Adjoint based state estimation of compressible flow in porous media

Yanbin Sun , Zhibin Liu , Yanjie Hu

Petroleum ›› 2021, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 39 -52.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2021, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) :39 -52. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2020.03.004
research-article
Adjoint based state estimation of compressible flow in porous media
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In this paper, we study the state estimation of compressible single phase flow in compressible porous media. The initial pressure distribution is estimated according to discrete adjoint approach based on the collected well pressure data. The first-order Tykhonov regularization method is used to obtain reasonable estimation. By analyzing the optimality condition of estimation problem, the discrete adjoint state equation and discrete adjoint gradient are derived based on the numerical scheme of the continuous equations. A quasi-Newton numerical optimization method related to adjoint gradient is proposed to solve the estimation problem. The estimation results with different regularization coefficients are compared and analyzed by numerical experiments. The deviation between the estimated pressure obtained without regularization and the real pressure is large. Estimation result with smaller deviation and higher smoothness can be obtained through appropriate regularization coefficient. When the observation error is large, the observed values generated by the estimated pressure fit well with the real pressure.

Keywords

Regularization / Discrete adjoint approach / State estimation / Single phase compressible flow / Porous media

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yanbin Sun, Zhibin Liu, Yanjie Hu. Adjoint based state estimation of compressible flow in porous media. Petroleum, 2021, 7(1): 39-52 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2020.03.004

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Province under the Grant No.16JC0314.

References

[1]

A.F. Bennett, J.R. Baugh, A parallel algorithm for variational assimilation in oceanography and meteorology, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 9 (1992) 426-433, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1992)009<0426:APAFVA>2.0.CO;2.

[2]

A.F. Bennett, Inverse Modeling of the Ocean and Atmosphere, Cambridge University Press Cambridge, 2002, pp. 59-74, 2007.

[3]

H.E. Ngodock, S.R. Smith, G.A. Jacobs, Cycling the representer Algorithm for variational data assimilation with a nonlinear reduced gravity ocean model, Ocean Model. 19 (2007) 101-111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2007.06.004.

[4]

J. Baird, C. Dawson, The representer method for data assimilation in singlephase Darcy flow in porous media, Comput. Geosci. 9 (2005) 247-271, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-005-9006-2.

[5]

J. Baird, C. Dawson, The representer method for two-phase flow in porous media, Comput. Geosci. 11 (2007) 235-248, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-007-9048-8.

[6]

M.A. Iglesias, C. Dawson, The representer method for state and parameter estimation in single-phase Darcy flow, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196 (2007) 4577-4596, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.05.024.

[7]

J.K. Przybysz-Jarnut, R.G. Hanea, J.-D. Jansen, A.W. Heemink, Application of the representer method for parameter estimation in numerical reservoir models, Comput. Geosci. 11 (2007) 73-85, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-006-9035-5.

[8]

G. Evensen, The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation, Ocean Dynam. 53 (2003) 343-367, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9.

[9]

Y. Chen, D.S. Oliver, Cross-covariances and localization for EnKF in multiphase flow data assimilation, Comput. Geosci. 14 (2010) 579-601, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-009-9174-6.

[10]

Y. Chen, D.S. Oliver, LevenbergeMarquardt forms of the iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history matching and uncertainty quantification, Comput. Geosci. 17 (2013) 689-703, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9351-5.

[11]

M. Hinze, R. Pinnau, M. Ulbrich, Optimization with PDE Constraints, Springer Science & Business Media, 2008, pp. 1-3.

[12]

N.-Z. Sun, W.W.-G. Yeh,Coupled inverse problems in groundwater modeling: 1. Sensitivity analysis and parameter identification, Water Resour. Res. 26 (1990) 2507-2525, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i010p02507.

[13]

N.-Z. Sun, W.W.-G. Yeh,Coupled inverse problems in groundwater modeling: 2. Identifiability and experimental design, Water Resour. Res. 26 (1990) 2527-2540, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i010p02527.

[14]

Z. Wu, A.C. Reynolds, D.S. Oliver, Conditioning geostatistical models to twophase production data, SPE J. 4 (1999) 142-155, https://doi.org/10.2118/56855-PA.

[15]

R. Li, A.C. Reynolds, D.S. Oliver, History matching of three-phase flow production data, SPE J. 8 (2003) 328-340, https://doi.org/10.2118/87336-PA.

[16]

J. Fu, H.A. Tchelepi, J. Caers, A multiscale adjoint method to compute sensitivity coefficients for flow in heterogeneous porous media, Adv. Water Resour. 33 (2010) 698-709, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.04.005.

[17]

T. Lee, J.H. Seinfeld, Estimation of absolute and relative permeabilities in petroleum reservoirs, Inverse Probl. 3 (1987) 711-728, https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/3/4/015.

[18]

T. Lee, J.H. Seinfeld, Estimation of two-phase petroleum reservoir properties by regularization, J. Comput. Phys. 69 (1987) 397-419, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90174-4.

[19]

P. Sarma, L.J. Durlofsky, K. Aziz, W.H. Chen, Efficient real-time reservoir management using adjoint-based optimal control and model updating, Comput. Geosci. 10 (2006) 3-36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-005-9009-z.

[20]

V. Bukshtynov, O. Volkov, L.J. Durlofsky, K. Aziz, Comprehensive framework for gradient-based optimization in closed-loop reservoir management, Comput. Geosci. 19 (2015) 877-897, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-015-9496-5.

[21]

D.S. Oliver, Y. Chen, Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review, Comput. Geosci. 15 (2011) 185-221, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-010-9194-2.

[22]

J.D. Jansen, Adjoint-based optimization of multi-phase flow through porous media e a review, Comput. Fluids 46 (2011) 40-51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.09.039.

[23]

Z.X. Chen, Computational Methods for Multiphase Flows in Porous Media, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2006, pp. 10-20.

[24]

J. Nocedal, S.J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, Springer, 2006, pp. 327-329.

[25]

S.A. Forth, An efficient overloaded implementation of forward mode automatic differentiation in MATLAB, ACM Trans. Math Software 32 (2006) 195-222, https://doi.org/10.1145/1141885.1141888.

[26]

R.D. Neidinger, Introduction to automatic differentiation and MATLAB object-oriented programming, SIAM Rev. 52 (2010) 545-563, https://doi.org/10.1137/080743627.

[27]

S. Krogstad, K.-A. Lie, O. Møyner, H.M. Nilsen, X. Raynaud, B. Skaflestad, MRSTAD e an Open-Source Framework for Rapid Prototyping and Evaluation of Reservoir Simulation Problems, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2118/173317-MS.

[28]

K. Lie, S. Krogstad, I.S. Ligaarden, J.R. Natvig, H.M. Nilsen, B. Skaflestad, Opensource MATLAB implementation of consistent discretisations on complex grids, Comput. Geosci. 16 (2012) 297-322, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-011-9244-4.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/