Simulating multiphase flow in a two-stage pusher centrifuge using computational fluid dynamics

Chong PANG, Wei TAN, Endian SHA, Yuanqing TAO, Liyan LIU

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 329-338.

PDF(811 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. All Journals
PDF(811 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 329-338. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-012-1205-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Simulating multiphase flow in a two-stage pusher centrifuge using computational fluid dynamics

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The design of two-stage pusher centrifuges have developed rapidly, but a good understanding of the theory behind their practice is a long-standing problem. To better understand centrifugal filter processes, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software program FLUENT has been used to model the three-dimensional geometry and to simulate multiphase flows based on Euler-Euler, moving mesh, dynamic mesh and porous media models. The simulation tangential velocities were a little smaller than those for rigid-body motion. In the stable flow region, the radial velocities were in good agreement with the theoretical data. Additionally, solid concentration distribution were obtained and also showed good agreement with the experimental data. These results show that this simulation method could be an effective tool to optimize the design of the two-stage pusher centrifuge.

Keywords

two-stage pusher centrifuge / multiphase flow / CFD / dynamic mesh / porous media

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chong PANG, Wei TAN, Endian SHA, Yuanqing TAO, Liyan LIU. Simulating multiphase flow in a two-stage pusher centrifuge using computational fluid dynamics. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(3): 329‒338 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-012-1205-5
This is a preview of subscription content, contact us for subscripton.

References

[1]
Sandro S. Innovating the pusher centrifuge for bulk chemical separation. Filtration and Separation Technologies, 2003, 40(6): 38–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Anlauf H. Recent developments in centrifuge technology. Separation and Purification Technology, 2007, 58(2): 242–246
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Zhang J. New-fashioned two-stage pusher centrifuge and its application. Chinese Well and Rock Salt, 1994, 21(3): 31–32 (in Chinese)
[4]
Yan F, Farouk B. Numerical simulations of flows inside a partially filled centrifuge. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2003, 125(6): 1033–1042
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Zhao C, Yang D, Zhang C. Numerical simulation of liquid-solid two-phase flow in tubular bowl centrifuge. Journal of Filtration & Spearation, 2007, 14(1): 22–25 (in Chinese)
[6]
Romaní Fernández X, Nirschl H. Multiphase CFD simulation of a solid bowl centrifuge. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2009, 32(5): 719–725
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Jain M, Paranandi M, Roush D, Göklen K, Kelly W J. Using CFD to understand how flow patterns affect retention of cell-sized particles in a tubular bowl centrifuge. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2005, 44(20): 7876–7884
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Deshmukh S S, Joshi J B, Koganti S B. Flow visualization and three-dimensional CFD simulation of the annular region of an annular centrifuge extrator. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(10): 3677–3686
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Janoske U, Piesche M. Numerical simulation of the fluid flow and the separation behavior in a single gap of a disk stack centrifuge. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 1999, 22(3): 213–216
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Fluent 6.3 User’s Guide. USA: Ansys Inc., 2006, 730–737
[11]
Yakhot V, Smith L. Renormalization-group analysis of turbulence. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 30(10): 275–310
[12]
Zhang M L, Shen Y M. Three-dimensional simulation of meandering river based on 3-D RNG κ-epsilon turbulence model. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2008, 20(4): 448–455
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Kim M, Prost R, Chung H. A blind watermarking for 3-D dynamic mesh model using distribution of temporal wavelet coefficients. MRCS 2006, LNCS4105: 257–264
[14]
Wang Y, Brannock M, Cox S, Leslie G. CFD simulations of membrane filtration zone in a submerged hollow fibre membrane bioreactor using a porous media approach. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 363(1-2): 57–66
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Sun Q, Jin D. Principle structure and design calculation for centrifuges. China: Machinery Industry, 1984, 223–236 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Terms in Universities of China (No. IRT0936)
Nomenclature
Gk=generationofturbulencekineticenergyduetothemeanvelocitygradients,kg/(m·s3)
Gb=generationofturbulencekineticduetobuoyancykg/(m·s3)
Cm,C1z,C2z=turbulentparameters
u=velocityvector,m·s-1
ug=speedofmoveminggridmesh,m·s-1
Γ=diffusioncoefficient
SΦ=sourceterm,kg/(m·s3)
nf=surfacegridnumberofcontrolvolume
Aj=surfaceareavectorofsurfacej
hmin=cellsminimumheightm
h0=idealcellheightm
C2=inertialresistancefactor,1/m
d=diameteroftheparticle,m
ur=settlingvelocity,m·s-1
uz=axialvelocity,m·s-1
ps=staticpressurePa
t = time just to reach the stable work condition
z = axial position, m
Greek symbols
κ=turbulencekineticenergy,m2·s-2
ϵ=turbulentdissipationrate,m2·s-3
μeff=turbulent(oreddy)viscosity,Pa·s
σk,σz=turbulentparameters
αs=partitionfactorforthelayer
α=permeability,m-2
η1=correctioncoefficientofthesettlingvelocity
ρ=fluiddensity,kg·m-3
ω=angularvelocity,r·min-1
γ=specificweightoftheliquid,kg/(m2·s2)
Subscripts
i, j, k = Cartesian coordinate components
l=liquidphase
s=solidphase

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(811 KB)

1933

Accesses

1

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/