Pressure-rate convolution and deconvolution response for fractured conventional and unconventional reservoirs using new decline rate model

Salam Al-Rbeawi , Jalal Farhan Owayed

Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 243 -251.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) :243 -251. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2018.10.001
research-article
Pressure-rate convolution and deconvolution response for fractured conventional and unconventional reservoirs using new decline rate model
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper introduces new approach for pressure-rate convolution and deconvolution analysis of multi-stages hydraulically fractured conventional and unconventional reservoirs. This approach demonstrates the impact of variable Sand face flow rate on reservoir performance. A new model for P/R deconvolution is used to convert pressure pulse from variable flow rate to single and constant rate response. The target of this study is fractal reservoirs with and without stimulated and unstimulated reservoir volume.

Multi-linear flow regimes approach is used to describe pressure behavior in the reservoirs while decline flow rate behavior is described by newly proposed model in this study. This model depicts, instead of van Everdingen model, indirectly the declining rate with time by using pressure responses with production time. Decline flow rate behavior simulated by linear and bi-linear flow models are also studied and compared with the one obtained by the new model. Several analytical models are used in this study by applying P/R convolution and deconvolution technique and solved for constant and variable flow rate considering different reservoir configurations and operating conditions. The results are interpreted and analyzed for better understanding pressure behaviors, flow regime types, and productivity index trends for continuously changing flow rate especially at early production time. Estimating stimulated reservoir volume (Vsrv) is considered one of the applications of convolved pressure since it is calculated from pseudo-steady state flow when late time boundary dominated flow regime is reached.

The outcomes of this study can be summarized as: 1) Introducing new approach for pressure-rate convolution and deconvolution technique for multi-stages hydraulically fractured reservoirs by applying new decline flow rate model that indirectly simulates variable flow rate with time. 2) Generating analytical models for dimensionless pressure and flow rate for constant and variable flow rate using the concept of P/R convolution and deconvolution. 3) Comparing the result of newly proposed models with the results obtained by applying van Everdingen model for decline rate behavior. 4) Studying the applicability of linear and bi-linear flow models in converting variable flow rate pressure response to single and constant flow rate pressure response. 5) Applying the deconvolution technique to simulate pressure response at late production time to estimate stimulated reservoir volume.

The most interesting points are: 1) The main difference in wellbore pressure behavior between variable and constant flow rate can be seen at early production time, however intermediate production time could also show very limited changes for the case of variable rate wellbore pressure. 2) A unit slope line flow regime could be developed for varied flow rate pressure response at very early production time similar to the wellbore storage dominated flow regime. 3) Productivity index calculated by the proposed models for variable flow rate is greater than the index for constant flow rate. 4) The impact of petrophysical properties of porous media and hydraulic fracture characteristics on pressure response are similar in the two cases of variable and constant flow rate. 5) The decline rate models for linear and bi-linear flow are not applicable in pressure deconvolution technique.

Keywords

Convolution and convolution technique / Rate transient analysis / Pressure transient analysis / Fractured reservoirs / Reservoir performance

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Salam Al-Rbeawi, Jalal Farhan Owayed. Pressure-rate convolution and deconvolution response for fractured conventional and unconventional reservoirs using new decline rate model. Petroleum, 2019, 5(3): 243-251 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2018.10.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

M. Onur, C. Ayan, F.J. Kuchuk, Pressure-pressure deconvolution analysis of multiwell-interference and interval-pressure-transient tests, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 14 (06) (2011) 652-662, https://doi.org/10.2118/149567-PA.

[2]

T. Von Schroeter, F. Hollaender, A.C. Gringarten, Deconvolution of well-test data as a nonlinear total least-squares problem, SPE J. 9 (04) (2004) 375-390, https://doi.org/10.2118/77688-PA.

[3]

F. Wang, S. Zheng, Wavelet frequency analysis of long-term transient pressure from permanent down-hole gauges (PDG) for the real-time reservoir monitoring, Paper Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition Held in Amsterdam, the Netherland, 25-27 October, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2118/170582-MS.

[4]

Hasan Salman Al-Hashim M.M. Al Buraikan H.Y. Al-Yousef M. Issaka, Pressure transient analysis of data from permanent downhole gauges, Paper Presented at the SPE Digital Conference & Exhibition Held in Woodland, TX, USA, 5-7 March, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2118/163723-MS.

[5]

M. Onur, P.S. Hegeman, F.J. Kuchuk, Pressure/pressure convolution analysis of multiprobe and packer-probe wireline formation tester data, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 7 (05) (2004) 351-364, https://doi.org/10.2118/88994-PA.

[6]

M.M. Levitan, Practical application of pressure-rate deconvolution to analysis of real well tests, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 8 (02) (2005) 113-121, https://doi.org/10.2118/84290-PA.

[7]

Salam Al-Rbeawi, Integrated analysis of pressure response using pressure-rate convolution and deconvolution techniques for varied flow rate production in fractured formations, JNGSE 51 (2018) (2018) 195-209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.01.012.

[8]

F. Kuchuk, L. Ayestaran, Analysis of simultaneously measured pressure and sand face flow rate in transient well testing (includes associated papers 13937 and 14693), J. Petrol. Technol. 37 (02) (1985) 323-334, https://doi.org/10.2118/12177-PA.

[9]

E. Pimonov, C. Ayan, M. Onur, F.J. Kuchuk, A new pressure/rate-deconvolution algorithm to analyze wireline formation-tester and well-test data, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 13 (04) (2010) 603-613, https://doi.org/10.2118/123982-PA.

[10]

A.C. Gringarten, From straight lines to deconvolution: the evolution of the state of the art in well test analysis, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 11 (01) (2008) 41-62, https://doi.org/10.2118/102079-PA.

[11]

T. Von Schroeter, F. Hollaender, A.C. Gringarten, Deconvolution of well test data as a nonlinear total least squares problem, Paper Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition Held in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 30 September-3 October 2001, 2001, https://doi.org/10.2118/71574-MS.

[12]

A. Roumboutsos, G. Stewart, A direct deconvolution or convolution algorithm for well test analysis, Paper Presented at the SPE 63th Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition Held in Houston, Texas, USA, October 2-5, 1988 https://doi.org/10.2118/18157-MS.

[13]

Y. Osman, A. Retnanto, M. Samir, M. Fraim, Enhancing pressure transient analysis through the application of deconvolution methods, case study, Paper Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show & Conference Held in Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain, 6-9 March, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2118/184022-MS.

[14]

J. Cumming, D. Wooff, T. Whittle, A.C. Gringarten, Multiwell deconvolution, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 17 (04) (2014) 457-465, https://doi.org/10.2118/166458-PA.

[15]

F.J. Kuchuk, Applications of convolution and deconvolution to transient well tests, SPE Form. Eval. 5 (04) (1990) 375-384, https://doi.org/10.2118/16394-PA.

[16]

D. Ilk, P.P. Valko, T.A. Blasingame, Deconvolution of variable-rate reservoir performance data using B-splines, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 9 (05) (2006) 582-595, https://doi.org/10.2118/95571-PA.

[17]

A.C. Gringarten,Practical use of well-test deconvolution, Paper Presented at the SPE 2010 Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition Held in Florence, Italy, September 20-22, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2118/134534-MS.

[18]

J.A. Cumming, D.A. Wooff, T. Whittle, R.J. Crossman, A.C. Gringarten, Assessing the non-uniqueness of the well test interpretation model using deconvolution, Paper Presented at the SPE Europe Held in London, UK, 10-13 June, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2118/164870-MS.

[19]

T. Von Schroeter, F. Hollaender, A.C. Gringarten, Analysis of well test data from permanent downhole gauges by deconvolution, Paper Presented at the SPE 2002 Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition Held in San Antonio, Texas, USA, 29 September-2 October 2002, 2002, https://doi.org/10.2118/71574-MS.

[20]

M.M. Levitan, M.R. Wilson, Deconvolution of pressure and rate data from gas reservoirs with significant pressure depletion, SPE J. 17 (03) (2010) 727-741, https://doi.org/10.2118/129966-PA.

[21]

M. Brown, E. Ozkan, R. Raghavan, H. Kazemi, Practical solutions for pressuretransient responses of fractured horizontal wells in unconventional shale reservoirs, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 14 (06) (2011) 663-676, https://doi.org/10.2118/125043-PA.

[22]

E. Ozkan, M.L. Brown, R. Raghavan, H. Kazemi, Comparison of fractured-horizontal-well performance in tight sand and shale reservoirs, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 14 (02) (2011) 248-259, https://doi.org/10.2118/121290-PA.

[23]

O. Ozcan, H. Sarak, E. Ozkan, R.S. Raghavan, A trilinear flow model for a fractured horizontal well in a fractal unconventional reservoir, Paper Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Held in Amsterdam, the Netherland, 27-29 October, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2118/170971-MS.

[24]

A.F. Van Everdingen, The Skin Effect and its Influence on Productive Capacity of a Well, Petrol. Trans. AIME (1953) 198, https://doi.org/10.2118/203-G.

[25]

F. Kuchuk, K. Morton, D. Biryukov, Rate-transient analysis for multistage fractured horizontal wells in conventional and un-conventional homogeneous and naturally fractured reservoirs, Paper Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition Held in Dubai, UAE, 26-28 September, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2118/181488-MS.

[26]

M.K. Fisher, J.R. Heinze, C.D. Harris, B.M. Davidson, C.A. Wright, K.P. Dunn, Optimizing horizontal completion techniques in the Barnett shale using microseismic fracture mapping, Paper Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition Held in Houston, TX, USA, 26-29 September, 2004, https://doi.org/10.2118/90051-MS.

[27]

C. Cipolla, J. Wallace, Stimulated reservoir volume: a misapplied concept? Paper Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracture Technology Conference Held in Woodland, TX, USA, 4-6 February, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2118/168596-MS.

[28]

M.J. Mayerhofer, E. Lolon, N.R. Warpinski, C.L. Cipolla, D.W. Walser, C.M. Rightmire, What is stimulated reservoir volume? SPE Prod. Oper. 25 (01) (2010) 89-98, https://doi.org/10.2118/119890-PA.

[29]

S.C. Maxwell, C.L. Cipolla, What does microseismicity tell us about hydraulic fracturing? Paper Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition Held in Denver, Colorado, USA, 30 October-2 November, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2118/146932-MS.

[30]

N.R. Warpinski, M. Mayerhofer, K. Agarwal, J. Du, Hydraulic-fracture geomechanics and microseismic-source mechanisms, SPE J. 19 (04) (2013) 766-780, https://doi.org/10.2118/158935-PA.

[31]

A. Gaurav, S. Kashikar, Stimulated rock volume and estimated ultimate recovery, Paper Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resource Technology Held in San Antonio, TX, USA, 20-22 July, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2118/178486-MS.

[32]

L.S.K. Fung, S. Du, Parallel-simulator framework for multipermeability modeling with discrete fractures for unconventional and tight gas reservoirs, SPE J. 21 (04) (2016) 1370-1385, https://doi.org/10.2118/179728-PA.

[33]

K. Du,The determination of tested drainage area and reservoir characterization from entire well-test history by deconvolution and conventional pressure-transient analysis techniques, Paper Presented at the SPE 2008 Annual Technical Conference Held in Denver, Colorado, USA. 21-24 September, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2118/115720-MS.

[34]

T.M. Whittle, A.C. Gringarten,The determination of minimum tested volume from the deconvolution of well test pressure transients, Paper Presented at the SPE 2008 Annual Technical Conference Held in Denver, Colorado, USA. 21-24 September, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2118/116575-MS.

[35]

Y. Wei, D. He, J. Wang, Y. Qi,A coupled model for fractured shale reservoirs with characteristics of continuum media and fractal geometry, Paper Presented at the SPE 2015 Asia & Pacific Unconventional Resources Conference & Exhibition Held in Brisbane, Australia, 9-11 November, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2118/176843-MS.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/