Cloud service selection using cloud service brokers: approaches and challenges

Meysam VAKILI, Neda JAHANGIRI, Mohsen SHARIFI

PDF(879 KB)
PDF(879 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 599-617. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-017-6124-7
REVIEW ARTICLE

Cloud service selection using cloud service brokers: approaches and challenges

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Cloud computing users are faced with a wide variety of services to choose from. Consequently, a number of cloud service brokers (CSBs) have emerged to help users in their service selection process. This paper reviews the recent approaches that have been introduced and used for cloud service brokerage and discusses their challenges accordingly. We propose a set of attributes for a CSB to be considered effective. Different CSBs’ approaches are classified as either single service or multiple service models. The CSBs are then assessed, analyzed, and compared with respect to the proposed set of attributes. Based on our studies, CSBs with multiple service models that support more of the proposed effective CSB attributes have wider application in cloud computing environments.

Keywords

cloud service broker (CSB) / cloud service selection / cloud computing / quality of service (QoS)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Meysam VAKILI, Neda JAHANGIRI, Mohsen SHARIFI. Cloud service selection using cloud service brokers: approaches and challenges. Front. Comput. Sci., 2019, 13(3): 599‒617 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-017-6124-7

References

[1]
Mell P, Grance P. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. NIST Special Publication 800-146, 2011
[2]
Wadhwa B, Jaitly A, Hasija N, Suri B. Cloud service brokers: addressing the new cloud phenomenon. In: Rajsingh E B, Bhojan A, Peter J D, eds. Informatics and Communication Technologies for Societal Development, Springer International Publishing, 2015, 29–40
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Badidi E. A cloud service broker for SLA-based SaaS provisioning. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Society. 2013, 61–66
[4]
Shin Y R, Huh E N. Optimization for reasonable service price in broker based cloud service environment. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology. 2014, 115–119
[5]
Buyya R, Ranjan R, Calheiros R N. InterCloud: utility-oriented federation of Cloud computing environments for scaling of application services. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing. 2010, 13–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Ferrer A J, Hernández F, Tordsson J, Elmroth E, Ali-Eldin A, Zsigri C, Sirvent R, Guitart J, Badia R M, Djemame K, Ziegler W. OPTIMIS: a holistic approach to cloud service provisioning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2012, 28(1), 66–77
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Simarro J L L, Moreno-Vozmediano R, Montero R S, Llorente I M. Dynamic placement of virtual machines for cost optimization in multicloud environments. In: Proceedings of International Conference on High Performance Computing and Simulation. 2011, 1–7
[8]
Liu F, Tong J, Mao J, Bohn R, Messina J, Badger L, Leaf D. NIST Cloud Computing Reference Architecture. NIST Special Publication 500, 2011
[9]
Grozev N, Buyya R. Inter-cloud architectures and application brokering: taxonomy and survey. Software: Practice and Experience, 2014, 44(3): 369–390
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Sanchez F D, Al Zahr S, Gagnaire M, Laisne J P, Marshall I J. CompatibleOne: bringing cloud as a commodity. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering. 2014, 397–402
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Bhattacharya A, Choudhury S. Service insurance: a new approach in cloud brokerage. In: Chaki R, Saeed K, Choudhury S, et al. eds. Applied Computation and Security Systems. Springer International Publishing, 2015, 39–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Song H, Bae C S, Lee J W, Youn C H. Utility adaptive service brokering mechanism for personal cloud service. In: Proceedings of Military Communications Conference. 2011, 1622–1627
[13]
Somasundaram T S, Govindarajan K, Rajagopalan M, Rao S M. A broker based architecture for adaptive load balancing and elastic resource provisioning and deprovisioning in multi-tenant based cloud environments. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Computing. 2012, 561–573
[14]
Ngan L D, Kanagasabai R. Owl-s based semantic cloud service broker. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Web Services. 2012, 560–567
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Whaiduzzaman M, Haque M N, Rejaul Karim Chowdhury M, Gani A. A study on strategic provisioning of cloud computing services. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1–16
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Sun L, Dong H, Hussain F K, Hussain O K, Chang E. Cloud service selection: state-of-the-art and future research directions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2014, 45: 134–150
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Subha M, Banu M U. A survey on QoS ranking in cloud computing. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2014, 4(2): 482–488
[18]
Jula A, Sundararajan E, Othman Z. Cloud computing service composition: a systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(8): 3809–3824
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Chao K M, Anane R, Chen J H, Gatward R. Negotiating agents in a market-oriented grid. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid. 2002, 436
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Kertész A, Kecskemeti G, Brandic I. An interoperable and selfadaptive approach for SLA-based service virtualization in heterogeneous Cloud environments. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2014, 32: 54–68
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Achar R, Thilagam P S. A broker based approach for cloud provider selection. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics. 2014, 1252–1257
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Schaffer H E. X as a service, cloud computing, and the need for good judgment. IT Professional, 2009, 11(5): 4–5
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Ray B K, Khatua S, Roy S. Negotiation based service brokering using game theory. In: Proceedings of Applications and Innovations in Mobile Computing Conference. 2014, 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Simarro J L L, Aniceto I S, Moreno-Vozmediano R, Montero R S, Llorente I M. A cloud broker architecture for multi-cloud environments. In: Proceedings of Large Scale Network-Centric Distributed Systems Conference. 2013, 359–376
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Brock M, Goscinski A. Enhancing Cloud Computing Environments using a Cluster as a Service. New York: Wiley Press, 2011
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Parhi M, Pattanayak B K, Patra M R. A multi-agent-based framework for cloud service description and discovery using ontology. In: Jain L C, Patnaik S, Ichalkaranje N, eds. Intelligent Computing, Communication and Devices, Springer International Publishing, 2015, 337–348
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Lee Y T, Wu C S. A quality-based semantic service broker using reachability indexes. In: Proceedings of IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things. 2014, 277–282
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Anastasi G F, Carlini E, Coppola M, Dazzi P. QBROKAGE: a genetic approach for QoS cloud brokering. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. 2014, 304–311
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Pawluk P, Simmons B, Smit M, Litoiu M, Mankovski S. Introducing STRATOS: a cloud broker service. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference Cloud Computing. 2012, 891–898
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Amato A, DiMartino B, Venticinque S. A distributed cloud brokering service. Informatica, 2015, 26(1): 1–15
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Haresh M, Kalady S, Govindan V. Agent based dynamic resource allocation on federated clouds. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Recent Advances in Intelligent Computational Systems. 2011, 111–114
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Li X, Ma H, Zhou F, Yao W. T-Broker: a trust-aware service brokering scheme for multiple cloud collaborative services. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2015, 10(7): 1402–1415
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Sundareswaran S, Squicciarini A, Lin D. A brokerage-based approach for cloud service selection. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing. 2012, 558–565
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Lim E, Thiran P. Communication of technical QoS among cloud brokers. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering. 2014, 403–409
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Garg S K, Versteeg S, Buyya R. SMICloud: a framework for comparing and ranking cloud services. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing. 2011, 210–218
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Tordsson J, Montero R S, Moreno-Vozmediano R, Llorente I M. Cloud brokering mechanisms for optimized placement of virtual machines across multiple providers. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2012, 28(2): 358–367
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Anastasi G F, Carlini E, Coppola M, Dazzi P. Smart cloud federation simulations with CloudSim. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Optimization Techniques for Resource Management in Clouds. 2013, 9–16
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Ye Z, Zhou X, Bouguettaya A. Genetic algorithm based QoS-aware service compositions in cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Database systems for advanced applications. 2011, 321–334
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Li X, Yang Y. Trusted data acquisition mechanism for cloud resource scheduling based on distributed agents. China Communication, 2011, 8(6): 108–116
[40]
Smit M, Pawluk P, Simmons B, Litoiu M. A web service for cloud metadata. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE World Congress Services. 2012, 361–368
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Shoham Y, Leyton-Brown K. Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Li X, Zhou F. PG-TRUST: a self-adaptive and scalable trust computing model for large-scale peer-to-peer grid computing. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2011, 21(5): 667–692
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Yoon K P, Hwang C L. Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. Sage Publications, 1995
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Siegel J, Perdue J. Cloud services measures for global use: the service measurement index (SMI). In: Proceedings of SRII Global Conference. 2012, 411–415
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Saaty T L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48(1): 9–26
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Kalepu S, Krishnaswamy S, Loke S W. Verity: a QoS metric for selecting Web services and providers. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering Workshops. 2003, 131–139
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
AlZain M, Pardede E, Soh B, Thom J. Cloud computing security: from single to multi-clouds. In: Proceedings of the 45th International Conference on System Science. 2012, 5490–5499
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Vukolíc M. The Byzantine empire in the intercloud. ACM SIGACT News, 2010, 41(3): 105–111
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Alhamad M, Dillon T, Chang E. Conceptual SLA framework for cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies. 2010, 606–610
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Sotomayor B, Montero R S, Llorente I M, Foster I. Virtual infrastructure management in private and hybrid clouds. IEEE Internet Computing, 2009, 13(5): 14–22
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Aslam M A, Auer S, Shen J, Herrmann M. Expressing business process models as OWL-S ontologies. In: Proceedings of Business Process Management Workshops. 2006, 400–415
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Gonzalez-Castillo J, Trastour D, Bartolini C. Description logics for matchmaking of services. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Applications of Description Logics. 2002
[53]
Ngan L D, Tsai Flora S, Keong C C, Kanagasabai R. Towards a common benchmark framework for cloud brokers. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems. 2012, 750–754
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Neapolitan R, Naimipour K. Foundations of Algorithms. Swdbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2010
[55]
Karim R, Ding C, Miri A. An end-to-end QoS mapping approach for cloud service selection. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE World Congress on Services. 2013, 341–348
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Komninos N, Junejo A K. Privacy preserving attribute based encryption for multiple cloud collaborative environment. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing. 2015, 595–600
[57]
Juan-Verdejo A, Zschaler S, Surajbali B, Baars H, Kemper H G. In- CLOUDer: a formalized decision support modelling approach to migrate applications to cloud environments. In: Proceedings of the 40th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications. 2014, 467–474
[58]
Grozev N, Buyya R. Multi-cloud provisioning and load distribution for three-tier applications. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 2014, 9(3): 13
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Simarro J L L, Moreno-Vozmediano R, Montero R S, Llorente I M. Scheduling strategies for optimal service deployment across multiple clouds. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2013, 29(6): 1431–1441
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Amato A, Di Martino B, Venticinque S. Evaluation and brokering of service level agreements for negotiation of cloud infrastructures. In: Proceedings of International Conference Internet Technology and Secured Transactions. 2012, 144–149
[61]
Afify Y M, Moawad I F, Badr N L, Tolba M. Cloud services discovery and selection: survey and new semantic-based system. In: Hassanien A E, Kim T H, Kacprzyk J, et al. eds. Bio-inspiring Cyber Security and Cloud Services: Trends and Innovations, Springer International Publishing, 2014. 449–477
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Afify Y M, Moawad I F, Badr N L, Tolba M. A semantic-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) discovery and selection system. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems. 2013, 57–63
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(879 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/