Velocity profiles description and shape factors inclusion in a hyperbolic, one-dimensional, transient two-fluid model for stratified and slug flow simulations in pipes

Arianna Bonzanini , Davide Picchi , Marco Ferrari , Pietro Poesio

Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 191 -198.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) :191 -198. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2018.03.005
research-article
Velocity profiles description and shape factors inclusion in a hyperbolic, one-dimensional, transient two-fluid model for stratified and slug flow simulations in pipes
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In a previous work it has been shown that a one-dimensional, hyperbolic, transient five equations two-fluid model is able to numerically describe stratified, wavy, and slug flow in horizontal and near-horizontal pipes. Slug statistical characteristics can be numerically predicted with results in good agreement with experimental data and well-known empirical relations. In this model some approximated and simplified assumptions are adopted to describe shear stresses at wall and at phase interface.

In this paper, we focus on the possibility to account for the cross sectional flow by inserting shape factors into the momentum balance equations of the aforementioned model. Velocity profiles are obtained by a pre-integrated model and they are computed at each time step and at each computational cell. Once that the velocity profiles are known, the obtained shape factors are inserted in the numerical resolution. In this way it is possible to recover part of the information lost due to the one-dimensional flow description.

Velocity profiles computed in stratified conditions are compared against experimental profiles measured by PIV technique; a method to compute the velocity profile during slug initiation and growth has been developed and the computed velocity distribution in the liquid phase was compared against the one-seventh power law.

Keywords

Multi-phase pipeline transport / Oil & gas / Hyperbolic two-fluid model / Velocity profiles / Shape factors

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Arianna Bonzanini, Davide Picchi, Marco Ferrari, Pietro Poesio. Velocity profiles description and shape factors inclusion in a hyperbolic, one-dimensional, transient two-fluid model for stratified and slug flow simulations in pipes. Petroleum, 2019, 5(2): 191-198 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2018.03.005

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

R.I. Issa, M.H.W. Kempf, Simulation of slug flow in horizontal and nearly horizontal pipes with the two-fluid model, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 29 (2003) 69-95.

[2]

F. Renault,A Lagrangian Slug Capturing Scheme for Gas-liquid Flows in Pipes, Vol. Phd Thesis 2005, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 2007.

[3]

M. Bonizzi, P. Andreussi, S. Banerjee, Flow regime independent, high resolution multi-field modelling of near-horizontal gas-liquid flows in pipelines, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 35 (2009) 34-46.

[4]

D. Biberg, A mathematical model for two-phase stratified turbulent duct flow, Multiphas. Sci. Technol. 19 (2007) 1-48.

[5]

M. Ferrari, A. Bonzanini, P. Poesio, A five-equation, transient, hyperbolic, onedimensional model for slug capturing in pipes, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluid. 85 (6) (2017) 327-362.

[6]

A. Ayati, J. Kolaas, G. Johnson, Combined simultaneous two-phase piv and interface elevation measurements in stratified gas/liquid pipe flow, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 74 (2015) 45-58.

[7]

A.E. Dukler, D. Moalem Maron, N. Brauner, A physical model for predicting the minimum stable slug length, Chem. Eng. Sci. 40 (1985) 1379-1385.

[8]

M. Gopal, W.P. Jepson, Development of digital image analysis techniques for the study of velocity and void profiles in slug flow, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 23 (1997) 945-965.

[9]

S.T. Munkejord, I.R. Gran,Modelling and Numerical Methods for Two-phase Flow, Vol. Phd Thesis 2005, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 2009. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Aktiengesell & Co. KG.

[10]

R. Saurel, R. Abgrall, A multiphase Godunov method for compressible multifluid and multiphase flow, J. Comput. Phys. 150 (2) (1999) 425-467.

[11]

Y. Taitel, A.E. Dukler, A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas-liquid flow, AIChE J. 22 (1) (1976) 47-55.

[12]

J.E. Kowalsky, Wall and interfacial shear stress in stratified flow in a horizontal pipe, AIChE J. 33 (1987) 274-281.

[13]

N.P. Hand,Gas-liquid Co-current Flow in a Horizontal Pipe, Ph.D. thesis, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, January 1991.

[14]

D. Picchi, S. Correra, P. Poesio, Flow pattern transition, pressure gradient, hold-up predictions in gas/non-Newtonian power-law fluid stratified flow, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 63 (2014) 105-115.

[15]

W.P. Jepson, Modelling the transition to slug flow in horizontal conduit, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 67 (1989) 731-740.

[16]

A. Prosperetti, G. Tryggvason, Computational Methods for Multiphase Flow, Cambridge University Press, 2007.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/