Dynamic characteristics of a switch and crossing on the West Coast main line in the UK

Abstract

Railway switches and crossings constitute a small fraction of linear track length but consume a large proportion of the railway track system maintenance budget. While switch and crossing (S&C) faults rarely prevent trains from running, switches and crossings are the source of many faults and need continual attention. On the rare occasions when trains are prevented from running the cost of the disruption is very high. Condition monitoring of the point operating equipment that moves the switchblades has been in use for many years but condition monitoring of the state of the switch in terms of the support and mechanical damage as trains pass over has only recently started to become possible. To this end, it is important to understand the correlation between S&C faults and sensor data that can detect those faults. This paper assesses some of the data collected from multiple sensors variously positioned on and around a switch and crossing on the UK mainline for a few days of normal train operation. Accelerometers, geophones, and strain gauges were installed at the locations where they were anticipated to be most useful. Forces at the load transfer point on the crossing nose were estimated from two separate strain gauge bridges and possible use of acceleration on the crossing is discussed. Correlations between different data are analysed and assessed and correlation between peak estimated load transfer forces and accelerations is presented. Based on the analysis, conclusions are drawn about the different types of dynamic information around S&Cs that can be obtained from a variety of sensor types.

Keywords

Railway / Accelerometer / Condition monitoring / Impact force / Switch and crossing / Strain gauge

References

[1] Capacity for rail (C4R) (2015) Operational failure modes of switch and crossing, Deliverable D13.1, EU project SCP3-GA-2013-605650. http://www.capacity4rail.eu/results. Accessed 21 Dec 2021

[2] Shih J Hemida H Stewart E Roberts C. Understanding the impact of train run-throughs on railway switches using finite element analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid, 2018 233 4 359-369

[3] Liu X Markine VL Wang H Shevtsov IY. Experimental tools for railway crossing condition monitoring (crossing condition monitoring tools). Measurement, 2018 129 424-435

[4] Ma Y Mashal AA Markine VL. Modelling and experimental validation of dynamic impact in 1:9 railway crossing panel. Tribol Int, 2018 118 208-226

[5] Boogaard MA Li Z Dollevoet RPBJ. In situ measurements of the crossing vibrations of a railway turnout. Measurement, 2018 125 313-324

[6] Chong L Jiahong W Zhixin Z Junsheng L Tongqun R Hongquan X. Design and evaluation of a remote measurement system for the online monitoring of rail vibration signals. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2016 230 3 724-733

[7] Oßberger U Kollment W Eck S. Insight towards condition monitoring of fixed railway crossings. Procedia Struct Integr, 2017 4 106-114

[8] Le Pen L Milne D Thompson D Powrie W. Evaluating railway track support stiffness from trackside measurements in the absence of wheel load data. Can Geotech J, 2016 53 7 1156-1166

[9] Barkhordari P, Galeazzi R, de Miguel Tejada A, and Santos IF (2017) Low-complexity behavioral model for predictive maintenance of railway turnouts. In: Annual conference of the prognostics and health management society, Florida, USA

[10] Barkhordari P Galeazzi R Blanke M. Prognosis of railway ballast degradation for turnouts using track-side accelerations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab, 2020 234 4 601-610

[11] Weston P Roberts C Yeo G Stewart E. Perspectives on railway track geometry condition monitoring from in-service railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn, 2015 53 7 1063-1091

[12] Salvador P Naranjo V Insa R Teixeira R. Axlebox accelerations: Their acquisition and time–frequency characterisation for railway track monitoring purposes. Measurement, 2016 82 301-312

[13] Kassa E Nielsen J. Dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout: full-scale field test and validation of simulation models. Veh Syst Dyn, 2008 46 sup1 521-534

[14] Ekdahl G, Andersson L, Wrang M (2007) Instrumented wheelset technology—advances and applications, IHHA Specialist Technical Session (STS) Kiruna Sweden

[15] Barke D Chiu WK. Structural health monitoring in the railway industry: a review. Struct Health Monitor, 2005 4 1 81-93

[16] Kouroussis G Caucheteur C Kinet D Alexandrou G Verlinden O Moeyaert V. Review of trackside monitoring solutions: from strain gages to optical fibre sensors. Sensors, 2015 15 8 20115-20139

[17] Karoumi R Wiberg J Liljencrantz A. Monitoring traffic loads and dynamic effects using an instrumented railway bridge. Eng Struct, 2005 27 12 1813-1819

[18] Bi L Zhao P Teng M Zhao L Liu X Xin M. Wayside testing methods for high-frequency vertical wheel–rail impact forces and its applicability. Measurement, 2020

[19] Cortis D Bruner M Malavasi G. Development of a wayside measurement system for the evaluation of wheel–rail lateral contact force. Measurement, 2020

[20] Xin L Markine VL Shevtsov IY. Numerical analysis of the dynamic interaction between wheel set and turnout crossing using the explicit finite element method. Veh Syst Dyn, 2016 54 3 301-327

[21] Wiedorn J Daves W Ossberger U Ossberger H Pletz M. Simplified explicit finite element model for the impact of a wheel on a crossing—validation and parameter study. Tribol Int, 2017 111 254-264

[22] SCode (Switch and Crossing Optimal Design and Evaluation) D3.1 (2019) Next generation control: monitoring and sensor systems, EU Shift2Rail S-Code project. http://www.s-code.info/results-and-publications/. Accessed 21 Dec 2021

[23] Skrypnyk R Ekh M Nielsen JCO Pålsson BA. Prediction of plastic deformation and wear in railway crossings–comparing the performance of two rail steel grades. Wear, 2019 428–429 302-314

[24] Li X Nielsen JCO Pålsson BA. Simulation of track settlement in railway turnouts. Veh Syst Dyn, 2014 52 sup1 421-439

[25] Hixson EL (1997) Shock and Vibration Handbook (Chapter 10). In: Harris CM (ed) Mechanical impedance, 5th edn. McGraw Hill

[26] Jenkins HH Stephenson JE Clayton GA Morland GW Lyon D. The effect of track and vehicle parameters on wheel/rail vertical dynamic loads. IMechE Railw Eng J, 1974 3 1 2-16

[27] Nielsen JCO Ekberg A Lunde R. Influence of short-pitch wheel/rail corrugation on rolling contact fatigue of railway wheels. Proc IMechE Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2005 219 3 177-187

[28] Nielsen J (2009) Wheel–rail interface handbook. In: Lewis R, Olofsson U (eds) Chapter 8: out-of-round railway wheels. Woodhead Publishing, pp 245–279

[29] Torstensson PT Squicciarini G Krüger M Pålsson BA Nielsen JCO Thompson DJ. Wheel–rail impact loads and noise generated at railway crossings—influence of vehicle speed and crossing dip angle. J Sounds Vib, 2019 456 119-136

[30] Johnson KL. The strength of surfaces in rolling contact. Proc ImechE Part C J Mech Eng Sci, 1989 203 3 151-163

[31] Rabbi MF Johnson DK Mishra D Bruzek R. Effect of track configuration and loading conditions on vertical wheel load measurements using the differential shear approach. Proc IMechE Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2009 26337 1 279-288

[32] Milković D Simić G Jakovljević Ž Tanasković J Lučanin V. Wayside system for wheel–rail contact forces measurements. Measurement, 2013 46 9 3308-3318

[33] Du C Dutta S Kurup P Yu T Wang X. A review of railway infrastructure monitoring using fiber optic sensors. Sens Actuators A Phys, 2020 303 66

Funding

Innovate UK(104427)

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council(EP/M025276/1)