Grassland management practices in Chinese steppes impact productivity, diversity and the relationship

Yingjun ZHANG, Wenjie LU, Hao ZHANG, Jiqiong ZHOU, Yue SHEN

PDF(434 KB)
PDF(434 KB)
Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 57-63. DOI: 10.15302/J-FASE-2017192
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Grassland management practices in Chinese steppes impact productivity, diversity and the relationship

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Grasslands are crucial parts of the terrestrial ecosystem, with an extremely high differentiation of productivity and diversity across spatial scales and land use patterns. The practices employed to manage grassland, such as grazing, haymaking, fertilization or reseeding, can improve the grassland condition. This study focuses on the changes in productivity and diversity and the relationship between them as affected by management practices. Productivity and diversity have unequivocally been altered in response to different management practices. When grazing intensity of a typical steppe increased from 1.5 to 9 sheep per hectare, both productivity and diversity declined. Higher grazing intensity (6 to 9 sheep per hectare) accelerated loss of diversity because of lower productivity. Productivity was significantly improved but diversity was lost by fertilizing. N fertilization also reduced the sensitivity of diversity to productivity. A similar response was found in mown grassland with increased productivity and diversity but their relationship was negatively affected. Mowing also slowed down the decline in diversity as productivity increased. Reseeding purple-flowered alfalfa led to an increased diversity, while yellow-flowered alfalfa increased productivity significantly. The negative productivity-diversity relationship was transformed to a positive one by reseeding alfalfa. These results enhance understanding of how productivity, diversity and their relationships change in response to altered grassland management practices, and support an integrated approach for improving both productivity and diversity.

Keywords

diversity / fertilizing / grassland management practice / grazing / mowing / productivity / reseeding

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yingjun ZHANG, Wenjie LU, Hao ZHANG, Jiqiong ZHOU, Yue SHEN. Grassland management practices in Chinese steppes impact productivity, diversity and the relationship. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng., 2018, 5(1): 57‒63 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2017192

References

[1]
Kang L, Han X, Zhang Z, Sun O J. Grassland ecosystems in China: review of current knowledge and research advancement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007, 362(1482): 997–1008 doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2029
Pubmed
[2]
Bai Y, Wu J, Clark C M, Pan Q, Zhang L, Chen S, Wang Q, Han X,Wisley B. Grazing alters ecosystem functioning and C:N:P stoichiometry of grasslands along a regional precipitation gradient. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 49(6): 1204–1215
[3]
Kiehl K, Kirmer A, Donath T W, Rasran L, Hölzel N. Species introduction in restoration projects—Evaluation of different techniques for the establishment of semi-natural grasslands in Central and Northwestern Europe. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2010, 11(4): 285–299
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Schönbach P, Wan H, Gierus M, Bai Y, Müller K, Lin L, Susenbeth A, Taube F. Grassland responses to grazing: effects of grazing intensity and management system in an Inner Mongolian steppe ecosystem. Plant and Soil, 2011, 340(1–2): 103–115
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Végvári Z, Valkó O, Deák B, Török P, Konyhás S, Tóthmérész B. Effects of land use and wildfires on the habitat selection of great bustard (Otis tarda I.)—Implications for species conservation. Land Degradation & Development, 2016, 27(4): 910–918 doi:10.1002/ldr.2495
[6]
Liu Y, Wu G L, Ding L M, Tian F P, Shi Z H. Diversity–productivity trade-off during converting cropland to perennial grassland in the semi-arid areas of China. Land Degradation & Development, 2017, 28(2): 699–707
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Polley H W, Wilsey B J, Derner J D. Dominant species constrain effects of species diversity on temporal variability in biomass production of tallgrass prairie. Oikos, 2007, 116(12): 2044–2052
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Rose L, Leuschner C. The diversity-productivity relationship in a permanent temperate grassland: negative diversity effect, dominant influence of management regime. Plant Ecology & Diversity, 2012, 5(3): 265–274
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Campbell V, Murphy G, Romanuk T N. Experimental design and the outcome and interpretation of diversity-stability relations. Oikos, 2011, 120(3): 399–408
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Tilman D. Diversity and production in European grasslands. Science, 1999, 286(5442): 1099–1100
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Bai Y, Wu J, Pan Q, Huang J, Wang Q, Li F, Buyantuyev A, Han X. Positive linear relationship between productivity and diversity: evidence from the Eurasian Steppe. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 44(5): 1023–1034
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Chase J M, Leibold M A. Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship. Nature, 2002, 416(6879): 427–430
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Pywell R F, Bullock J M, Hopkins A, Walker K J, Sparks T H, Burke M J W, Peel S. Restoration of species-rich grassland on arable land: assessing the limiting processes using a multi-site experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 39(2): 294–309
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Korell L, Schmidt R, Bruelheide H, Hensen I, Auge H. Mechanisms driving diversity-productivity relationships differ between exotic and native communities and are affected by gastropod herbivory. Oecologia, 2016, 180(4): 1025–1036
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Stein C, Auge H, Fischer M, Weisser W W, Prati D. Dispersal and seed limitation affect diversity and productivity of montane grasslands. Oikos, 2008, 117(10): 1469–1478
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Cardinale B J, Matulich K L, Hooper D U, Byrnes J E, Duffy E, Gamfeldt L, Balvanera P, O’Connor M I, Gonzalez A. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. American Journal of Botany, 2011, 98(3): 572–592
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime J P, Hector A, Hooper D U, Huston M A, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, Tilman D, Wardle D A. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 2001, 294(5543): 804–808
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
Wang X, Zhang Y, Huang D, Li Z, Zhang X. Methane uptake and emissions in a typical steppe grazing system during the grazing season. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 105: 14–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Zhang Y, Huang D, Badgery W B, Kemp D R, Chen W, Wang X, Liu N. Reduced grazing pressure delivers production and environmental benefits for the typical steppe of north China. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5(1): 16434
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Yang H, Jiang L, Li L, Li A, Wu M, Wan S. Diversity-dependent stability under mowing and nutrient addition: evidence from a 7-year grassland experiment. Ecology Letters, 2012, 15(6): 619–626
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Beyhaut E, Larson D L, Allan D L, Graham P H. Legumes in prairie restoration: evidence for wide cross-nodulation and improved inoculant delivery. Plant and Soil, 2014, 377(1–2): 245–258
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Shen Y, Chen W Q, Yang G W, Yang X, Liu N, Sun X, Chen J S, Zhang Y J. Can litter addition mediate plant productivity responses to increased precipitation and nitrogen deposition in a typical steppe? Ecological Research, 2016, 31(4): 579–587
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Lu W J, Zhang Y J, Liu N. Changes in stable fraction of soil organic carbon and microbial structure in response of grazing intensity. Proceedings of XXIII International Grassland Congress, 2015
[24]
Salvati L, Carlucci M. Towards sustainability in agro-forest systems? Grazing intensity, soil degradation and the socioeconomic profile of rural communities in Italy. Ecological Economics, 2015, 112: 1–13
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Liu N, Kan H M, Yang G W, Zhang Y J. Changes in plant, soil, and microbes in a typical steppe from simulated grazing: explaining potential change in soil C. Ecological Monographs, 2015, 85(2): 269–286
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Gross K, Cardinale B J, Fox J W, Gonzalez A, Loreau M, Wayne Polley H, Reich P B, van Ruijven J. Species richness and the temporal stability of biomass production: a new analysis of recent biodiversity experiments. American Naturalist, 2014, 183(1): 1–12 doi:10.1086/673915
Pubmed
[27]
Xu Z, Ren H, Li M H, van Ruijven J, Han X, Wan S, Li H, Yu Q, Jiang Y, Jiang L. Environmental changes drive the temporal stability of semi-arid natural grasslands through altering species asynchrony. Journal of Ecology, 2015, 103(5): 1308–1316
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Grace J B, Michael Anderson T, Smith M D, Seabloom E, Andelman S J, Meche G, Weiher E, Allain L K, Jutila H, Sankaran M, Knops J, Ritchie M, Willig M R. Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities? Ecology Letters, 2007, 10(8): 680–689
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Li W, Xu F, Zheng S, Taube F, Bai Y. Patterns and thresholds of grazing-induced changes in community structure and ecosystem functioning: species-level responses and the critical role of species traits. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 54(3): 963–975
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Lu W, Liu N, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Guo Y, Yang X. Impact of vegetation community on litter decomposition: evidence from a reciprocal transplant study with 13C labeled plant litter. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2017, 112: 248–257
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Wallenstein M D, Burns R G. Ecology of Extracellular Enzyme Activities and Organic Matt er Degradation in Soil: A Complex Community-Driven Process, in Methods of Soil Enzymology, Dick R P, Editor, 2011, 35–55
[32]
Chen W Q, Zhang Y J, Mai X H, Shen Y. Multiple mechanisms contributed to the reduced stability of Inner Mongolia grassland ecosystem following nitrogen enrichment. Plant and Soil, 2016, 409(1–2): 283–296
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Zhang Y, Loreau M, He N, Zhang G,Han X. Mowing exacerbates the loss of ecosystem stability under nitrogen enrichment in a temperate grassland. Functional Ecology, 2017, 31(8): 1637–1646
[34]
Bai Y, Wu J, Clark C M, Naeem S, Pan Q, Huang J, Zhang L, Han X. Tradeoffs and thresholds in the effects of nitrogen addition on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: evidence from Inner Mongolia Grasslands. Global Change Biology, 2010, 16(1): 358–372 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01950.x
[35]
Mladkova P, Mladek J, Hejduk S, Hejcman M, Cruz P, Jouany C, Pakeman R J. High-nature-value grasslands have the capacity to cope with nutrient impoverishment induced by mowing and livestock grazing. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 52(4): 1073–1081
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Storkey J, Döring T, Baddeley J, Collins R, Roderick S, Jones H, Watson C. Engineering a plant community to deliver multiple ecosystem services. Ecological Applications, 2015, 25(4): 1034–1043
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[37]
Socher S A, Prati D, Boch S, Müller J, Klaus V H, Hölzel N, Fischer M. Direct and productivity-mediated indirect effects of fertilization, mowing and grazing on grassland species richness. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100(6): 1391–1399
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Lü X T, Lü F M, Zhou L S, Han X, Han X G. Stoichiometric response of dominant grasses to fire and mowing in a semi-arid grassland. Journal of Arid Environments, 2012, 78: 154–160
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Jones G B, Alpuerto J B, Tracy B F, Fukao T. Physiological effect of cutting height and high temperature on regrowth vigor in orchardgrass. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 805
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[40]
Elsaesser M, Engel S, Breunig J, Thumm U. Increasing protein yields from grassland by reseeding of legumes. EGF at 50: The future of European grasslands. Proceedings of the 25th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Aberystwyth, Wales, 7–11 September 2014, ed. Hopkins A, Collins R P, Fraser M D, King V R, Lloyd D C, Moorby J M,Robson P R H. 2014, 880–883
[41]
Mulder C, Jumpponen A, Högberg P, Huss-Danell K. How plant diversity and legumes affect nitrogen dynamics in experimental grassland communities. Oecologia, 2002, 133(3): 412–421
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[42]
Mortenson M C, Schuman G E, Ingram L J, Nayigihugu V, Hess B W. Forage production and quality of a mixed-grass rangeland interseeded with Medicago sativa ssp falcata. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 2005, 58(5): 505–513
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Fukami T, Morin P J. Productivity-biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly. Nature, 2003, 424(6947): 423–426
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[43]
Adler P B, Seabloom E W, Borer E T, Hillebrand H, Hautier Y, Hector A, Harpole W S, O’Halloran L R, Grace J B, Anderson T M, Bakker J D, Biederman L A, Brown C S, Buckley Y M, Calabrese L B, Chu C J, Cleland E E, Collins S L, Cottingham K L, Crawley M J, Damschen E I, Davies K F, DeCrappeo N M, Fay P A, Firn J, Frater P, Gasarch E I, Gruner D S, Hagenah N, Hille Ris Lambers J, Humphries H, Jin V L, Kay A D, Kirkman K P, Klein J A, Knops J M H, La Pierre K J, Lambrinos J G, Li W, MacDougall A S, McCulley R L, Melbourne B A, Mitchell C E, Moore J L, Morgan J W, Mortensen B, Orrock J L, Prober S M, Pyke D A, Risch A C, Schuetz M, Smith M D, Stevens C J, Sullivan L L, Wang G, Wragg P D, Wright J P, Yang L H. Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. Science, 2011, 333(6050): 1750–1753
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[45]
Chase J M. Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments. Science, 2010, 328(5984): 1388–1391
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31472137), the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (2014CB138805) and China Forage and Grass Research System (CARS-34).

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Yingjun Zhang, Wenjie Lu, Hao Zhang, Jiqiong Zhou, and Yue Shen declare they have no conflicts of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2018. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(434 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/