Problems, assumptions and solutions in locomotive design, traction and operational studies

Abstract

Locomotive design is a highly complex task that requires the use of systems engineering that depends upon knowledge from a range of disciplines and is strongly oriented on how to design and manage complex systems that operate under a wide range of different train operational conditions on various types of tracks. Considering that field investigation programs for locomotive operational scenarios involve high costs and cause disruption of train operations on real railway networks and given recent developments in the rollingstock compliance standards in Australia and overseas that allow the assessment of some aspects of rail vehicle behaviour through computer simulations, a great number of multidisciplinary research studies have been performed and these can contribute to further improvement of a locomotive design technique by increasing the amount of computer-based studies. This paper was focused on the presentation of the all-important key components required for locomotive studies, starting from developing a realistic locomotive design model, its validation and further applications for train studies. The integration of all engineering disciplines is achieved by means of advanced simulation approaches that can incorporate existing AC and DC locomotive designs, hybrid locomotive designs, full locomotive traction system models, rail friction processes, the application of simplified and exact wheel-rail contact theories, wheel-rail wear and rolling contact fatigue, train dynamic behaviour and in-train forces, comprehensive track infrastructure details, and the use of co-simulation and parallel computing. The co-simulation and parallel computing approaches that have been implemented on Central Queensland University’s High-Performance Computing cluster for locomotive studies will be presented. The confidence in these approaches is based on specific validation procedures that include a locomotive model acceptance procedure and field test data. The problems and limitations presented in locomotive traction studies in the way they are conducted at the present time are summarised and discussed.

References

[1.] Thorburn J, Haywood G (2008) The use of train performance simulation in the development of locomotive concepts. In: Proceedings of conference on railway engineering (CORE 2008). Railway Technical Society of Australasia, Perth, WA, Australia, 7–10 September 2008, pp 369–376

[2.] McCabe D (2008) Standard locomotive. In: Proceedings of AusRAIL 2010, Australasian Railway Association, Perth, WA, Australia, 23–24 November 2010, pp 1–6

[3.] Cole C, Spiryagin M, Sun YQ, Vo KD, Tieu KA, Zhu HT (2014) R3.119-locomotive adhesion. Final Report, CRC for Rail Innovation, Brisbane, Australia

[4.] Vo KD, Tieu KA, Zhu HT, Kosasih PB. Comparisons of stress, heat and wear generated by AC versus DC locomotives under diverse operational conditions. Wear 2015, 328–329 186-196

[5.] Vo KD, Tieu KA, Zhu HT, Kosasih PB. The influence of high temperature due to high adhesion condition on rail damage. Wear 2015, 330–331 571-580

[6.] Ahmad S, Nielsen D, Wu Q, Spiryagin M (2020) Final report—track structures vs train dynamics and load effects—stage II. WP7, Version 1.3, Australasian Centre for Railway Innovation, Canberra

[7.] Spiryagin M, Persson I, Hayman M, Wu Q, Sun Y, Nielsen D, Bosomworth C, Cole C. Friction measurement and creep force modelling methodology for locomotive track damage studies. Wear 2019, 432–433 1-16

[8.] Graessler I, Hentze J, Bruckmann T (2018) V-models for interdisciplinary systems engineering. In: Marjanović D, Štorga M, Škec S, Bojčetić N, Pavković N (eds) 15th International design conference of proceedings of the DESIGN 2018. University of Zagreb, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21–24 May 2018, pp 747–756

[9.] Gausemeier J, Moehringer S (2003) New guideline VDI 2206: a flexible procedure model for the design of mechatronic systems. In: Folkeson A, Gralen K, Norell M, Sellgren U (eds) Proceedings of 14th international conference on engineering design (ICED 03). The Design Society, UK. Stockholm, Sweden, 19–21 August 2003

[10.] Wright L, Davidson S. How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 2020, 7 13 1-13

[11.] West T, Blackburn M. Is digital thread/digital twin affordable? A systemic assessment of the cost of DoD’s latest Manhattan project. Procedia Comput Sci 2017, 114 47-56

[12.] Defense Acquisition University. Digital twin. DAU glossary of defense acquisition acronyms and terms. https://www.dau.edu/glossary/Pages/Glossary.aspx#!bothD27349. Accessed 8 June 2021

[13.] Spiryagin M, Wolfs P, Cole C, Spiryagin V, Sun Y, McSweeney T. Design and simulation of heavy haul locomotives and trains. Ground vehicle engineering series 2017 Boca Raton CRC Press

[14.] Polach O, Berg M, Iwnicki S. Iwnicki S, Spiryagin M, Cole C, Mcsweeney T. Simulation of railway vehicle dynamics. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics 2020 2 Boca Raton CRC Press 651-722

[15.] Spiryagin M, George A, Sun Y, Cole C, McSweeney T, Simson S. Investigation of locomotive multibody modelling issues and results assessment based on the locomotive model acceptance procedure. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 2013, 227 5 453-468

[16.] Polach O, Böttcher A, Vannuci D . Validation of simulation models in the context of railway vehicle acceptance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 2015, 229 6 729-754

[17.] Götz G, Polach O. Verification and validation of simulations in a rail vehicle certification context. Int J Rail Transp 2018, 6 2 83-10

[18.] Juris M (2019) Shift2Rail–PLASA2. Deliverable D 4.1. Virtual Certification: State of the art, gap analysis and barriers identification, benefits for the Rail Industry. Report H2020-S2RJU-CFM-2018

[19.] Spiryagin M, Simson S, Cole C, Persson I. Co-simulation of a mechatronic system using Gensys and Simulink. Veh Syst Dyn 2012, 50 3 495-507

[20.] Spiryagin M, Wolfs P, Szanto F, Cole C. Simplified and advanced modelling of traction control systems of heavy-haul locomotives. Veh Syst Dyn 2015, 53 5 672-691

[21.] Spiryagin M, Wolfs P, Cole C, Stichel S, Berg M, Plöchl M. Influence of AC system design on the realisation of tractive efforts by high adhesion locomotives. Veh Syst Dyn 2017, 55 8 1241-1264

[22.] Cole C, Spiryagin M, Wu Q, Sun YQ. Modelling, simulation and applications of longitudinal train dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn 2017, 55 10 1498-1571

[23.] Spiryagin M, Persson I, Wu Q, Bosomworth C, Wolfs P, Cole C. A co-simulation approach for heavy haul long distance locomotive-track simulation studies. Veh Syst Dyn 2019, 57 9 1363-1380

[24.] Wu Q, Spiryagin M, Cole C, McSweeney T. Parallel computing in railway research. Int J Rail Transp 2020, 8 2 111-134

[25.] Wu Q, Spiryagin M, Sun Y, Cole C. Parallel co-simulation of locomotive wheel wear and rolling contact fatigue in a heavy haul train operational environment. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 2021, 235 2 166-178

[26.] Polach O, Evans J. Simulations of running dynamics for vehicle acceptance: application and validation. Int J Railw Technol 2013, 2 4 59-84

[27.] Spiryagin M, Cole C, Sun Y, McClanachan M, Spiryagin V, McSweeney T. Design and simulation of rail vehicles 2014 Ground vehicle engineering series CRC Press, Boca Raton

[28.] Rail Industry Safety & Standards Board (RISSB). AS 7509:2017 Rolling stock–dynamic behaviour. Brisbane, Australia

[29.] Iwnicki S. Manchester benchmarks for rail vehicle simulation. Veh Syst Dyn 1998, 30 3–4 295-313

[30.] European Committee for Standardisation, EN 14363 (2019-11) Railway applications—Testing for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles—Testing of running behaviour and stationary tests

[31.] UIC 518:2009. Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour–safety–track fatigue–ride quality. Paris, France

[32.] Szanto F (2017) Do we need more standards? In: Proceedings of AusRAIL PLUS 2017, Rail's Digital Revolution, Brisbane, Australia, 21–23 November 2017, pp 1–3

[33.] Hiensch M, Steenbergen M. Rolling contact fatigue on premium rail grades: damage function development from field data. Wear 2018, 394–395 187-194

[34.] Tian Y, Daniel WJT, Liu S, Meehan PA. Comparison of PI and fuzzy logic based sliding mode locomotive creep controls with change of rail-wheel contact conditions. Int J Rail Transp 2015, 3 1 40-59

[35.] Liu S, Tian Y, Daniel WJT, Meehan PA. Dynamic response of a locomotive with AC electric drives to changes in friction conditions. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 2017, 231 1 90-103

[36.] Tian Y (2015) Locomotive traction and rail wear control. Dissertation, University of Queensland

[37.] Spiryagin V (2004) Improvement of dynamic interaction between the locomotive and railway track. Dissertation, East Ukrainian National University (in Russian)

[38.] Simson S, Cole C. Parametric simulation study of traction curving of three axle steering bogie designs. Veh Syst Dyn 2008, 46 1 717-728

[39.] Spiryagin M, Cole C, Sun YQ. Adhesion estimation and its implementation for traction control of locomotives. Int J Rail Transp 2014, 2 3 187-204

[40.] Casanueva C, Enblom R, Stichel S, Berg M. On integrated wheel and track damage prediction using vehicle–track dynamic simulations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 2017, 231 7 775-785

[41.] Zhou Z, Chen Z, Spiryagin M, Bernal Arango E, Wolfs P, Cole C, Zhai W. Dynamic response feature of electromechanical coupled drive subsystem in a locomotive excited by wheel flat. Eng Fail Anal 2021, 122 105248

[42.] DEsolver, GENSYS Reference Manual. http://gensys.se/ref_man.html. Accessed 27 May 2021

[43.] Kragelsky IV, Dobychin MN, Kombalov VS. Friction and wear calculation methods 1982 Oxford Pergamon Press

[44.] Descartes S, Desrayaud C, Niccolini E et al (2005) Presence and role of the third body in a wheel-rail contact. Wear 258(7–8):1081–1090

[45.] Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS, Lewis SR . Tribology of the wheel-rail contact: the effect of third body materials. Int J Railw Technol 2012, 1 1 167-194

[46.] Spiryagin M, Lee KS, Yoo HH . Modeling of adhesion for railway vehicles. J Adhes Sci Technol 2008, 22 10–11 1017-1034

[47.] Shrestha S, Spiryagin M, Wu Q. Variable control setting to enhance rail vehicle braking safety. In: Proceedings of 2020 Joint Rail Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, St. Louis, MO, USA, paper V001T09A001

[48.] Magel E (2017) A survey of wheel/rail friction. Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research, Development, and Technology, Washington, DC, USA, Report No.: DOT/FRA/ORD-17-21

[49.] Khalladi A, Elleuch K. Tribological behavior of wheel-rail contact under different contaminants using pin-on-disk methodology. J Tribol 2017, 139 1 011102

[50.] Zhu Y, Olofsson U, Chen H. Friction between wheel and rail: a pin-on-disc study of environmental conditions and iron oxides. Tribol Lett 2013, 52 327-339

[51.] Galas R, Smejkal D, Omasta M . Twin-disc experimental device for study of adhesion in wheel-rail contact. Eng Mech 2014, 21 5 329-334

[52.] Gallardo-Hernandez EA, Lewis R. Twin disc assessment of wheel/rail adhesion. Wear 2008, 265 9–10 1309-1316

[53.] Bosso N, Zampieri N (2014) Experimental and numerical simulation of wheel-rail adhesion and wear using a scaled roller rig and a real-time contact code. Shock Vib. Article ID 385018: 1–14

[54.] Shrestha S, Spiryagin M, Wu Q. Friction condition characterization for rail vehicle advanced braking system. Mech Syst Signal Process 2019, 134 106324

[55.] Allen PD, Zhang W, Liang Y . Iwnicki S, Spiryagin M, Cole C, Mcsweeney T . Roller rigs. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics 2019 2 Boca Raton CRC Press 761-823

[56.] Matsumoto A, Sato Y, Ohno H . A new measuring method of wheel-rail contact forces and related considerations. Wear 2008, 265 9–10 1518-1525

[57.] Palinko M (2016) Estimation of wheel-rail friction at vehicle certification measurements. Dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology

[58.] Spiryagin M, Persson I, Hayman M . Friction measurement and creep force modelling methodology for locomotive track damage studies. Wear 2019, 432–433 202932

[59.] Harrison H. The development of a low creep regime, hand-operated tribometer. Wear 2008, 265 9–10 1526-1531

[60.] Polach O. Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit. Wear 2005, 258 7–8 992-1000

[61.] Schlunegger H. Haftwertausnützung für die Entwicklung der Zugkräfte. ZEV-Glasers Annalen 1989, 6–7 194-203

[62.] Logston CF, Itami GS. Locomotive friction-creep studies. J Eng Ind 1980, 102 3 275-281

[63.] Yuan Z, Wu M, Tian C . A review on the application of friction models in wheel-rail adhesion calculation. Urban Rail Transit 2021, 7 1 1-11

[64.] Andersson S. Lewis R, Olofsson U. Friction and wear simulation of the wheel-rail interface. Wheel-rail interface handbook 2009 Cambridge Woodhead Publishing, CRC 93-124

[65.] Croft BE, Vollebregt EAH, Thompson DJ . Maeda T . An investigation of velocity-dependent friction in wheel-rail rolling contact. Noise and vibration mitigation for rail transportation systems. Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design 2012 Tokyo Springer 33-41

[66.] Vollebregt EAH . Nielsen J . FASTSIM with falling friction and friction memory. Noise and vibration mitigation for rail transportation systems. Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design 2015 Berlin Springer 425-432

[67.] Chen HC (1997) On the rolling contact of high speed wheel/rail system. Dissertation, Academy of Railway Sciences of China, Beijing

[68.] Zhang W, Chen J, Wu X . Wheel/rail adhesion and analysis by using full scale roller rig. Wear 2002, 253 1–2 82-88

[69.] Vollebregt EAH, Schuttelaars HM. Quasi-static analysis of two-dimensional rolling contact with slip-velocity dependent friction. J Sound Vib 2012, 331 9 2141-2155

[70.] Croft B, Jones C, Thompson D. Velocity-dependent friction in a model of wheel-rail rolling contact and wear. Veh Syst Dyn 2011, 49 11 1791-1802

[71.] Polach O. Influence of locomotive tractive effort on the forces between wheel and rail. Veh Syst Dyn Suppl 2001, 35 Sup. 7-22

[72.] Spiryagin M, Polach O, Cole C. Creep force modelling for rail traction vehicles based on the Fastsim algorithm. Veh Syst Dyn 2013, 51 11 1765-1783

[73.] Piotrowski J. Kalker’s algorithm Fastsim solves tangential contact problems with slip-dependent friction and friction anisotropy. Veh Syst Dyn 2010, 48 7 869-889

[74.] Yang Z, Deng X, Li Z. Numerical modeling of dynamic frictional rolling contact with an explicit finite element method. Tribol Int 2019, 129 214-231

[75.] Hertz H. Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. J fur die Reine und Angew Math 1881, 92 156-171

[76.] Kalker JJ. A fast algorithm for the simplified theory of rolling contact. Veh Syst Dyn 1982, 11 1 1-13

[77.] Piotrowski J, Kik W. A simplified model of wheel/rail contact mechanics for non-Hertzian problems and its application in rail vehicle dynamic simulations. Veh Syst Dyn 2008, 46 1–2 27-48

[78.] Sichani MS, Enblom R, Berg M. A novel method to model wheel-rail normal contact in vehicle dynamics simulation. Veh Syst Dyn 2014, 52 12 1752-1764

[79.] Ayasse J, Chollet H. Determination of the wheel rail contact patch in semi-Hertzian conditions. Veh Syst Dyn 2005, 43 3 161-172

[80.] Linder C (1997) Verschleiss von Eisenbahnrädern mit Unrundheiten.Dissertation. ETH Nr. 12, ETH Zurich

[81.] Vollebregt EAH (2020) User guide for CONTACT, rolling and sliding contact with friction. Vtech CMCC, Technical report 20-01, version 21.1. https://www.cmcc.nl/documentation

[82.] Sichani MS, Enblom R, Berg M. An alternative to Fastsim for tangential solution of the wheel-rail contact. Veh Syst Dyn 2016, 54 6 748-764

[83.] Kalker JJ. Book of tables for the Hertzian creep-force law 1996 Delft Delft University of Technology

[84.] Kalker JJ. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact 1990 Dordrecht Kluwer Academic Publishers

[85.] Vollebregt EAH. Numerical modeling of measured railway creep versus creep-force curves with CONTACT. Wear 2014, 314 1–2 87-95

[86.] van der Wekken CD, Vollebregt EAH (2018) Local plasticity modelling and its influence on wheel-rail friction. In: Z Li, A Nunez (ed) Proceedings of the 11th international conference on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, pp 1013–1018

[87.] Shrestha S, Wu Q, Spiryagin M (2018) Wheel-rail contact modelling for real-time adhesion estimation systems with consideration of bogie dynamics. In: Li Z, Núñez A (eds) 11th International conference on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems, Delft, The Netherlands, pp 862–869

[88.] Spiryagin M, Vollebregt E, Hayman M, Persson I, Wu Q, Bosomworth C, Cole C. Development and computational performance improvement of the wheel-rail coupling for heavy haul locomotive traction studies. Veh Syst Dyn 2020

[89.] Olofsson U, Telliskivi T. Wear, plastic deformation and friction of two rail steels: a full-scale test and a laboratory study. Wear 2003, 254 1–2 80-93

[90.] Jendel T. Prediction of wheel profile wear-comparisons with field measurements. Wear 2002, 253 1–2 89-99

[91.] Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS. Wear mechanisms and transitions in railway wheel steels. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J Eng Tribol 2004, 218 6 467-478

[92.] Lewis R, Olofsson U. Mapping rail wear regimes and transitions. Wear 2004, 257 7–8 721-729

[93.] Lewis R, Magel E, Wang W-J . Towards a standard approach for the wear testing of wheel and rail materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 2017, 231 7 760-774

[94.] Pearce TG, Sherratt ND. Prediction of wheel profile wear. Wear 1991, 144 1–2 343-351

[95.] Dearden J. The wear of steel rails and tyres in railway service. Wear 1960, 3 43-59

[96.] Ignesti M, Malvezzi M, Marini L . Development of a wear model for the prediction of wheel and rail profile evolution in railway systems. Wear 2012, 284–285 1-17

[97.] Auciello J, Ignesti M, Malvezzi M . Development and validation of a wear model for the analysis of the wheel profile evolution in railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 2012, 50 11 1707-1734

[98.] Ignesti M, Innocenti A, Marini L . Development of a model for the simultaneous analysis of wheel and rail wear in railway systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 2014, 31 191-240

[99.] Zobory I. Prediction of wheel/rail profile wear. Veh Syst Dyn 1997, 28 2–3 221-259

[100.] Ramalho A. Wear modelling in rail–wheel contact. Wear 2015, 330–331 524-532

[101.] Ye Y, Sun Y, Shi D . A wheel wear prediction model of non-Hertzian wheel-rail contact considering wheelset yaw: comparison between simulated and field test results. Wear 2021, 474–475 203715

[102.] Wu Q, Spiryagin M, Wolfs P, Cole C. Traction modelling in train dynamics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 2019, 233 4 382-395

[103.] Semple JD (2007) The next generation of locomotive power. In: Proceedings of the AusRAIL Plus Conference, 4–6 December 2007, Sydney, Australia

[104.] Ahmad S, Spiryagin M, Wu Q, Wolfs P, Bosomworth C, Cole C (2021) Rapid charging train operational concepts for hybrid heavy haul locomotive consists. In: Proceedings of the conference on railway excellence, 21–23 June 2021, Perth, Australia

[105.] Ahmad S, Spiryagin M, Cole C, Wu Q, Wolfs P, Bosomworth C. Analysis of positioning of wayside charging stations for hybrid locomotive consists in heavy haul train operations. Rail Eng Sci 2021, 29 3 285-298

[106.] Lawson LJ, Cook LM (1979) Wayside energy storage study: volume IV—dual mode locomotive: preliminary design study. US Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC

[107.] Nelson RF. Power requirements for batteries in hybrid electric vehicles. J Power Sour 2000, 91 1 2-26

[108.] Spiryagin M, Wolfs P, Wu Q, Cole C, McSweeney T, Bosomworth C (2020) Rapid charging energy storage system for a hybrid freight locomotive. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ASME joint rail conference, 19–22 April 2020, St. Louis, MO

[109.] Spiryagin M, Bruni S, Bosomworth C, Wolfs P, Cole C. Rail vehicle mechatronics 2021 Boca Raton CRC Press

[110.] Spiryagin M, Wu Q, Bosomworth C, Cole C, Wolfs P, Hayman M et al (2019) Understanding the impact of high traction hybrid locomotive designs on heavy haul train performance. In: Proceedings of the AusRAIL PLUS conference, 3–5 December 2019, Sydney, Australia

[111.] Spiryagin M, Wu Q, Wolfs P, Sun Y, Cole C. Comparison of locomotive energy storage systems for heavy-haul operation. Int J Rail Transp 2018, 6 1 1-15

[112.] Evans M, Skipper WA, Buckley-Johnstone L, Meierhofer A, Six K, Lewis R. The development of a high pressure torsion test methodology for simulating wheel/rail contacts. Tribol Int 2021, 156 106842

[113.] Six K, Meierhofer A, Muller G . Physical processes in wheel-rail contact and its implications on vehicle-track interaction. Veh Syst Dyn 2015, 53 5 635-650

[114.] Meymand SZ, Keylin A, Ahmadian M. A survey of wheel-rail contact models for rail vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn 2016, 54 3 386-428

[115.] Vollebregt EAH. Conformal contact: corrections and new results. Veh Syst Dyn 2018, 56 10 1622-1632

[116.] Vollebregt E. Detailed wheel/rail geometry processing with the conformal contact approach. Multibody Syst Dyn 2021, 52 135-167

[117.] Meierhofer A, Trummer G, Bernsteiner C, Six K. Vehicle tests showing how the weather in autumn influences the wheel-rail traction characteristics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 2020, 234 4 426-435

[118.] Magel E, Kalousek J, Sroba P. (2014) Chasing the magic wear rate. In: Pombo J (ed) Proceedings of the second international conference on railway technology: research, development and maintenance, Paper 116. Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire

[119.] Magel E, Mutton P, Ekberg A, Kapoor A. Rolling contact fatigue, wear and broken rail derailments. Wear 2016, 366–367 249-257

[120.] Wu Q, Wang B, Spiryagin M, Cole C. Curving resistance from wheel-rail interface. Veh Syst Dyn 2020

[121.] Wu Q, Wang B, Cole C, Spiryagin M. Implications of lateral coupler forces for rail vehicle curving resistance. ASME J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 2021, 16 3 031002