Effectiveness of exploring historical commits for developer recommendation: an empirical study

Abstract

Developer recommendation is an essential task for resolving incoming issues in the evolution of software. Many developer recommendation techniques have been developed in the literature; among these studies, most techniques usually combined historical commits as supplementary information with bug repositories and/or source-code repositories to recommend developers. However, the question of whether themessages in historical commits are always useful has not yet been answered. This article aims at solving this problem by conducting an empirical study on four open-source projects. The results show that: (1) the number of meaningfulwords of the commit description has an impact on the quality of the commit, and a larger number of meaningful words in the description means that it can generally better reflect developers’ expertise; (2) using commit description to recommend the relevant developers is better than that using relevant files that are recorded in historical commits; (3) developers tend to change the relevant files that they have changed many times before; (4) developers generally tend to change the files that they have changed recently.

Keywords

developer recommendation / historical commits / empirical study

References

[1] Eyolfson J, Tan L, Lam P. Correlations between bugginess and timebased commit characteristics. Empirical Software Engineering, 2014, 19(4): 1009–1039

[2] Brindescu C, Codoban M, Shmarkatiuk S, Dig D. How do centralized and distributed version control systems impact software changes? In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2014, 322–333

[3] Sun X, Zhou T, Li G, Hu J, Yang H, Li B. An empirical study on real bugs for machine learning programs. In: Proceedings of the 24th Asia- Pacific Software Engineering Conference. 2017, 348–357

[4] Fagerholm F, Guinea A S, Münch J, Borenstein J. The role of mentoring and project characteristics for onboarding in open source software projects. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. 2014

[5] Anvik J, Hiew L, Murphy G C. Who should fix this bug? In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2006, 361–370

[6] Zhou Z, Wang Y, Wu Q J, Yang C N, Sun X. Effective and efficient global context verification for image copy detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2016, 12(1): 48–63

[7] Sun X, Yang H, Xia X, Li B. Enhancing developer recommendation with supplementary information via mining historical commits. Journal of Systems and Software, 2017, 134: 355–368

[8] Hossen K, Kagdi H H, Poshyvanyk D. Amalgamating source code authors, maintainers, and change proneness to triage change requests. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Program Comprehension. 2014, 130–141

[9] Shobe J F, Karim M Y, Zanjani M B, Kagdi H. On mapping releases to commits in open source systems. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Program Comprehension. 2014, 68–71

[10] Zanjani M B, Swartzendruber G, Kagdi H. Impact analysis of change requests on source code based on interaction and commit histories. In: Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. 2014, 162–171

[11] Yang H, Sun X, Li B, Hu J. Recommending developers with supplementary information for issue request resolution. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2016, 707–709

[12] Wang S, Lo D. Version history, similar report, and structure: putting them together for improved bug localization. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Program Comprehension. 2014, 53–63

[13] McDonald D W, Ackerman M S. Expertise recommender: a flexible recommendation system and architecture. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2000, 231–240

[14] Yang H, Sun X, Bin Li and Y D. DR_PSF: enhancing developer recommendation by leveraging personalized source-code files. In: Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Computer Society International Conference on Computers, Software and Applications. 2016, 239–244

[15] Xia X, Lo D, Wang X, Zhou B. Accurate developer recommendation for bug resolution. In: Proceedings of the 20th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering. 2013, 72–81

[16] Fu Z, Ren K, Shu J, Sun X, Huang F. Enabling personalized search over encrypted outsourced data with efficiency improvement. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2016, 27(9): 2546–2559

[17] Kagdi H, Gethers M, Poshyvanyk D, Hammad M. Assigning change requests to software developers. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 2012, 24(1): 3–33

[18] Anvik J, Murphy G C. Reducing the effort of bug report triage: Recommenders for development-oriented decisions. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2011, 20(3): 10

[19] Canfora G, Cerulo L. How software repositories can help in resolving a new change request. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Empirical Studies in Reverse Engineering. 2005

[20] Bhattacharya P, Neamtiu I, Shelton C R. Automated, highly-accurate, bug assignment using machine learning and tossing graphs. Journal of Systems and Software, 2012, 85(10): 2275–2292

[21] Ahsan S N, Ferzund J, Wotawa F. Automatic software bug triage system (BTS) based on latent semantic indexing and support vector machine. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Software Engineering Advances. 2009, 216–221

[22] Kagdi H H, Hammad M, Maletic J I. Who can help me with this source code change? In: Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. 2008, 157–166

[23] Gu B, Sheng V S, Wang Z, Ho D, Osman S, Li S. Incremental learning for ν-support vector regression. Neural Networks, 2015, 67: 140–150

[24] Vásquez M L, Hossen K, Dang H, Kagdi H H, Gethers M, Poshyvanyk D. Triaging incoming change requests: bug or commit history, or code authorship? In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. 2012, 451–460

[25] Gu B, Sheng V S, Tay K, Romano W, Li S. Incremental support vector learning for ordinal regression. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2015, 26(7): 1403–1416

[26] Hu H, Zhang H, Xuan J, Sun W. Effective bug triage based on historical bug-fix information. In: Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering. 2014, 122–132

[27] Shokripour R, Anvik J, Kasirun Z M, Zamani S. Why so complicated? simple term filtering and weighting for location-based bug report assignment recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. 2013, 2–11

[28] Xia Z, Wang X, Sun X, Wang B. Steganalysis of least significant bit matching using multi-order differences. Security and Communication Networks, 2014, 7(8): 1283–1291

[29] Kagdi H H, Poshyvanyk D. Who can help me with this change request? In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension. 2009, 273–277

[30] Shokripour R, Anvik J, Kasirun Z M, Zamani S. A time-based approach to automatic bug report assignment. Journal of Systems and Software, 2015, 102: 109–122

[31] Ma T, Zhou J, Tang M, Tian Y, Al-Dhelaan A, Al-Rodhaan M, Lee S. Social network and tag sources based augmenting collaborative recommender system. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 2015, 98(4): 902–910

[32] Sun X, Peng X, Li B, Li B, Wen W. IPSETFUL: an iterative process of selecting test cases for effective fault localization by exploring concept lattice of program spectra. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2016, 10(5): 812–831

[33] Wang L, Sun X, Wang J, Duan Y, Li B. Construct bug knowledge graph for bug resolution: poster. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering. 2017, 189–191

[34] Sun X, Li B, Li Y, Chen Y. What information in software historical repositories do we need to support software maintenance tasks? an approach based on topic model. Computer and Information Science, 2015, 27–37

[35] Zhang Y, Sun X, Wang B. Efficient algorithm for k-barrier coverage based on integer linear programming. China Communications, 2016, 13(7): 16–23

[36] Sun X, Liu X, Li B, Duan Y, Yang H, Hu J. Exploring topic models in software engineering data analysis: a survey. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing. 2016, 357–362

[37] Sun X, Li B, Leung H K N, Li B, Li Y. MSR4SM: using topic models to effectively mining software repositories for software maintenance tasks. Information & Software Technology, 2015, 66: 1–12

[38] Xie S, Wang Y. Construction of tree network with limited delivery latency in homogeneous wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 2014, 78(1): 231–246

[39] Yang H, Sun X, Duan Y, Li B. On the effects of exploring historical commit messages for developer recommendation. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 2016, 25(4): 658–664

[40] Fu Z, Wu X, Guan C, Sun X, Ren K. Toward efficient multi-keyword fuzzy search over encrypted outsourced data with accuracy improvement. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2016, 11(12): 2706–2716

[41] Fu Z, Sun X, Liu Q, Zhou L, Shu J. Achieving efficient cloud search services: multi-keyword ranked search over encrypted cloud data supporting parallel computing. IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2015, E98.B(1): 190–200

[42] McBurney P W, McMillan C. Automatic documentation generation via source code summarization of method context. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Program Comprehension. 2014, 279–290

[43] Hindle A, Germán D M, Holt R C. What do large commits tell us?: a taxonomical study of large commits. In: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories. 2008, 99–108

[44] Hattori L P, Lanza M. On the nature of commits. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 2008, 63–71

[45] Sun X, Geng Q, Lo D, Duan Y, Liu X, Li B. Code comment quality analysis and improvement recommendation: an automated approach. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2016, 26(6): 981–1000

[46] Beyer D, Fararooy A. CheckDep: a tool for tracking software dependencies. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Program Comprehension. 42–43

[47] Ye X, Bunescu R C, Liu C. Learning to rank relevant files for bug reports using domain knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. 2014, 689–699

[48] Leacock C, Chodorow M. Combining local context and wordnet similarity for word sense identification. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, 1998, 49(2): 265–283

[49] Sun X, Liu X, Hu J, Zhu J. Empirical studies on the nlp techniques for source code data preprocessing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Evidential Assessment of Software Technologies. 2014, 32–39

[50] Porter M F. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 1980, 14(3): 130–137

[51] Conover W J. Practical nonparametric statistics. Technometrics, 1999

[52] Grissom R J, Kim J J. Effect sizes for research: a broad practical approach. British Journal ofMathematical & Statistical Psychology, 2002

[53] Bavota G, Vásquez M L, Bernal-Cárdenas C E, Penta M D, Oliveto R, Poshyvanyk D. The impact of API change- and fault-proneness on the user ratings of android apps. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2015, 41(4): 384–407

[54] Xia Z, Wang X, Sun X, Wang Q. A secure and dynamic multi-keyword ranked search scheme over encrypted cloud data. IEEE Transactions on Parallel & Distributed Systems, 2016, 27(2): 340–352

[55] Madsen R E, Sigurdsson S, Hansen L K, Larsen J. Pruning the vocabulary for better context recognition. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 2004, 483–488

[56] Corazza A, Martino S D, Maggio V. Linsen: an efficient approach to split identifiers and expand abbreviations. In: Proceedings of the 28thIEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. 2012, 233–242

[57] Guerrouj L, Penta M D, Antoniol G, Guéhéneuc Y G. Tidier: an identifier splitting approach using speech recognition techniques. Software: Evolution and Process, 2013, 25(6): 575–599

[58] Xia Z, Wang X, Sun X, Liu Q, Xiong N. Steganalysis of LSB matching using differences between nonadjacent pixels. Multimedia Tools & Applications, 2016, 75(4): 1947–1962

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature