Technology developments and biomedical applications of polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography

Zhenyang DING, Chia-Pin LIANG, Yu CHEN

Front. Optoelectron. ›› 2015, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 128-140.

PDF(6573 KB)
Front. Optoelectron. All Journals
PDF(6573 KB)
Front. Optoelectron. ›› 2015, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : 128-140. DOI: 10.1007/s12200-015-0475-1
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

Technology developments and biomedical applications of polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) enables depth-resolved mapping of sample polarization information, such as phase-retardation and optical axis orientation, which is particularly useful when the nano-scale organization of tissue that are difficult to be observed in the intensity images of a regular optical coherence tomography (OCT). In this review, we survey two types of methods and systems of PS-OCT. The first type is PS-OCT with single input polarization state, which contain bulk optics or polarization maintaining fiber (PMF) based systems and single-mode fiber (SMF) based systems. The second type is PS-OCT with two different input polarization states, which contain SMF based systems and PMF based systems, through either time, frequency, or depth multiplexing. In addition, representative biomedical applications using PS-OCT, such as retinal imaging, skin cancer detection, and brain mapping, are demonstrated.

Keywords

optical coherence tomography (OCT) / polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) / polarization / imaging

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhenyang DING, Chia-Pin LIANG, Yu CHEN. Technology developments and biomedical applications of polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Front. Optoelectron., 2015, 8(2): 128‒140 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-015-0475-1

1 Introduction

Microbolometer is one kind of thermal infrared (IR) detector, which has a great development in recent years. It has a wide application, such as light emitting diode (LED) defect test, industrial product test and so on, due to its high performance and room temperature operation without cooling system. The incident infrared radiation is transformed into heat and temperature rise of the sensitive material causes physical property change of this material. The signal is detected by precision circuit. This is the principle of microbolometer.
Many materials can be used as sensitive materials for microbolometer, such as VOx, which has a high negative temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) in semiconductor materials, and Ti, which has a relative high positive TCR in metal materials [1,2]. Other materials like amorphous silicon [3], silicon diode [4], etc., also have been developed in recent years.
Porous silicon technology has been used in many fields such as particle filter [5], micro-hotplates [6] and thermal sensors [7]. The purpose of utilizing porous silicon for microbolometer is to form sacrificial layer to reduce thermal conductance. Comparing with other sacrificial layers, porous silicon has these advantages: easy to be removed quickly; compatible with deposition process of thin film and compatible with the process of standard IC.
In this work, we deposit VOx thin film of high TCR about -3.5%/K. To test the property of this VOx thin film, X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) have been used. A research on the property of porous silicon has been investigated in detail. We integrate this film into microbolomer-based on porous silicon as sacrificial layer. The bolometer performance has been tested.

2 Vanadium oxide thin film of high TCR

As the common sensitive film, there are a lot of phases in vanadium oxide because of high TCR or transition from semiconductor to metal phase at a certain temperature. For example, vanadium oxide is mainly composed of V2O3, V2O5 and V3O4[2]. In this experiment, utilizing the method of pulsed DC magnetron sputtering, vanadium oxide thin film is deposited with vanadium metal target (99.99% purity) for 15 min at argon and oxygen mixed atmosphere under optimized fabrication condition. The movement of electrons is confined near certain cathode areas by magnetic field so that probability of the gas molecules collision with electrons increases. This improves the ionization events and then the deposition efficiency. To obtain a high quality of VOx film, the ratio of argon gas and oxygen gas is controlled about 179 sccm∶20 sccm by precise mass flow controller with 0.78 A×397 V sputtering power. During deposition process, the substrate temperature of 250°C is relatively low, which is beneficial to on-chiped readout integrated circuit (ROIC) for large array microbolometer. The VOx thin film sample for XRD test is deposited on silicon substrate with 300 nm Si3N4 buffer layer. Si3N4 film is deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) at 300°C. Semiconductor film resistance R(T) and TCR can be expressed as
R(T)=R0exp(ΔEKT2),
α=dRRdT=ΔEKT2,
where ΔE is activation energy; K is Boltzmann constant; T is temperature; R0 is resistance constant; α is TCR. The electrical properties of VOx film is investigated by four-probe system with precise temperature controller. This VOx thin film shows TCR of -3.5%/K and sheet resistance at room temperature is about 128 kΩ/sq shown in Fig. 1. It appears a good linear trend from 290 to 350 K without any phase transition phenomena. The typical XRD pattern of VOx thin film is shown in Fig. 2. The spectrum shows peaks 1 (33.0°), 2 (52.5°), 3(55.3°) that are related to the reflection from planes V2O3(104), V3O5(510), VO2 (211). No other significant peaks corresponding to other vanadium oxide are observed. The AFM photo of vanadium oxide is shown in Fig. 3. It indicates that thin film is well crystallized. The average height of crystallite is about 6 nm.
Fig.1 In(R) dependence on temperature for VOx thin film

Full size|PPT slide

Fig.2 XRD pattern of vanadium oxide

Full size|PPT slide

Fig.3 AFM micrographs of vanadium oxide

Full size|PPT slide

3 Preparation of porous silicon

Porous silicon is formed by the method [5-8] of anodic electrochemical etching of the silicon in the well-proportioned mixture of hydrofluoric acid (HF) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution. The charge exchanges between dopant silicon surface and electrolytic HF and H2O2 forms Schottky contact results in porous silicon [9]. Photoresist is used to pattern the needed region in order to make unmasked region pore. High dopant concentration p-type(111) silicon with a low resistivity of 2×10-2 Ω·cm is used to increase current flux, so that silicon can be easily porous and dissolved. Bias current is applied by Pt electrodes in double reaction tank, while the silicon is fixed in the middle of insulated baffle.
Figure 4 shows that different concentration of HF solution has influence on corrosion rate of anodic oxidation while current is stable. With the same HF solution, the corrosion rate increases as the current increases. High concentration of HF solution has a faster corrosion rate than other low concentration of HF solution. With time passing by, the depth of porous silicon becomes deeper while keeping 30% concentration of HF solution stable as shown in Fig. 5. The depth of porous silicon shows linear dependence on anodizing time in 10 min.
The two channels of porous region are removed in KOH solution as shown in Fig. 6. KOH solution dissolves two channels unmasked region. Based on this quickly dissolved sacrificial layer (only two minutes), it is suitable for micromachining of the devices. A 2.5 μm cavity length of porous silicon (9 mA/cm2 bias current, 2 min) corresponds to 8-14 μm atmosphere infrared transmittance spectrum because of λ/4 resonance theory [10].
Fig.4 Curves of corrosion rate of HF solution versus current density

Full size|PPT slide

Fig.5 Curves of depth of porous silicon versus anodizing time

Full size|PPT slide

Fig.6 Porous Si contour profile as sacrificial layer after dissolved

Full size|PPT slide

4 Process flow for microbolometer

Process flow steps are shown in Fig. 7. Firstly, the porous silicon sacrificial layer has been prepared by the method of anodic electrochemical etching as shown in Fig. 7(a). Si3N4/SiO2/Si3N4(thickness: 200 /150/200 nm) “sandwich structure” supporting layer is deposited by PECVD (Fig. 7(b)). The sandwich structure plays roles of insulating, supporting, reducing heat-conductive and absorbing infrared. This kind of silicon dioxide/silicon nitride has advantage of well uniformity and hardness. Vanadium oxide sensitive film (150 nm) is deposited by utilizing the method of pulsed DC magnetron sputtering (Fig. 7(c)). The shape of this sensitive thin film is well patterned by wet etched method. On top of VOx adjacent to the edge deposits a conductive layer by sputtering Cr/Au (60/100 nm). It sticks to the bottom layer well and shows a good conductivity. The conductive layer is formed by lift-off method (Fig. 7(d)). Then with the method of pulsed DC magnetron sputtering, controlling N2, argon gas rates, TiN absorbing layer (300 nm) is deposited. PECVD Si3N4/SiO2 (200/100 nm) makes further efforts to promote infrared absorption and to protect the bottom layers (Fig. 7(e)). Thus micro-bridge structure has been left to be formed. After the required shape and region have been etched to the bottom by MRIE (Fig. 7(f)), KOH solution immerses the sample only 2 min. H2emerges from the solution during this anisotropic wet etching process. Finally, micro-bridge structure VOx infrared bolometer unit has been investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as shown in Fig. 8. The minimum conductive layer width of micro-bridge is 5 μm. A wider metal layer (about 8 μm) connects the narrow one on one side, on the other side connects outer circuit. The VOx sensitive region is of a circle shape whose diameter is 50 μm. All above is fully utilized for IR absorption and thermal conductance reduction.
Fig.7 Process flow of microbolometer based on porous silicon sacrificial layer. (a) Preparation of porous silicon layer; (b) deposition of supporting layer; (c) deposition and etching of VOx; (d) deposition of conduction layer; (e) PECVD films and deposition of TiN absorbing layer; (f) etching of absorbing structure; (g) removal of porous silicon sacrificial layer

Full size|PPT slide

Fig.8 Microphotography of microbolometer

Full size|PPT slide

Fig.9 Total absorption for microbolometer

Full size|PPT slide

5 Detector test

To analyze IR absorption for detector, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to measure the absorption. The curve is determined as the wavelength from 4-15 μm. The absorption of total films is shown in Fig. 9. The value of highest absorption at 9.87 μm reaches 98%. The average absorption of 8-14 μm is calculated to be about 74%. It means the total film system including TiN absorber is of good absorption for mid-infrared.
Fig.10 Test system for VOx bolometer

Full size|PPT slide

The vanadium oxide thin film mentioned above is compatible with CMOS technology. This thin film has been integrated into microbolometer. The bolometer sheet resistance is 128 kΩ/sq, with a TCR of -3.5%/K. The bolometer is packaged in a vacuum chamber. In front of chamber is an 8-14 μm optical window, which is biased by a DC power current source. The signal is measured through a low noise pre-amplifier and a lock in amplifier. Black body source of 850°C radiates the microbolometer through a chopper frequency which ranges from 5 to 800 Hz. The chamber is pumped and kept about 10 Pa. The bolometer test system is shown in Fig. 10. The purpose of utilizing porous silicon is to form sacrificial layer to reduce thermal conductance. The total thermal conductance is composed of thermal conductance of gas atmosphere Ggas, supporting legs Gleg and material radiation Grad: Gtotal = Gleg+Ggas+Grad. Because of such a low vacuum pressure, Grad and Ggas can be ignored. So Gleg is the main thermal conductance for this bolometer. The thermal time constant τ with thermal conductance G of 4.8×10-7 W/K was 5.4 ms, which is obtained through 3 dB frequency signal. The thermal mass C was about 2.59×10-9 J/K with the relation: C = τ×G. The bolometer responsivity Rv and detectivity D* are given by
Rv=αηIbR0g1+ω2τ2,
D*=RvAdΔfVn,
where α is TCR; η is infrared absorptivity; Ib is bias current applied to device; R0 is bolometer resistance at room temperature; g is the thermal conductance; τ is thermal time constant; ω is modulation frequency. Ad is active absorptive area; Vn is noise; ∆f is frequency bandwidth. The curve of responsivity Rv at 9 Hz depended on chopper frequency is shown in Fig. 11. Detector’s responsivity has maximum value of 6.7×104 V/W and it shows decline trend especially between 30-90 Hz. Comparing with our former bolometer based on porous silicon [11], thermal conductance has been reduced from the level of 10-5 to 10-7 W/K, due to the higher TCR of VOx, the higher absorption and the less thermal conductance and less thermal mass. The responsivity has reached as 10 times as the former 5000 V/W. To reach the same responsivity, power consumption has only 1/10 than the former one because of the optimization of the structure, which means that the power consumption has been minimized greatly. The noise voltage remains a relative low level. Bolometer detectivity at 24 Hz with 9.8 μA bias current has maximum value of 1.09×109 cm·Hz1/2/W shown in Fig. 12.
Fig.11 Curve of responsivity (Rv) depended on frequency

Full size|PPT slide

Fig.12 Curves of detectivity (D*)and noise voltage versus frequency

Full size|PPT slide

6 Conclusions

Vanadium oxide thin film is deposited and VOx film of TCR of -3.5%/K is obtained. Based on porous silicon as sacrificial layer, microbolometer of 74% IR absorptivity is fabricated to test the performance of VOx thin film. The results indicate that this kind of bolometer integrated into this VOx thin film, has maximum detectivity of 1.09×109 cm·Hz1/2/W at 24 Hz frequency and 9.8 μA bias current.

References

[1]
Hee M R, Huang D, Swanson E A, Fujimoto J G. Polarization-sensitive low-coherence reflectometer for birefringence characterization and ranging. Journal of the Optical Society of America. B, Optical Physics, 1992, 9(6): 903–908
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Huang D, Swanson E A, Lin C P, Schuman J S, Stinson W G, Chang W, Hee M R, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito C A. Optical coherence tomography. Science, 1991, 254(5035): 1178–1181
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
de Boer J, Srinivas S, Malekafzali A, Chen Z, Nelson J. Imaging thermally damaged tissue by polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Optics Express, 1998, 3(6): 212–218
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Schoenenberger K, Colston B W, Maitland D J, Da Silva L B, Everett M J. Mapping of birefringence and thermal damage in tissue by use of polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Applied Optics, 1998, 37(25): 6026–6036
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Park B H, Saxer C, Srinivas S M, Nelson J S, de Boer J F. In vivo burn depth determination by high-speed fiber-based polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2001, 6(4): 474–479
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
Jiao S, Wang L V. Jones-matrix imaging of biological tissues with quadruple-channel optical coherence tomography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2002, 7(3): 350–358
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Jiao S, Yu W, Stoica G, Wang L V. Contrast mechanisms in polarization-sensitive Mueller-matrix optical coherence tomography and application in burn imaging. Applied Optics, 2003, 42(25): 5191–5197
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Pierce M C, Strasswimmer J, Park B H, Cense B, de Boer J F. Advances in optical coherence tomography imaging for dermatology. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 2004, 123(3): 458–463
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Srinivas S M, de Boer J F, Park H, Keikhanzadeh K, Huang H E, Zhang J, Jung W Q, Chen Z, Nelson J S. Determination of burn depth by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2004, 9(1): 207–212
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Strasswimmer J, Pierce M C, Park B H, Neel V, de Boer J F. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography of invasive basal cell carcinoma. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2004, 9(2): 292–298
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Duan L, Marvdashti T, Lee A, Tang J Y, Ellerbee A K. Automated identification of basal cell carcinoma by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Biomedical Optics Express, 2014, 5(10): 3717–3729
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Pircher M, Goetzinger E, Leitgeb R, Hitzenberger C K. Transversal phase resolved polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2004, 49(7): 1257–1263
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Götzinger E, Pircher M, Sticker M, Fercher A F, Hitzenberger C K. Measurement and imaging of birefringent properties of the human cornea with phase-resolved, polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2004, 9(1): 94–102
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Ducros M G, de Boer J F, Huang H E, Chao L C, Chen Z P, Nelson J S, Milner T E, Rylander H III. Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography of the rabbit eye. IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 1999, 5(4): 1159–1167
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Ducros M G, Marsack J D, Rylander H G 3rd, Thomsen S L, Milner T E. Primate retina imaging with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 2001, 18(12): 2945–2956
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Cense B, Chen T C, Park B H, Pierce M C, de Boer J F. In vivo birefringence and thickness measurements of the human retinal nerve fiber layer using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2004, 9(1): 121–125
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Götzinger E, Pircher M, Hitzenberger C K. High speed spectral domain polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Optics Express, 2005, 13(25): 10217–10229
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
Kemp N J, Park J, Zaatari H N, Rylander H G, Milner T E. High-sensitivity determination of birefringence in turbid media with enhanced polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 2005, 22(3): 552–560
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Baumann B, Choi W, Potsaid B, Huang D, Duker J S, Fujimoto J G. Swept source/Fourier domain polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography with a passive polarization delay unit. Optics Express, 2012, 20(9): 10229–10241
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Götzinger E, Pircher M, Geitzenauer W, Ahlers C, Baumann B, Michels S, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Hitzenberger C K. Retinal pigment epithelium segmentation by polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Optics Express, 2008, 16(21): 16410–16422
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Zotter S, Pircher M, Torzicky T, Baumann B, Yoshida H, Hirose F, Roberts P, Ritter M, Schütze C, Götzinger E, Trasischker W, Vass C, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Hitzenberger C K. Large-field high-speed polarization sensitive spectral domain OCT and its applications in ophthalmology. Biomedical Optics Express, 2012, 3(11): 2720–2732
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
Cense B, Chen T C, Park B H, Pierce M C, de Boer J F. Thickness and birefringence of healthy retinal nerve fiber layer tissue measured with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2004, 45(8): 2606–2612
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Makita S, Yamanari M, Yasuno Y. Generalized Jones matrix optical coherence tomography: performance and local birefringence imaging. Optics Express, 2010, 18(2): 854–876
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
Wang X J, Milner T E, de Boer J F, Zhang Y, Pashley D H, Nelson J S. Characterization of dentin and enamel by use of optical coherence tomography. Applied Optics, 1999, 38(10): 2092–2096
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
Baumgartner A, Dichtl S, Hitzenberger C K, Sattmann H, Robl B, Moritz A, Fercher A F, Sperr W. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography of dental structures. Caries Research, 2000, 34(1): 59–69
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[26]
Fried D, Xie J, Shafi S, Featherstone J D, Breunig T M, Le C. Imaging caries lesions and lesion progression with polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2002, 7(4): 618–627
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[27]
Chen Y, Otis L, Piao D, Zhu Q. Characterization of dentin, enamel, and carious lesions by a polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography system. Applied Optics, 2005, 44(11): 2041–2048
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Jones R S, Darling C L, Featherstone J D, Fried D. Remineralization of in vitro dental caries assessed with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of biomedical optics, 2006, 11(1): 014016
[29]
Pierce M, Shishkov M, Park B, Nassif N, Bouma B, Tearney G, de Boer J. Effects of sample arm motion in endoscopic polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Optics Express, 2005, 13(15): 5739–5749
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[30]
Fan C, Yao G. Imaging myocardial fiber orientation using polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Biomedical Optics Express, 2013, 4(3): 460–465
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[31]
Wang Y, Yao G. Optical tractography of the mouse heart using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Biomedical Optics Express, 2013, 4(11): 2540–2545
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Hariri L P, Villiger M, Applegate M B, Mino-Kenudson M, Mark E J, Bouma B E, Suter M J. Seeing beyond the bronchoscope to increase the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopic biopsy. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2013, 187(2): 125–129
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[33]
Pasquesi J J, Schlachter S C, Boppart M D, Chaney E, Kaufman S J, Boppart S A. In vivo detection of exercised-induced ultrastructural changes in genetically-altered murine skeletal muscle using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Optics Express, 2006, 14(4): 1547–1556
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Matcher S J, Winlove C P, Gangnus S V. The collagen structure of bovine intervertebral disc studied using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2004, 49(7): 1295–1306
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[35]
Wang H, Black A J, Zhu J, Stigen T W, Al-Qaisi M K, Netoff T I, Abosch A, Akkin T. Reconstructing micrometer-scale fiber pathways in the brain: multi-contrast optical coherence tomography based tractography. NeuroImage, 2011, 58(4): 984–992
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[36]
Wang H, Zhu J, Akkin T. Serial optical coherence scanner for large-scale brain imaging at microscopic resolution. NeuroImage, 2014, 84: 1007–1017
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[37]
Nakaji H, Kouyama N, Muragaki Y, Kawakami Y, Iseki H. Localization of nerve fiber bundles by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2008, 174(1): 82–90
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[38]
Al-Qaisi M K, Akkin T. Swept-source polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography based on polarization-maintaining fiber. Optics Express, 2010, 18(4): 3392–3403
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[39]
Hitzenberger C, Goetzinger E, Sticker M, Pircher M, Fercher A. Measurement and imaging of birefringence and optic axis orientation by phase resolved polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Optics Express, 2001, 9(13): 780–790
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[40]
Wang H, Al-Qaisi M K, Akkin T. Polarization-maintaining fiber based polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography in spectral domain. Optics Letters, 2010, 35(2): 154–156
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[41]
de Boer J F, Milner T E. Review of polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography and Stokes vector determination. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2002, 7(3): 359–371
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[42]
Bonesi M, Sattmann H, Torzicky T, Zotter S, Baumann B, Pircher M, Götzinger E, Eigenwillig C, Wieser W, Huber R, Hitzenberger C K. High-speed polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography scan engine based on Fourier domain mode locked laser. Biomedical Optics Express, 2012, 3(11): 2987–3000
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[43]
Trasischker W, Zotter S, Torzicky T, Baumann B, Haindl R, Pircher M, Hitzenberger C K. Single input state polarization sensitive swept source optical coherence tomography based on an all single mode fiber interferometer. Biomedical Optics Express, 2014, 5(8): 2798–2809
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[44]
Ding Z, Liang C, Tang Q, Chen Y. Quantitative measurement of tissue birefringence by single mode fiber based PS-OCT with a single input polarization state using Muller matrix. Submitted to Biomedical Optics Express
[45]
Park B H, Pierce M C, Cense B, de Boer J F. Jones matrix analysis for a polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography system using fiber-optic components. Optics Letters, 2004, 29(21): 2512–2514
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[46]
Oh W Y, Yun S H, Vakoc B J, Shishkov M, Desjardins A E, Park B H, de Boer J F, Tearney G J, Bouma B E. High-speed polarization sensitive optical frequency domain imaging with frequency multiplexing. Optics Express, 2008, 16(2): 1096–1103
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[47]
Fan C, Yao G. Mapping local retardance in birefringent samples using polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography. Optics Letters, 2012, 37(9): 1415–1417
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[48]
Fan C, Yao G. Mapping local optical axis in birefringent samples using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2012, 17(11): 110501
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[49]
Fan C, Yao G. Full-range spectral domain Jones matrix optical coherence tomography using a single spectral camera. Optics Express, 2012, 20(20): 22360–22371
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[50]
Fan C, Yao G. Single camera spectral domain polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography using offset B-scan modulation. Optics Express, 2010, 18(7): 7281–7287
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[51]
Yamanari M, Makita S, Yasuno Y. Polarization-sensitive swept-source optical coherence tomography with continuous source polarization modulation. Optics Express, 2008, 16(8): 5892–5906
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[52]
Guo S, Zhang J, Wang L, Nelson J S, Chen Z. Depth-resolved birefringence and differential optical axis orientation measurements with fiber-based polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Optics Letters, 2004, 29(17): 2025–2027
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[53]
Yun S, Tearney G, de Boer J, Bouma B. Removing the depth-degeneracy in optical frequency domain imaging with frequency shifting. Optics Express, 2004, 12(20): 4822–4828
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[54]
Corsi F, Galtarossa A, Palmieri L. Polarization mode dispersion characterization of single-mode optical fiber using backscattering technique. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 1998, 16(10): 1832–1843
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Park B, Pierce M, Cense B, de Boer J. Real-time multi-functional optical coherence tomography. Optics Express, 2003, 11(7): 782–793
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Grant Nos. R01DK094877, R21AG042700, R21DK088066 and R21EB012215), and the National Science Foundation (NSF) (Grant No. CBET-1254743) (CAREER Award). We acknowledge Qinggong Tang for helpful comments.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(6573 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/