Proposed EU legislation to force changes in sewage sludge disposal: A case study

Vojtěch Turek, Bohuslav Kilkovský, Zdeněk Jegla, Petr Stehlík

PDF(285 KB)
PDF(285 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4) : 660-669. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-018-1773-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Proposed EU legislation to force changes in sewage sludge disposal: A case study

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The consequences of changes planned in the European Union legislation relevant to the disposal of sewage sludges are discussed. A specific municipal waste water treatment plant is analyzed in terms of drying and subsequent combustion or pyrolysis of the produced stabilized sludge, and the respective net energy balances are carried out. A simplified economic analysis of the two disposal options is presented, which suggest that combustion of the sludge would be economically infeasible while pyrolysis of the sludge in a modular, self-sufficient container unit can bring a small financial benefit due to the selling of the produced phosphorus-rich biochar.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

sewage sludge / drying / combustion / pyrolysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Vojtěch Turek, Bohuslav Kilkovský, Zdeněk Jegla, Petr Stehlík. Proposed EU legislation to force changes in sewage sludge disposal: A case study. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 660‒669 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1773-0

References

[1]
Zhang L, Xu C, Champagne P, Mabee W. Overview of current biological and thermo-chemical treatment technologies for sustainable sludge management. Waste Management & Research, 2014, 32(7): 586–600
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Barber W P F. Thermal hydrolysis for sewage treatment: A critical review. Water Research, 2016, 104: 53–71
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Ding H H, Chang S, Liu Y. Biological hydrolysis pretreatment on secondary sludge: Enhancement of anaerobic digestion and mechanism study. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 244: 989–995
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Thornley P, Adams P. Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2017, 152
[5]
Wołejko E, Wydro U, Jabłońska-Trypuć A, Butarewicz A, Łoboda T. The effect of sewage sludge fertilization on the concentration of PAHs in urban soils. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 232: 347–357
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Fuentes D, Valdecantos A, Cortina J, Vallejo V R. Seedling performance in sewage sludge-amended degraded Mediterranean woodlands. Ecological Engineering, 2007, 31(4): 281–291
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bianchini A, Bonfiglioli L, Pellegrini M, Saccani C. Sewage sludge drying process integration with a waste-to-energy power plant. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2015, 42: 159–165
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Donatello S, Cheeseman C R. Recycling and recovery routes for incinerated sewage sludge ash (ISSA): A review. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2013, 33(11): 2328–2340
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Arlabosse P, Chavez S, Lecomte D. Method for thermal design of paddle dryers: Application to municipal sewage sludge. Drying Technology, 2004, 22(10): 2375–2393
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Li Y, Wang H, Zhang J, Wang J, Ouyang L. The industrial practice of co-processing sewage sludge in cement kiln. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 16: 628–632
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture. Official Journal L 181(04/07/1986): 6–12
[12]
Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 relating to fertilisers. Official Journal L 304(21/11/2003): 1–194
[13]
Chun Y N, Lim M S, Yoshikawa K. Development of a high-efficiency rotary dryer for sewage sludge. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2012, 14(1): 65–73
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Huang Y W, Chen M Q, Jia L. Assessment on thermal behavior of municipal sewage sludge thin-layer during hot air forced convective drying. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 96: 209–216
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Ameri B, Hanini S, Benhamou A, Chibane D. Comparative approach to the performance of direct and indirect solar drying of sludge from sewage plants, experimental and theoretical evaluation. Solar Energy, 2018, 159: 722–732
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Mawioo P M, Garcia H A, Hooijmans C M, Velkushanova K, Simonič M, Mijatović I, Brdjanovic D. A pilot-scale microwave technology for sludge sanitization and drying. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 601-602: 1437–1448
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Chen J, Deng Z, Chen W, Lyu L, Wang F. Comparative study on drying characteristics of sewage sludge in two kinds of indirect heat drying equipment. In: Aissaoui A G, Chen B Y, Park E, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Development. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2016, 9–13
[18]
Li S, Li Y, Lu Q, Zhu J, Yao Y, Bao S. Integrated drying and incineration of wet sewage sludge in combined bubbling and circulating fluidized bed units. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2014, 34(12): 2561–2566
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Ha S A, Kim D K, Wang J P. Sludge moisture reduction based on MRT and hold-up estimation method using hot-air belt-type conveyor dryer. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Industrial Automation. Lancaster: DEStech Publications, Inc.,, 2015, 591–599
[20]
Louarn S, Ploteau J P, Glouannec P, Noel H. Experimental and numerical study of flat plate sludge drying at low temperature by convection and direct conduction. Drying Technology, 2014, 32(14): 1664–1674
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Werther J, Ogada T. Sewage sludge combustion. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1999, 25(1): 55–116
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Ma J, Zhang L, Li A. Energy-efficient co-biodrying of dewatered sludge and food waste: Synergistic enhancement and variables investigation. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2016, 56: 411–422
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Appels L, Baeyens J, Degrève J, Dewil R. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2008, 34(6): 755–781
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Sassi H P, Ikner L A, Abd-Elmaksoud S, Gerba C P, Pepper I L. Comparative survival of viruses during thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 615: 15–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Hosseini S E, Barzegaravval H, Wahid M A, Ganjehkaviri A, Sies M M. Thermodynamic assessment of integrated biogas-based micro-power generation system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 128: 104–119
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Higgins M J, Beightol S, Mandahar U, Suzuki R, Xiao S, Lu H W, Le T, Mah J, Pathak B, DeClippeleir H, Novak J T, Al-Omari A, Murthy S N. Pretreatment of a primary and secondary sludge blend at different thermal hydrolysis temperatures: Impacts on anaerobic digestion, dewatering and filtrate characteristics. Water Research, 2017, 122: 557–569
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Bougrier C, Delgenès J P, Carrère H. Effects of thermal treatments on five different waste activated sludge samples solubilisation, physical properties and anaerobic digestion. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 139(2): 236–244
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Fonts I, Juan A, Gea G, Murillo M B, Sánchez J L. Sewage sludge pyrolysis in fluidized bed, 1: Influence of operational conditions on the product distribution. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(15): 5376–5385
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Jaramillo-Arango A, Fonts I, Chejne F, Arauzo J. Product compositions from sewage sludge pyrolysis in a fluidized bed and correlations with temperature. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2016, 121: 287–296
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Fonts I, Juan A, Gea G, Murillo M B, Arauzo J. Sewage sludge pyrolysis in a fluidized bed. 2: Influence of operating conditions on some physicochemical properties of the liquid product. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(4): 2179–2187
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Arazo R O, Genuino D A D, de Luna M D G, Capareda S C. Bio-oil production from dry sewage sludge by fast pyrolysis in an electrically-heated fluidized bed reactor. Sustainable Environment Research, 2017, 27(1): 7–14
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Han R, Zhao C, Liu J, Chen A, Wang H. Thermal characterization and syngas production from the pyrolysis of biophysical dried and traditional thermal dried sewage sludge. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 198: 276–282
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Frišták V, Pipíška M, Soja G. Pyrolysis treatment of sewage sludge: A promising way to produce phosphorus fertilizer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 172: 1772–1778
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Directive 2010/75/EU of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control). Official Journal L 334(17/12/2010): 17–119
[35]
Niessen W R. Combustion and Incineration Processes: Applications in Environmental Engineering. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010, 5–66
[36]
Thomsen T P, Sárossy Z, Gøbel B, Stoholm P, Ahrenfeldt J, Frandsen F J, Henriksen U B. Low temperature circulating fluidized bed gasification and co-gasification of municipal sewage sludge. Part 1: Process performance and gas product characterization. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2017, 66: 123–133
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Ding W, Li L, Liu J. Investigation of the effects of temperature and sludge characteristics on odors and VOC emissions during the drying process of sewage sludge. Water Science and Technology, 2015, 72(4): 543–552
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Tontti T, Poutiainen H, Heinonen-Tanski H. Efficiently treated sewage sludge supplemented with nitrogen and potassium is a good fertilizer for cereals. Land Degradation & Development, 2017, 28(2): 742–751
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Sun Y, Jin B S, Huang Y J, Zuo W, Jia J Q, Wang Y Y. Distribution and characteristics of products from pyrolysis of sewage sludge. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 726-731: 2885–2893
[40]
Agarwal M, Tardio J, Venkata Mohan S. Pyrolysis of activated sludge: Energy analysis and its technical feasibility. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 178: 70–75
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Gerber H, Scherer J, Sehn W, Siekmann K. Thermal Mineralization: Pyreg—A Method for Decentralized Sewage Sludge Treatment. BWK (Düsseldorf), 2010, 62: 55 (in German)
[42]
Samolada M C, Zabaniotou A A. Comparative assessment of municipal sewage sludge incineration, gasification and pyrolysis for a sustainable sludge-to-energy management in Greece. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2014, 34(2): 411–420
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Ashwekar P, Jiang Y, Pan H. Feasibility study of energy recovery by incineration—a case study of the triangle wastewater treatment plant. Dissertation of the Master Degree. Durham: Duke University, 2017, 22–24
[44]
Sundberg E. Review of advanced pyrolysis processes with lignocellulosic feedstock—technical solutions and market conditions. Dissertation for the Master's Degree. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2017, 56 (in Swedish)

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic within the “National Sustainability Programme I” project No. LO1202 “NETME CENTRE PLUS”.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(285 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/