Mechanism of polymer adsorption on shale surfaces: Effect of polymer type and presence of monovalent and divalent salts

Sudiptya Banerjee , Zaid R. Abdulsattar , Kaylaychi Agim , Robert H. Lane , Berna Hascakir

Petroleum ›› 2017, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 384 -390.

PDF
Petroleum ›› 2017, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) :384 -390. DOI: 10.1016/j.petlm.2017.04.002
research-article
Mechanism of polymer adsorption on shale surfaces: Effect of polymer type and presence of monovalent and divalent salts
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This paper studies the adsorption behavior of representative guar-based polymers onto the surface of source rock outcrop samples to provide a better picture of the interaction(s) of polymers with these rocks. Outcrop samples from the Barnett, Eagle Ford, and Marcellus shales were collected, analyzed for mineralogy and total organic content, and then exposed to different polymer solutions under elevated temperature and moderately elevated pressure. Viscosities of these polymer solutions were measured before and after exposure to the rock samples to establish a correlation between polymer adsorption and rock mineralogy and/or organic content. Results indicate a direct correlation between polymer adsorption and both rock mineralogy. Cationic polymers are shown to be more prone to adsorption onto the surface of the rock than non-ionic polymers. The results from this work establish that fluid-rock interactions are significant and that further research regarding shale polymer interactions and its effects on hydrocarbon production is needed with representative downhole shale samples given the trends now shown with outcrop samples.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sudiptya Banerjee, Zaid R. Abdulsattar, Kaylaychi Agim, Robert H. Lane, Berna Hascakir. Mechanism of polymer adsorption on shale surfaces: Effect of polymer type and presence of monovalent and divalent salts. Petroleum, 2017, 3(3): 384-390 DOI:10.1016/j.petlm.2017.04.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

The Authors of this paper would like to express their sincere gratitude to the members of The Crisman Institute for Petroleum Research for their generous Funding and for supplying the fracturing fluid components. They would also like to thank Dr. Chan at Ellington and Associates for his help in conducting the mineralogy analysis on the rock samples. Finally, we would like to thank The Heavy Oil, Oil Shales, Oil Sands, and Carbonate Analysis and Recovery Methods (HOCAM) research group at Texas A&M University.

Author contributions

SB, ZRA, and KA were equally contributed in this research. RHB and BH conceived, designed, and supervised the research and wrote the paper.

References

[1]

J. Wang, P. Somasundaran, D.R. Nagaraj, Adsorption mechanism of guar gum at solid-liquid interfaces, Miner. Eng. 18 (1) (2005) 77-81.

[2]

R.L. Parfitt, Adsorption of charged sugars by montmorillonite, Soil Sci. Soc. 113 (1) (1972) 417-421.

[3]

B.K.G. Theng, Clay-polymer interactions: summary and perspectives, Clays Clay Miner. 30 (1) (1982) 1-10.

[4]

M. Josh, B. Clennell, Broadband electrical properties of clays and shales: comparative investigations of remolded and preserved samples, Geophysics 80 (2) (2015) 129-143.

[5]

R.W. Miller, D.T. Gardiner,Soils in Our Environment, eighth ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1998.

[6]

M. Binazadeh, M. Xu, A. Zolfaghari, H. Dehghanpour, Effect of electrostatic interactions on water uptake of gas shales: the interplay of solution ionic strength and electrostatic double layer, Energy Fuels 30 (2) (2016) 992-1001.

[7]

J. Letey, Adsorption and desorption of polymers on soil, Soil Sci. 158 (4) (1994) 244-248.

[8]

W.J. Weber, Physicochemical Processes for Water Quality Control, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1972, pp. 229-238.

[9]

G.P. Willhite, SPE Text Book Series, Waterflooding, vol. 3, 1986, pp. 223-298. Richardson Texas.

[10]

M. Ali, B. Hascakir, Water-rock interaction for Eagle Ford, Marcellus, green river, and Barnett shale samples and implications for hydraulic fracturing fluid engineering, SPE J. 22 (1) (2017) 162-171.

[11]

P. Carman, K. Lant, Making the Case for Shale Clay Stabilization, SPE Eastern Regional Meeting Morgantown, West Virginia, USA, 12-14 October 2010. SPE 139030.

[12]

Z.R. Abdulsattar, K. Agim, R.H. Lane, B. Hascakir,Physicochemical interactions of shale with injected water-based fluids, in:International Symposium on Oil Field Chemistry, 13-15 April 2015. The Woodlands, Texas, USA, SPE-173727-MS.

[13]

Y. Unal, T. Kar, A. Mukhametshina, B. Hascakir,The impact of clay type on the asphaltene deposition during bitumen extraction with steam assisted gravity drainage, in:International Symposium on Oil Field Chemistry, 13-15 April 2015. The Woodlands, Texas, USA, SPE-173795-MS.

[14]

N. Schamp, J. Huylebroeck, Adsorption of polymers on clays, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Symp. 42 (2) (1973) 553-562.

[15]

L. Bailey, M. Keall, A. Audibert, Effect of clay/polymer interactions on shale stabilization during drilling, Langmuir 10 (5) (1994) 1544-1549.

[16]

M. Pawlik, J.S. Laskowski, Stabilization of mineral suspensions by guar gum in potash ore flotation systems, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 84 (5) (2006) 532-538.

[17]

G.R. Saini, A. Maclean, Adsorption-flocculation reactions of soil polysaccharides with kaolinite, Soil Sci. Soc. 30 (1) (1966) 697-699.

[18]

X. Ma, M. Pawlik, Effect of alkali metal cations on adsorption of guar gum onto quartz, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 289 (1) (2005) 48-55.

[19]

T. Kar, A. Mukhametshina, Y. Unal, B. Hascakir, The effect of clay type on steam assisted gravity drainage performance, SPE J. Can. Pet. Technol. 54 (6) (2015) 412-423.

[20]

H. Dehghanpour, Q. Lan, Y. Saeed, H. Fei, Z. Qi, Spontaneous imbibition of brine and oil in gas shales: effect of water adsorption and resulting microfractures, Energy Fuels 27 (6) (2013) 3039-3049.

[21]

H. Dehghanpour, H.A. Zubair, A. Chhabra, A. Ullah, Liquid intake of organic shales, Energy Fuels 26 (9) (2012) 5750-5758.

[22]

T. Kar, C. Ovalles, E. Rogel, J. Vien, B. Hascakir, The residual oil saturation determination for steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and solvent-SAGD, Fuel 172 (2016) 187-195.

[23]

A.M. Avachat, R.R.D. Shilpa, N. Shrotriya, Recent investigations of plant based natural gums, mucilages and resins in novel drug delivery systems, Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 44-1 (2011) 46-99.

[24]

F. Garcia Ochoa, Santos, J.A. Casas, E. Gomez, Xanthan gum: production, recovery, and properties, Biotechnol. Adv. 18-7 (2000) 549-579.

[25]

F. Civan, Mineralogy and Mineral Sensitivity of Petroleum-bearing Formations in Reservoir Formation Damage, second ed., Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington, 2007, pp. 13-77.

[26]

H.D.Chapman,Methods of soilanalysis,in:C.A. Black (Ed.), Part 2.Number 9 in the Series Agronomy, American Institute of Agronomy, Madison,WI, 1965.

[27]

R. Dohrmann, Cation exchange capacity methodology iii: correct exchangeable calcium determination of calcareous clays using a new silverethiourea method, Appl. Clay Sci. 34 (1-4) (2006) 47-57.

[28]

P. Somasundaran, A. Ofori, K. Ananthapadmabhan, Mineral-solution equilibria in sparingly soluble mineral systems, Colloids Surf. 15 (1985) 309-333.

[29]

D.R.Q. Ketterings, Recommended methods for determining soil cation exchange capacity, in: Recommended Soil Testing Procedures for the Northeastern United States, third ed., Northeast Coordinating Committee for Soil Testing, 2011, p. 493.

[30]

J.G. Speight, The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum, second ed., Inc, M.D, New York, 1991.

[31]

A. Aboulkas, K. Harfi, Study of the kinetics and mechanisms of thermal decomposition of Moroccan tarfaya oil shale and its kerogen, Oil Shale 25-4 (2008) 426-443.

[32]

J. Burger, P. Sourieau, M. Combarnous, Thermal Recovery Methods of Oil Recovery, Paris, 1985.

[33]

R.L. Stone, R.A. Rowland, DTA of kaolinite and montmorillonite under water vapor pressures up to six atmospheres, Clays Clay Miner. 3 (1954) 103-116.

[34]

D. Mudgil, S. Barak, B.S. Khatkar, X-ray diffraction, IR spectroscopy and thermal characterization of partially hydrolyzed guar gum, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 50-4 (2012) 1035-1039.

[35]

B.M. Prado, S. Kim, B.F. Ozen, L.J. Mauer, Differentiation of carbohydrate gums and mixtures using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics, J. Agric. Food Chem. 53-1 (2005) 2823-2829.

[36]

R. Issarani, B.P. Nagori, Effect of gamma radiation on solution viscosity of galactomannans: influence of galactose: mannose ratio, Indian J. Chem. Technol. 12-1 (2005) 105-107.

[37]

Z.H. Ping, Q.T. Nguyen, S.M. Chen, J.Q. Zhou, Y.D. Ding, States of water in different hydrophilic polymers e DSC and FTIR studies, Polymer 42 (2001) 8461-8467.

[38]

L.M. Zhang, J.F. Zhou, P.S. Hui, A comparative study on viscosity behavior of water-soluble chemically modified guar gum derivatives with different functional lateral groups, J. Sci. Food Agric. 85-15 (2005) 2638-2644.

[39]

G.E. Manger, Porosity and Bulk Density of Sedimentary Rocks, Geological Survey Bulletin 1 ( 114-E), 1963.

[40]

M. Ramurthy, R.D. Barree, D.P. Kundert, Surface-area versus conductivitytype fracture treatments in shale reservoirs, SPE Prod. Oper. 24-4 (2011) 357-367.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/