Cell surface protein engineering for high-performance whole-cell catalysts

Hajime Nakatani, Katsutoshi Hori

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 46-57.

PDF(289 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. All Journals
PDF(289 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 46-57. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-017-1609-3
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

Cell surface protein engineering for high-performance whole-cell catalysts

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Cell surface protein engineering facilitated by accumulation of information on genome and protein structure involves heterologous production and modification of cell surface proteins using genetic engineering, and is important for the development of high-performance whole-cell catalysts. In this field, cell surface display is a major technology by exposing target proteins, such as enzymes, on the cell surface using a carrier protein. The target proteins are fused to the carrier proteins that transport and tether them to the cell surface, as well as to a secretion signal. This paper reviews cell surface display systems for prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells from the perspective of carrier proteins, which determine the number of displayed molecules, and the localization, size, and direction (N- or C-terminal anchoring) of the passengers. We also discuss advanced methods for displaying multiple enzymes and a new method for the immobilization of whole-cell catalysts using adhesive surface proteins.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

cell surface engineering / surface display / whole-cell catalysts / bioprocess

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hajime Nakatani, Katsutoshi Hori. Cell surface protein engineering for high-performance whole-cell catalysts. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 46‒57 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-017-1609-3

1 1 Stability of soap bubbles

Soap bubbles are small gas pockets enclosed by liquid films in an air environment. They are commonly seen in children’s play and artistic performances. They are also building blocks that constitute foams, which are ubiquitous in our daily life and industrial processes ranging from foods, cosmetics and medicines to mining. Studying the behaviors of bubbles is crucial for these foam manufacturing industrial processes; their varied behaviors also attract the attention of researchers [1,2]. For instance, bubble films tend to minimize their surface area under given boundary conditions; thus, they are representative experimental models of minimal surfaces for verifying complex mathematical problems involving minimal optimization [3,4].
Soap bubbles are thought to be fragile and transient, and their rupture is related to viscous surface tension as well as Marangoni and nuclei effects depending on the composition of the bubble shell and the surrounding environment [1,3]. Without any stabilizers, the bursting of bare bubbles is primarily caused by the gravity-induced drainage of the liquid film, the thickness h of which follows the dynamics [5] h=h0exp(t/τ), where τ is the characteristic time of drainage scaling as η/ρgR, h0 denotes the initial film thickness, η is the liquid viscosity, ρ is the liquid density, and R is the bubble radius, respectively. When the bubble surface is thinned to a critical value, normally on the order of tens of nanometers, long-range van der Waals interactions accelerate the thinning process, and the bursting of bubbles consequently occurs [5]. Increasing the liquid viscosity of the liquid film can prevent film drainage and prolong the lifetime of bubbles [6]. However, bare viscous bubbles are still transient and can only last seconds. By adding surfactants to the bubble shell, surfactant molecules can induce the Marangoni effect on the surface or even immobilize surface boundaries [7], which significantly prevents film drainage and can promote bubble life to minutes. Even so, surfactant-stabilized bubbles eventually rupture due to liquid evaporation and/or the nucleation of holes caused by dust in the surrounding environment. In a dustless, vibration-free environment with saturated vapor atmospheres to suppress the nuclei and to prevent the evaporation of liquid, a bare viscous bubble can reach a lifetime as long as 2 years [5]. However, in a normal environment, overcoming film drainage, evaporation, and nuclei effects and achieving a long bubble lifetime are challenging tasks [8].

2 2 Particulate interfaces: particle-covered droplets in liquid, particle-covered bubbles in liquid and particle-covered droplets in air

Since Ramsden [9] and Pickering [10] found a century ago that particles are surface reactive and can therefore adsorb onto interfaces, particles have been intensively used as particulate agents to stabilize multiphase interfaces similar to surfactant molecules (Fig.1). For instance, particles can occupy the interface of immiscible liquids, stabilizing either water-in-oil or oil-in-water emulsions [1115], as shown in Fig.1(a)–(c). These particle-stabilized emulsions are called Pickering emulsions [16], named after S.U. Pickering, who discovered them in 1907 [10]. In addition, particles can absorb on the liquid−air interface and thus serve as stabilizers for air bubbles in liquid, forming particle-covered bubbles in a liquid environment, which are also known as “armored bubbles” [1723] (Fig.1(d–g)). This can also coat liquid droplets in air, forming particle-covered droplets termed “liquid marbles” [2430]. Particles can even hang onto interfaces with ultralow interfacial tensions, such as in the interface of aqueous two-phase systems. The two immiscible aqueous phases are formed by phase separation in an aqueous solution dissolved with polymers, biomolecules and salts [3133]. Recent works have revealed that protein particles [34] and fibrils [35,36] can effectively stabilize aqueous-in-aqueous emulsions.
Fig.1 (a) Schematics of a Pickering emulsion. (b) Asymmetric Janus Pickering emulsions through particle jamming of coalesced emulsions. The scale bar is 500 μm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [15], copyright 2014, Springer Nature. (c) The deformation and stability of Pickering emulsions in an electric field. The scale bar is 300 μm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [11], copyright 2013, The American Association for the Advancement of Science. (d) Schematics of an armored bubble. (e) Optic images of a spherical armored bubble. The scale bar is 400 μm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [18], copyright 2006, American Chemical Society. (f) Two floating armored bubbles do not coalesce due to particle stabilization. The scale bar is 200 μm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [37], copyright 2020 Elsevier. (g) Nonspherical armored bubbles with various shapes [18]. The scale bar is 200 μm. (h) Schematics of a liquid marble. (i) Photographs of liquid marbles encapsulating various chemical solutions. The scale bar is 2 mm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [38], copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH. (j) SEM image of a dried polyhedral liquid marble stabilized by hexagonal fluorinated PET plates. The scale bar is 200 μm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [39], copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH. (k) Complex particle-stabilized liquid/air surfaces forming a complex structure representing a Chinese dragon symbol. The scale bar is 10 cm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [40], copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.

Full size|PPT slide

The accumulation of particles on the interface is driven by the minimization of the total surface energy of the system [13,41,42]. For instance, the spherical particle straddled at the immiscible interface has an adsorption energy of ΔG=πa2γ(1|cosθ|)2, where a denotes the radius of the colloidal particle, γ indicates the interfacial tension, and θ is the contact angle at the interface [41]. For particles with nonspherical shapes, such as rod-like particles and disk-like particles, the adsorption energies at the fluid surface are even larger than those with spherical particles of the same volume, thereby strengthening their attachment to fluid interfaces [39,41,43]. For most particle-laden interfaces, the adsorption energy of particles is several orders higher than the thermal energy kT, with k and T being the Boltzmann constant and the temperature, respectively. As a result, the adsorption of particles at interfaces is irreversible, which differs from surfactant molecules that constantly adsorb and desorb. More interestingly, Janus particles that have two distinct surface regions with opposite chemical compositions and wetting properties are considerably more effective than homogeneous particles in stabilizing multiphase interfaces [4447].

3 3 Gas marbles: a recently discovered particle-covered bubble in air

Particulate materials, such as fat globules and protein aggregates, have been applied extensively for stabilizing foams in the food industry [2,41]. Most studies have focused on the collective behaviors of foams against coalescence and flocculation, which are crucial for the quality and shelf life of foam-based food products. In comparison, research on the individual behavior of particle-stabilized bubbles has been inadequate. Recently, a compact monolayer of microparticles has been demonstrated to straddle on air/liquid/air interfaces and stabilize a single bubble, forming a new soft object called a “gas marble” [8,48,49], as shown in Fig.2. A gas marble consists of gas coated by a layer of particles that entrap a liquid thin film exposed to the atmosphere, as shown in Fig.2(a,b). Although the states of their constituent phases are different, the appearance of a gas marble is similar to that of a liquid marble. Importantly, the delimiting particle armor in liquid marble straddles at the single-layer liquid−gas interface, while that in gas marble straddles at the bilayer liquid−gas interfaces, as shown inFig.2(a).
Fig.2 (a) Schematic of a gas marble. Insert illustrating the cross-section of the gas marble shell and the layout of particles on the marble surface. (b) Optical image of a gas marble. The fluorescent picture demonstrates the enlargement of the particle layout. (c) Comparison of mechanical stability among gas marbles, liquid marbles and armored marbles at different sizes of bubbles and drops (Db). Both the critical overpressures (ΔP+) and underpressures (ΔP+) are normalized by capillary pressure (ΔPcap) to make a fair comparison. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [45], copyright 2017, American Physicsal Society.

Full size|PPT slide

Compared to soap bubbles, a gas marble with particle-entrapping liquid film has significantly higher robustness [48]. The mechanical stability of a gas marble can be characterized by measuring the pressure difference ΔP = PbPatm that causes bursting, where Pb and Patm denote the inner pressure of the gas marble and the atmospheric pressure, respectively. There are two scenarios in which a gas marble can rupture: overpressure ΔP+ > 0 when the gas marble undergoes an inflation test, and underpressure Δ P < 0 while a gas marble is in the deflation process. It has been found that particulate bubbles can sustain both overpressures and underpressures with amplitudes ~10 times greater than the Laplace pressure, Δ Pcap = 4γ/Rb (a gas marble has two liquid/air interfaces), which suggests that the particle monolayer at the thin liquid film dramatically improves the stability of bubbles [48]. The outstanding mechanical strength is attributed to the strong cohesive nature of the particle-assembled shell on the bubble surface. More interestingly, the normalized pressures ΔP+Pcap and ΔPPcap of a gas marble are much larger than those of liquid marbles and armored bubbles [23,50], as shown in Fig.2(c). The significant differences in underpressures between gas marbles and liquid marbles come from the capacity of gas marbles to resist fluid loading up to 10 times the Laplace pressure of corresponding bare bubbles, whereas liquid marbles do not possess any strength for such a solicitation mode [48].

4 4 Gas marbles represent ultra-long-lasting bubbles in the atmospheric environment

Gas marbles are more robust than bubbles, liquid marbles and armored bubbles underwater [48]. Do they have a longer life than bubbles with no particles? A recent work demonstrated that particle-stabilized bubbles can maintain their integrity for more than 1 year in a standard atmosphere [8]. The ultra-long-lasting bubble is a gas marble featuring a particle-entrapping thin film of glycol aqueous solution. Its long life is attributed to the conduction of film drainage, liquid evaporation and gas diffusion, which accounts for the otherwise transient and fragile nature of bare bubbles. First, the particle shell can slow the drainage of the film through wetting forces. These partial-wetting particles adsorb on the two liquid interfaces, forming a monolayer through cohesive attractions. This monolayer traps the liquid by capillarity, makes the liquid passages constricted and tortuous, and thus significantly hinders the overall drainage within the thin film [41]. Second, the particles on the film can reduce the area of the surface across which gas diffuses, thus making the particulate film less permeable to gas than their pure liquid counterparts. The low gas permeability of the film slows the aging of gas marbles since evaporation is inhibited [49]. For instance, a normal water soap bubble (Rb = 3.7 mm) could burst within 1 min because of evaporation. When coated with the particles, the lifetime of a water bubble with an identical radius can be prolonged to 9 min, as shown in Fig.3(a). The phenomenon wherein particulate film reduces evaporation also exists in liquid marbles. It has also been suggested that the higher the surface coverage is, the lower the evaporation rate [51]. Last but not least, to further slow the evaporation and make the bubble longer lasting, a mixture of water and glycerol can be formulated to generate a gas marble (Fig.3). Glycerol has a strong affinity for water molecules due to its rich hydroxyl groups. Thus, the glycerol within the particulate film of bubble can absorb water molecules contained in air, which compensates for water evaporation and enhances bubble stability (Fig.3(a)). In a gas marble, adsorption and evaporation of water can be balanced, and the resultant marble can be further stabilized by optimizing the glycerol mass ratio and relative humidity, as summarized in the phase diagram shown in Fig.3(b) [8].
Fig.3 (a) Morphology and lifetimes of different marbles: soap water bubble, water gas marble and water/glycerol gas marble. The water/glycerol gas marble has the longest lifetime, which maintains its morphology after 9 months. (b) Phase diagram of different regimes of gas marble depending on the initial glycerol mass ratio and the relative humidity. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [8], copyright 2022, American Physical Society.

Full size|PPT slide

5 5 Perspectives of gas marbles

Recent progress in particle-stabilized bubble with ultra-robustness and ultra-long-lasting life not only extends our understanding of particulate-stabilized interfaces but could also have important implications for applications. Gas marbles can inspire the design and fabrication of novel materials. For instance, highly robust bubbles could inspire new strategies for foam stabilization, which is crucial for developing foam-based materials or products [1,2,23]. By inhibiting the coalescence of foams on the level of a single bubble, well-controlled aerated materials can also be designed. Additionally, particulate-stabilized bubbles with high mechanical strength and long life can be exploited as gas storage materials. By designing the film composition and inhibiting the gas permittivity, valuable or polluted gases can be encapsulated inside the bubbles with insignificant gas diffusion/exchange with the environment.
Gas marbles can also be utilized as a new type of confined microreactor. For instance, we can use gas marbles for miniaturized reactions between interior and exterior gases. By tuning the film composition, we can control the permittivity of gas marbles and explore the reaction dynamics of the two gases. In addition, the thin film of gas marbles can be the confinement where miniaturized liquid/gas reactions with high efficiency take place. The thin film of gas marbles possesses an ultrahigh surface-to-volume ratio: S/V ~1/h, where h is the thickness of the film. With its unique properties, this new soft object, the gas marble, could open new possibilities both for a fundamental understanding of particle-laden interfaces as well as for the development of novel bubble-based materials and novel microreactors.
This is a preview of subscription content, contact us for subscripton.

References

[1]
Liljeqvist S, Samuelson P, Hansson M, Nguyen T N, Binz H, Stahl S. Surface display of the cholera toxin B subunit on Staphylococcus xylosus and Staphylococcus carnosus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1997, 63(7): 2481–2488
[2]
Lee J S, Shin K S, Pan J G, Kim C J. Surface-displayed viral antigens on Salmonella carrier vaccine. Nature Biotechnology, 2000, 18(6): 645–648
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Martineau P, Charbit A, Leclerc C, Werts C, O’Callaghan D, Hofnung M. A genetic system to elicit and monitor antipeptide antibodies without peptide synthesis. Bio/Technology, 1991, 9(2): 170–172
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Westerlund-Wikstrom B, Tanskanen J, Virkola R, Hacker J, Lindberg M, Skurnik M, Korhonen T K. Functional expression of adhesive peptides as fusions to Escherichia coli flagellin. Protein Engineering, 1997, 10(11): 1319–1326
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Boder E T, Wittrup K D. Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries. Nature Biotechnology, 1997, 15(6): 553–557
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Xu Z, Lee S Y. Display of polyhistidine peptides on the Escherichia coli cell surface by using outer membrane protein C as an anchoring motif. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1999, 65(11): 5142–5147
[7]
Sousa C, Kotrba P, Ruml T, Cebolla A, De Lorenzo V. Metalloadsorption by Escherichia coli cells displaying yeast and mammalian metallothioneins anchored to the outer membrane protein LamB. Journal of Bacteriology, 1998, 180(9): 2280–2284
[8]
Bae W, Mulchandani A, Chen W. Cell surface display of synthetic phytochelatins using ice nucleation protein for enhanced heavy metal bioaccumulation. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 2002, 88(2): 223–227
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Liu C, Yang B, Gan J, Zhang Y, Liang M, Shu X, Shu J. Heterogeneous reactions of suspended parathion, malathion, and fenthion particles with NO(3) radicals. Chemosphere, 2012, 87(5): 470–476
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Smith G P. Filamentous fusion phage: Novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science, 1985, 228(4705): 1315–1317
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Li M. Applications of display technology in protein analysis. Nature Biotechnology, 2000, 18(12): 1251–1256
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Freudl R, MacIntyre S, Degen M, Henning U. Cell surface exposure of the outer membrane protein OmpA of Escherichia coli K-12. Journal of Molecular Biology, 1986, 188(3): 491–494
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Ishikawa M, Shigemori K, Hori K. Application of the adhesive bacterionanofiber AtaA to a novel microbial immobilization method for the production of indigo as a model chemical. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2014, 111(1): 16–24
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Hori K, Ohara Y, Ishikawa M, Nakatani H. Effectiveness of direct immobilization of bacterial cells onto material surfaces using the bacterionanofiber protein AtaA. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015, 99(12): 5025–5032
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Xu X, Gao C, Zhang X, Che B, Ma C, Qiu J, Tao F, Xu P. Production of N-acetyl-D-neuraminic acid by use of an efficient spore surface display system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(10): 3197–3201
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Smith M R, Khera E, Wen F. Engineering novel and improved biocatalysts by cell surface display. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(16): 4021–4032
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Beerli R R, Bauer M, Buser R B, Gwerder M, Muntwiler S, Maurer P, Saudan P, Bachmann M F. Isolation of human monoclonal antibodies by mammalian cell display. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(38): 14336–14341
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Ernst W, Grabherr R, Wegner D, Borth N, Grassauer A, Katinger H. Baculovirus surface display: Construction and screening of a eukaryotic epitope library. Nucleic Acids Research, 1998, 26(7): 1718–1723
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Schneewind O, Missiakas D M. Protein secretion and surface display in Gram-positive bacteria. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 367(1592): 1123–1139
[20]
van Bloois E, Winter R T, Kolmar H, Fraaije M W. Decorating microbes: Surface display of proteins on Escherichia coli. Trends in Biotechnology, 2011, 29(2): 79–86
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Levin A M, Weiss G A. Optimizing the affinity and specificity of proteins with molecular display. Molecular BioSystems, 2006, 2(1): 49–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Francisco J A, Earhart C F, Georgiou G. Transport and anchoring of beta-lactamase to the external surface of Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1992, 89(7): 2713–2717
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Francisco J A, Campbell R, Iverson B L, Georgiou G. Production and fluorescence-activated cell sorting of Escherichia coli expressing a functional antibody fragment on the external surface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1993, 90(22): 10444–10448
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Francisco J A, Stathopoulos C, Warren R A, Kilburn D G, Georgiou G. Specific adhesion and hydrolysis of cellulose by intact Escherichia coli expressing surface anchored cellulase or cellulose binding domains. Bio/Technology, 1993, 11(4): 491–495
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Wei W, Liu X, Sun P, Wang X, Zhu H, Hong M, Mao Z W, Zhao J. Simple whole-cell biodetection and bioremediation of heavy metals based on an engineered lead-specific operon. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(6): 3363–3371
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Yang C, Zhao Q, Liu Z, Li Q, Qiao C, Mulchandani A, Chen W. Cell surface display of functional macromolecule fusions on Escherichia coli for development of an autofluorescent whole-cell biocatalyst. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(16): 6105–6110
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Qu W, Xue Y, Ding Q. Display of fungi xylanase on Escherichia coli cell surface and use of the enzyme in xylan biodegradation. Current Microbiology, 2015, 70(6): 779–785
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Richins R D, Kaneva I, Mulchandani A, Chen W. Biodegradation of organophosphorus pesticides by surface-expressed organophosphorus hydrolase. Nature Biotechnology, 1997, 15(10): 984–987
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Jung H C, Lebeault J M, Pan J G. Surface display of Zymomonas mobilis levansucrase by using the ice-nucleation protein of Pseudomonas syringae. Nature Biotechnology, 1998, 16(6): 576–580
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Maurer J, Jose J, Meyer T F. Autodisplay: One-component system for efficient surface display and release of soluble recombinant proteins from Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology, 1997, 179(3): 794–804
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Karami A, Latifi A M, Khodi S. Comparison of the organophosphorus hydrolase surface display using InaVN and Lpp-OmpA systems in Escherichia coli. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 24(3): 379–385
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Kawahara H. The structures and functions of ice crystal-controlling proteins from bacteria. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2002, 94(6): 492–496
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Jung H C, Park J H, Park S H, Lebeault J M, Pan J G. Expression of carboxymethylcellulase on the surface of Escherichia coli using Pseudomonas syringae ice nucleation protein. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 1998, 22(5): 348–354
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
van Bloois E, Winter R T, Janssen D B, Fraaije M W. Export of functional Streptomyces coelicolor alditol oxidase to the periplasm or cell surface of Escherichia coli and its application in whole-cell biocatalysis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2009, 83(4): 679–687
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Yim S K, Jung H C, Pan J G, Kang H S, Ahn T, Yun C H. Functional expression of mammalian NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase on the cell surface of Escherichia coli. Protein Expression and Purification, 2006, 49(2): 292–298
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Yim S K, Kim D H, Jung H C, Pan J G, Kang H S, Ahn T, Yun C H. Surface display of heme- and diflavin-containing cytochrome P450 BM3 in Escherichia coli: A whole cell biocatalyst for oxidation. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 20(4): 712–717
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Benz I, Schmidt M A. Structures and functions of autotransporter proteins in microbial pathogens. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2011, 301(6): 461–468
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Leo J C, Grin I, Linke D.Type V secretion: Mechanism(s) of autotransport through the bacterial outer membrane. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 367(1592): 1088–1101
[39]
Nicolay T, Vanderleyden J, Spaepen S. Autotransporter-based cell surface display in Gram-negative bacteria. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 2013, 41(1): 109–123
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Jose J, Meyer T F. The autodisplay story, from discovery to biotechnical and biomedical applications. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2007, 71(4): 600–619
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Detzel C, Maas R, Tubeleviciute A, Jose J. Autodisplay of nitrilase from Klebsiella pneumoniae and whole-cell degradation of oxynil herbicides and related compounds. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 97(11): 4887–4896
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Jose J, von Schwichow S. Autodisplay of active sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH) yields a whole cell biocatalyst for the synthesis of rare sugars. ChemBioChem, 2004, 5(4): 491–499
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Lattemann C T, Maurer J, Gerland E, Meyer T F. Autodisplay: Functional display of active beta-lactamase on the surface of Escherichia coli by the AIDA-I autotransporter. Journal of Bacteriology, 2000, 182(13): 3726–3733
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Schultheiss E, Weiss S, Winterer E, Maas R, Heinzle E, Jose J. Esterase autodisplay: Enzyme engineering and whole-cell activity determination in microplates with pH sensors. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 74(15): 4782–4791
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Li C, Zhu Y, Benz I, Schmidt M A, Chen W, Mulchandani A, Qiao C. Presentation of functional organophosphorus hydrolase fusions on the surface of Escherichia coli by the AIDA-I autotransporter pathway. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2008, 99(2): 485–490
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Becker S, Theile S, Heppeler N, Michalczyk A, Wentzel A, Wilhelm S, Jaeger K E, Kolmar H. A generic system for the Escherichia coli cell-surface display of lipolytic enzymes. FEBS Letters, 2005, 579(5): 1177–1182
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Shanna S, Iasson E P, Tozakidis M, Teese J J. Maximized autotransporter-mediated expression (MATE) for surface display and secretion of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 2015, 50(3): 251–260
[48]
Tozakidis I E, Brossette T, Lenz F, Maas R M, Jose J. Proof of concept for the simplified breakdown of cellulose by combining Pseudomonas putida strains with surface displayed thermophilic endocellulase, exocellulase and beta-glucosidase. Microbial Cell Factories, 2016, 15(1): 103
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Crampton M, Berger E, Reid S, Louw M. The development of a flagellin surface display expression system in a moderate thermophile, Bacillus halodurans Alk36. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 75(3): 599–607
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Pallesen L, Poulsen L K, Christiansen G, Klemm P. Chimeric FimH adhesin of type 1 fimbriae: A bacterial surface display system for heterologous sequences. Microbiology, 1995, 141(11): 2839–2848
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Ishikawa M, Nakatani H, Hori K. AtaA, a new member of the trimeric autotransporter adhesins from Acinetobacter sp. Tol 5 mediating high adhesiveness to various abiotic surfaces. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e48830
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Nummelin H, Merckel M C, Leo J C, Lankinen H, Skurnik M, Goldman A. The Yersinia adhesin YadA collagen-binding domain structure is a novel left-handed parallel beta-roll. EMBO Journal, 2004, 23(4): 701–711
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
O’Rourke F, Schmidgen T, Kaiser P O, Linke D, Kempf V A. Adhesins of Bartonella spp. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2011, 715: 51–70
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Yoshimoto S, Nakatani H, Iwasaki K, Hori K. An Acinetobacter trimeric autotransporter adhesin reaped from cells exhibits its nonspecific stickiness via a highly stable 3D structure. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 28020
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Schneewind O, Mihaylova-Petkov D, Model P. Cell wall sorting signals in surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria. EMBO Journal, 1993, 12(12): 4803–4811
[56]
Lee S Y, Choi J H, Xu Z. Microbial cell-surface display. Trends in Biotechnology, 2003, 21(1): 45–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Schreuder M P, Brekelmans S, van den Ende H, Klis F M. Targeting of a heterologous protein to the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast (Chichester, England), 1993, 9(4): 399–409
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Pepper L R, Cho Y K, Boder E T, Shusta E V. A decade of yeast surface display technology: Where are we now? Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, 2008, 11(2): 127–134
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Kuroda K, Ueda M. Arming technology in yeast-novel strategy for whole-cell biocatalyst and protein engineering. Biomolecules, 2013, 3(3): 632–650
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Blazic M, Kovacevic G, Prodanovic O, Ostafe R, Gavrovic-Jankulovic M, Fischer R, Prodanovic R. Yeast surface display for the expression, purification and characterization of wild-type and B11 mutant glucose oxidases. Protein Expression and Purification, 2013, 89(2): 175–180
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Gera N, Hussain M, Rao B M. Protein selection using yeast surface display. Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2013, 60(1): 15–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Tanaka T, Yamada R, Ogino C, Kondo A. Recent developments in yeast cell surface display toward extended applications in biotechnology. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012, 95(3): 577–591
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Wen F, Sethi D K, Wucherpfennig K W, Zhao H. Cell surface display of functional human MHC class II proteins: Yeast display versus insect cell display. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, 2011, 24(9): 701–709
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Yeasmin S, Kim C H, Park H J, Sheikh M I, Lee J Y, Kim J W, Back K K, Kim S H. Cell surface display of cellulase activity-free xylanase enzyme on Saccharomyces cerevisiae EBY100. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2011, 164(3): 294–304
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Ueda M, Tanaka A. Cell surface engineering of yeast: Construction of arming yeast with biocatalyst. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2000, 90(2): 125–136
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Kondo A, Shigechi H, Abe M, Uyama K, Matsumoto T, Takahashi S, Ueda M, Tanaka A, Kishimoto M, Fukuda H. High-level ethanol production from starch by a flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain displaying cell-surface glucoamylase. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2002, 58(3): 291–296
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Chen Y, Stemple B, Kumar M, Wei N. Cell surface display fungal laccase as a renewable biocatalyst for degradation of persistent micropollutants bisphenol A and sulfamethoxazole. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(16): 8799–8808
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
He X, Shang J, Li F, Liu H. Yeast cell surface display of linoleic acid isomerase from Propionibacterium acnes and its application for the production of trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 2014, 62(1): 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Bony M, Thines-Sempoux D, Barre P, Blondin B. Localization and cell surface anchoring of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae flocculation protein Flo1p. Journal of Bacteriology, 1997, 179(15): 4929–4936
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Matsumoto T, Fukuda H, Ueda M, Tanaka A, Kondo A. Construction of yeast strains with high cell surface lipase activity by using novel display systems based on the Flo1p flocculation functional domain. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2002, 68(9): 4517–4522
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Han Z L, Han S Y, Zheng S P, Lin Y. Enhancing thermostability of a Rhizomucor miehei lipase by engineering a disulfide bond and displaying on the yeast cell surface. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2009, 85(1): 117–126
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Jiang Z B, Song H T, Gupta N, Ma L X, Wu Z B. Cell surface display of functionally active lipases from Yarrowia lipolytica in Pichia pastoris. Protein Expression and Purification, 2007, 56(1): 35–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Moura M V, da Silva G P, Machado A C, Torres F A, Freire D M, Almeida R V. Displaying lipase B from Candida antarctica in Pichia pastoris using the yeast surface display approach: Prospection of a new anchor and characterization of the whole cell biocatalyst. PLoS One, 2015, 10(10): e0141454
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Kondo A, Ueda M. Yeast cell-surface display—applications of molecular display. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2004, 64(1): 28–40
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Bauer F F, Govender P, Bester M C. Yeast flocculation and its biotechnological relevance. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 88(1): 31–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Vallejo J A, Sanchez-Perez A, Martinez J P, Villa T G. Cell aggregations in yeasts and their applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 97(6): 2305–2318
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Abe H, Ohba M, Shimma Y, Jigami Y. Yeast cells harboring human alpha-1,3-fucosyltransferase at the cell surface engineered using Pir, a cell wall-anchored protein. FEMS Yeast Research, 2004, 4(4-5): 417–425
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Abe H, Shimma Y, Jigami Y. In vitro oligosaccharide synthesis using intact yeast cells that display glycosyltransferases at the cell surface through cell wall-anchored protein Pir. Glycobiology, 2003, 13(2): 87–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Andres I, Gallardo O, Parascandola P, Javier Pastor F I, Zueco J. Use of the cell wall protein Pir4 as a fusion partner for the expression of Bacillus sp. BP-7 xylanase A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2005, 89(6): 690–697
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Shimma Y, Saito F, Oosawa F, Jigami Y. Construction of a library of human glycosyltransferases immobilized in the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006, 72(11): 7003–7012
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Shi B, Ke X, Yu H, Xie J, Jia Y, Guo R. Novel properties for endoglucanase acquired by cell-surface display technique. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015, 25(11): 1856–1862
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Yuzbasheva E Y, Yuzbashev T V, Perkovskaya N I, Mostova E B, Vybornaya T V, Sukhozhenko A V, Toropygin I Y, Sineoky S P. Cell surface display of Yarrowia lipolytica lipase Lip2p using the cell wall protein YlPir1p, its characterization, and application as a whole-cell biocatalyst. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2015, 175(8): 3888–3900
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Castillo L, Martinez A I, Garcera A, Elorza M V, Valentin E, Sentandreu R. Functional analysis of the cysteine residues and the repetitive sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pir4/Cis3: The repetitive sequence is needed for binding to the cell wall beta-1,3-glucan. Yeast (Chichester, England), 2003, 20(11): 973–983
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Ecker M, Deutzmann R, Lehle L, Mrsa V, Tanner W. Pir proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are attached to beta-1,3-glucan by a new protein-carbohydrate linkage. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2006, 281(17): 11523–11529
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Starwalt S E, Masteller E L, Bluestone J A, Kranz D M. Directed evolution of a single-chain class II MHC product by yeast display. Protein Engineering, 2003, 16(2): 147–156
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Yang N, Yu Z, Jia D, Xie Z, Zhang K, Xia Z, Lei L, Qiao M. The contribution of Pir protein family to yeast cell surface display. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98(7): 2897–2905
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Liu R, Yang C, Xu Y, Xu P, Jiang H, Qiao C. Development of a whole-cell biocatalyst/biosensor by display of multiple heterologous proteins on the Escherichia coli cell surface for the detoxification and detection of organophosphates. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2013, 61(32): 7810–7816
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Tang X, Liang B, Yi T, Manco G, Palchetti I, Liu A. Cell surface display of organophosphorus hydrolase for sensitive spectrophotometric detection of p-nitrophenol substituted organophosphates. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2014, 55: 107–112
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Yang J, Liu R, Jiang H, Yang Y, Qiao C. Selection of a whole-cell biocatalyst for methyl parathion biodegradation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012, 95(6): 1625–1632
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Chen X A, Ishida N, Todaka N, Nakamura R, Maruyama J, Takahashi H, Kitamoto K. Promotion of efficient saccharification of crystalline cellulose by Aspergillus fumigatus Swo1. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(8): 2556–2561
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Arantes V, Saddler J N. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: The role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2010, 3(1): 4
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Nakatani Y, Yamada R, Ogino C, Kondo A. Synergetic effect of yeast cell-surface expression of cellulase and expansin-like protein on direct ethanol production from cellulose. Microbial Cell Factories, 2013, 12(1): 66
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Hyeon J E, Jeon S D, Han S O. Cellulosome-based, Clostridium-derived multi-functional enzyme complexes for advanced biotechnology tool development: Advances and applications. Biotechnology Advances, 2013, 31(6): 936–944
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Schwarz W H. The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2001, 56(5-6): 634–649
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Wen F, Sun J, Zhao H. Yeast surface display of trifunctional minicellulosomes for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose to ethanol. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(4): 1251–1260
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Tsai S L, Oh J, Singh S, Chen R, Chen W. Functional assembly of minicellulosomes on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell surface for cellulose hydrolysis and ethanol production. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(19): 6087–6093
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Liang Y, Si T, Ang E L, Zhao H. Engineered pentafunctional minicellulosome for simultaneous saccharification and ethanol fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2014, 80(21): 6677–6684
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
You C, Zhang X Z, Sathitsuksanoh N, Lynd L R, Zhang Y H. Enhanced microbial utilization of recalcitrant cellulose by an ex vivo cellulosome-microbe complex. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(5): 1437–1444
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Lin Y, Tanaka S. Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: Current state and prospects. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2006, 69(6): 627–642
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Dervakos G A, Webb C. On the merits of viable-cell immobilisation. Biotechnology Advances, 1991, 9(4): 559–612
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Junter G A, Jouenne T. Immobilized viable microbial cells: From the process to the proteome em leader or the cart before the horse. Biotechnology Advances, 2004, 22(8): 633–658
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Carballeira J D, Quezada M A, Hoyos P, Simeo Y, Hernaiz M J, Alcantara A R, Sinisterra J V. Microbial cells as catalysts for stereoselective red-ox reactions. Biotechnology Advances, 2009, 27(6): 686–714
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Cassidy M B, Lee H, Trevors J T. Environmental applications of immobilized microbial cells: A review. Journal of Industrial Microbiology, 1996, 16(2): 79–101
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Schaeffer C R, Woods K M, Longo G M, Kiedrowski M R, Paharik A E, Buttner H, Christner M, Boissy R J, Horswill A R, Rohde H, Fey P D. Accumulation-associated protein enhances Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation under dynamic conditions and is required for infection in a rat catheter model. Infection and Immunity, 2015, 83(1): 214–226
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Cotter S E, Surana N K, St Geme J W 3rd. Trimeric autotransporters: A distinct subfamily of autotransporter proteins. Trends in Microbiology, 2005, 13(5): 199–205
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Hobley L, Harkins C, MacPhee C E, Stanley-Wall N R. Giving structure to the biofilm matrix: An overview of individual strategies and emerging common themes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2015, 39(5): 649–669
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Ishikawa M, Shigemori K, Suzuki A, Hori K. Evaluation of adhesiveness of Acinetobacter sp. Tol 5 to abiotic surfaces. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2012, 113(6): 719–725
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(289 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/