A hybrid multi-swarm particle swarm optimization to solve constrained optimization problems
Yong WANG, Zixing CAI
A hybrid multi-swarm particle swarm optimization to solve constrained optimization problems
In the real-world applications, most optimization problems are subject to different types of constraints. These problems are known as constrained optimization problems (COPs). Solving COPs is a very important area in the optimization field. In this paper, a hybrid multi-swarm particle swarm optimization (HMPSO) is proposed to deal with COPs. This method adopts a parallel search operator in which the current swarm is partitioned into several subswarms and particle swarm optimization (PSO) is severed as the search engine for each sub-swarm. Moreover, in order to explore more promising regions of the search space, differential evolution (DE) is incorporated to improve the personal best of each particle. First, the method is tested on 13 benchmark test functions and compared with three stateof-the-art approaches. The simulation results indicate that the proposed HMPSO is highly competitive in solving the 13 benchmark test functions. Afterward, the effectiveness of some mechanisms proposed in this paper and the effect of the parameter setting were validated by various experiments. Finally, HMPSO is further applied to solve 24 benchmark test functions collected in the 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC2006) and the experimental results indicate that HMPSO is able to deal with 22 test functions.
constrained optimization problems / constrainthandling technique / particle swarm optimization / differential evolution
[1] |
Michalewicz Z, Schoenauer M. Evolutionary algorithm for constrained parameter optimization problems. Evolutionary Computation, 1996, 4(1): 1-32
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Coello Coello C A. Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 191(11-12): 1245-1287
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Mezura-Montes E, Coello Coello C A. A simple multimembered evolution strategy to solve constrained optimization problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2005, 9(1): 1-17
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Cai Z, Wang Y. A multiobjective optimization-based evolutionary algorithm for constrained optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 10(6): 658-675
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Wang Y, Cai Z, Zhou Y, Zeng W. An adaptive trade-off model for constrained evolutionary optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2008,12(1): 80-92
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Wang Y, Cai Z, Guo G, Zhou Y. Multiobjective optimization and hybrid evolutionary algorithm to solve constrained optimization problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 2007, 37(3): 560-575
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Wang Y, Liu H, Cai Z, Zhou Y. An orthogonal design based constrained evolutionary optimization algorithm. Engineering Optimization, 2007, 39 (6): 715-736
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1995, 1942-1948
|
[9] |
Liang J J, Suganthan P N. Dynamic multi-swarm particle swarm optimizer with a novel constraint-handling mechanism. In: Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’2006). IEEE Press, 2006, 9-16
|
[10] |
Krohling R A, Coelho L S. Coevolutionary particle swarm optimization using Gaussian distribution for solving constrained optimization problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 2006, 36(6): 1407-1416
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
He Q, Wang L. An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems. Engineering Application of Artificial Intelligence, 2007, 20(1): 89-99
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
He Q, Wang L. A hybrid particle swarm optimization with a feasibility-based rule for constrained optimization. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2007, 186(2): 1407-1422
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Deb K.An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2000, 18(2-4): 311-338
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Pulido T G, Coello Coello C A. A constraint-handling mechanism for particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’2004). IEEE Press, 2004, 1396-1403
|
[15] |
Munoz-Zavala A E, Hernandez-Aguirre A, Villa-Diharce E R, Botello-Rionda S. PESO+ for constrained optimization. In: Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’2006). IEEE Press, 2006, 231-238
|
[16] |
Zielinski K, Laur R. Constrained single-objective optimization using particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’2006). IEEE Press, 2006, 443-450
|
[17] |
Parsopoulos K E, Vrahatis M N. On the computation of all global minimizers through particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2004, 8(3): 211-224
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Shi Y, Eberhart R C. A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 1998, 69-73
|
[19] |
Clerc M, Kennedy J. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(1): 58-73
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution- a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, Technical Report TR-95-012, 1995
|
[21] |
Brest J, Zumer V, Maucec M S. Self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm in constrained real-parameter optimization. In: Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’2006). IEEE Press, 2006, 215-222
|
[22] |
Runarsson T P, Yao X. Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2000, 4(3): 284-294
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Takahama T, Sakai S. Constrained optimization by applying the α constrained method to the nonlinear simplex method with mutations. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2005, 9(5): 437-451
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Runarsson T P, Yao X. Search bias in constrained evolutionary optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 2005, 35(2): 233-243
|
[25] |
Liang J J, Runarsson T P, Mezura-Montes E, ClercM, Suganthan P N, Coello Coello C A, Deb K. Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2006. Special Session on Constrained Real-Parameter Optimization, Technical Report. Singapore Nanyang Technological University, 2006
|
[26] |
Brest J, Greiner S, Boskovic B, Mernik M, Zumer V. Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: A comparative study on numerical benchmark problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 10(6): 646-657
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Rahnamayan S, Tizhoosh H R, Salama M M A. Opposition-based differential evolution. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2008, 12(1): 64-79
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Noman N, Iba H. Accelerating differential evolution using an adaptive local search. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2008, 12(1): 107-125
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Yang Z, Tang K, Yao X. Large scale evolutionary optimization using cooperative coevolution. Information Sciences, 2008, 78(15): 2985-2999
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |