Automated retrofit targeting of heat exchanger networks

Timothy G. Walmsley, Nathan S. Lal, Petar S. Varbanov, Jiří J. Klemeš

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4) : 630-642.

PDF(771 KB)
PDF(771 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4) : 630-642. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-018-1747-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Automated retrofit targeting of heat exchanger networks

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop a novel heat exchanger network (HEN) retrofit method based on a new automated retrofit targeting (ART) algorithm. ART uses the heat surplus-deficit table (HSDT) in combination with the Bridge Retrofit concepts to generate retrofit bridges option, from which a retrofit design may be formulated. The HSDT is a tabular tool that shows potential for improved re-integration of heat source and sink streams within a HEN. Using the HSDT, retrofit bridges—a set of modifications that links a cooler to a heater to save energy—may be identified, quantified, and compared. The novel retrofit method including the ART algorithm has been successfully implemented in Microsoft ExcelTM to enable analysis of large-scale HENs. A refinery case study with 27 streams and 46 existing heat exchangers demonstrated the retrofit method’s potential. For the case study, the ART algorithm found 68903 feasible unique retrofit opportunities with a minimum 400 kW·unit−1 threshold for heat recovery divided by the number of new units. The most promising retrofit project required 3 new heat exchanger units to achieve a heat savings of 4.24 MW with a favorable annualised profit and a reasonable payback period.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

process retrofit / pinch analysis / heat exchanger network / heat recovery

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Timothy G. Walmsley, Nathan S. Lal, Petar S. Varbanov, Jiří J. Klemeš. Automated retrofit targeting of heat exchanger networks. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 630‒642 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1747-2

References

[1]
Zore Ž, Čuček L, Kravanja Z. Syntheses of sustainable supply networks with a new composite criterion—Sustainability profit. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2017, 102: 139–155 doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.12.003
[2]
Klemeš J J, ed. Handbook of Process Integration (PI): Minimisation of Energy and Water Use, Waste and Emissions.Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2013, 3–27
[3]
Tarighaleslami A H, Walmsley T G, Atkins M J, Walmsley M R W, Neale J R. Total site heat integration: Utility selection and optimisation using cost and exergy derivative analysis. Energy, 2017, 141: 949–963
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Perry S, Klemeš J J, Bulatov I. Integrating waste and renewable energy to reduce the carbon footprint of locally integrated energy sectors. Energy, 2008, 33(10): 1489–1497
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Ong B H Y, Walmsley T G, Atkins M J, Walmsley M R W. Total site mass, heat and power integration using process integration and process graph. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 167: 32–43
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Akpomiemie M O, Smith R. Cost-effective strategy for heat exchanger network retrofit. Energy, 2018, 146: 82–97
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Walmsley T G, Atkins M J, Walmsley M R W, Philipp M, Peesel R H. Process and utility systems integration and optimisation for ultra-low energy milk powder production. Energy, 2018, 146: 67–81
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Van Duc Long N, Lee M. Debottlenecking the retrofitted thermally coupled distillation sequence. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(35): 12635–12645
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Smith R, Jobson M, Chen L. Recent development in the retrofit of heat exchanger networks. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010, 30(16): 2281–2289
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Sreepathi B K, Rangaiah G P. Review of heat exchanger network retrofitting methodologies and their applications. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53(28): 11205–11220
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Bagajewicz M, Valtinson G, Nguyen Thanh D. Retrofit of crude units preheating trains: Mathematical programming versus pinch technology. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(42): 14913–14926
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Jiang N, Shelley J D, Doyle S, Smith R. Heat exchanger network retrofit with a fixed network structure. Applied Energy, 2014, 127: 25–33
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Akpomiemie M O, Smith R. Retrofit of heat exchanger networks without topology modifications and additional heat transfer area. Applied Energy, 2015, 159: 381–390
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Akpomiemie M O, Smith R. Retrofit of heat exchanger networks with heat transfer enhancement based on an area ratio approach. Applied Energy, 2016, 165: 22–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Pan M, Bulatov I, Smith R. Exploiting tube inserts to intensify heat transfer for the retrofit of heat exchanger networks considering fouling mitigation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(8): 2925–2943
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Pan M, Bulatov I, Smith R. Improving heat recovery in retrofitting heat exchanger networks with heat transfer intensification, pressure drop constraint and fouling mitigation. Applied Energy, 2016, 161: 611–626
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Li B H, Chang C T. Retrofitting heat exchanger networks based on simple pinch analysis. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(8): 3967–3971
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Bakhtiari B, Bedard S. Retrofitting heat exchanger networks using a modified network pinch approach. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 51(1–2): 973–979
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Nordman R, Berntsson T. Use of advanced composite curves for assessing cost-effective HEN retrofit I: Theory and concepts. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(2–3): 275–281
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Nordman R, Berntsson T. Use of advanced composite curves for assessing cost-effective HEN retrofit II. Case studies. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(2–3): 282–289
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Kamel D A, Gadalla M A, Abdelaziz O Y, Labib M A, Ashour F H. Temperature driving force (TDF) curves for heat exchanger network retrofit—A case study and implications. Energy, 2017, 123: 283–295
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Lai Y Q, Manan Z A, Wan Alwi S R. Heat exchanger network retrofit using individual stream temperature vs enthalpy plot. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017, 61: 1651–1656
[23]
Bonhivers J C, Korbel M, Sorin M, Savulescu L, Stuart P R. Energy transfer diagram for improving integration of industrial systems. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 63(1): 468–479
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Bonhivers J C, Srinivasan B, Stuart P R. New analysis method to reduce the industrial energy requirements by heat-exchanger network retrofit: Part 1—Concepts. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 119: 659–669
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Bonhivers J C, Alva-Argaez A, Srinivasan B, Stuart P R. New analysis method to reduce the industrial energy requirements by heat-exchanger network retrofit: Part 2—Stepwise and graphical approach. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 119: 670–686
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Walmsley M R W, Lal N, Walmsley T G, Atkins M J. A modified energy transfer diagram for improved retrofit bridge analysis. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017, 61: 907–912
[27]
Lal N S, Walmsley T G, Walmsley M R W, Atkins M J, Neale J R. A novel heat exchanger network bridge retrofit method using the modified energy transfer diagram. Energy, 2018, 155: 190–204
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Yong J Y, Varbanov P S, Klemeš J J. Heat exchanger network retrofit supported by extended grid diagram and heat path development. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 89: 1033–1045
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Abbood N K, Manan Z A, Wan Alwi S R. A combined numerical and visualization tool for utility targeting and heat exchanger network retrofitting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 23(1): 1–7
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Nemet A, Klemeš J J, Varbanov P S, Mantelli V. Heat integration retrofit analysis—an oil refinery case study by retrofit tracing grid diagram. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 163–182
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Čuček L, Kravanja Z. Retrofit of total site heat exchanger networks by mathematical programming approach. In: Martín M, ed. Alternative Energy Sources and Technologies.New Jersey: Springer International Publishing, 2016, 297–340
[32]
Čuček L, Mantelli V, Yong J Y, Varbanov P S, Klemeš J J, Kravanja Z. A procedure for the retrofitting of large-scale heat exchanger networks for fixed and flexible designs applied to existing refinery total site. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2015, 45: 109–114
[33]
Ayotte-Sauvé E, Ashrafi O, Bédard S, Rohani N. Optimal retrofit of heat exchanger networks: A stepwise approach. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2017, 106: 243–268
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Kakaç S, Liu H. Heat exchangers: Selection, rating, and thermal design.London: CRC, 2002, 57–66
[35]
Turton R, Bailie R C, Whiting W B, Shaeiwitz J A. Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes. Pearson Education, 2008, 186–193

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by: the EU project “Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory – SPIL,” project No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000456 funded by EU “CZ Operational Programme Research and Development, Education,” Priority 1: Strengthening capacity for quality research, in a collaboration agreement with the University of Waikato, New Zealand; and, the Todd Foundation Energy PhD Research Scholarship.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1747-2 and is accessible for authorized users

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(771 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/