Discovering admissibleWeb services with uncertain QoS

Xiaodong FU, Kun YUE, Li LIU, Ping ZOU, Yong FENG

PDF(553 KB)
PDF(553 KB)
Front. Comput. Sci. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 265-279. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-014-4059-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Discovering admissibleWeb services with uncertain QoS

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Open and dynamic environments lead to inherent uncertainty of Web service QoS (Quality of Service), and the QoS-aware service selection problem can be looked upon as a decision problem under uncertainty. We use an empirical distribution function to describe the uncertainty of scores obtained from historical transactions. We then propose an approach to discovering the admissible set of services including alternative services that are not dominated by any other alternatives according to the expected utility criterion. Stochastic dominance (SD) rules are used to compare two services with uncertain scores regardless of the distribution form of their uncertain scores. By using the properties of SD rules, an algorithm is developed to reduce the number of SD tests, by which the admissible services can be reported progressively. We prove that the proposed algorithm can be run on partitioned or incremental alternative services. Moreover, we achieve some useful theoretical conclusions for correct pruning of unnecessary calculations and comparisons in each SD test, by which the efficiency of the SD tests can be improved. We make a comprehensive experimental study using real datasets to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, and scalability of the proposed algorithm.

Keywords

Web services / uncertain QoS / partial preference / empirical distribution function / stochastic dominance / admissible set

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaodong FU, Kun YUE, Li LIU, Ping ZOU, Yong FENG. Discovering admissibleWeb services with uncertain QoS. Front. Comput. Sci., 2015, 9(2): 265‒279 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-014-4059-9

References

[1]
Papazoglou M, Traverso P, Dustdar S, Leymann F. Service-oriented computing: state of the art and research challenges. Computer, 2007, 40(11): 38-45
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Sanati F, Lu J. An ontology for e-government service integration. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 2012, 27(2): 89-101
[3]
Dou W, Lv C, Zhang X, Chen J. A collaborative QoS-aware service evaluation method among multi-users for a shared service. International Journal of Web Services Research, 2012, 9(1): 30-50
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Zheng Z, Zhang Y, Lyu M R. Investigating QoS of real-world Web services. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2014, 7(1): 32-39
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Candan K S, Li W S, Phan T, Zhou M. Frontiers in information and software as services. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering. 2009, 1761-1768
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Alrifai M, Skoutas D, Risse T. Selecting skyline services for QoS-based Web service composition. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2010, 11-20
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Zeng L, Benatallah B, Ngu AHH, Dumas M, Kalagnanam J, Chang H. QoS-aware middleware for Web services composition. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2004, 30(5): 311-327
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Yu T, Zhang Y, Lin K J. Efficient algorithms for Web services selection with end-to-end QoS constraints. ACM Transactions on the Web, 2007, 1(1): 6
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Alrifai M, Risse T. Combining global optimization with local selection for efficient QoS-aware service composition. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2009, 881-890
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Hwang S Y, Wang H, Tang J, Srivastava J. A probabilistic approach to modeling and estimating the QoS of Web-services-based workflows. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(23): 5484-5503
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Rosario S, Benveniste A, Haar S, Jard C. Probabilistic QoS and soft contracts for transaction-based Web services orchestrations. IEEE Transactions on Service Computing, 2008, 1(4): 187-200
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Jurca R, Faltings B, Binder W. Reliable QoS monitoring based on client feedback. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2007, 1003-1012
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Barbon F, Traverso P, Pistore M, Trainotti M. Run-time monitoring of instances and classes of Web service compositions. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Services. 2006, 63-71
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Porter R B, Gaumnitz J E. Stochastic dominance vs. mean-variance portfolio analysis: an empirical evaluation. American Economic Review, 1972, 62(3): 438-446
[15]
Cynthia B L, Allan E S. Precise and realistic utility functions for usercentric performance analysis of schedulers. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing. 2007, 107-116
[16]
Arrow K J. Essays in the theory of risk-bearing. North-Holland Publishing Company, 1976
[17]
Zheng H, Yang J, Zhao W. QoS probability distribution estimation for Web services and service compositions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications. 2010, 1-8
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Wiesemann W, Hochreiter R, Kuhn D. A stochastic programming approach for QoS-aware service composition. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid. 2008, 226-233
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Fu X D, Yue K, Zou P, Wang F. Risk-driven Web services selection based on stochastic QoS. ICIC Express Letters, 2011, 5(7): 2269-2274
[20]
Klein A, Ishikawa F, Bauer B. A probabilistic approach to service selection with conditional contracts and usage patterns. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Service Oriented Computing. 2009, 253-268
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Schuller D, Lampe U, Eckert J, Steinmetz R, Schulte S. Cost-driven optimization of complex service-based workflows for stochastic QoS parameters. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Web Services. 2012, 66-73
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Zheng Z, Zhang Y, Lyu M. Distributed QoS evaluation for real-world Web services. In: Proceedi<?Pub Caret?>ngs of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Web Services. 2010, 83-90
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Yu Q, Bouguettaya A. Computing service skyline from uncertain QoWS. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2010, 3(1): 16-29
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Levy H. Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis. Management Science, 1992, 38(4): 555-593
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Chakraborty S, Yeh C H. A simulation based comparative study of normalization procedures in multiattribute decision making. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge Engineering and Databases. 2007, 102-109
[26]
van der Vaart A W. Asymptotic statistics. London: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[27]
Kroll Y, Levy H. Stochastic dominance: areview and some new evidence. Research in Finance, 1980, 2: 163-227
[28]
Kuosmanen T. Efficient diversification according to stochastic dominance criteria. Management Science, 2004, 50(10): 1390-1406
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Hadar J, Russell W R. Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. American Economic Review, 1969, 59(1): 25-34
[30]
Hanoch G, Levy H. The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk. The Review of Economic Studies, 1969, 36(3): 335-346
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Whitmore G A. Third-degree stochastic dominance. American Economic Review, 1970, 60(3): 457-459
[32]
Bawa V S. Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Journal of Financial Economics, 1975, 2(1): 95-121
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Hu F, Wang G, Feng L. Fast knowledge reduction algorithms based on quick sort, In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology. 2008, 72-79
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Haddad J E, Manouvrier M, Rukoz M. TQoS: transactional and QoSaware selection algorithm for automatic Web service composition. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2010, 3(1): 73-85
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Lecue F. Optimizing QoS-aware semantic Web service composition. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference. 2009, 375-391
[36]
Borzsonyi S, Kossmann D, Stocker K. The skyline operator. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Data Engineering, 2001, 421-430
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Yu Q, Bouguettaya A. Efficient service skyline computation for composite service selection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2013, 25(4): 776-789
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Skoutas D, Sacharidis D, Simitsis A, Sellis T. Serving the sky: discovering and selecting semantic Web services through dynamic skyline queries. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing. 2008, 222-229
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Skoutas D, Sacharidis D, Simitsis A, Sellis T. Ranking and clustering Web services using multicriteria dominance relationships. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2010, 3(3): 163-177
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Rosario S, Benveniste A, Jard C. Flexible probabilistic QoS management of orchestrations. International Journal of Web Services Research, 2010, 7(2): 21-42
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Fourneau J M, Mokdad L, Pekergin N. Stochastic bounds for performance evaluation of Web services. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2010, 22(10): 1286-1307
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(553 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/