A quantitative risk assessment model for lightning-induced failures in natural gas automated metering systems

Xia Wu , Jiujiang Cai , Hanqing Liu , Wenlong Jia , Changjun Li , Mengjun Teng

Petroleum ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 167 -181.

PDF (6936KB)
Petroleum ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) :167 -181. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2025.11.002
Full Length Article
research-article
A quantitative risk assessment model for lightning-induced failures in natural gas automated metering systems
Author information +
History +
PDF (6936KB)

Abstract

As one of the most probable natural hazards leading to technological disasters, lightning can easily damage analytical instruments in oil and gas stations, resulting in data loss and operational anomalies. Compared with other equipment, Natural Gas Automated Metering Systems (NGAMS), which comprise various precision analytical instruments, are more susceptible to lightning strikes. This vulnerability often leads to production shutdowns, inaccurate metering, and commercial disputes. A quantitative risk assessment model for lightning-induced failures in NGAMS is proposed to enhance the integrity management of metering stations. The model consists of a lightning failure probability model and a consequence evaluation method that incorporates reputational loss. First, a lightning identification criterion is established based on the electro-geometric model, and a basic lightning probability model is developed using Monte Carlo simulations. Second, a basic failure probability model is constructed by modeling the system's equivalent circuit and incorporating the insulation withstand characteristics of the equipment. Two correction factors, specifically the location factor and lightning protection measures, are subsequently incorporated to establish the comprehensive lightning failure probability model. Furthermore, a reputational loss evaluation method is proposed by developing a reputation loss indicator system and integrating the Z-BWM method with cloud model. Case study results show that when the average lightning probability is 1.03 × 10−2, the maximum system failure probability reaches 4.14 × 10−5, representing a 35.29% increase over the inherent failure probability. The corresponding reputational loss is classified as low risk, verifying the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed model.

Keywords

Metering station / Natural gas automated metering systems (NGAMS) / Lightning probability / Failure probability / Reputation loss

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xia Wu, Jiujiang Cai, Hanqing Liu, Wenlong Jia, Changjun Li, Mengjun Teng. A quantitative risk assessment model for lightning-induced failures in natural gas automated metering systems. Petroleum, 2026, 12(1): 167-181 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2025.11.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Le Gao, et al. Configuration and operational status of transnational metering stations in the China-Russia eastern gas pipeline. Oil Gas Storage Transp., 39 (4) (2020), pp. 446-452.

[2]

Bjørn Kvamme, Navid Saeidi. A zero emission scheme for producing energy from natural gas hydrates and conventional natural gas. Petroleum, 7 (4) (2021), pp. 364-384.

[3]

Hai Li, et al. An optimal flow rate allocation model of the oilfield treated oil pipeline network. Petroleum, 10 (1) (2024), pp. 93-100.

[4]

Liang Zhou, et al. Standardization of international trade metering for central Asia natural gas line D. China Stand, 2 (2020), pp. 158-167.

[5]

Jian Wang. Lightning risk assessment and protection measures for field instruments in petrochemical enterprises. Petrochem. Technol. Econ., 27 (3) (2011), pp. 12-17.

[6]

Elisabetta Renni, et al. Industrial accidents triggered by lightning. J. Hazard Mater., 184 (1-3) (2010), pp. 42-48.

[7]

Taibi He, et al. Risk assessment of natural gas and hydrogen joint construction station based on Fault Tree Analysis. World Petroleum Industry, 31 (5) (2024), pp. 91-100.

[8]

Jinqiu Hu, et al. Discussion on intelligent early warning methods for unsafe behaviors of operators in oil and gas industry. World Petroleum Industry, 31 (2) (2024), pp. 83-90.

[9]

A. Necci, et al. Equipment failure probability due to the impact of lightning. Chem. Eng. Trans., 26 (2012), pp. 129-134.

[10]

Amos Necci, et al. A model for process equipment damage probability assessment due to lightning. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 115 (2013), pp. 91-99.

[11]

Amos Necci, et al. Quantitative assessment of risk due to major accidents triggered by lightning. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 154 (2016), pp. 60-72.

[12]

R.T. Waters. A. Haddad, D. Warne ( Advances in High Voltage Engineering ( Inst. Eng. Technol., London U. Lightning phenomena and protection systems. Eds.), IET Power and Energy Series 40), K (2004), pp. 107-114.

[13]

Alberto Borghetti, et al. Monte carlo based lightning risk assessment in oil plant tank farms. 2010 30th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), IEEE (2010).

[14]

Jinliang He, et al. Analysis methods for lightning shielding failure of transmission lines and associated applicability. Proceed. CSEE, 44 (18) (2024), pp. 7426-7440.

[15]

Yingzhe Cui, et al. The dynamic expansion of leader discharge channels under positive voltage impulse with different rise times in long air gap: experimental observation and simulation results. J. Appl. Phys., 125 (2019), p. 11.

[16]

Vladlen Shvedov, et al. Optical beaming of electrical discharges. Nat. Commun., 11 (1) (2020), p. 5306.

[17]

Yingzhe Cui, et al. Thermodynamic properties of negative discharge channels in a 1-m air gap measured by optical interferometry. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 47 (5) (2018), pp. 1917-1925.

[18]

Alexios I. Ioannidis, et al. Shielding failure of high-voltage substations: a fractal-based approach for negative and positive lightning. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 57 (3) (2021), pp. 2317-2325.

[19]

Ziwei Ma, et al. Improved electrogeometric model for shielding failure evaluation of double-circuit UHVAC transmission lines based on leader propagation simulations. Elec. Power Syst. Res., 239 (2025), Article 111240.

[20]

C. Gai, et al. Quantitative risk assessment method for the impact of lightning disasters on storage tanks. Diss., 27 (2) (2012), pp. 92-95.

[21]

International Electrotechnical Commission. Protection Against lightning-part 2: Risk Management for Structures and Services." Risk Management for Structures and Services". IEC ( 2024), p. 62305 2.

[22]

L. Zardasti, et al. Review on the identification of reputation loss indicators in an onshore pipeline explosion event. J. Loss Prevent. Proc., 48 (2017), pp. 71-86.

[23]

Xuefeng Chen, et al. A two-dimensional risk assessment method for oil and gas pipelines based on “Accident Probability-Reputation Loss”. Kor. J. Chem. Eng., 41 (1) (2024), pp. 135-145.

[24]

Xuefeng Chen, et al. Selection of key indicators for reputation loss in oil and gas pipeline failure event. Eng. Fail. Anal., 99 (2019), pp. 69-84.

[25]

J.G. Anderson, et al. Estimating lightning performance of transmission lines. II. Updates to analytical models. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 8 (1993), pp. 1254-1267.

[26]

Vladimir A. Rakov. Lightning discharge and fundamentals of lightning protection. J. Light. Res., 4 (1) (2012), pp. 3-11.

[27]

IEEE Std 1410-2010. IEEE Guide for Improving the Lightning Performance of Electric Power Overhead Distribution Lines. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ (2010).

[28]

IEC 60071-2: 1996. Insulation Coordination - Part 2: Application Guide. IEC, Geneva (1996).

[29]

Wenhui Wu, et al. Electromagnetic Transient Calculation in Power Systems and EMTP Applications. China Water & Power Press (2012).

[30]

Technical Code for Lightning Protection of Building Electronic Information Systems: GB/T 50343-2012, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing (2012).

[31]

IEEE Working Group. Modeling of metal oxide surge arresters. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 10 (2) (1995), pp. 393-397.

[32]

Tetsuya Hidaka, et al. Relationship between grounding resistance connected to surge arresters and lightning surge behavior observed in low-voltage equipment. 2013 International Symposium on Lightning Protection (XII SIPDA), IEEE (2013).

[33]

IEEE Guide for Improving the Lightning Performance of Electric Power Overhead Distribution Lines, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2011).

[34]

API Recommended Practice 581: Risk-Based Inspection Methodology ( third ed.), American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC (2016).

[35]

Zacharias G. Datsios, Pantelis N. Mikropoulos, Thomas E. Tsovilis. Effects of lightning channel equivalent impedance on lightning performance of overhead transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Electromagn C., 61 (3) (2019), pp. 623-630.

[36]

M. Hasegawa, et al. Estimation of the equivalent impedance of lightning return-stroke channel from current waveforms measured at tall towers. IEEE Trans. Electromagn C., 66 (4) (2024), pp. 1168-1175.

[37]

M.V. Kostenko. Electrodynamic characteristics of lightning and their influence on disturbances of high-voltage lines. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 100 (D2) (1995), pp. 2739-2747.

PDF (6936KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/