A novel Fe₂O₃@CeO₂ heterojunction substrate with high surface-enhanced Raman scattering performance

Abstract

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) has been applied in many fields due to its advantages of fast and nondestructive detection. For semiconductors, the large-scale electron-hole pair separation of heterojunction is conducive to efficient charge transfer, which is a promising SERS substrate. Here, we designed a Fe₂O₃@CeO₂ heterojunction substrate by hydrothermal method and explored its enhancement mechanism in detail. α-Fe₂O₃ is a promising semiconductor with a narrow bandgap, and CeO₂ has adequate oxygen vacancies on the surface. Combing α-Fe₂O₃ and CeO₂ into a shell-core structure, Fe₂O₃@CeO₂ heterojunction presents higher SERS performance than pure Fe₂O₃ and CeO₂ for methyl orange (MO) molecule with a limit of detection (LOD) of 5 × 10^–8 mol/L. Under the excitation of 514 nm, Fe₂O₃ can produce an effective exciton resonance due to its narrow bandgap (2.01 eV). The oxygen vacancy in CeO₂ acts as the active site to promote the adsorption of molecules and facilitate the photo-induced charge transfer (PICT) between the substrate and MO molecules. Therefore, the high SERS performance of Fe₂O₃@CeO₂ heterojunction is achieved due to the coupling effect of excitons resonance, molecular resonance, and PICT resonance. It is found that Fe₂O₃@CeO₂ has good SERS performance and stability to organic pesticides, especially metamitron (LOD = 5 × 10^–9 mol/L). This work combines the advantages of Fe₂O₃ being prone to producing photoelectrons and abundant oxygen vacancies of CeO₂, providing a reference for designing semiconductor SERS.

Keywords

Fe ₂O ₃@CeO ₂ heterojunction / oxygen vacancy / photo-induced charge transfer / SERS

References

[1] Blackie EJ, Le Ru EC, Etchegoin PG. Single-molecule surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of nonresonant molecules. J Am Chem Soc. 2009; 131(40): 14466-14472.

[2] Guarrotxena N, Bazan GC. Antitags: SERS-encoded nanoparticle assemblies that enable single-spot multiplex protein detection. Adv Mater. 2013; 26(12): 1941-1946.

[3] Huang F, Ma G, Liu J, Lin J, Wang X, Guo L. High-yield synthesis of hollow octahedral silver nanocages with controllable pack density and their high-performance SERS application. Small. 2016; 12(39): 5442-5448.

[4] Meng X, Qiu L, Xi G, Wang X, Guo L. Smart design of high-performance surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates. SmartMat. 2021; 2(4): 466-487.

[5] Krajczewski J, Kudelski A. Shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Front Chem. 2019; 7: 410.

[6] Musumeci A, Gosztola D, Schiller T, et al. SERS of semiconducting nanoparticles (TiO₂ hybrid composites). J Am Chem Soc. 2009; 131(17): 6040-6041.

[7] Schuck PJ, Fromm DP, Sundaramurthy A, Kino GS, Moerner WE. Improving the mismatch between light and nanoscale objects with gold bowtie nanoantennas. Phys Rev Lett. 2005; 94(1): 017402.

[8] Wang X, Ma G, Li A, et al. Composition-adjustable Ag–Au substitutional alloy microcages enabling tunable plasmon resonance for ultrasensitive SERS. Chem Sci. 2018; 9(16): 4009-4015.

[9] Ding Q, Zhou Z, Wang H, et al Self-healable, recyclable, ultrastretchable, and high-performanc. NO₂ sensors based on an organohydrogel for room and sub-zero temperature and wireless operation. SmartMat. 2022; 4(1): e1141.

[10] Yang S, Dai X, Stogin BB, Wong T-S. Ultrasensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection in common fluids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 113(2): 268-273.

[11] Lu T, Li T, Shi D, et al. In situ establishment of Co/MoS₂ heterostructures onto inverse opal-structured N, S-doped carbo. hollow nanospheres: interfacial and architectural dual engineering for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. SmartMat. 2021; 2(4): 591-602.

[12] Khan J, Ahmad RTM, Tan J, et al Recent advances in 2D organic–inorganic heterostructures for electronics and optoelectronics. SmartMat. 2022; 4(2): e1156.

[13] Li A, Lin J, Huang Z, Wang X, Guo L. Surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy on amorphous semiconducting rhodium sulfide microbowl substrates. iScience. 2018; 10: 1-10.

[14] Wang X, Shi W, Jin Z, et al. Remarkable SERS activity observed from amorphous ZnO nanocages. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017; 56(33): 9851-9855.

[15] Wang X, Shi W, Wang S, et al. Two-dimensional amorphous TiO₂ nanosheets enabling high-efficiency photoinduced charge transfer for excellent SERS activity. J Am Chem Soc. 2019; 141(14): 5856-5862.

[16] Zheng G, Pastoriza-Santos I. Pérez-Juste J, Liz-Marzán LM. Plasmonic metal-organic frameworks. SmartMat. 2021; 2(4): 446-465.

[17] Liu J, Lee C, Hu Y, et al. Recent progress in intermetallic nanocrystals for electrocatalysis: from binary to ternary to high-entropy intermetallics. SmartMat. 2023; 4(4): e1210.

[18] Cong S, Yuan Y, Chen Z, et al. Noble metal-comparable SERS enhancement from semiconducting metal oxides by making oxygen vacancies. Nat Commun. 2015; 6(1): 7800.

[19] Lin J, Shang Y, Li X, et al Ultrasensitive SERS detection by defect engineering on single Cu₂O superstructure particle. Adv Mater. 2016; 29(5): 1604797.

[20] Li M, Fan X, Gao Y, Qiu T. W₁₈O₄₉/monolayer MoS₂ heterojunction-enhanced Raman scattering. J Phys Chem Lett. 2019; 10(14): 4038-4044.

[21] Xie S, Chen D, Gu C, et al. Molybdenum oxide/tungsten oxide nano-heterojunction with improved surface-enhanced Raman scattering performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021; 13(28): 33345-33353.

[22] Xie S, Lai K, Gu C, et al. Fine fabrication of TiO₂/MoO_x nano-heterojunctions and investigating on the improved charge transfer for SERS application. Materials Today Nano. 2022; 18: 100179.

[23] Cheng W, He J, Yao T, et al. Half-unit-cell α-Fe₂O₃ semiconductor nanosheets with intrinsic and robust ferromagnetism. J Am Chem Soc. 2014; 136(29): 10393-10398.

[24] Mishra M, Chun D-M. α-Fe₂O₃ as a photocatalytic material: a review. Appl Catal A. 2015; 498: 126-141.

[25] Shao P, Ren Z, Tian J, et al. Silica hydrogel-mediated dissolution-recrystallization strategy for synthesis of ultrathin α-Fe₂O₃ nanosheets with highly exposed (110) facets: a superior photocatalyst for degradation of bisphenol S. Chem Eng J. 2017; 323: 64-73.

[26] Sun T-W, Zhu Y-J, Qi C, Ding GJ, Chen F, Wu J. α-Fe₂O₃ nanosheet-assembled hierarchical hollow mesoporous microspheres: microwave-assisted solvothermal synthesis and application in photocatalysis. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016; 463: 107-117.

[27] Wang J-C, Ren J, Yao H-C, et al. Synergistic photocatalysis of Cr(VI) reduction and 4-Chlorophenol degradation over hydroxylated α-Fe₂O₃ under visible light irradiation. J Hazard Mater. 2016; 311: 11-19.

[28] Yamada K, Mukaihata N, Kawahara T, Tada H. Electrochemically assisted visible light photocatalysis in a heterosupramolecular system consisting of α-Fe₂O₃ and surfactant molecular assembly. Langmuir. 2007; 23(16): 8593-8596.

[29] Bokare AD, Choi W. Review of iron-free Fenton-like systems for activating H₂O₂ in advanced oxidation processes. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 275: 121-135.

[30] Ghasemi E, Ziyadi H, Afshar AM, Sillanpää M. Iron oxide nanofibers: a new magnetic catalyst for azo dyes degradation in aqueous solution. Chem Eng J. 2015; 264: 146-151.

[31] Marques RG, Ferrari-Lima AM. Slusarski-Santana V, Fernandes-Machado NRC. Ag₂O and Fe₂O₃ modified oxides on the photocatalytic treatment of pulp and paper wastewater. J Environ Manage. 2017; 195: 242-248.

[32] Satheesh R, Vignesh K, Suganthi A, Rajarajan M. Visible light responsive photocatalytic applications of transition metal (M=Cu, Ni and Co) doped α-Fe₂O₃ nanoparticles. J Environ Chem Eng. 2014; 2(4): 1956-1968.

[33] Wang YL, Li YH, Wang XL, Hou Y, Chen AP, Yang HG. Effects of redox mediators on α-Fe₂O₃ exposed by {012} and {104} facets for photocatalytic water oxidation. Appl Catal B. 2017; 206: 216-220.

[34] Cheng X-L, Jiang J-S, Jin C-Y. Lin CC, Zeng Y, Zhang QH. Cauliflower-like α-Fe₂O₃ microstructures: toluene–water interface-assisted synthesis, characterization, and applications in wastewater treatment and visible-light photocatalysis. Chem Eng J. 2014; 236: 139-148.

[35] Mehraj O, Pirzada BM, Mir NA, Khan MZ, Sabir S. A highly efficient visible-light-driven novel p-n junction Fe₂O₃/BiOI photocatalyst: surface decoration of BiOI nanosheets with Fe₂O₃ nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci. 2016; 387: 642-651.

[36] Ma R, Jahurul Islam M, Amaranatha Reddy D, Kim TK. Transformation of CeO₂ into a mixed phase CeO₂/Ce₂O₃ nanohybrid by liquid phase pulsed laser ablation for enhanced photocatalytic activity through Z-scheme pattern. Ceram Int. 2016; 42(16): 18495-18502.

[37] Zhang Y-C, Li Z, Zhang L, et al. Role of oxygen vacancies in photocatalytic water oxidation on ceria oxide: experiment and DFT studies. Appl Catal B. 2018; 224: 101-108.

[38] Inerbaev TM, Karakoti AS, Kuchibhatla SVNT, Kumar A, Masunov AE, Seal S. Aqueous medium induced optical transitions in cerium oxide nanoparticles. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015; 17(9): 6217-6221.

[39] Hao Y, Li L, Zhang J, Luo H, Zhang X, Chen E. Multilayer and open structure of dendritic crosslinked CeO₂-ZrO₂ composite: enhanced photocatalytic degradation and water splitting performance. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017; 42(9): 5916-5929.

[40] Liu Y, Zhu G, Gao J, et al. A novel CeO₂/Bi₄Ti₃O₁₂ composite heterojunction structure with an enhanced photocatalytic activity for bisphenol A. J Alloys Compd. 2016; 688: 487-496.

[41] Tambat S, Umale S, Sontakke S. Photocatalytic degradation of Milling Yellow dye using sol–gel synthesized CeO₂. Mater Res Bull. 2016; 76: 466-472.

[42] Cargnello M, Montini T, Polizzi S, et al. Novel embedded Pd@CeO₂ catalysts: a way to active and stable catalysts. Dalton Trans. 2010; 39(8): 2122-2127.

[43] Wang F, Wang X, Liu D, et al. High-performance ZnCo₂O₄@CeO₂ core@shell microspheres for catalytic CO oxidation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014; 6(24): 22216-22223.

[44] Zhang S, Wang H, Si H, et al. Novel core–shell (ϵ-MnO₂/CeO₂)@CeO₂ composite catalyst with a synergistic effect for efficient formaldehyde oxidation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020; 12(36): 40285-40295.

[45] Sugimoto T, Wang Y, Itoh H, Muramatsu A. Systematic control of size, shape and internal structure of monodisperse α-Fe₂O₃ particles. Colloids Surf A. 1998; 134(3): 265-279.

[46] Zheng X, Huang M, You Y, Peng H, Wen J. Core-shell structured α-Fe₂O₃@CeO₂ heterojunction for the enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Mater Res Bull. 2018; 101: 20-28.

[47] Zhang X, Si S, Zhang X, Wu W, Xiao X, Jiang C. Improved thermal stability of graphene-veiled noble metal nanoarrays as recyclable SERS substrates. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017; 9(46): 40726-40733.

[48] Lou C, Pan H, Mei H, Lu G, Liu X, Zhang J. Low coordination states in Co₃O₄/NiO_x heterostructures by atomic layer deposition for enhanced gas detection. Chem Eng J. 2022; 448: 137641.

[49] Hussain I, Tanimu G, Ahmed S, Aniz CU, Alasiri H, Alhooshani K. A review of the indispensable role of oxygen vacancies for enhanced CO₂ methanation activity over CeO₂-based catalysts: uncovering, influencing, and tuning strategies. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2023; 48(64): 24663-24696.

[50] Huang X, Zhang K, Peng B, Wang G, Muhler M, Wang F. Ceria-based materials for thermocatalytic and photocatalytic organic synthesis. ACS Catal. 2021; 11(15): 9618-9678.

[51] Holgado JP, Alvarez R, Munuera G. Study of CeO₂ XPS spectra by factor analysis: reduction of CeO₂. Appl Surf Sci. 2000; 161(3-4): 301-315.

[52] Bêche E, Charvin P, Perarnau D, Abanades S, Flamant G. Ce 3d XPS investigation of cerium oxides and mixed cerium oxide (Ce_xTi_yO_z). Surf Interface Anal. 2008; 40(3-4): 264-267.

[53] Holgado JP, Munuera G, Espinós JP, González-Elipe AR. XPS study of oxidation processes of CeO_x defective layers. Appl Surf Sci. 2000; 158(1-2): 164-171.

[54] Yao X, He Y, Fu S, et al. Bimetallic MOF-derived CeO₂/Co₃O₄ microflowers with synergy of oxygen vacancy and p-n heterojunction for high-performance n-butanol sensors. Mater Today Commun. 2022; 33: 104445.

[55] Han XX, Ji W, Zhao B, Ozaki Y. Semiconductor-enhanced Raman scattering: active nanomaterials and applications. Nanoscale. 2017; 9(15): 4847-4861.

[56] Farajzadeh MA, Afshar Mogaddam MR, Rezaee Aghdam S, Nouri N, Bamorrowat M. Application of elevated temperature-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for determination of organophosphorus pesticides residues in aqueous samples followed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection. Food Chem. 2016; 212: 198-204.

[57] Dissanayake NM, Arachchilage JS, Samuels TA, Obare SO. Highly sensitive plasmonic metal nanoparticle-based sensors for the detection of organophosphorus pesticides. Talanta. 2019; 200: 218-227.

[58] Tankiewicz M, Fenik J, Biziuk M. Determination of organophosphorus and organonitrogen pesticides in water samples. Trends Anal Chem. 2010; 29(9): 1050-1063.

[59] Pogačnik L, Franko M. Detection of organophosphate and carbamate pesticides in vegetable samples by a photothermal biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2003; 18(1): 1-9.

[60] Kaushal J, Khatri M, Arya SK. A treatise on Organophosphate pesticide pollution: current strategies and advancements in their environmental degradation and elimination. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2021; 207: 111483.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). SmartMat published by Tianjin University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.