Improved expert selection model for forex trading

Jia ZHU, Xingcheng WU, Jing XIAO, Changqin HUANG, Yong TANG, Ke Deng

PDF(638 KB)
PDF(638 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 518-527. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-017-6472-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Improved expert selection model for forex trading

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Online prediction is a process that repeatedly predicts the next element in the coming period from a sequence of given previous elements. This process has a broad range of applications in various areas, such as medical, streaming media, and finance. The greatest challenge for online prediction is that the sequence data may not have explicit features because the data is frequently updated, which means good predictions are difficult to maintain. One of the popular solutions is to make the prediction with expert advice, and the challenge is to pick the right experts with minimum cumulative loss. In this research, we use the forex trading prediction, which is a good example for online prediction, as a case study. We also propose an improved expert selection model to select a good set of forex experts by learning previously observed sequences. Our model considers not only the average mistakes made by experts, but also the average profit earned by experts, to achieve a better performance, particularly in terms of financial profit. We demonstrate the merits of our model on two real major currency pairs corpora with extensive experiments.

Keywords

online learning / expert selection / forex prediction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jia ZHU, Xingcheng WU, Jing XIAO, Changqin HUANG, Yong TANG, Ke Deng. Improved expert selection model for forex trading. Front. Comput. Sci., 2018, 12(3): 518‒527 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6472-3

References

[1]
Deshpande M, Karypis G. Evaluation of techniques for classifying biological sequences. In: Proceedings of Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2002, 417–431
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Duskin O, Feitelson D G. Distinguishing humans from robots in web search logs: preliminary results using query rates and intervals. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Search Click Data. 2009, 15–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Kadous M W, Sammut C. Classification of multivariate time series and structured data using constructive induction. Machine Learning, 2005, 58(2): 179–216
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Liu X, Zhang P Z, Zeng D J. Sequence matching for suspicious activity detection in anti-money laundering. In: Proceedings of IEEE ISI International Workshops on Intelligence and Security Informatics. 2008, 50–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Tan P N, Kumar V. Discovery of web robot sessions based on their navigational patterns. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2002, 6(1): 9–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Wang J G, Huang J Z, Guo J F, Lan Y Y. Recommending high-utility search engine queries via a query-recommending model. Neurocomputing, 2015, 167(1): 195–208
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Huang X, Cheng H, Li R H, Qin L, Yu J X. Top-k structural diversity search in large networks. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2013, 6(13): 1618–1629
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Hutter M. On the foundations of universal sequence prediction. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of Computation. 2006, 408–420
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Kaj L N. Application of a simple likelihood ratio approximant to protein sequence classification. Bioinformatics, 2006, 22(23): 2865–2869
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Wang J L, Zhao P L, Hoi S C H. Cost-sensitive online classification. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2014, 26(10): 2425–2438
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Zhu Z X, Xiao J, Li J Q, Wang F X, Zhang Q F. Global path planning of wheeled robots using multi-objective memetic algorithms. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 2015, 22(4): 387–404
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Mao R, Xu H L, Wu W B, Li J Q, Li Y, Lu M H. Overcoming the challenge of variety: big data abstraction, the next evolution of data management for aal communication systems. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2015, 53(1): 42–47
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Wang J L, Zhao P L, Hoi S C H, Jin R. Online feature selection and its applications. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2006, 26(3): 698–710
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Mao R, Zhang P H, Li X L, Liu X, Lu M H. Pivot selection for metricspace indexing. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2016, 7(2): 311–323
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Lu M H, Tang Y N, Sun R C, Wang T F, Chen S P, Mao R. A real time displacement estimation algorithm for ultrasound elastography. Computers in Industry, 2015, 69(1): 61–71
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Li J Q, Liu C C, Liu B, Mao R, Wang Y C, Chen S, Yang J J, Pan H, Wang Q. Diversity-aware retrieval of medical records. Computers in Industry, 2015, 69(1): 81–91
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Zheng K, Zhou X F, Fung P C, Xie K X. Spatial query processing for fuzzy objects. The VLDB Journal, 2012, 21(5): 1–23
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Littlestone N, Warmuth M K. The weighted majority algorithm. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 1989, 256–261
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Littlestone N. Learning quickly when irrelevant attributes abound: a new linear-threshold algorithm. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 1987, 68–77
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Rosenblatt F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 1958, 65(6): 386
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Valiant L G. A theory of the learnable. Communications of the ACM, 1984, 27(11): 1134–1142
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Blum A. Separating distribution-free and mistake-bound learning models over the boolean domain. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 1990, 211–218
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Widrow B, Hoff M E. Adaptive Switching Circuits. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988
[24]
Wei L, Keogh E. Semi-supervised time series classification. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2006, 748–753
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Xi X P, Keogh E, Shelton C, Wei L, Ratanamahatana C A. Fast time series classification using numerosity reduction. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine learning. 2006, 1033–1040
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Lewis D D. Naive (bayes) at forty: the independence assumption in information retrieval. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Machine Learning. 1998, 4–15
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Yakhnenko O, Silvescu A, Honavar V. Discriminatively trained markov model for sequence classification. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2005, 498–505
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Eban E, Birnbaum A, Shalev-Shwartz S, Globerson A. Learning the experts for online sequence prediction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine learning. 2012, 125–133
[29]
Cesa-Bianchi N, Freund Y, Haussler D, Helmbold D P, Schapire R E, Warmuth M K. How to use expert advice. Journal of the ACM, 1997, 44(3): 427–485
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Foster D P, Vohra R V. A randomization rule for selecting forecasts. Operations Research, 1993, 41(4): 704–709
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Abernethy J, Bartlett P, Rakhlin A. Multitask learning with expert advice. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Learning Theory. 2007, 484–498
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Avidan S. Ensemble tracking. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2007, 29(2): 261–271
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Yu C N J, Joachims T. Learning structural svms with latent variables. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning. 2009, 1169–1176
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Ron D, Singer Y, Tishby N. The power of amnesia: learning probabilistic automata with variable memory length. Machine Learning, 1996, 25(2): 117–149
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Zhao P, Hoi S, Zhuang J. Active learning with expert advice. In: Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 2013, 704–713
[36]
Zhu J, Yang J, Xiao J, Huang C Q, Zhao G S, Tang Y. Online prediction for forex with an optimized experts selection model. In: Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Web Conference. 2016, 371–382
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Zheng K, Huang Z, Zhou O Y, Zhou X F. Discovering the most influential sites over uncertain data: a rank based approach. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2012, 24(12): 2156–2169
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Zheng K, Su H, Zheng B L, Shang S, Xu J, Liu J, Zhou X F. Interactive top-k spatial keyword queries. In: Proceedings of the 31st IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering. 2015, 423–434
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Vapnik V N. The nature of statistical learning theory. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1995, 8(6): 1564–1564
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(638 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/