An investigation of reaction furnace temperatures and sulfur recovery

Abstract

In a modern day sulfur recovery unit (SRU), hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) is converted to elemental sulfur using a modified Claus unit. A process simulator called TSWEET has been used to consider the Claus process. The effect of the H₂S concentration, the H₂S/CO₂ ratio, the input air flow rate, the acid gas flow of the acid gas (AG) splitter and the temperature of the acid gas feed at three different oxygen concentrations (in the air input) on the main burner temperature have been studied. Also the effects of the tail gas ratio and the catalytic bed type on the sulfur recovery were studied. The bed temperatures were optimized in order to enhance the sulfur recovery for a given acid gas feed and air input. Initially when the fraction of AG splitter flow to the main burner was increased, the temperature of the main burner increased to a maximum but then decreased sharply when the flow fraction was further increased; this was true for all three concentrations of oxygen. However, if three other parameters (the concentration of H₂S, the ratio H₂S/CO₂ and the flow rate of air) were increased, the temperature of the main burner increased monotonically. This increase had different slopes depending on the oxygen concentration in the input air. But, by increasing the temperature of the acid gas feed, the temperature of the main burner decreased. In general, the concentration of oxygen in the input air into the Claus unit had little effect on the temperature of the main burner (This is true for all parameters). The optimal catalytic bed temperature, tail gas ratio and type of catalytic bed were also determined and these conditions are a minimum temperature of 300°C, a ratio of 2.0 and a hydrolysing Claus bed.

Keywords

Claus unit / concentration of H₂S / tail gas ratio / sulfur recovery / catalytic bed

References

[1] Elbishtawi R, Haimour N. Claus recycles with double combustion process. Fuel Processing Technology, 2004, 86(3): 245–260

[2] ZareNezhad B. An investigation on the most important influencing parameters regarding the selection of the proper catalysts for Claus SRU converts. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2009, 15(2): 143–147

[3] Monnery W D, Svrcek W Y, Behie L A. Modeling the modified Claus process reaction furnace and the implications on plant design and recovery. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1993, 71(5): 711–724

[4] Nasato L V, Karan K, Mehrotra A K, Behie L A. Modeling reaction quench times in the waste heat boiler of a Claus plant. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1994, 33(1): 7–13

[5] Kamyshny A Jr, Goifman A, Rizkov D, Lev O. Formation of carbonyl sulfide by the reaction of carbon monoxide and inorganic polysulfides. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(9): 1865–1872

[6] Zarenezhad B, Hosseinpour N. Evaluation of different alternatives for increasing the reaction furnace temperature of Claus SRU by chemical equilibrium calculations. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 28(7): 738–744

[7] Fisher H. Burner/fire box design improves sulphur recovery. Hydrocarbon Processing, 1974: 27–30

[8] Covington K, Mclntyre G. Investigate your option. Hydrocarbon Engineering, 2002: 81–84

[9] Mcintyre G, Lyddon L.Claus sulphur recovery options. Petroleum Technology Quarterly Spring, 1997: 57–61

[10] Lins V F C, Guimaraes E M. Failure of a heat exchanger generated by an excess of SO₂ and H₂S in the sulphur recovery unit of a petroleum refinery. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2007, 20(1): 91–97

[11] Boussetta N, Lanoisellé J L, Bedel-Cloutour C, Vorobiev E. Extraction of soluble matter from grape pomace by high voltage electrical discharges for polyphenol recovery: effect of sulphur dioxide and thermal treatments. Journal of Food Engineering, 2009, 95(1): 192–198

[12] Zagoruiko A N, Matro Y S. Mathematical modelling of Claus reactors undergoing sulphur condensation and evaporation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2002, 87(1): 73–88

[13] Mattssonboze K W, Lyddon L G. Using a process simulator to improve sulphur recovery. Sulphur (Jan/Feb), 1997, 37–41

[14] Maddox R N. Gas Conditioning and Processing: Gas and Liquid Sweetening. Campbell Petroleum Series Vol. 4, 4th Ed. Oklahoma: Norman, 1998

[15] Roberge P R. Handbook of Corrosion Engineering. New York: McGraw Hill, 1999, 833–862

[16] Chen Y Y, Liou Y M, Shih H C. Stress corrosion cracking of type 321 stainless steels in simulated petrochemical process environments containing hydrogen sulfide and chloride. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2005, 407(1-2): 114–126

[17] Ramos M A, Mainier F B, Pimenta G S. Corrosäo por H₂S e CO₂ em sistema de producäo de petróleo, Petrobrás, Rio de Janeiro, 1982

[18] Vagapov R K, Frolova L V, Kuznetsov Y I. Inhibition effect of Schiff base on steel hydrogenation in H₂S-containing media. Protection of Metals, 2002, 38(1): 27–31

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the National Iranian Gas Company (NIGC) for their financial support of this study.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg