. Interestingly, recent progress in both the CCS and energy storage fields reveals that technologies such as calcium looping are technically viable and promising options in both cases. Novel integrated systems can be achieved by integrating these applications into CCS with inherent energy storage capacity, as well as linking other CCS technologies with renewable energy sources via energy storage technologies, which will maximise the profit from electricity production, mitigate efficiency and economic penalties related to CCS, and improve renewable energy utilisation.
carbon capture / energy storage / renewable energy sources / decarbonisation / fossil fuels
[1] |
IEA. Tracking Clean Energy Progress. Paris: IEA Publications, 2019
|
[2] |
Akrami A, Doostizadeh M, Aminifar F. Power system flexibility: An overview of emergence to evolution. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2019, 7(5): 987–1007
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Bui M, Adjiman C S, Bardow A, Anthony E J, Boston A, Brown S, Fennel P S, Fuss S, Galindo A, Hackett L A,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
NREL. Renewable Electricity Futures Study. Golden: National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2012
|
[5] |
Pierpont B, Nelson D, Goggins A, Posner D. Flexibility. The Path to Low-Carbon, Low-Cost Electricity Grids. London: Climate Policy Initiative, 2017
|
[6] |
Arias B, Criado Y A, Sanchez-Biezma A, Abanades J C. Oxy-fired fluidized bed combustors with a flexible power output using circulating solids for thermal energy storage. Applied Energy, 2014, 132: 127–136
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Chalmers H, Gibbins J, Leach M. Valuing power plant flexibility with CCS: The case of post-combustion capture retrofits. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2012, 17(6): 621–649
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Edenhofer O. King coal and the queen of subsidies. Science, 2015, 349(6254): 1286–1287
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Mahlia T M I, Saktisahdan T J, Jannifar A, Hasan M H, Matseelar H S C. A review of available methods and development on energy storage: Technology update. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 33: 532–545
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Ummels B C, Kling W L, Pelgrum E. Integration of large-scale wind power and use of energy storage in the Netherlands’ electricity supply. IET Renewable Power Generation, 2008, 2(1): 34–46
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
DOE. DOE Global Energy Storage Database. 2019
|
[12] |
Gil A, Medrano M, Martorell I, Lázaro A, Dolado P, Zalba B, Cabeza L F. State of the art on high temperature thermal energy storage for power generation. Part 1-Concepts, materials and modellization. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(1): 31–55
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Hou Y, Vidu R, Stroeve P. Solar energy storage methods. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2011, 50(15): 8954–8964
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Gur I, Sawyer K, Prasher R. Searching for a better thermal battery. Science, 2012, 335(6075): 1454–1455
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Yan T, Wang R Z, Li T X, Wang L W, Fred I T. A review of promising candidate reactions for chemical heat storage. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 43: 13–31
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Ervin G. Solar heat storage using chemical reactions. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 1977, 22(1): 51–61
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Barker R. The reversibility of the reaction CaCO3⇄CaO+CO2. Journal of Applied Chemistry & Biotechnology, 1973, 23(10): 733–742
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Ortiz C, Valverde J M, Chacartegui R, Perez-Maqueda L A, Giménez P. The calcium-looping (CaCO3/CaO) process for thermochemical energy storage in concentrating solar power plants. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 113: 109252
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Akinyele D O, Rayudu R K. Review of energy storage technologies for sustainable power networks. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2014, 8: 74–91
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Smith E M. Storage of electrical energy using supercritical liquid air. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1977, 191(1): 289–298
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Kantharaj B, Garvey S, Pimm A. Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension. Applied Energy, 2015, 157: 152–164
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Zhang Y, Yang K, Hong H, Zhong X, Xu J. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel energy storage system with carbon dioxide as working fluid. Renewable Energy, 2016, 99: 682–697
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Hu Y, Li X, Li H, Yan J. Peak and off-peak operations of the air separation unit in oxy-coal combustion power generation systems. Applied Energy, 2013, 112: 747–754
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Jin B, Su M, Zhao H, Zheng C. Plantwide control and operating strategy for air separation unit in oxy-combustion power plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 106: 782–792
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Morgan R, Nelmes S, Gibson E, Brett G. Liquid air energy storage—Analysis and first results from a pilot scale demonstration plant. Applied Energy, 2015, 137: 845–853
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Hanak D P, Biliyok C, Manovic V. Calcium looping with inherent energy storage for decarbonisation of coal-fired power plant. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016, 9(3): 971–983
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Luo X, Wang J, Dooner M, Clarke J. Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation. Applied Energy, 2015, 137: 511–536
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
IEA. Global Energy & CO2 Status Report. Paris: IEA Publications, 2018
|
[29] |
Rochelle G T. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science, 2009, 325(5948): 1652–1654
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Perrin N, Dubettier R, Lockwood F, Tranier J P, Bourhy-Weber C, Terrien P. Oxycombustion for coal power plants: Advantages, solutions and projects. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 74: 75–82
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Hanak D P, Michalski S, Manovic V. From post-combustion carbon capture to sorption-enhanced hydrogen production: A state-of-the-art review of carbonate looping process feasibility. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 177: 428–452
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Ma Z, Martinek J. Analysis of solar receiver performance for chemical-looping integration with a concentrating solar thermal system. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 2019, 141(2): 021003
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Chiesa P, Lozza G, Malandrino A, Romano M, Piccolo V. Three-reactors chemical looping process for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(9): 2233–2245
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Bailera M, Lisbona P, Romeo L M, Espatolero S. Power to gas-biomass oxycombustion hybrid system: Energy integration and potential applications. Applied Energy, 2016, 167: 221–229
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Swithenbank J, Finney K N, Chen Q, Yang Y, Nolan A, Sharifi V N. Waste heat usage. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 60(1-2): 430–440
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Zhao R, Deng S, Zhao L, Liu Y, Tan Y. Energy-saving pathway exploration of CCS integrated with solar energy: Literature research and comparative analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 102: 66–80
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Mechleri E, Fennell P S, Mac Dowell N. Optimisation and evaluation of flexible operation strategies for coal- and gas-CCS power stations with a multi-period design approach. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 59: 24–39
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Hirth L, Ueckerdt F, Edenhofer O. Integration costs revisited—an economic framework for wind and solar variability. Renewable Energy, 2015, 74: 925–939
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Hanak D P, Powell D, Manovic V. Techno-economic analysis of oxy-combustion coal-fired power plant with cryogenic oxygen storage. Applied Energy, 2017, 191: 193–203
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Market Insider. CO2 European Emission Allowances Price. 2019
|
[41] |
Ma Z, Glatzmaier G, Mehos M. Fluidized bed technology for concentrating solar power with thermal energy storage. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 2014, 136(3): 031014
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Chen H, Cong T N, Yang W, Tan C, Li Y, Ding Y. Progress in electrical energy storage system: A critical review. Progress in Natural Science, 2009, 19(3): 291–312
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Manovic V, Anthony E J. Steam reactivation of spent CaO-based sorbent for multiple CO2 capture cycles. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(4): 1420–1425
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Heuberger C F, Staffell I, Shah N, Mac Dowell N. Quantifying the value of CCS for the future electricity system. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016, 9(8): 2497–2510
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |