Mechanistic Insights and Advances in Electrode/Electrolyte Interfaces for Efficient Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction to C₂ Products

Abstract

Electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction (ECR) is a promising approach to converting CO₂ into chemicals and fuels. Among the ECR products, C₂ products such as ethylene, ethanol, and acetate have been extensively studied due to their high industrial demands. However, the mechanistic understanding of C₂ product formation remains unclear due to the lack of in situ or operando measurements that can observe the complex and instantaneous atomic evolutions of adsorbates at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Moreover, the sensitivity of ECR reactions to variations at the interface further widens the gap between mechanistic understanding and performance enhancement. To bridge this gap, first-principle studies provide insights into how the interface influences ECR. In this study, we present a review of mechanistic studies investigating the effects of various factors at the interface, with an emphasis on the C₂ product formation. We begin by introducing ECR and the essential metrics. Next, we discuss the factors classified by their components at the interface, namely, electrocatalyst, electrolyte, and adsorbates, respectively, and their effects on the C₂ product formation. Due to the interplay among these factors, we aim to deconvolute the influence of each factor and clearly demonstrate their impacts. Finally, we outline the promising directions for mechanistic studies of C₂ products.

Keywords

C ₂ product / electrocatalytic CO ₂ reduction / electrode/electrolyte interface / mechanistic studies

References

[1] IEA., Putting CO₂ to Use (Paris: IEA, 2019).

[2] J. M. Barlow, L. E. Clarke, Z. Zhang, et al., “Molecular Design of Redox Carriers for Electrochemical CO₂ Capture and Concentration,” Chemical Society Reviews 51, no. 20 (2022): 8415–8433.

[3] S. Nitopi, E. Bertheussen, S. B. Scott, et al., “Progress and Perspectives of Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction on Copper in Aqueous Electrolyte,” Chemical Reviews 119, no. 12 (2019): 7610–7672.

[4] S. Jin, Z. Hao, K. Zhang, Z. Yan, and J. Chen, “Advances and Challenges for the Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ to Co: From Fundamentals to Industrialization,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60, no. 38 (2021): 20627–20648.

[5] X. She, Y. Wang, H. Xu, S. Chi Edman Tsang, and S. Ping Lau, “Challenges and Opportunities in Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction to Chemicals and Fuels,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 49 (2022): e202211396.

[6] S. Wang, T. Kou, S. E. Baker, E. B. Duoss, and Y. Li, “Recent Progress in Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ by Oxide-Derived Copper Catalysts,” Materials Today Nano 12 (2020): 100096.

[7] S. Zhu, E. P. Delmo, T. Li, et al., “Recent Advances in Catalyst Structure and Composition Engineering Strategies for Regulating CO₂ Electrochemical Reduction,” Advanced Materials 33, no. 50 (2021): 2005484.

[8] Y. Hori, H. Wakebe, T. Tsukamoto, and O. Koga, “Electrocatalytic Process of CO Selectivity in Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ at Metal Electrodes in Aqueous Media,” Electrochimica Acta 39, no. 11 (1994): 1833–1839.

[9] A. Bagger, W. Ju, A. S. Varela, P. Strasser, and J. Rossmeisl, “Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction: A Classification Problem,” Chemphyschem 18, no. 22 (2017): 3266–3273.

[10] S. D. Rihm, M. K. Kovalev, A. A. Lapkin, et al., “On the Role of C4 and C5 Products in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction via Copper-Based Catalysts,” Energy & Environmental Science 52, no. 15 (2023): 5013–5050.

[11] K. P. Kuhl, E. R. Cave, D. N. Abram, et al., “New Insights Into the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide on Metallic Copper Surfaces,” Energy & Environmental Science 5, no. 5 (2012): 7050–7059.

[12] A. Bagger, W. Ju, A. S. Varela, P. Strasser, and J. Rossmeisl, “Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction: Classifying Cu Facets,” ACS Catalysis 9, no. 9 (2019): 7894–7899.

[13] T. Bligaard, J. K. Nørskov, S. Dahl, J. Matthiesen, C. H. Christensen, and J. Sehested, “The Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi Relation and the Volcano Curve in Heterogeneous Catalysis,” Journal of Catalysis 224, no. 1 (2004): 206–217.

[14] J. Chen, B. W. J. Chen, J. Zhang, W. Chen, and Y. Y. Sun, “Origin of Copper as a Unique Catalyst for C–C Coupling in Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction,” Chemical Science 15, no. 23 (2024): 8835–8840.

[15] Y. Zhou, A. J. Martín, F. Dattila, et al., “Long-Chain Hydrocarbons by CO₂ Electroreduction Using Polarized Nickel Catalysts,” Nature Catalysis 5, no. 6 (2022): 545–554.

[16] P. Chen, P. Zhang, X. Kang, et al., “Efficient Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO₂ to Ethane over Nitrogen-Doped Fe₂O₃,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 32 (2022): 14769–14777.

[17] M. Esmaeilirad, Z. Jiang, A. M. Harzandi, et al., “Imidazolium-Functionalized Mo₃P Nanoparticles With an Ionomer Coating for Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO₂ to Propane,” Nature Energy 8, no. 8 (2023): 891–900.

[18] J. Ding, H. Bin Yang, X.-L. Ma, et al., “A Tin-Based Tandem Electrocatalyst for CO₂ Reduction to Ethanol With 80% Selectivity,” Nature Energy 8, no. 12 (2023): 1386–1394.

[19] M. G. Kibria, J. P. Edwards, C. M. Gabardo, et al., “Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Into Chemical Feedstocks: From Mechanistic Electrocatalysis Models to System Design,” Advanced Materials 31, no. 31 (2019): 1807166.

[20] W. Lai, Y. Qiao, J. Zhang, et al., “Design Strategies for Markedly Enhancing Energy Efficiency in the Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction Reaction,” Energy & Environmental Science 15, no. 9 (2022): 3603–3629.

[21] F. Li, A. Thevenon, A. Rosas-Hernández, et al., “Molecular Tuning of CO₂-To-Ethylene Conversion,” Nature 577, no. 7791 (2020): 509–513.

[22] S. Kuang, Y. Su, M. Li, et al., “Asymmetrical Electrohydrogenation of CO₂ to Ethanol With Copper–Gold Heterojunctions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, no. 4 (2023): e2214175120.

[23] J. E. Huang, F. Li, A. Ozden, et al., “CO₂ Electrolysis to Multicarbon Products in Strong Acid,” Science 372, no. 6546 (2021): 1074–1078.

[24] A. Ozden, F. P. García de Arquer, J. E. Huang, et al., “Carbon-Efficient Carbon Dioxide Electrolysers,” Nature Sustainability 5, no. 7 (2022): 563–573.

[25] J. Chen, H. Qiu, Y. Zhao, et al., “Selective and Stable CO₂ Electroreduction at High Rates via Control of Local H₂O/CO₂ Ratio,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 5893.

[26] G. Mangione, J. Huang, R. Buonsanti, and C. Corminboeuf, “Dual-Facet Mechanism in Copper Nanocubes for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Into Ethylene,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 10, no. 15 (2019): 4259–4265.

[27] C. Zhan, F. Dattila, C. Rettenmaier, et al., “Revealing the CO Coverage-Driven C–C Coupling Mechanism for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction on Cu₂O Nanocubes via Operando Raman Spectroscopy,” ACS Catalysis 11, no. 13 (2021): 7694–7701.

[28] F. S. Roberts, K. P. Kuhl, and A. Nilsson, “High Selectivity for Ethylene From Carbon Dioxide Reduction Over Copper Nanocube Electrocatalysts,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54, no. 17 (2015): 5179–5182.

[29] A. Loiudice, P. Lobaccaro, E. A. Kamali, et al., “Tailoring Copper Nanocrystals Towards C₂ Products in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55, no. 19 (2016): 5789–5792.

[30] Y. Wang, H. Shen, K. J. T. Livi, et al., “Copper Nanocubes for CO₂ Reduction in Gas Diffusion Electrodes,” Nano Letters 19, no. 12 (2019): 8461–8468.

[31] D. Kim, C. S. Kley, Y. Li, and P. Yang, “Copper Nanoparticle Ensembles for Selective Electroreduction of CO₂ to C₂–C₃ Products,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 40 (2017): 10560–10565.

[32] J. Feijóo, Y. Yang, M. V. Fonseca Guzman, et al., “Operando High-Energy-Resolution X-Ray Spectroscopy of Evolving Cu Nanoparticle Electrocatalysts for CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 37 (2023): 20208–20213.

[33] Y. Yang, S. Louisia, S. Yu, et al., “Operando Studies Reveal Active Cu Nanograins for CO₂ Electroreduction,” Nature 614, no. 7947 (2023): 262–269.

[34] J. Kim, W. Choi, J. W. Park, C. Kim, M. Kim, and H. Song, “Branched Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Induce Highly Selective Ethylene Production by Electrochemical Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141, no. 17 (2019): 6986–6994.

[35] D. Raciti, K. J. Livi, and C. Wang, “Highly Dense Cu Nanowires for Low-Overpotential CO₂ Reduction,” Nano Letters 15, no. 10 (2015): 6829–6835.

[36] L. Han, B. Tian, X. Gao, et al., “Copper Nanowire With Enriched High-Index Facets for Highly Selective CO₂ Reduction,” SmartMat 3, no. 1 (2022): 142–150.

[37] G. Liu, P. Adesina, N. Nasiri, et al., “Elucidating Reaction Pathways of the CO₂ Electroreduction via Tailorable Tortuosities and Oxidation States of Cu Nanostructures,” Advanced Functional Materials 32, no. 36 (2022): 2204993.

[38] K. D. Yang, W. R. Ko, J. H. Lee, et al., “Morphology-Directed Selective Production of Ethylene or Ethane From CO₂ on a Cu Mesopore Electrode,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56, no. 3 (2017): 796–800.

[39] W. Liu, P. Zhai, A. Li, et al., “Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction to Ethylene by Ultrathin Cuo Nanoplate Arrays,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 1877.

[40] Y. Xiao, M. Wang, H. Yang, et al., “Multi-Shell Copper Catalysts for Selective Electroreduction of CO₂ to Multicarbon Chemicals,” Advanced Energy Materials 14, no. 1 (2024): 2302556.

[41] G. L. De Gregorio, T. Burdyny, A. Loiudice, P. Iyengar, W. A. Smith, and R. Buonsanti, “Facet-Dependent Selectivity of Cu Catalysts in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction at Commercially Viable Current Densities,” ACS Catalysis 10, no. 9 (2020): 4854–4862.

[42] H. Wang, E. Matios, C. Wang, et al., “Rapid and Scalable Synthesis of Cuprous Halide-Derived Copper Nano-Architectures for Selective Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide,” Nano Letters 19, no. 6 (2019): 3925–3932.

[43] J. Cai, Q. Zhao, W.-Y. Hsu, et al., “Highly Selective Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ Into Methane on Nanotwinned Cu,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 16 (2023): 9136–9143.

[44] P. De Luna, R. Quintero-Bermudez, C.-T. Dinh, et al., “Catalyst Electro-Redeposition Controls Morphology and Oxidation State for Selective Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” Nature Catalysis 1, no. 2 (2018): 103–110.

[45] D. Cheng, Z.-J. Zhao, G. Zhang, et al., “The Nature of Active Sites for Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction Over Oxide-Derived Copper Catalysts,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 395.

[46] O. Piqué, F. Viñes, F. Illas, and F. Calle-Vallejo, “Elucidating the Structure of Ethanol-Producing Active Sites at Oxide-Derived Cu Electrocatalysts,” ACS Catalysis 10, no. 18 (2020): 10488–10494.

[47] O. Piqué, Q. H. Low, A. D. Handoko, B. S. Yeo, and F. Calle-Vallejo, “Selectivity Map for the Late Stages of CO and CO₂ Reduction to C₂ Species on Copper Electrodes,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 60, no. 19 (2021): 10784–10790.

[48] A. M. Reichert, O. Piqué, W. A. Parada, I. Katsounaros, and F. Calle-Vallejo, “Mechanistic Insight Into Electrocatalytic Glyoxal Reduction on Copper and Its Relation to CO₂ Reduction,” Chemical Science 13, no. 37 (2022): 11205–11214.

[49] A. K. Ummireddi, Z. Li, and J. Wu, “Copper Defects for CO₂ Electrocatalysis Toward a Specific Multicarbon Product,” Trends in Chemistry 5, no. 3 (2023): 170–173.

[50] D. Winkler, M. Leitner, A. Auer, and J. Kunze-Liebhäuser, “The Relevance of the Interfacial Water Reactivity for Electrochemical CO Reduction on Copper Single Crystals,” ACS Catalysis 14, no. 2 (2024): 1098–1106.

[51] R. Amirbeigiarab, J. Tian, A. Herzog, et al., “Atomic-Scale Surface Restructuring of Copper Electrodes Under CO₂ Electroreduction Conditions,” Nature Catalysis 6, no. 9 (2023): 837–846.

[52] S. Xue, B. Garlyyev, A. Auer, J. Kunze-Liebhäuser, and A. S. Bandarenka, “How the Nature of the Alkali Metal Cations Influences the Double-Layer Capacitance of Cu, Au, and Pt Single-Crystal Electrodes,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 124, no. 23 (2020): 12442–12447.

[53] A. Auer, M. Andersen, E.-M. Wernig, et al., “Self-Activation of Copper Electrodes During CO Electro-Oxidation in Alkaline Electrolyte,” Nature Catalysis 3, no. 10 (2020): 797–803.

[54] Z. Zhang, W. Gee, P. Sautet, and A. N. Alexandrova, “H and Co CO-Induced Roughening of Cu Surface in CO₂ Electroreduction Conditions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146, no. 23 (2024): 16119–16127.

[55] W. Luo, X. Nie, M. J. Janik, and A. Asthagiri, “Facet Dependence of CO₂ Reduction Paths on Cu Electrodes,” ACS Catalysis 6, no. 1 (2016): 219–229.

[56] Y. Hori, I. Takahashi, O. Koga, and N. Hoshi, “Selective Formation of C2 Compounds From Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ at a Series of Copper Single Crystal Electrodes,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B 106, no. 1 (2002): 15–17.

[57] I. Takahashi, O. Koga, N. Hoshi, and Y. Hori, “Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ at Copper Single Crystal Cu(S)-[n(111)×(111)] and Cu(S)-[n(110)×(100)] Electrodes,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 533, no. 1 (2002): 135–143.

[58] Y. Hori, I. Takahashi, O. Koga, and N. Hoshi, “Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide at Various Series of Copper Single Crystal Electrodes,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 199, no. 1 (2003): 39–47.

[59] M. Song, Z. Jiao, W. Jing, Y. Liu, and L. Guo, “Revealing the Nature of C–C Coupling Sites on a Cu Surface for CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, no. 20 (2022): 4434–4440.

[60] K. Jiang, R. B. Sandberg, A. J. Akey, et al., “Metal Ion Cycling of Cu Foil for Selective C–C Coupling in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Nature Catalysis 1, no. 2 (2018): 111–119.

[61] R. B. Sandberg, J. H. Montoya, K. Chan, and J. K. Nørskov, “CO-CO Coupling on Cu Facets: Coverage, Strain and Field Effects,” Surface Science 654 (2016): 56–62.

[62] X. Liu, J. Xiao, H. Peng, X. Hong, K. Chan, and J. K. Nørskov, “Understanding Trends in Electrochemical Carbon Dioxide Reduction Rates,” Nature Communications 8, no. 1 (2017): 15438.

[63] X. Liu, P. Schlexer, J. Xiao, et al., “pH Effects on the Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ Towards C2 Products on Stepped Copper,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 32.

[64] H. Peng, M. T. Tang, X. Liu, et al., “The Role of Atomic Carbon in Directing Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction to Multicarbon Products,” Energy & Environmental Science 14, no. 1 (2021): 473–482.

[65] H.-J. Peng, M. T. Tang, J. Halldin Stenlid, X. Liu, and F. Abild-Pedersen, “Trends in Oxygenate/Hydrocarbon Selectivity for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction to C2 Products,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 1399.

[66] H. Xiao, T. Cheng, W. A. Goddard, III, and R. Sundararaman, “Mechanistic Explanation of the pH Dependence and Onset Potentials for Hydrocarbon Products From Electrochemical Reduction of CO on Cu(111),” Journal of the American Chemical Society 138, no. 2 (2016): 483–486.

[67] T. Cheng, H. Xiao, and W. A. Goddard, III, “Full Atomistic Reaction Mechanism With Kinetics for CO Reduction on Cu(100) From Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Free-Energy Calculations at 298 K,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 8 (2017): 1795–1800.

[68] H. Xiao, T. Cheng, and W. A. Goddard, III, “Atomistic Mechanisms Underlying Selectivities in C₁ and C₂ Products From Electrochemical Reduction of CO on Cu(111),” Journal of the American Chemical Society 139, no. 1 (2017): 130–136.

[69] J. Santatiwongchai, K. Faungnawakij, and P. Hirunsit, “Comprehensive Mechanism of CO₂ Electroreduction Toward Ethylene and Ethanol: The Solvent Effect From Explicit Water–Cu(100) Interface Models,” ACS Catalysis 11, no. 15 (2021): 9688–9701.

[70] M. T. Tang, H. Peng, P. S. Lamoureux, M. Bajdich, and F. Abild-Pedersen, “From Electricity to Fuels: Descriptors for C₁ Selectivity in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Applied Catalysis, B: Environmental 279 (2020): 119384.

[71] T.-C. Kuo, J.-W. Chou, M.-H. Shen, et al., “First-Principles Study of C–C Coupling Pathways for CO₂ Electrochemical Reduction Catalyzed by Cu(110),” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 125, no. 4 (2021): 2464–2476.

[72] X. Nie, M. R. Esopi, M. J. Janik, and A. Asthagiri, “Selectivity of CO₂ Reduction on Copper Electrodes: The Role of the Kinetics of Elementary Steps,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 52, no. 9 (2013): 2459–2462.

[73] X. Nie, W. Luo, M. J. Janik, and A. Asthagiri, “Reaction Mechanisms of CO₂ Electrochemical Reduction on Cu(111) Determined With Density Functional Theory,” Journal of Catalysis 312 (2014): 108–122.

[74] T. Cheng, H. Xiao, and W. A. Goddard, III, “Reaction Mechanisms for the Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ to CO and Formate on the Cu(100) Surface at 298 K From Quantum Mechanics Free Energy Calculations With Explicit Water,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 138, no. 42 (2016): 13802–13805.

[75] S.-Q. Xiang, J.-L. Shi, S.-T. Gao, W. Zhang, and L. B. Zhao, “Thermodynamic and Kinetic Competition Between C–H and O–H Bond Formation Pathways During Electrochemical Reduction of CO on Copper Electrodes,” ACS Catalysis 11, no. 4 (2021): 2422–2434.

[76] E. Pérez-Gallent, M. C. Figueiredo, F. Calle-Vallejo, and M. T. M. Koper, “Spectroscopic Observation of a Hydrogenated CO Dimer Intermediate During Co Reduction on Cu(100) Electrodes,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56, no. 13 (2017): 3621–3624.

[77] E. Pérez-Gallent, G. Marcandalli, M. C. Figueiredo, F. Calle-Vallejo, and M. T. M. Koper, “Structure-and Potential-Dependent Cation Effects on CO Reduction at Copper Single-Crystal Electrodes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 139, no. 45 (2017): 16412–16419.

[78] A. J. Garza, A. T. Bell, and M. Head-Gordon, “Mechanism of CO₂ Reduction at Copper Surfaces: Pathways to C₂ Products,” ACS Catalysis 8, no. 2 (2018): 1490–1499.

[79] H. H. Heenen, H. Shin, G. Kastlunger, et al., “The Mechanism for Acetate Formation in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction on Cu: Selectivity With Potential, pH, and Nanostructuring,” Energy & Environmental Science 15, no. 9 (2022): 3978–3990.

[80] Z. Zhang, Z. Wei, P. Sautet, and A. N. Alexandrova, “Hydrogen-Induced Restructuring of a Cu(100) Electrode in Electroreduction Conditions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 42 (2022): 19284–19293.

[81] D. Cheng, Z. Wei, Z. Zhang, P. Broekmann, A. N. Alexandrova, and P. Sautet, “Restructuring and Activation of Cu(111) Under Electrocatalytic Reduction Conditions,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 20 (2023): e202218575.

[82] Q. Liu, Q. Jiang, L. Li, and W. Yang, “Spontaneous Reconstruction of Copper Active Sites During the Alkaline Corr: Degradation and Recovery of the Performance,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146, no. 6 (2024): 4242–4251.

[83] C. M. Gunathunge, V. J. Ovalle, Y. Li, M. J. Janik, and M. M. Waegele, “Existence of an Electrochemically Inert CO Population on Cu Electrodes in Alkaline pH,” ACS Catalysis 8, no. 8 (2018): 7507–7516.

[84] Z. Chen, T. Wang, B. Liu, et al., “Grain-Boundary-Rich Copper for Efficient Solar-Driven Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction to Ethylene and Ethanol,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142, no. 15 (2020): 6878–6883.

[85] D. Cheng, G. Zhang, L. Li, et al., “Guiding Catalytic CO₂ Reduction to Ethanol With Copper Grain Boundaries,” Chemical Science 14, no. 29 (2023): 7966–7972.

[86] Z.-Z. Wu, X.-L. Zhang, Z.-Z. Niu, et al., “Identification of Cu(100)/Cu(111) Interfaces as Superior Active Sites for CO Dimerization During CO₂ Electroreduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 1 (2022): 259–269.

[87] W. Ma, S. Xie, B. Zhang, et al., “Copper Lattice Tension Boosts Full-Cell Co Electrolysis to Multi-Carbon Olefins and Oxygenates,” Chem 9, no. 8 (2023): 2161–2177.

[88] J. A. Gauthier, J. H. Stenlid, F. Abild-Pedersen, M. Head-Gordon, and A. T. Bell, “The Role of Roughening to Enhance Selectivity to C₂₊ Products During CO₂ Electroreduction on Copper,” ACS Energy Letters 6, no. 9 (2021): 3252–3260.

[89] W. Guo, S. Zhang, J. Zhang, et al., “Accelerating Multielectron Reduction at Cu_xO Nanograins Interfaces With Controlled Local Electric Field,” Nature Communications 14, no. 1 (2023): 7383.

[90] M. Wu, D. Huang, F. Lai, et al., “Sequential *CO Management via Controlling In Situ Reconstruction for Efficient Industrial-Current-Density CO₂-To-C₂₊ Electroreduction,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, no. 40 (2023): e2302851120.

[91] M. Liu, Y. Pang, B. Zhang, et al., “Enhanced Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction via Field-Induced Reagent Concentration,” Nature 537, no. 7620 (2016): 382–386.

[92] T. Saberi Safaei, A. Mepham, X. Zheng, et al., “High-Density Nanosharp Microstructures Enable Efficient CO₂ Electroreduction,” Nano Letters 16, no. 11 (2016): 7224–7228.

[93] T. Burdyny, P. J. Graham, Y. Pang, et al., “Nanomorphology-Enhanced Gas-Evolution Intensifies CO₂ Reduction Electrochemistry,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5, no. 5 (2017): 4031–4040.

[94] B. Yang, K. Liu, H. Li, et al., “Accelerating CO₂ Electroreduction to Multicarbon Products via Synergistic Electric–Thermal Field on Copper Nanoneedles,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 7 (2022): 3039–3049.

[95] M. Fang, M. Wang, Z. Wang, et al., “Hydrophobic, Ultrastable Cu^δ+ for Robust CO₂ Electroreduction to C₂ Products at Ampere-Current Levels,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 20 (2023): 11323–11332.

[96] X. Zi, Y. Zhou, L. Zhu, et al., “Breaking K⁺ Concentration Limit on Cu Nanoneedles for Acidic Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction to Multi-Carbon Products,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 42 (2023): e202309351.

[97] T. Zhang, B. Yuan, W. Wang, et al., “Tailoring *H Intermediate Coverage on the CuAl₂O₄/CuO Catalyst for Enhanced Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction to Ethanol,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 29 (2023): e202302096.

[98] J. Zhang, G. Zeng, S. Zhu, et al., “Steering CO₂ Electroreduction Pathway Toward Ethanol via Surface-Bounded Hydroxyl Species-Induced Noncovalent Interaction,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, no. 11 (2023): e2218987120.

[99] D. Wei, Y. Wang, C.-L. Dong, et al., “Surface Adsorbed Hydroxyl: A Double-Edged Sword in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Over Oxide-Derived Copper,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 31 (2023): e202306876.

[100] Z. Wang, Y. Li, X. Zhao, et al., “Localized Alkaline Environment via In Situ Electrostatic Confinement for Enhanced CO₂-To-Ethylene Conversion in Neutral Medium,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 11 (2023): 6339–6348.

[101] P.-P. Yang, X.-L. Zhang, F.-Y. Gao, et al., “Protecting Copper Oxidation State via Intermediate Confinement for Selective CO₂ Electroreduction to C₂₊ Fuels,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142, no. 13 (2020): 6400–6408.

[102] T.-T. Zhuang, Y. Pang, Z.-Q. Liang, et al., “Copper Nanocavities Confine Intermediates for Efficient Electrosynthesis of C3 Alcohol Fuels From Carbon Monoxide,” Nature Catalysis 1, no. 12 (2018): 946–951.

[103] C. Liu, M. Zhang, J. Li, et al., “Nanoconfinement Engineering Over Hollow Multi-Shell Structured Copper Towards Efficient Electrocatalytical C–C Coupling,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 3 (2022): e202113498.

[104] X. Wang, Z. Wang, F. P. García de Arquer, et al., “Efficient Electrically Powered CO₂-To-Ethanol via Suppression of Deoxygenation,” Nature Energy 5, no. 6 (2020): 478–486.

[105] H. S. Jeon, J. Timoshenko, C. Rettenmaier, et al., “Selectivity Control of Cu Nanocrystals in a Gas-Fed Flow Cell Through CO₂ Pulsed Electroreduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 143, no. 19 (2021): 7578–7587.

[106] Z. Tang, E. Nishiwaki, K. E. Fritz, T. Hanrath, and J. Suntivich, “Cu(I) Reducibility Controls Ethylene vs Ethanol Selectivity on (100)-Textured Copper During Pulsed CO₂ Reduction,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13, no. 12 (2021): 14050–14055.

[107] C. Kim, L.-C. Weng, and A. T. Bell, “Impact of Pulsed Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ on the Formation of C₂₊ Products Over Cu,” ACS Catalysis 10, no. 21 (2020): 12403–12413.

[108] K. W. Kimura, R. Casebolt, J. Cimada DaSilva, et al., “Selective Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction During Pulsed Potential Stems From Dynamic Interface,” ACS Catalysis 10, no. 15 (2020): 8632–8639.

[109] Z. Li, L. Wang, T. Wang, L. Sun, and W. Yang, “Steering the Dynamics of Reaction Intermediates and Catalyst Surface During Electrochemical Pulsed CO₂ Reduction for Enhanced C₂₊ Selectivity,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 37 (2023): 20655–20664.

[110] R. M. Arán-Ais, F. Scholten, S. Kunze, R. Rizo, and B. Roldan Cuenya, “The Role of In Situ Generated Morphological Motifs and Cu(I) Species in C₂₊ Product Selectivity During CO₂ Pulsed Electroreduction,” Nature Energy 5, no. 4 (2020): 317–325.

[111] J. Timoshenko, A. Bergmann, C. Rettenmaier, et al., “Steering the Structure and Selectivity of CO₂ Electroreduction Catalysts by Potential Pulses,” Nature Catalysis 5, no. 4 (2022): 259–267.

[112] H. Feng, C. Chen, S. Wang, et al., “Theoretical Investigation of Cu–Au Alloy for Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction: Cu/Au Ratio Determining C₁/C₂ Selectivity,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, no. 34 (2022): 8002–8009.

[113] S. Yan, Z. Chen, Y. Chen, et al., “High-Power CO₂-To-C₂ Electroreduction on Ga-Spaced, Square-Like C. Sites,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 48 (2023): 26374–26382.

[114] J. Feng, L. Wu, S. Liu, et al., “Improving CO₂-To-C₂₊ Product Electroreduction Efficiency via Atomic Lanthanide Dopant-Induced Tensile-Strained CuO_x Catalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 17 (2023): 9857–9866.

[115] M. Zhong, K. Tran, Y. Min, et al., “Accelerated Discovery of CO₂ Electrocatalysts Using Active Machine Learning,” Nature 581, no. 7807 (2020): 178–183.

[116] J. Zhang, C. Guo, S. Fang, et al., “Accelerating Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction to Multi-Carbon Products via Asymmetric Intermediate Binding at Confined Nanointerfaces,” Nature Communications 14, no. 1 (2023): 1298.

[117] Y. Xie, P. Ou, X. Wang, et al., “High Carbon Utilization in CO₂ Reduction to Multi-Carbon Products in Acidic Media,” Nature Catalysis 5, no. 6 (2022): 564–570.

[118] D. Ren, B. S.-H. Ang, and B. S. Yeo, “Tuning the Selectivity of Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction Toward Ethanol on Oxide-Derived Cu_xZn Catalysts,” ACS Catalysis 6, no. 12 (2016): 8239–8247.

[119] S. Liang, J. Xiao, T. Zhang, Y. Zheng, Q. Wang, and B. Liu, “Sulfur Changes the Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Pathway Over Cu Electrocatalysts,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 44 (2023): e202310740.

[120] R. Chen, J. Zhao, Y. Li, et al., “Operando Mössbauer Spectroscopic Tracking the Metastable State of Atomically Dispersed Tin in Copper Oxide for Selective CO₂ Electroreduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 37 (2023): 20683–20691.

[121] S. C. Abeyweera, M. Simukaitis, Q. Wei, and Y. Sun, “Interfaced Ag/Cu Nanostructures Derived From Metal Thiolate Nanoplates: A Highly Selective Catalyst for Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ to Ethanol,” SmartMat 3, no. 1 (2022): 173–182.

[122] P. Iyengar, M. J. Kolb, J. R. Pankhurst, F. Calle-Vallejo, and R. Buonsanti, “Elucidating the Facet-Dependent Selectivity for CO₂ Electroreduction to Ethanol of Cu–Ag Tandem Catalysts,” ACS Catalysis 11, no. 8 (2021): 4456–4463.

[123] P. Wang, H. Yang, C. Tang, et al., “Boosting Electrocatalytic CO₂–To–Ethanol Production via Asymmetric C–C Coupling,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 3754.

[124] P.-C. Chen, C. Chen, Y. Yang, et al., “Chemical and Structural Evolution of AgCu Catalysts in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 18 (2023): 10116–10125.

[125] D. Choukroun, L. Pacquets, C. Li, et al., “Mapping Composition–Selectivity Relationships of Supported Sub-10 nm Cu–Ag Nanocrystals for High-Rate CO₂ Electroreduction,” ACS Nano 15, no. 9 (2021): 14858–14872.

[126] J. Li, H. Xiong, X. Liu, et al., “Weak CO Binding Sites Induced by Cu–Ag Interfaces Promote CO Electroreduction to Multi-Carbon Liquid Products,” Nature Communications 14, no. 1 (2023): 698.

[127] S. Lee, G. Park, and J. Lee, “Importance of Ag–Cu Biphasic Boundaries for Selective Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ to Ethanol,” ACS Catalysis 7, no. 12 (2017): 8594–8604.

[128] Y. Liu, H. Qiu, J. Li, L. Guo, and J. W. Ager, “Tandem Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction With Efficient Intermediate Conversion Over Pyramid-Textured Cu–Ag Catalysts,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13, no. 34 (2021): 40513–40521.

[129] C. Du, J. P. Mills, A. G. Yohannes, et al., “Cascade Electrocatalysis via Agcu Single-Atom Alloy and Ag Nanoparticles in CO₂ Electroreduction Toward Multicarbon Products,” Nature Communications 14, no. 1 (2023): 6142.

[130] L. R. L Ting, O. Piqué, S. Y. Lim, M. Tanhaei, F. Calle-Vallejo, and B. S. Yeo, “Enhancing CO₂ Electroreduction to Ethanol on Copper–Silver Composites by Opening an Alternative Catalytic Pathway,” ACS Catalysis 10, no. 7 (2020): 4059–4069.

[131] D. Wei, Y. Wang, C.-L. Dong, et al., “Decrypting the Controlled Product Selectivity Over Ag-Cu Bimetallic Surface Alloys for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 19 (2023): e202217369.

[132] X. Wang, P. Ou, A. Ozden, et al., “Efficient Electrosynthesis of n-Propanol From Carbon Monoxide Using a Ag–Ru–Cu Catalyst,” Nature Energy 7 (2022): 170–176.

[133] S. V. Somerville, P. B. O’Mara, T. M. Benedetti, et al., “Nanoconfinement Allows a Less Active Cascade Catalyst to Produce More C₂₊ Products in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 127, no. 1 (2023): 289–299.

[134] L. Ding, N. Zhu, Y. Hu, et al., “Over 70 % Faradaic Efficiency for CO₂ Electroreduction to Ethanol Enabled by Potassium Dopant-Tuned Interaction Between Copper Sites and Intermediates,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 36 (2022): e202209268.

[135] Z. Zhang, S. Chen, J. Zhu, et al., “Charge-Separated Pd^δ––Cu^δ+ Atom Pairs Promote Co₂ Reduction to C₂,” Nano Letters 23, no. 6 (2023): 2312–2320.

[136] J. Feng, L. Wu, X. Song, et al., “CO₂ Electrolysis to Multi-Carbon Products in Strong Acid at Ampere-Current Levels on La-Cu Spheres With Channels,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 4821.

[137] S. Chu, C. Kang, W. Park, et al., “Single Atom and Defect Engineering of CuO for Efficient Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ to C₂H₄,” SmartMat 3, no. 1 (2022): 194–205.

[138] C. W. Li and M. W. Kanan, “CO₂ Reduction at Low Overpotential on Cu Electrodes Resulting From the Reduction of Thick Cu₂O Films,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 134, no. 17 (2012): 7231–7234.

[139] D. Ren, Y. Deng, A. D. Handoko, C. S. Chen, S. Malkhandi, and B. S. Yeo, “Selective Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene and Ethanol on Copper(I) Oxide Catalysts,” ACS Catalysis 5, no. 5 (2015): 2814–2821.

[140] A. Eilert, F. Cavalca, F. S. Roberts, et al., “Subsurface Oxygen in Oxide-Derived Copper Electrocatalysts for Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8, no. 1 (2017): 285–290.

[141] H.-Y. Wang, M. Soldemo, D. Degerman, et al., “Back Cover: Direct Evidence of Subsurface Oxygen Formation in Oxide-Derived Cu by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 3/2022),” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 3 (2022): e202111021.

[142] L. Mandal, K. R. Yang, M. R. Motapothula, et al., “Investigating the Role of Copper Oxide in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction in Real Time,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 10, no. 10 (2018): 8574–8584.

[143] Y. Lum and J. W. Ager, “Stability of Residual Oxides in Oxide-Derived Copper Catalysts for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Investigated With ¹⁸O Labeling,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 57, no. 2 (2018): 551–554.

[144] M. Fields, X. Hong, J. K. Nørskov, and K. Chan, “Role of Subsurface Oxygen on Cu Surfaces for CO₂ Electrochemical Reduction,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 122, no. 28 (2018): 16209–16215.

[145] A. J. Garza, A. T. Bell, and M. Head-Gordon, “Is Subsurface Oxygen Necessary for the Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ on Copper?,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 9, no. 3 (2018): 601–606.

[146] H. Mistry, A. S. Varela, C. S. Bonifacio, et al., “Highly Selective Plasma-Activated Copper Catalysts for Carbon Dioxide Reduction to Ethylene,” Nature Communications 7, no. 1 (2016): 12123.

[147] R. Cai, M. Sun, F. Yang, et al., “Engineering Cu(I)/Cu(0) Interfaces for Efficient Ethanol Production From CO₂ Electroreduction,” Chem 10, no. 1 (2024): 211–233.

[148] H. Xiao, W. A. Goddard, III, T. Cheng, and Y. Liu, “Cu Metal Embedded in Oxidized Matrix Catalyst to Promote CO₂ Activation and CO Dimerization for Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 26 (2017): 6685–6688.

[149] M. Zheng, P. Wang, X. Zhi, et al., “Electrocatalytic CO₂-To-C₂₊ With Ampere-Level Current on Heteroatom-Engineered Copper via Tuning *CO Intermediate Coverage,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 32 (2022): 14936–14944.

[150] J. Li, A. Ozden, M. Wan, et al., “Silica-Copper Catalyst Interfaces Enable Carbon-Carbon Coupling Towards Ethylene Electrosynthesis,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 2808.

[151] M. Choi, S. Bong, J. W. Kim, and J. Lee, “Formation of 1-Butanol From CO₂ Without *Co Dimerization on a Phosphorus-Rich Copper Cathode,” ACS Energy Letters 6, no. 6 (2021): 2090–2095.

[152] Y. Zhou, F. Che, M. Liu, et al., “Dopant-Induced Electron Localization Drives CO₂ Reduction to C₂ Hydrocarbons,” Nature Chemistry 10, no. 9 (2018): 974–980.

[153] W. Ma, S. Xie, T. Liu, et al., “Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO₂ to Ethylene and Ethanol Through Hydrogen-Assisted C–C Coupling Over Fluorine-Modified Copper,” Nature Catalysis 3, no. 6 (2020): 478–487.

[154] C. Kim, J. C. Bui, X. Luo, et al., “Tailored Catalyst Microenvironments for CO₂ Electroreduction to Multicarbon Products on Copper Using Bilayer Ionomer Coatings,” Nature Energy 6, no. 11 (2021): 1026–1034.

[155] G. Lee, A. S. Rasouli, B.-H. Lee, et al., “CO₂ Electroreduction to Multicarbon Products From Carbonate Capture Liquid,” Joule 7, no. 6 (2023): 1277–1288.

[156] G. Kastlunger, L. Wang, N. Govindarajan, et al., “Using pH Dependence to Understand Mechanisms in Electrochemical CO Reduction,” ACS Catalysis 12, no. 8 (2022): 4344–4357.

[157] J. Zosel, W. Oelßner, M. Decker, G. Gerlach, and U. Guth, “The Measurement of Dissolved and Gaseous Carbon Dioxide Concentration,” Measurement Science and Technology 22, no. 7 (2011): 072001.

[158] Y. Zhao, X. Zu, R. Chen, et al., “Industrial-Current-Density CO₂-To-C₂₊ Electroreduction by Anti-Swelling Anion-Exchange Ionomer-Modified Oxide-Derived Cu Nanosheets,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 23 (2022): 10446–10454.

[159] J. Li, X. Chang, H. Zhang, et al., “Electrokinetic and In Situ Spectroscopic Investigations of CO Electrochemical Reduction on Copper,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 3264.

[160] C.-T. Dinh, T. Burdyny, M. G. Kibria, et al., “CO₂ Electroreduction to Ethylene via Hydroxide-Mediated Copper Catalysis at an Abrupt Interface,” Science 360, no. 6390 (2018): 783–787.

[161] Y. Lum, B. Yue, P. Lobaccaro, A. T. Bell, and J. W. Ager, “Optimizing C–C Coupling on Oxide-Derived Copper Catalysts for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121, no. 26 (2017): 14191–14203.

[162] N. Wang, K. Yao, A. Vomiero, Y. Wang, and H. Liang, “Inhibiting Carbonate Formation Using CO₂–CO–C₂₊ Tandems,” SmartMat 2, no. 4 (2021): 423–425.

[163] L. Wang, S. A. Nitopi, E. Bertheussen, et al., “Electrochemical Carbon Monoxide Reduction on Polycrystalline Copper: Effects of Potential, Pressure, and pH on Selectivity Toward Multicarbon and Oxygenated Products,” ACS Catalysis 8, no. 8 (2018): 7445–7454.

[164] S. Banerjee, Z.-Q. Zhang, A. S. Hall, and V. S. Thoi, “Surfactant Perturbation of Cation Interactions at the Electrode–Electrolyte Interface in Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” ACS Catalysis 10, no. 17 (2020): 9907–9914.

[165] H. Khani, A. R. Puente Santiago, and T. He, “An Interfacial View of Cation Effects on Electrocatalysis Systems,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 43 (2023): e202306103.

[166] X. Yang, H. Ding, S. Li, S. Zheng, J. F. Li, and F. Pan, “Cation-Induced Interfacial Hydrophobic Microenvironment Promotes the C–C Coupling in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146, no. 8 (2024): 5532–5542.

[167] X. Qin, H. A. Hansen, K. Honkala, and M. M. Melander, “Cation-Induced Changes in the Inner-and Outer-Sphere Mechanisms of Electrocatalytic CO₂ Reduction,” Nature Communications 14, no. 1 (2023): 7607.

[168] S. Y. Lee, J. Kim, G. Bak, et al., “Probing Cation Effects on *CO Intermediates From Electroreduction of CO₂ Through Operando Raman Spectroscopy,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 42 (2023): 23068–23075.

[169] W. Ni, Y. Guan, H. Chen, Y. Zhang, S. Wang, and S. Zhang, “Molecular Engineering of Cation Solvation Structure for Highly Selective Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 37 (2023): e202303233.

[170] J. Gu, S. Liu, W. Ni, W. Ren, S. Haussener, and X. Hu, “Modulating Electric Field Distribution by Alkali Cations for CO₂ Electroreduction in Strongly Acidic Medium,” Nature Catalysis 5, no. 4 (2022): 268–276.

[171] M. C. O Monteiro, F. Dattila, B. Hagedoorn, R. García-Muelas, N. López, and M. T. M. Koper, “Absence of CO₂ Electroreduction on Copper, Gold and Silver Electrodes Without Metal Cations in Solution,” Nature Catalysis 4, no. 8 (2021): 654–662.

[172] W. Ren, A. Xu, K. Chan, and X. Hu, “A Cation Concentration Gradient Approach to Tune the Selectivity and Activity of CO₂ Electroreduction,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 49 (2022): e202214173.

[173] J. Resasco, L. D. Chen, E. Clark, et al., “Promoter Effects of Alkali Metal Cations on the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 139, no. 32 (2017): 11277–11287.

[174] A. S. Malkani, J. Li, N. J. Oliveira, et al., “Understanding the Electric and Nonelectric Field Components of the Cation Effect on the Electrochemical CO Reduction Reaction,” Science Advances 6, no. 45 (2020): abd2569.

[175] S. Ringe, E. L. Clark, J. Resasco, et al., “Understanding Cation Effects in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Energy & Environmental Science 12, no. 10 (2019): 3001–3014.

[176] M. R. Singh, Y. Kwon, Y. Lum, J. W. Ager, and A. T. Bell, “Hydrolysis of Electrolyte Cations Enhances the Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ Over Ag and Cu,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 138, no. 39 (2016): 13006–13012.

[177] L. D. Chen, M. Urushihara, K. Chan, and J. K. Nørskov, “Electric Field Effects in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” ACS Catalysis 6, no. 10 (2016): 7133–7139.

[178] J. Wang, Y. Qin, S. Jin, et al., “Customizing CO₂ Electroreduction by Pulse-Induced Anion Enrichment,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 48 (2023): 26213–26221.

[179] D. Hochfilzer, A. Xu, J. E. Sørensen, et al., “Transients in Electrochemical CO Reduction Explained by Mass Transport of Buffers,” ACS Catalysis 12, no. 9 (2022): 5155–5161.

[180] H. Hashiba, L.-C. Weng, Y. Chen, et al., “Effects of Electrolyte Buffer Capacity on Surface Reactant Species and the Reaction Rate of CO₂ in Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 122, no. 7 (2018): 3719–3726.

[181] J. Resasco, Y. Lum, E. Clark, J. Z. Zeledon, and A. T. Bell, “Effects of Anion Identity and Concentration on Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂,” ChemElectroChem 5, no. 7 (2018): 1064–1072.

[182] T. Ludwig, J. A. Gauthier, K. S. Brown, S. Ringe, J. K. Nørskov, and K. Chan, “Solvent–Adsorbate Interactions and Adsorbate-Specific Solvent Structure in Carbon Dioxide Reduction on a Stepped Cu Surface,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 123, no. 10 (2019): 5999–6009.

[183] F. Shao, Z. Xia, F. You, et al., “Surface Water as an Initial Proton Source for the Electrochemical CO Reduction Reaction on Copper Surfaces,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62, no. 3 (2023): e202214210.

[184] Y. Lum, T. Cheng, W. A. Goddard, III, and J. W. Ager, “Electrochemical CO Reduction Builds Solvent Water Into Oxygenate Products,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140, no. 30 (2018): 9337–9340.

[185] H. Zhang, J. Gao, D. Raciti, and A. S. Hall, “Promoting Cu-Catalysed CO₂ Electroreduction to Multicarbon Products by Tuning the Activity of H₂O,” Nature Catalysis 6, no. 9 (2023): 807–817.

[186] R. E. Vos, K. E. Kolmeijer, T. S. Jacobs, W. van der Stam, B. M. Weckhuysen, and M. T. M. Koper, “How Temperature Affects the Selectivity of the Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction on Copper,” ACS Catalysis 13, no. 12 (2023): 8080–8091.

[187] J. Hou, X. Chang, J. Li, B. Xu, and Q. Lu, “Correlating CO Coverage and CO Electroreduction on Cu via High-Pressure In Situ Spectroscopic and Reactivity Investigations,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144, no. 48 (2022): 22202–22211.

[188] X. Chang, J. Li, H. Xiong, et al., “C–C Coupling Is Unlikely to be the Rate-Determining Step in the Formation of C₂₊ Products in the Copper-Catalyzed Electrochemical Reduction of CO,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61, no. 2 (2022): e202111167.

[189] R. Duan, L. Luo, W. Qin, X. Xiao, R. Zhou, and Z. Zheng, “Effects of *CO Coverage on Selective Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO₂ to Ethylene Over Cu₂O With Undercoordinated Cu Sites,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 126, no. 49 (2022): 20878–20885.

[190] W. Deng, P. Zhang, Y. Qiao, et al., “Unraveling the Rate-Determining Step of C₂₊ Products During Electrochemical CO Reduction,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 892.

[191] Y. Huang, A. D. Handoko, P. Hirunsit, and B. S. Yeo, “Electrochemical Reduction of CO₂ Using Copper Single-Crystal Surfaces: Effects of Co* Coverage on the Selective Formation of Ethylene,” ACS Catalysis 7, no. 3 (2017): 1749–1756.

[192] X. Chang, S. Vijay, Y. Zhao, N. J. Oliveira, K. Chan, and B. Xu, “Understanding the Complementarities of Surface-Enhanced Infrared and Raman Spectroscopies in CO Adsorption and Electrochemical Reduction,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 2656.

[193] J. Li, Z. Wang, C. McCallum, et al., “Constraining CO Coverage on Copper Promotes High-Efficiency Ethylene Electroproduction,” Nature Catalysis 2, no. 12 (2019): 1124–1131.

[194] X. Wang, J. F. de Araújo, W. Ju, et al., “Mechanistic Reaction Pathways of Enhanced Ethylene Yields During Electroreduction of CO₂–CO CO-Feeds on Cu and Cu-Tandem Electrocatalysts,” Nature Nanotechnology 14, no. 11 (2019): 1063–1070.

[195] P. Wei, D. Gao, T. Liu, et al., “Coverage-Driven Selectivity Switch From Ethylene to Acetate in High-Rate CO₂/CO Electrolysis,” Nature Nanotechnology 18, no. 3 (2023): 299–306.

[196] J. Y. T Kim, C. Sellers, S. Hao, T. P. Senftle, and H. Wang, “Different Distributions of Multi-Carbon Products in CO₂ and CO Electroreduction Under Practical Reaction Conditions,” Nature Catalysis 6, no. 12 (2023): 1115–1124.

[197] W. Gao, Y. Xu, L. Fu, X. Chang, and B. Xu, “Experimental Evidence of Distinct Sites for CO₂-To-CO and CO Conversion on Cu in the Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction Reaction,” Nature Catalysis 6, no. 8 (2023): 885–894.

[198] Y. Lum and J. W. Ager, “Evidence for Product-Specific Active Sites on Oxide-Derived Cu Catalysts for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction,” Nature Catalysis 2, no. 1 (2019): 86–93.

[199] Z. Sun, H. Yin, K. Liu, et al., “Machine Learning Accelerated Calculation and Design of Electrocatalysts for CO₂ Reduction,” SmartMat 3, no. 1 (2022): 68–83.

[200] B. W. J Chen, X. Zhang, and J. Zhang, “Accelerating Explicit Solvent Models of Heterogeneous Catalysts With Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials,” Chemical Science 14, no. 31 (2023): 8338–8354.

[201] Z. Lian, F. Dattila, and N. López, “Stability and Lifetime of Diffusion-Trapped Oxygen in Oxide-Derived Copper CO₂ Reduction Electrocatalysts,” Nature Catalysis 7, no. 4 (2024): 401–411.

[202] H. H. Kristoffersen and K. Chan, “Towards Constant Potential Modeling of CO-CO Coupling at Liquid Water-Cu(100) Interfaces,” Journal of Catalysis 396 (2021): 251–260.

[203] S. Liu, Y. Li, D. Wang, et al., “Alkali Cation-Induced Cathodic Corrosion in Cu Electrocatalysts,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 5080.

[204] Y. Xu, W. Gao, Z.-X. Chen, et al., “Cation-Dependent Impact of CO₂ on Cu-Catalyzed Electrochemical CO Reduction Reaction,” ACS Catalysis 14, no. 14 (2024): 10829–10838.

[205] Z.-M. Zhang, T. Wang, Y.-C. Cai, et al., “Probing Electrolyte Effects on Cation-Enhanced CO₂ Reduction on Copper in Acidic Media,” Nature Catalysis 7, no. 7 (2024): 807–817.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). SmartMat published by Tianjin University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.