Ni-Co bimetallic catalyst for CH4 reforming with CO2
Xiaohong LI, Jun AI, Wenying LI, Dongxiong LI
Ni-Co bimetallic catalyst for CH4 reforming with CO2
A co-precipitation method was employed to prepare Ni/Al2O3-ZrO2, Co/Al2O3-ZrO2 and Ni-Co/Al2O3-ZrO2 catalysts. Their properties were characterized by N2 adsorption (BET), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), temperature-programmed reduction (TPR), temperature-programmed desorption (CO2-TPD), and temperature-programmed surface reaction (CH4-TPSR and CO2-TPSR). Ni-Co/Al2O3-ZrO2 bimetallic catalyst has good performance in the reduction of active components Ni, Co and CO2 adsorption. Compared with mono-metallic catalyst, bimetallic catalyst could provide more active sites and CO2 adsorption sites (C+ CO2 = 2CO) for the methane-reforming reaction, and a more appropriate force formed between active components and composite support (SMSI) for the catalytic reaction. According to the CH4-CO2-TPSR, there were 80.9% and 81.5% higher CH4 and CO2 conversion over Ni-Co/Al2O3-ZrO2 catalyst, and its better resistance to carbon deposition, less than 0.5% of coke after 4 h reaction, was found by TGA. The high activity and excellent anti-coking of the Ni-Co/Al2O3-ZrO2 catalyst were closely related to the synergy between Ni and Co active metal, the strong metal-support interaction and the use of composite support.
Ni-Co bimetallic catalyst / composite support / CH4 reforming with CO2
[1] |
Rostrup-Nielsen J R. Aspects of CO2-reforming of methane. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, 1994, 81: 25–41
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Ross J R H, van Keulen A N J, Hegarty M E S, Seshan K. The catalytic conversion of natural gas to useful products. Catalysis Today, 1996, 30(1-3): 193–199
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Bradford M C J, Vannice M A. CO2 reforming of CH4. Catalysis Reviews. Science and Engineering, 1999, 41(1): 1–42
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Fischer F, Tropsch H. Conversion of methane into hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Brennstoff Chem, 1928, 3(9): 9–46
|
[5] |
Slagtern A, Schuurman Y, Leclercq C, Verykios X, Mirodatos C. Specific features concerning the mechanism of methane reforming by carbon dioxide over Ni/La2O3 catalyst. Journal of Catalysis, 1997, 172(1): 118–126
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Rostrup-Nielsen J R. Industrial relevance of coking. Catalysis Today, 1997, 37(3): 225–232
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Choudhary V R, Mamman A S. Simultaneous oxidative conversion and CO2 or steam reforming of methane to syngas over CoO-NiO-MgO catalyst. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 1998, 73(4): 345–350
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Takanabe K, Nagaoka K, Nariai K, Aika K I. Titania-supported cobalt and nickel bimetallic catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Journal of Catalysis, 2005, 232(2): 268–275
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Zhang J G, Wang H, Dalai A K. Development of stable bimetallic catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Journal of Catalysis, 2007, 249(2): 300–310
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Koh A C W, Chen L W, Keeleong W, Johnson B F G, Khimyak T, Lin J Y. Hydrogen or synthesis gas production via the partial oxidation of methane over supported nickel–cobalt catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(6): 725–730
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Li N, Luo L T, Ouyang Y. Studies on properties of nanosized ZrO2/Al2O3 composite support and Ni/ ZrO2/Al2O3 catalyst. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2005, 26(9): 775–779 (in Chinese)
|
[12] |
Liu S G, Guan L X, Li J P, Zhao N, Wei W, Sun Y H. CO2 reforming of CH4 over stabilized mesoporous Ni-CaO-ZrO2 composites. Fuel, 2008, 87(12): 2477–2481
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Zhang J G, Wang H, Dalai A K. Effects of metal content on activity and stability of Ni-Co bimetallic catalysts for CO2 reforming of CH4. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2008, 339(2): 121–129
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |