Towards energy-prioritized orbital computing service

Tongqiao XU , Xiaofeng HOU , Chao LI , Xiaozhi ZHU , Mingxuan ZHANG , Jinyang GUO , Yang HU , Minyi GUO , Kaoru OTA

Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2027, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5) : 2105107

PDF (5240KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2027, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5) :2105107 DOI: 10.1007/s11704-026-51869-4
Architecture
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Towards energy-prioritized orbital computing service
Author information +
History +
PDF (5240KB)

Abstract

In-orbit computing has emerged as a transformative solution to address the bandwidth bottleneck inherent in traditional satellite services. To meet the real-time demands of satellite computing and make efficient use of the scarce in-orbit energy, the next generation of in-orbit computing should operate in a pulse-like manner, performing rapid computations only after acquiring target data and remaining in a low-power sleep mode for the majority of the time. This novel paradigm, referred to as orbital pulse computing (OPC), facilitates fast data processing, significantly reducing service latency while avoiding unnecessary energy consumption, thereby enhancing service throughput. We propose EPOCH, an energy-prioritized architecture towards efficient OPC service. It aims to emphasize the importance of energy and task awareness in OPC scheduling and processing. To achieve this, EPOCH implements its design across three levels. At the constellation level, EPOCH balances the task distributions based on the awareness of satellites. At the satellite level, EPOCH optimizes pulse-aware scheduling by considering energy and pulse. At the task level, EPOCH provides a power-aware dynamic approach for the task queue. Extensive experiments show that EPOCH could achieve a 66.5% improvement in request throughput and a 24.3% reduction in latency compared with state-of-the-art orbit service designs.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

computer architecture / emerging application domains / power management / scheduling and resource management

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tongqiao XU, Xiaofeng HOU, Chao LI, Xiaozhi ZHU, Mingxuan ZHANG, Jinyang GUO, Yang HU, Minyi GUO, Kaoru OTA. Towards energy-prioritized orbital computing service. Front. Comput. Sci., 2027, 21 (5) : 2105107 DOI:10.1007/s11704-026-51869-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Denby B, Lucia B. Orbital edge computing: nanosatellite constellations as a new class of computer system. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. 2020, 939−954

[2]

Bleier N, Mubarik M H, Swenson G R, Kumar R. Space microdatacenters. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture. 2023, 900−915

[3]

Analysys Mason. Space cloud computing 5th edition. https://www.analysysmason.com/research/content/reports/space-cloud-computing-nsi046/, 2024. Accessed: 2026-04-15

[4]

Xie R, Tang Q, Wang Q, Liu X, Yu F R, Huang T . Satellite-terrestrial integrated edge computing networks: architecture, challenges, and open issues. IEEE Network, 2020, 34( 3): 224–231

[5]

World Economic Forum. Space: the $1.8 trillion opportunity for global economic growth. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Space_2024.pdf, 2024. Accessed: 2026-04-15

[6]

Bhattacherjee D, Kassing S, Licciardello M, Singla A. In-orbit computing: an outlandish thought experiment? In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. 2020, 197−204

[7]

Werner D. Living on the edge: satellites adopt powerful computers. https://spacenews.com/living-on-the-edge-satellites-adopt-powerful-computers/, 2022. Accessed: 2026-04-15

[8]

Wang C, Zhang Y, Li Q, Zhou A, Wang S. Satellite computing: a case study of cloud-native satellites. In: Proceedings of 2023 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Communications (EDGE). 2023, 262−270

[9]

Li Q, Wang S, Xu C, Ma X, Xu M, Zhou A, Xing R, Yang B, Zhu Z, Zhang Y, Liu X. Exploring real-time satellite computing: from energy and thermal perspectives. In: Proceedings of 2024 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS). 2024, 161−173

[10]

Denby B, Chintalapudi K, Chandra R, Lucia B, Noghabi S. Kodan: addressing the computational bottleneck in space. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 3. 2023, 392−403

[11]

Leyva-Mayorga I, Martinez-Gost M, Moretti M, Pérez-Neira A, Vázquez M Á, Popovski P, Soret B . Satellite edge computing for real-time and very-high resolution earth observation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2023, 71( 10): 6180–6194

[12]

Kong Q, Qu X, Zhang S, Yin F, Lu R, Chen B . A secure satellite-edge computing framework for collaborative line outage identification in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2024, 17( 3): 761–775

[13]

Jiang Q, Zheng L, Zhou Y, Liu H, Kong Q, Zhang Y, Chen B . Efficient on-orbit remote sensing imagery processing via satellite edge computing resource scheduling optimization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 1000519

[14]

Dai M, Chang S, Wang Y, Su Z . Energy-efficient multi-access edge computing for heterogeneous satellite-maritime networks: a hybrid harvesting-and-offloading design. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2025, 24( 11): 12001–12018

[15]

Xing R, Xu M, Zhou A, Li Q, Zhang Y, Qian F, Wang S. Deciphering the enigma of satellite computing with COTS devices: measurement and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. 2024, 420−435

[16]

Fleischer S, Hihn J, Mrozinski J, Hooke M, Hasnain Z, Stukes S, Johnson J. Online NASA Software Estimating Tools (ONSET): a suite of web-based cost analysis tools. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100). 2021, 1−16

[17]

Cheng Z, Denby B, McCleary K, Lucia B. EagleEye: nanosatellite constellation design for high-coverage, high-resolution sensing. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 1. 2024, 117−132

[18]

Wang G, Lu Z, Wang P . ShuffleCloudNet: a lightweight composite neural network-based method for cloud computation in remote-sensing images. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14( 20): 5258

[19]

Lin T Y, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K, Dollár P . Focal loss for dense object detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2020, 42( 2): 318–327

[20]

Zeng K, Wang Y . A deep convolutional neural network for oil spill detection from spaceborne SAR images. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12( 6): 1015

[21]

Agrawal N, Nelson P V, Low R D . A novel approach for predicting large wildfires using machine learning towards environmental justice via environmental remote sensing and atmospheric reanalysis data across the United States. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15( 23): 5501

[22]

Whitcraft A K, Becker-Reshef I, Justice C O. NASA Harvest(ing) earth observations for informed agricultural decisions. In: Proceedings of IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 2020, 3706−3708

[23]

Liu M, Chai Z, Deng H, Liu R . A CNN-transformer network with multiscale context aggregation for fine-grained cropland change detection. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2022, 15: 4297–4306

[24]

Godfray H C J, Beddington J R, Crute I R, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir J F, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas S M, Toulmin C . Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 2010, 327( 5967): 812–818

[25]

Li Q, Wang S, Ma X, Zhou A, Yang F. Towards sustainable satellite edge computing. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE). 2021, 1−8

[26]

Furutanpey A, Zhang Q, Raith P, Pfandzelter T, Wang S, Dustdar S . FOOL: addressing the downlink bottleneck in satellite computing with neural feature compression. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2025, 24( 8): 6747–6764

[27]

Denby B D. Orbital edge computing: software, hardware, and system support for computational satellites. Carnegie Mellon University, Dissertation, 2024

[28]

Andersson J, Hjorth M, Johansson F, Habinc S. LEON processor devices for space missions: first 20 years of LEON in space. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology (SMC-IT). 2017, 136−141

[29]

McBee R, Anderson J L, Koets M A, Ramirez J, Tschirhart Z. Considerations in the deployment of machine learning algorithms on spaceflight hardware. In: Proceedings of 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100). 2021, 1−10

[30]

Bountos N I, Ouaknine A, Rolnick D. FoMo-Bench: a multi-modal, multi-scale and multi-task Forest Monitoring Benchmark for remote sensing foundation models. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2312.10114

[31]

Wei S, Zeng X, Qu Q, Wang M, Su H, Shi J . HRSID: a high-resolution SAR images dataset for ship detection and instance segmentation. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 120234–120254

[32]

Canadian Space Agency. RADARSAT constellation mission. https://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/satellites/radarsat/what-is-rcm.asp, 2023. Accessed: 2026-04-15

[33]

Daniel Pilone, Andrew Pawloski, Matthew Hanson. Acquiring, processing, and analyzing open broadcast science data with extremely low latency at scale with AWS Groundstation and cloud processing. https://yvm2020.authorea.com/doi/full/10.1002/essoar.10501882.1, 2020. Accessed: 2026-04-15

[34]

Skystocks. 8U CubeSat platform. https://www.skystocksinc.com/products/integrated-cubesat-platform, 2025. Accessed: 2026-04-15

[35]

NVIDIA. NVIDIA Jetson Nano. https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/jetson-nano. Accessed: 2026-04-15

[36]

Harrigan M. Implementation of a configurable small satellite design and mission planning tool. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dissertation, 2024

[37]

Hughes S P, Conway D J, Parker J. Using the general mission analysis tool (GMAT). In: Proceedings of the AAS Guidance and Control Conference. 2017

[38]

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. CubeSat 101: Basic concepts and processes for first-time CubeSat developers. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/nasa_csli_cubesat_101_508.pdf, 2017. Accessed: 2026-04-15

[39]

The CubeSat Program. CubeSat design specification (1U-12U). CP-CDS-R14.1. San Luis Obispo: Cal Poly, 2022

[40]

Kelso T S. CelesTrak. https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/, 2026. Accessed: 2026-04-15

[41]

Kulu E. Nanosats database. See nanosats.eu/, 2020

[42]

Li J, Knapp D E, Schill S R, Roelfsema C, Phinn S, Silman M, Mascaro J, Asner G P . Adaptive bathymetry estimation for shallow coastal waters using Planet Dove satellites. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, 232: 111302

[43]

Vrabel J C, Anderson C, Bresnahan P C, Christopherson J B, Clauson J, Kim M, Ryan R E, Sampath A. System characterization report on the BlackSky global multispectral sensor. Open-File Report 2021-1030-O. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey, 2023

[44]

Chen H, Shi Z . A spatial-temporal attention-based method and a new dataset for remote sensing image change detection. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12( 10): 1662

[45]

Hou D, Miao Z, Xing H, Wu H . Exploiting low dimensional features from the MobileNets for remote sensing image retrieval. Earth Science Informatics, 2020, 13( 4): 1437–1443

[46]

Vasisht D, Shenoy J, Chandra R. L2D2: low latency distributed downlink for LEO satellites. In: Proceedings of 2021 ACM SIGCOMM Conference. 2021, 151−164

[47]

Liu J, Zhu X, Xu T, Hou X, Li C. SpaceExit: enabling efficient adaptive computing in space with early exits. In: Proceedings of 2025 USENIX Annual Technical Conference. 2025, 1343−1358

[48]

Gobieski G, Lucia B, Beckmann N. Intelligence beyond the edge: inference on intermittent embedded systems. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. 2019, 199−213

[49]

Colin A, Ruppel E, Lucia B . A reconfigurable energy storage architecture for energy-harvesting devices. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 2018, 53( 2): 767–781

[50]

Ganesan K, San Miguel J, Enright Jerger N. The what’s next intermittent computing architecture. In: Proceedings of 2019 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA). 2019, 211−223

[51]

Wang C, Lu N, Wang S, Cheng Y, Jiang B . Dynamic long short-term memory neural-network- based indirect remaining-useful-life prognosis for satellite lithium-ion battery. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8( 11): 2078

[52]

Tsuchida H, Kawamoto Y, Kato N, Kaneko K, Tani S, Uchida S, Aruga H . Efficient power control for satellite-borne batteries using Q-learning in low-earth-orbit satellite constellations. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2020, 9( 6): 809–812

[53]

Li Q, Wang S, Ma X, Zhou A, Wang Y, Huang G, Liu X . Battery-aware energy optimization for satellite edge computing. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2024, 17( 2): 437–451

[54]

Hou X, Xu T, Li C, Xu C, Liu J, Hu Y, Zhao J, Leng J, Cheng K T, Guo M. A tale of two domains: exploring efficient architecture design for truly autonomous things. In: Proceedings of the 51st ACM/IEEE Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA). 2024, 167−181

[55]

Hou X, Tang P, Xu T, Xu C, Li C, Guo M. CPM: a cross-layer power management facility to enable QoS-aware AIoT systems. In: Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS). 2024, 1−10

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

PDF (5240KB)

280

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/