Perspective of mixed matrix membranes for carbon capture

Abstract

Polymeric membrane-based gas separation has found wide applications in industry, such as carbon capture, hydrogen recovery, natural gas sweetening, as well as oxygen enrichment. Commercial gas separation membranes are required to have high gas permeability and selectivity, while being cost-effective to process. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) have a composite structure that consists of polymers and fillers, therefore featuring the advantages of both materials. Much effort has been made to improve the gas separation performance of MMMs as well as general membrane properties, such as mechanical strength and thermal stability. This perspective describes potential use of MMMs for carbon capture applications, explores their limitations in fabrication and methods to overcome them, and addresses their performance under industry gas conditions.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

membranes / polymeric / mixed matrix / impurities

References

[1] Baker R W. Membrane Technology and Applications. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2004, 1–14

[2] Freeman B D, Pinnau I. Polymer Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1999, 1–27

[3] Galizia M, Chi W S, Smith Z P, Merkel T C, Baker R W, Freeman B D. 50th anniversary perspective: Polymers and mixed matrix membranes for gas and vapor separation: A review and prospective opportunities. Macromolecules, 2017, 50(20): 7809–7843

[4] Bauer N, Mouratiadou I, Luderer G, Baumstark L, Brecha R J, Edenhofer O, Kriegler E. Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation—an analysis with REMIND. Climatic Change, 2016, 136(1): 69–82

[5] Mikkelsen M, Jørgensen M, Krebs F C. The teraton challenge. A review of fixation and transformation of carbon dioxide. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010, 3(1): 43–81

[6] Robeson L M. The upper bound revisited. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 320(1-2): 390–400

[7] Robeson L M. Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1991, 62(2): 165–185

[8] Freeman B D. Basis of permeability/selectivity tradeoff relations in polymeric gas separation membranes. Macromolecules, 1999, 32(2): 375–380

[9] Chung T S, Jiang L Y, Li Y, Kulprathipanja S. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Progress in Polymer Science, 2007, 32(4): 483–507

[10] Rezakazemi M, Ebadi Amooghin A, Montazer-Rahmati M M, Ismail A F, Matsuura T. State-of-the-art membrane based CO₂ separation using mixed matrix membranes (MMMs): An overview on current status and future directions. Progress in Polymer Science, 2014, 39(5): 817–861

[11] Dong G, Li H, Chen V. Challenges and opportunities for mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2013, 1(15): 4610–4630

[12] Kanehashi S. Development of hybrid membranes for carbon capture. Kobunshi Ronbunshu, 2016, 73(5): 475–490

[13] Ismail A F, Khulbe K, Matsuura T. Gas Separation Membranes. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2015, 11–35

[14] Hilal N, Ismail A F, Matsuura T, Oatley-Radcliffe D. Membrane Characterization. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017, 309–336

[15] Kanehashi S, Nagai K. Analysis of dual-mode model parameters for gas sorption in glassy polymers. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 253(1-2): 117–138

[16] Kanehashi S, Chen G Q, Scholes C A, Ozcelik B, Hua C, Ciddor L, Southon P D, D’Alessandro D M, Kentish S E. Enhancing gas permeability in mixed matrix membranes through tuning the nanoparticle properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 482: 49–55

[17] Bruggeman D A G. Calculation of different physical Constants of heterogeneous substances. I. Dielectric Constants and conductivities of the mixed bodies of isotropic substances. Annalen der Physik, 1935, 416(7): 636–664 (in German)

[18] Lewis T B, Nielsen L E. Dynamic mechanical properties of particulate-filled composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1970, 14(6): 1449–1471

[19] Mahajan R, Koros W J. Mixed matrix membrane materials with glassy polymers. Part 1. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2002, 42(7): 1420–1431

[20] Bondi A. van der Waals volume and radii. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1964, 68(3): 441–451

[21] van Krevelen D W. Properties of Polymers. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009

[22] Kanehashi S, Gu H, Shindo R, Sato S, Miyakoshi T, Nagai K. Gas permeation and separation properties of polyimide/ZSM-5 zeolite composite membranes containing liquid sulfolane. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2013, 128(6): 3814–3823

[23] Shindo R, Kishida M, Sawa H, Kidesaki T, Sato S, Kanehashi S, Nagai K. Characterization and gas permeation properties of polyimide/ZSM-5 zeolite composite membranes containing ionic liquid. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 454: 330–338

[24] Xin Q, Ouyang J, Liu T, Li Z, Li Z, Liu Y, Wang S, Wu H, Jiang Z, Cao X. Enhanced interfacial interaction and CO₂ separation performance of mixed matrix membrane by incorporating polyethylenimine-decorated metal-organic frameworks. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015, 7(2): 1065–1077

[25] Patel R, Park J T, Hong H P, Kim J H, Min B R. Use of block copolymer as compatibilizer in polyimide/zeolite composite membranes. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2011, 22(5): 768–772

[26] Kanehashi S, Chen G Q, Danaci D, Webley P A, Kentish S E. Can the addition of carbon nanoparticles to a polyimide membrane reduce plasticization? Separation and Purification Technology, 2017, 183: 333–340

[27] Chung T S, Chan S S, Wang R, Lu Z, He C. Characterization of permeability and sorption in Matrimid/C₆₀ mixed matrix membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, 211(1): 91–99

[28] Vu D Q, Koros W J, Miller S J. Mixed matrix membranes using carbon molecular sieves: I. Preparation and experimental results. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, 211(2): 311–334

[29] Zhang Y, Musselman I H, Ferraris J P, Balkus K J. Gas permeability properties of mixed-matrix matrimid membranes containing a carbon aerogel: A material with both micropores and mesopores. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(8): 2794–2802

[30] Yong H H, Park H C, Kang Y S, Won J, Kim W N. Zeolite-filled polyimide membrane containing 2,4,6-triaminopyrimidine. Journal of Membrane Science, 2001, 188(2): 151–163

[31] Zornoza B, Téllez C, Coronas J. Mixed matrix membranes comprising glassy polymers and dispersed mesoporous silica spheres for gas separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 368(1-2): 100–109

[32] Khan A L, Klaysom C, Gahlaut A, Khan A U, Vankelecom I F J. Mixed matrix membranes comprising of Matrimid and –SO₃H functionalized mesoporous MCM-41 for gas separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 447: 73–79

[33] Hosseini S S, Li Y, Chung T S, Liu Y. Enhanced gas separation performance of nanocomposite membranes using MgO nanoparticles. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 302(1-2): 207–217

[34] Moghadam F, Omidkhah M R, Vasheghani-Farahani E, Pedram M Z, Dorosti F. The effect of TiO₂ nanoparticles on gas transport properties of Matrimid5218-based mixed matrix membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2011, 77(1): 128–136

[35] Song Q, Nataraj S K, Roussenova M V, Tan J C, Hughes D J, Li W, Bourgoin P, Alam M A, Cheetham A K, Al-Muhtaseb S A, Sivaniah E. Zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) based polymer nanocomposite membranes for gas separation. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(8): 8359–8369

[36] Zhang Y, Balkus K J Jr, Musselman I H, Ferraris J P. Mixed-matrix membranes composed of Matrimid^® and mesoporous ZSM-5 nanoparticles. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 325(1): 28–39

[37] Perez E V, Balkus K J Jr, Ferraris J P, Musselman I H. Mixed-matrix membranes containing MOF-5 for gas separations. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 328(1-2): 165–173

[38] Zhang Y, Musselman I H, Ferraris J P, Balkus K J Jr. Gas permeability properties of Matrimid^® membranes containing the metal-organic framework Cu-BPY-HFS. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 313(1-2): 170–181

[39] Ordoñez M J C, Balkus K J Jr, Ferraris J P, Musselman I H. Molecular sieving realized with ZIF-8/Matrimid^® mixed-matrix membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 361(1-2): 28–37

[40] Nagai K, Masuda T, Nakagawa T, Freeman B D, Pinnau I. Poly[1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne] and related polymers: Synthesis, properties and functions. Progress in Polymer Science, 2001, 26(5): 721–798

[41] Bos A, Pünt I G M, Wessling M, Strathmann H. CO₂-induced plasticization phenomena in glassy polymers. Journal of Membrane Science, 1999, 155(1): 67–78

[42] Donohue M D, Minhas B S, Lee S Y. Permeation behavior of carbon dioxide-methane mixtures in cellulose acetate membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1989, 42(3): 197–214

[43] Ismail A F, Lorna W. Penetrant-induced plasticization phenomenon in glassy polymers for gas separation membrane. Separation and Purification Technology, 2002, 27(3): 173–194

[44] Wessling M, Schoeman S, van der Boomgaard T, Smolders C A. Plasticization of gas separation membranes. Gas Separation & Purification, 1991, 5(4): 222–228

[45] Duthie X, Kentish S, Pas S J, Hill A J, Powell C, Nagai K, Stevens G, Qiao G. Thermal treatment of dense polyimide membranes. Journal of Polymer Science. Part B, Polymer Physics, 2008, 46(18): 1879–1890

[46] Duthie X J, Kentish S E, Powell C E, Qiao G G, Nagai K, Stevens G W. Plasticization suppression in grafted polyimide-epoxy network membranes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(24): 8183–8192

[47] Kanehashi S, Nakagawa T, Nagai K, Duthie X, Kentish S, Stevens G. Effects of carbon dioxide-induced plasticization on the gas transport properties of glassy polyimide membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 298(1–2): 147–155

[48] Kanehashi S, Onda M, Shindo R, Sato S, Kazama S, Nagai K. Synthesis, characterization, and CO₂ permeation properties of acetylene-terminated polyimide membranes. Polymer Engineering and Science, 2013, 53(8): 1667–1675

[49] Wind J D, Staudt-Bickel C, Paul D R, Koros W J. Solid-state covalent cross-linking of polyimide membranes for carbon dioxide plasticization reduction. Macromolecules, 2003, 36(6): 1882–1888

[50] Bos A, Pünt I, Strathmann H, Wessling M. Suppression of gas separation membrane plasticization by homogeneous polymer blending. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2001, 47(5): 1088–1093

[51] Shahid S, Nijmeijer K. High pressure gas separation performance of mixed-matrix polymer membranes containing mesoporous Fe(BTC). Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 459: 33–44

[52] Scholes C A, Kentish S E, Stevens G W. Effects of minor components in carbon dioxide capture using polymeric gas separation membranes. Separation and Purification Reviews, 2009, 38(1): 1–44

[53] Merkel T C, Lin H, Wei X, Baker R. Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: An opportunity for membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 359(1-2): 126–139

[54] Baker R W, Lokhandwala K. Natural gas processing with membranes: An overview. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(7): 2109–2121

[55] Deng L, Hägg M B. Techno-economic evaluation of biogas upgrading process using CO₂ facilitated transport membrane. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4(4): 638–646

[56] Chen G Q, Kanehashi S, Doherty C M, Hill A J, Kentish S E. Water vapor permeation through cellulose acetate membranes and its impact upon membrane separation performance for natural gas purification. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 487: 249–255

[57] Kanehashi S, Konishi S, Takeo K, Owa K, Kawakita H, Sato S, Miyakoshi T, Nagai K. Effect of OH group on the water vapor sorption property of adamantane-containing polymer membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 427: 176–185

[58] Kanehashi S, Tomita Y, Obokata K, Kidesaki T, Sato S, Miyakoshi T, Nagai K. Effect of substituted groups on characterization and water vapor sorption property of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS)-containing methacryl polymer membranes. Polymer, 2013, 54(9): 2315–2323

[59] Azher H, Scholes C A, Stevens G W, Kentish S E. Water permeation and sorption properties of Nafion 115 at elevated temperatures. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 459: 104–113

[60] Lu H T, Kanehashi S, Scholes C A, Kentish S E. The potential for use of cellulose triacetate membranes in post combustion capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 55: 97–104

[61] Farla J C M, Hendriks C A, Blok K. Carbon dioxide recovery from industrial processes. Climatic Change, 1995, 29(4): 439–461

[62] Thambimuthu K, Soltanieh M, Abandas J C. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005

[63] Awe O W, Zhao Y, Nzihou A, Minh D P, Lyczko N. A review of biogas utilisation, purification and upgrading technologies. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2017, 8(2): 267–283

[64] Kanehashi S, Chen G Q, Ciddor L, Chaffee A, Kentish S E. The impact of water vapor on CO₂ separation performance of mixed matrix membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 492: 471–477

[65] Kanehashi S, Aguiar A, Lu H T, Chen G Q, Kentish S. Effects of industrial gas impurities on the performance of mixed matrix membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 549: 686–692

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press