Greenhouse gas emissions from thermal treatment of non-recyclable municipal waste
Tomáš Ferdan, Martin Pavlas, Vlastimír Nevrlý, Radovan Šomplák, Petr Stehlík
Greenhouse gas emissions from thermal treatment of non-recyclable municipal waste
This paper analyses factors affecting the production of greenhouse gases from the treatment of residual municipal waste. The analysis is conducted so that the environmentally-friendly decision-making criteria may be later implemented into an optimisation task, which allocates waste treatment capacities. A simplified method of life cycle assessment is applied to describe environmental impact of the allocation. Global warming potential (GWP) is employed as a unit to quantify greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. The objective is to identify the environmental burdens and credits measured by GWP for the three fundamental methods for treatment of residual waste unsuitable for material recovery. The three methods are waste-to-energy (WTE), landfilling and mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) with subsequent utilization of refuse-derived fuel. The composition of the waste itself and content of fossil-derived carbon and biogenic carbon are important parameters to identify amounts of GHG. In case of WTE, subsequent use of the energy, e.g., in district heating systems in case of heat, is another important parameter to be considered. GWP function dependant on WTE capacity is introduced. The conclusion of this paper provides an assessment of the potential benefits of the results in optimisation tasks for the planning of overall strategy in waste management.
waste management / greenhouse gases / global warming potential / allocation planning / waste-to-energy
[1] |
Barbosa-Póvoa A P, da Silva C, Carvalho A. Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An Operations Research Perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 268(2): 399–431
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Bing X, Bloemhof J M, Ramos T R P, Barbosa-Povoa A P, Wong C Y, van der Vorst J G A J. Research challenges in municipal solid waste logistics management. Waste Management, 2016, 48: 584–592
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Ghiani G, Laganà D, Manni E, Musmanno R, Vigo D. Operations research in solid waste management: A survey of strategic and tactical issues. Computers & Operations Research, 2014, 44: 22–32
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Šomplák R, Pavlas M, Kropáč J, Putna O, Procházka V. Logistic model-based tool for policy-making towards sustainable waste management. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2014, 16(7): 1275–1286
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Martinez-Sanchez V, Hulgaard T, Hindsgaul C, Riber C, Kamuk B, Astrup T F. Estimation of marginal costs at existing waste treatment facilities. Waste Management, 2016, 50: 364–375
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Šomplák R, Ferdan T, Popela P, Pavlas M. Waste-to-energy facility planning under uncertain circumstances. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 61(1): 106–114
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Fruergaard T, Christensen T H, Astrup T. Energy recovery from waste incineration: Assessing the importance of district heating networks. Waste Management, 2010, 30(7): 1264–1272
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Ferdan T, Šomplák R, Pavlas M. Improved feasibility analysis under volatile conditions: Case of waste-to-energy. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2014, 39: 691–696
|
[9] |
Garcia D J, You F. Network-based life cycle optimization of the net atmospheric CO2-eq ratio (NACR) of fuels and chemicals production from biomass. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2015, 3(8): 1732–1744
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Neto J Q F, Walther G, Bloemhof J, van Nunen J A E E, Spengler T. A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 193(3): 670–682
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Harijani A M, Mansour S, Karimi B, Lee C G. Multi-period sustainable and integrated recycling network for municipal solid waste—A case study in Tehran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 151: 96–108
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Rabl A, Spadaro J V, Holland M. How Much is Clean Air Worth? Calculation the Benefits of Pollution Control. London: Cambridge University Press, 2014
|
[13] |
Nevrlý V, Šomplák R, Gregor J, Pavlas M, Klemeš J J. Impact assessment of pollutants from waste-related operations as a feature of holistic logistic tool. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 220: 77–86
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Cristóbal J, Castellani V, Manfredi S, Sala S. Prioritizing and optimizing sustainable measures for food waste prevention and management. Waste Management, 2018, 72: 3–16
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Asefi H, Lim S. A novel multi-dimensional modeling approach to integrated municipal solid waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 166: 1131–1143
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Habibi F, Asadi E, Sadjadi S J, Barzinpour F. A multi-objective robust optimization model for site-selection and capacity allocation of municipal solid waste facilities: A case study in Tehran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 166: 816–834
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Čuček L, Klemeš J J, Kravanja Z. A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 34: 9–20
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G K, Tignor M, Allen S, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V A, Midgey P. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to The fifth assessment report of the Intergovermental panel on climate change.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 710–712
|
[19] |
Curran M A. Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practise. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Work Assignment 3–15, 2006
|
[20] |
Environmental management–Life cycle assessment–Principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006. International Organization for Standardization, 2006
|
[21] |
Cleary J. Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: A comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature. Environment International, 2009, 35(8): 1256–1266
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Laurent A, Bakas I, Clavreul J, Bernstad A, Niero M, Gentil E, Hauschild M Z, Christensen T H. Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part I: Lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Management, 2014, 34(3): 573–588
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Laurent A, Clavreul J, Bernstad A, Bakas I, Niero M, Gentil E, Christensen T H, Hauschild M Z. Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part II: Methodological guidance for a better practice. Waste Management, 2014, 34(3): 589–606
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Astrup T F, Tonini D, Turconi R, Boldrin A. Life cycle assessment of thermal waste-to-energy technologies: Review and recommendations. Waste Management, 2015, 37: 104–115
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Lausselet C, Cherubini F, Del Alamo Serrano G, Becidan M, Strømman A H. Life-cycle assessment of a waste-to-energy plant in central Norway: Current situation and effects of changes in waste fraction composition. Waste Management, 2016, 58: 191–201
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Finnveden G, Johansson J, Lind P, Moberg A. Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste. Part1: General methodology and results. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2005, 13(3): 213–229
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Toniolo S, Mazzi A, Garato V G, Aguiari F, Scipioni A. Assessing the “design paradox” with life cycle assessment: A case study of a municipal solid waste incineration plant. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2014, 91: 109–116
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Schwarzböck T, Rechberger H, Cencic O, Fellner J. Determining national greenhouse gas emissions from waste-to-energy using the balance method. Waste Management, 2016, 49: 263–271
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Arafat H A, Jijakli K A, Ahsan A. Environmental performance and energy recovery potential of five processes for municipal solid waste treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 105: 233–240
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Banar M, Cokaygil Z, Ozkan A. Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey. Waste Management, 2009, 29(1): 54–62
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Havukainen J, Zhan M, Dong J, Liikanen M, Deviatkin I, Li X, Horttanainen M. Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management incorporating mechanical treatment of waste and incineration in Hangzhou, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 141: 453–461
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Jensen M B, Møller J, Scheutz C. Comparison of the organic waste management systems in the Danish-German border region using life cycle assessment (LCA). Waste Management, 2016, 49: 491–504
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Hong J, Zhan S, Yu Z, Hong J, Qi C. Life-cycle environmental and economic assessment of medical waste treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 174: 65–73
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Fruergaard T, Astrup T. Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective. Waste Management, 2011, 31(3): 572–582
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Koroneos Ch J, Nanaki E A. Integrated solid waste management and energy production—a life cycle assessment approach: The case study of the city of Thessaloniki. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 27: 141–150
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Jia X, Wang S, Li Z, Wang F, Tan R R, Qian Y. Pinch analysis of GHG mitigation strategies for municipal solid waste management: A case study on Qingdao City. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 174: 933–944
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Genovese A, Morris J, Piccolo C, Koh S C L. Assessing redundancies in environmental performance measures for supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 167: 1290–1302
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Mumford K A, Wu Y, Smith K H, Stevens G W. Review of solvent based carbon-dioxide capture technologies. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 125–141
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
De Guido G, Compagnoni M, Pellegrini L A, Rossetti I. Mature versus emerging technologies for CO2 capture in power plants: Key open issues in post-combustion amine scrubbing and in chemical looping combustion. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12(2): 315–325
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Gerber L, Fazlollahi S, Maréchal F. A systematic methodology for the environomic design and synthesis of energy systems combining process integration, life cycle assessment and industrial ecology. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2013, 59: 2–16
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Kumar A, Samadder S R. A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste. Waste Management, 2017, 69: 407–422
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Stehlík P. Up-to-Date Waste-to-Energy Approach, from Idea to Industrial Application. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, 2016, 37–43
|
[43] |
Brunner P H, Rechberger H. Waste to energy--key element for sustainable waste management. Waste Management, 2015, 37: 3–12
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[44] |
IPCC. Reference Document on the Best Available Techniques for Waste Incineration, 2006a. Available at the European IPPC Bureau (EIPPCB) website on May 10, 2018
|
[45] |
Pavlas M, Touš M, Klimek P, Bébar L. Waste incineration with production of clean and reliable energy. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2011, 13(4): 595–605
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Reimann D O. CEWEP Energy Report III, Results of Specific Data for Energy, R1 Plant Efficiency Factor and NCV of 314 European Waste-to-Energy (WtE) Plants CEWEP, Bamberg, Germany, 2012. Available at Confederation of European Waste-to-Energy Plants on May 15, 2018
|
[47] |
Montejo C, Costa C, Ramos P, Márquez M del C. Analysis and comparison of municipal solid waste and reject fraction as fuels for incineration plants. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(13): 2135–2140
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Den Boer E, Jȩdrczak A. Performance of mechanical biological treatment of residual municipal waste in Poland. In: Conference on Advances in Energy Systems and Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw. E3S Web of Conferences, 2017
|
[49] |
Eggleston H S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Kanagawa: the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, IGES, 2006
|
[50] |
Pavlas M, Šomplák R, Smejkalová V, Nevrlý V, Zavíralová L, Kůdela J, Popela P. Spatially distributed production data for supply chain models—Forecasting with hazardous waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161: 1317–1328
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[51] |
Šyc M, Krausová A, Kameníková P, Šomplák R, Pavlas M, Zach B, Pohořelý M, Svoboda K, Punčochář M. Material analysis of Bottom ash from waste-to-energy plants. Waste Management, 2018, 73: 360–366
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[52] |
Ministry of Industry and Trade, Act no. 480/2012 Coll., of 20 December 2012, on Energy Audit and Energy Evaluation, 2012. Journal of Laws, 2012(182): 6450–6480 (in Czech)
|
[53] |
OTE a.s. National Energy Mix, 2016. Available at OTE website on April 24, 2018 (in Czech)
|
[54] |
Slivka V. Study on the State of the Heating Industry, VŠB- Technical University of Ostrava, 2011, Czech Republic. Available at MPO website on April 24, 2018 (in Czech)
|
[55] |
ISWA Working group on landfill. Landfill operational guidelines 2nd edition, 2010. Available at ISWA website on May 17, 2018
|
[56] |
Omar H, Rohani S. Treatment of landfill waste, leachate and landfill gas: A review. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 15–32
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[57] |
Ahmed S I, Johari A, Hashim H, Lim J S, Jusoh M, Mat R, Alkali H. Economic and environmental evaluation of landfill gas utilisation: A multi-period optimisation approach for low carbon regions. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2015, 102: 191–201
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[58] |
Reinhart D, Barlaz M. Landfill Gas Management: A Roadmap for EREF Directed Research, North Carolina State University and University of Central Florida, USA, 2010. Available at Environmental Research & Education Foundation (EREF) website on May 17, 2018
|
[59] |
Barlaz M A, Chanton J P, Green R B. Controls on landfill gas collection efficiency: Instantaneous and lifetime performance. Journal of the Air & Waste Management, 2009, 59(12): 1399–1404
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[60] |
Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gases emissions and sinks 1990–2015: EPA 430-R-08–005. Washington D C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2017
|
[61] |
Vogt R, Derreza-Greeven C, Giegrich J, Dehaust G, Möck A. The Climate Change Mitigation Potential of the Waste Sector: Illustration of the potential for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from the waste sector in OECD countries and selected emerging economies; Utilisation of the findings in waste technology. Dessau-Roßlau: Federal Environment Agency, 2015
|
[62] |
Archer E, Baddeley A, Klein A, Schwager J A, Whiting K. Mechanical-biological-treatment: A guide for decision makers— Processes, policies and markets. Juniper Consultancy Services Ltd., 2005
|
[63] |
Ranieri E, Ionescu G, Fedele A, Palmieri E, Ranieri A C, Campanaro V. Sampling, characterisation and processing of solid recovered fuel production from municipal solid waste: An Italian plant case study. Waste Management & Research, 2017, 35(8): 890–898
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[64] |
Gregor J, Pavlas M, Šomplák R. Transportation cost as an integral part of supply chain optimization in the field of waste management. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017, 56: 1927–1932
|
[65] |
European Commission (EC). EU ETS Handbook. Brussels: European Union, 2015, 4–26
|
[66] |
European Commission (EC). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments. Brussels: European Union, 2015, 1–41
|
[67] |
European Commission (EC). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on binding annual greenhouse gas emission reductions by Member States from 2021 to 2030 for a resilient Energy Union and to meet commitments under the Paris Agreement and amending Regulation No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on a mechanism for monitoring and reporting greenhouse gas emissions and other information relevant to climate change. Brussels: European Union, 2016, 1–38
|
/
〈 | 〉 |