Interactions between nano-TiO2 particles and algal cells at moderate particle concentration

Mingyu LIN, Yao Hsiang TSENG, Chin-Pao HUANG

PDF(1655 KB)
PDF(1655 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 242-257. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-015-1513-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Interactions between nano-TiO2 particles and algal cells at moderate particle concentration

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Nano-sized titanium dioxide (nano-TiO2) has wide industrial applications and therefore considerable chances of exposure are created for human beings and ecosystems. To better understand the interactions between nano-TiO2 and aquatic organisms, we first studied TiO2 uptake by algae exemplified by Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. P. subcapitata were exposed to nano-TiO2 in a series of concentrations and at various pH. TiO2 uptake was quantified using a sedimentation curve analysis technique. After exposure of algae to TiO2, the variation of zeta potential was measured and the morphology of algae-TiO2 aggregate was observed with scanning electron microscopy and the optical microscopy. The steady-state TiO2 uptake was found to be pH-dependent and the isotherms can be described well by Freundlich model. TiO2 deposited on algal surfaces causes the shift of pHzpc of TiO2-covered algae from that of algae toward that of TiO2. The attraction between TiO2-covered algal cells induces the agglomeration of algae and TiO2 and thus the formation of algae-TiO2 aggregates in the size of 12 to 50 µm. The 2-D fractal dimension of the aggregates is pH-dependent and ranges from 1.31 to 1.67. The theoretical analysis of the Gibbs energy of interaction indicates that both TiO2 uptake by algae and the formation of algae-TiO2 aggregate are influenced by the interaction between TiO2 particles.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

nano-TiO2 / Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata / algal cells / titanium dioxide uptake

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Mingyu LIN, Yao Hsiang TSENG, Chin-Pao HUANG. Interactions between nano-TiO2 particles and algal cells at moderate particle concentration. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(2): 242‒257 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-015-1513-7

References

[1]
Colvin V L. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 21(10): 1166–1170
[2]
Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science, 2006, 311(5761): 622–627
[3]
Karakoti A S, Hench L L, Seal S. The potential toxicity of nanomaterials: The role of surfaces. JOM, 2006, 58(7): 77–82
[4]
Long T C, Saleh N, Tilton R D, Lowry G V, Veronesi B. Titanium dioxide (P25) produces reactive oxygen species in immortalized brain microglia (BV2): Implications for nanoparticle neurotoxicity. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 40(14): 4346–4352
[5]
Kuempel E D, Attfield M D, Vallyathan V, Lapp N L, Hale J M, Smith R J, Castranova V. Pulmonary inflammation and crystalline silica in respirable coal mine dust: Dose-response. Journal of Bio-Science, 2003, 28(1): 61–69
[6]
Tsuji J S, Maynard A D, Howard P C, James J T, Lam C W, Warheit D B, Santamaria A B. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part IV: Risk assessment of nanoparticles. Toxicological Sciences, 2006, 89(1): 42–50
[7]
Linkous C A, Carter G J, Locuson D B, Ouellette A J, Slattery D K, Smitha L A. Photocatalytic inhibition of algae growth using TiO2, WO3, and cocatalyst modifications. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(22): 4754–4758
[8]
Oberdörster E. Manufactured nanomaterials (Fullerenes, C-60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile largemouth bass. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2004, 112(10): 1058–1062
[9]
Kim S C, Lee D K. Preparation of TiO2-coated hollow glass beads and their application to the control of algal growth in eutrophic water. Microchemical Journal, 2005, 80(2): 227–232
[10]
Hund-Rinke K, Simon M. Ecotoxic effect of photocatalytic active nanoparticles TiO2 on algae and daphnids. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2006, 13(4): 225–232
[11]
Lovern S B, Klaper R. Daphnia magna mortality when exposed to titanium dioxide and fullerene (C60) nanoparticles. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2006, 25(4): 1132–1137
[12]
Lovern S B, Strickler J R, Klaper R. Behavioral and physiological changes in Daphnia magna when exposed to nanoparticle suspensions (titanium dioxide, nano-C60, and C60HxC70Hx). Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(12): 4465–4470
[13]
Manier N, Bado-Nilles A, Delalain P, Aguerre-Chariol O, Pandard P. Ecotoxicity of non-aged and aged CeO2 nanomaterials towards freshwater microalgae. Environmental Pollution, 2013, 180: 67–70
[14]
Wick P, Manser P, Limbachd L K, Dettlaff-Weglikowskab U, Krumeichc F, Rothb S, Starkd W J, Bruininkaet A. The degree and kind of agglomeration affect carbon nanotube cytotoxicity. Toxicology Letters, 2007, 168(2): 121–131
[15]
Geiser M, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Geiser M, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Kapp N, Schürch S, Kreyling W, Schulz H, Semmler M. Im Hof V, Heyder J, Gehr P. Ultrafine particles cross cellular membranes by nonphagocytic mechanisms in lungs and in cultured cells. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2005, 113(11): 1555–1560
[16]
Limbach L K, Li Y C, Grass R N, Brunner T J, Hintermann M A, Muller M, Gunther D, Stark W J. Oxide nanoparticle uptake in human lung fibroblasts: Effects of particle size, agglomeration, and diffusion at low concentrations. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(23): 9370–9376
[17]
Chang E, Thek N, Yu W W, Colvin V L, Drezek R. Evaluation of quantum dot cytotoxicity based on intracellular uptake. Small, 2006, 2(12): 1412–1417
[18]
Thill A, Zeyons O, Spalla O, Chauvat F, Rose J, Auffan M, Flank A M. Cytotoxicity of CeO2 nanoparticles for Escherichia coli. Physico-chemical insight of the cytotoxicity mechanism. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(19): 6151–6156
[19]
Kashiwada S. Distribution of nanoparticles in the see-through medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environmental Health Perspectives, 2006, 114(11): 1697–1702
[20]
Crist R, Oberholser H K, Shank N, Nguyen M. Nature of bonding between metallic ions and algal cell walls. Environmental Science & Technology, 1981, 15(10): 1212–1217
[21]
Robinson K A, Baird D J, Wrona F J. Surface metal adsorption on zooplankton carapaces: Implications for exposure and effects in consumer organisms. Environmental Pollution, 2003, 122(2): 159–167
[22]
Taylor G, Baird D J, Soares A M V M. Surface binding of contaminants by algae: Consequences for lethal toxicity and feeding to Daphnia magna straus. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1998, 17(3): 412–419
[23]
Gong N, Shao K, Feng W, Lin Z, Liang C, Sun Y. Biotoxicity of nickel oxide nanoparticles and bio-remediation by microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. Chemosphere, 2011, 83(4): 510–516
[24]
Ji J, Long Z, Lin D. Toxicity of oxide nanoparticles to the green algae Chlorella sp. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 170(2–3): 525–530
[25]
Sadip M, Dalai S, Chandrasekaran N, Mukheriee A. Ectotoxicity study of titania (TiO2) NPs on two microalgae species: Scenedesmus sp. and Chlorella sp. Ecotoxicity and Environmental Safety, 2011, 74(5): 1180–1187
[26]
Metzler D M, Li M H, Erdem A, Huang C P. Responses of algae to photocatalytic nano-TiO2 particles with an emphasis on the effect of particle size. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 170(2-3): 538–546
[27]
Perreault F, Oukarroum A, Melegari S P, Matias W G, Popovic R. Polymer coating of copper oxide nanoparticles increases nanoparticles uptake and toxicity in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Chemosphere, 2012, 87(11): 1388–1394
[28]
Chen P Y, Powell B H, Mortimer M, Ke P C. Adaptive interactions between zinc oxide nanoparticles and Chlorella sp. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(21): 12178–12185
[29]
Ma S, Zhou K, Yang K, Lin D. Heteroagglomeration of oxide nanoparticles with algal cells: Effects of particle type, ionic strength and pH. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 49(2): 932–939
[30]
Xia B, Chen B, Sun X, Qu K, Ma F, Du M. Interaction of TiO2 nanoparticles with the marine microalga Nitzschia closterium: Growth inhibition, oxidative stress and internalization. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 508: 525–533
[31]
Vigneault B, Percot A, Lafleur M, Campbell P G C. Permeability changes in model and phytoplankton membranes in the presence of aquatic humic substances. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(18): 3907–3913
[32]
Moye H A, Miles C J, Phlips E J, Sargent B, Merritt K K. Kinetics and uptake mechanisms for monomethylmercury between freshwater algae and water. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(16): 3550–3555
[33]
Kaulbach E S, Szymanowski J E S, Fein J B. Surface complexation modeling of proton and Cd adsorption onto an algal cell wall. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(11): 4060–4065
[34]
Konstantinou I K, Albanis T A. TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solution: Kinetic and mechanistic investigations: A review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2004, 49(1): 1–14
[35]
Choi H, Stathatos E, Dionysiou D D. Sol-gel preparation of mesoporous photocatalytic TiO2 films and TiO2/Al2O3 composite membranes for environmental applications. Applied Catalysis B-Environmental, 2006, 63(1-2): 60–67
[36]
Nohynek G J, Lademann J, Ribaud C J, Roberts M S. Grey goo on the skin nanotechnology, cosmetic and sunscreen safety. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2007, 37(3): 251–277
[37]
Kirchnerova J, Cohen M L H, Guy C, Klvana D. Photocatalytic oxidation of n-butanol under fluorescent visible light lamp over commercial TiO2 (Hombicat UV100 and Degussa P25). Applied Catalysis A, General, 2005, 282(1-2): 321–332
[38]
Lin H, Huang C P, Li W, Ni C, Shah S I, Tseng Y H. Size dependency of nanocrystalline TiO2 on its optical property and photocatalytic reactivity exemplified by 2-chlorophenol. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2006, 68(1-2): 1–11
[39]
Nicolosi V, Vrbanic V, Mrzel A, McCauley J, O’Flaherty S, McGuinness C, Compagnini G, Mihailovic D, Blau W J, Coleman J N. Solubility of Mo6S4.5I4.5 nanowires in common solvents: A sedimentation study. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2005, 109(15): 7124–7133
[40]
Burger R. Phenomenological foundation and mathematical theory of sedimentation-consolidation processes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2000, 80(1-3): 177–188
[41]
Reynolds C S. The Ecology of Freshwater Phytoplankton. London: Cambridge University Press, 1984, 384
[42]
Smoluchowski M. Versuch einer mathematischen theorie der koagulations kinetic kolloider lösungen. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, 1917, 92: 129–168
[43]
Jiang Q, Logan B E. Fractal dimensions of aggregates determined from steady-state size distributions. Environmental Science & Technology, 1991, 25(12): 2031–2038
[44]
Chakraborti R K, Gardner K H, Atkinson J F, van Benschoten J E. Changes in fractal dimension during aggregation. Water Research, 2003, 37(4): 873–883
[45]
Phenrat T, Saleh N, Sirk K, Tilton R D, Lowry G V. Aggregation and sedimentation of aqueous nanoscale zerovalent iron dispersions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(1): 284–290
[46]
McCarthy D N, Nicolosi V, Vengust D, Mihailovic D, Blau W J, Coleman J N. Dispersion and purification of Mo6S3I6 nanowires in organic solvents. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 101(1): 014317
[47]
Kim A S, Yuan R. Hydrodynamics of an ideal aggregate with quadratically increasing permeability. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2005, 285(2): 627–633
[48]
Adamson A W, Gast A P. Physical Chemistry of Surfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1997, 511, 522
[49]
Russel W B, Saville D A, Schowalter W R. Colloidal Dispersions. London: Cambridge University Press, 1989, 506
[50]
Chithrani B D, Ghazani A A, Chan W C W. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Letters, 2006, 6(4): 662–668
[51]
Weber W J, Micginley P M, Katz L E. Sorption phenomena in subsurface systems: Concepts, models and effects on contaminant fate and transport. Water Research, 1991, 25(5): 499–528
[52]
Elimelech M, O’Melia C R. Effect of particle-size on collision efficiency in the deposition of brownian particles with electrostatic energy barriers. Langmuir, 1990, 6(6): 1153–1163
[53]
Elimelech M. Kinetics of capture of colloidal particles in packed beds under attractive double layer interactions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1991, 146(2): 337–352
[54]
Adamczyk Z. Particle adsorption and deposition: Role of electrostatic interactions. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2003, 100: 267–347
[55]
Bremer M G E G, Duval J F L, Norde W, Lyklema J. Electrostatic interactions between immunoglobulin (IgG) molecules and a charged sorbent. Colloids and Surfaces, 2004, A 250: 29–42
[56]
McClements D J. Theoretical analysis of factors affecting the formation and stability of multilayered colloidal dispersions. Langmuir, 2005, 21(21): 9777–9785
[57]
Hogg R, Healy T W, Fuerstenau D W. Mutual coagulation of colloidal dispersions. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1996, 62(522P): 1638
[58]
Gregory J. Interaction of unequal double-layers at constant charge. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1975, 51(1): 44–51
[59]
Yaremko Z M, Tkachenko N H, Bellmann C, Pich A. Redispergation of TiO2 particles in aqueous solutions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2006, 296(2): 565–571
[60]
Zhang J. Surface forces between silica surfaces in CnTACl solutions and surface free energy characterization of talc. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2006
[61]
Han M Y, Kim W. A theoretical consideration of algae removal with clays. Microchemical Journal, 68(2-3): 157–161
[62]
Jarvis P, Jefferson B, Gregory J, Parsons S A. A review of floc strength and breakage. Water Research, 2005, 39(14): 3121–3137
[63]
Alince B. Colloidal particles deposition on pulp fibers. Colloids and Surfaces, 1989, 39(1-3): 39–51
[64]
Khan S S, Srivashan P, Vaishnvavi N, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N. Interaction of silver nanoparticles with bacterial extracellul<?Pub Caret?>ar proteins and its adsorption isotherms and kinetics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 192: 299–306

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by USEPA STAR Grant # R-83172101. Results, discussions, and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be interpret as endorsement of the funding agency. Sources of nanoparticles studied came from Degussa Corp. The authors have no direct financial interest in or relationship with any of the above companies.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1655 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/