New Opportunities For the Integration of Artificial Intelligence With Materials Science: From Large Language Models to Embodied Large Models

Abstract

The rapid advancement of large model technology in recent years has ushered in new opportunities for materials science. Leveraging their powerful feature learning capabilities, emergent properties, and flexible fine-tuning mechanisms, large models are gradually being applied to all aspects of materials science research. However, we contend that the deep integration of artificial intelligence and materials science urgently requires a transition from “virtual intelligence assistance” to “embodied intelligence dominance”. Future materials discovery will be autonomously executed in closed-loop operations within physical environments by Embodied AI Chemists. This review first introduces the blossom of large model technology and its multifaceted applications in various materials science-related topics. Subsequently, this review specifically maps the developmental pathways of autonomous experimental platforms, underscoring the comparative advantages of large-model-based systems over traditional machine learning approaches. Furthermore, it discusses the potential of embodied large models in materials science and proposes potential applications by constructing diverse training datasets, enhancing embodied reasoning capabilities, establishing intelligent collaborative environments, and developing multi-agent collaborative frameworks. Through this comprehensive analysis, we aim to pioneer new intelligent pathways for materials science research, motivating an end-to-end intelligent transformation from theoretical exploration to experimental realization.

Keywords

autonomous experimentation platforms / embodied large models / large language models / materials science

References

[1] D. A. Pensak and E. J. Corey, “LHASA—Logic and Heuristics Applied to Synthetic Analysis,” Computer-Assisted Analysis in Organic Synthesis (1977): 1–32, https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1977-0061.ch001.

[2] S. Zhang, Z. Zhang, and R. Li, “Applications of Machine Learning in Chemistry,” Univerisity Chemistry 40, no. 1 (2025): 206–218, https://doi.org/10.12461/PKU.DXHX202404151.

[3] X. Bai and X. Zhang, “Artificial Intelligence-Powered Materials Science,” Nano-Micro Letters 17, no. 1 (2025): 135, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-024-01634-8.

[4] E. Kim, K. Huang, A. Saunders, A. McCallum, G. Ceder, and E. Olivetti, “Materials Synthesis Insights From Scientific Literature via Text Extraction and Machine Learning,” Chemistry of Materials 29, no. 21 (2017): 9436–9444, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03500.

[5] A. Trewartha, N. Walker, H. Huo, et al., “Quantifying the Advantage of Domain-Specific Pre-Training on Named Entity Recognition Tasks in Materials Science,” Patterns 3, no. 4 (2022): 100488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100488.

[6] X. Ma, Z. Li, L. E. K. Achenie, and H. Xin, “Machine-Learning-Augmented Chemisorption Model for CO₂ Electroreduction Catalyst Screening,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 6, no. 18 (2015): 3528–3533, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01660.

[7] K. Tran and Z. W. Ulissi, “Active Learning Across Intermetallics to Guide Discovery of Electrocatalysts for CO₂ Reduction and H2 Evolution,” Nature catalysis 1, no. 9 (2018): 696–703, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0142-1.

[8] T. Xie and J. C. Grossman, “Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for an Accurate and Interpretable Prediction of Material Properties,” Physical Review Letters 120, no. 14 (2018): 145301, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301.

[9] A. W. Senior, R. Evans, J. Jumper, et al., “Improved Protein Structure Prediction Using Potentials From Deep Learning,” Nature 577, no. 7792 (2020): 706–710, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7.

[10] P. Liu, H. Huang, S. Antonov, et al., “Machine Learning Assisted Design of γ′-Strengthened Co-Base Superalloys With Multi-Performance Optimization,” npj Computational Materials 6, no. 1 (2020): 62, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-0334-5.

[11] S. Lu, Q. Zhou, Y. Ouyang, Y. Guo, Q. Li, and J. Wang, “Accelerated Discovery of Stable Lead-Free Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Perovskites Via Machine Learning,” Nature Communications 9, no. 1 (2018): 3405, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05761-w.

[12] R. Gómez-Bombarelli, J. Aguilera-Iparraguirre, T. D. Hirzel, et al., “Design of Efficient Molecular Organic Light-Emitting Diodes by a High-Throughput Virtual Screening and Experimental Approach,” Nature Materials 15, no. 10 (2016): 1120–1127, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4717.

[13] C. Wang, H. Fu, L. Jiang, D. Xue, and J. Xie, “A property-Oriented Design Strategy for High Performance Copper Alloys Via Machine Learning,” npj Computational Materials 5, no. 1 (2019): 87, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0227-7.

[14] C. Wen, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, et al., “Machine Learning Assisted Design of High Entropy Alloys With Desired Property,” Acta Materialia 170 (2019): 109–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.010.

[15] D. Salley, G. Keenan, J. Grizou, A. Sharma, S. Martín, and L. Cronin, “A Nanomaterials Discovery Robot for the Darwinian Evolution of Shape Programmable Gold Nanoparticles,” Nature Communications 11, no. 1 (2020): 2771, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16501-4.

[16] F. Mekki-Berrada, Z. Ren, T. Huang, et al., “Two-Step Machine Learning Enables Optimized Nanoparticle Synthesis,” npj Computational Materials 7, no. 1 (2021): 55, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00520-w.

[17] X. Lin, Z. Si, W. Fu, et al., “Intelligent Identification of Two-Dimensional Nanostructures by Machine-Learning Optical Microscopy,” Nano Research 11, no. 12 (2018): 6316–6324, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-018-2155-0.

[18] A. Ziletti, D. Kumar, M. Scheffler, and L. M. Ghiringhelli, “Insightful Classification of Crystal Structures Using Deep Learning,” Nature Communications 9, no. 1 (2018): 2775, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05169-6.

[19] A. Cui, K. Jiang, M. Jiang, et al., “Decoding Phases of Matter by Machine-Learning Raman Spectroscopy,” Physical Review Applied 12, no. 5 (2019): 054049, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.054049.

[20] N. J. Szymanski, B. Rendy, Y. Fei, et al., “An Autonomous Laboratory for the Accelerated Synthesis of Novel Materials,” Nature 624, no. 7990 (2023): 86–91, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06734-w.

[21] P. Nikolaev, D. Hooper, F. Webber, et al., “Autonomy in Materials Research: A Case Study in Carbon Nanotube Growth,” npj Computational Materials 2, no. 1 (2016): 16031, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.31.

[22] B. P. MacLeod, F. G. L. Parlane, T. D. Morrissey, et al., “Self-Driving Laboratory for Accelerated Discovery of Thin-Film Materials,” Science Advances 6, no. 20 (2020): eaaz8867, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz8867.

[23] Introducing ChatGPT | OpenAI, Accessed March 15, 2025, https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/.

[24] G. Team, R. Anil, S. Borgeaud, et al., “Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online June 17, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.11805.

[25] R. Islam and O. M. Moushi, “GPT-4o: The Cutting-Edge Advancement in Multimodal LLM,” arXiv. Preprint posted online June 21, 2024, https://www.authorea.com/users/771522/articles/1121145-gpt-4o-the-cutting-edge-advancement-in-multimodal-llm.

[26] S. Shahriar, B. Lund, N. R. Mannuru, et al., “Putting GPT-4o to the Sword: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Language, Vision, Speech, and Multimodal Proficiency,” arXiv. Preprint posted online June 19, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.09519.

[27] S. Mercer, S. Spillard, D. P. Martin, “Brief Analysis of DeepSeek R1 and Its Implications for Generative AI,” arXiv. Preprint posted online February 7, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.02523.

[28] S. Wu, Z. Peng, X. Du, et al., “A Comparative Study on Reasoning Patterns of Openai’s o1 Model,” arXiv. Preprint posted online October 22, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.13639.

[29] T. Zhong, Z. Liu, Y. Pan, et al., “Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGI,” arXiv. Preprint posted online September 27, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.18486

[30] J. Wei, Y. Tay, R. Bommasani, et al., “Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online October 26, 2022, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.07682.

[31] N. Wang, H. Yang, C. D. Wang, “FinGPT: Instruction Tuning Benchmark for Open-Source Large Language Models in Financial Datasets,” arXiv. Preprint posted online November 11, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.04793.

[32] H. Yang, B. Zhang, N. Wang, et al., “FinRobot: An Open-Source AI Agent Platform for Financial Applications Using Large Language Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online May 27, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.14767.

[33] K. Singhal, S. Azizi, T. Tu, et al., “Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge,” Nature 620, no. 7972 (2023): 172–180, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2.

[34] K. Zhang, R. Zhou, E. Adhikarla, et al., “BiomedGPT: A Generalist Vision-Language Foundation Model for Diverse Biomedical Tasks,” Nature Medicine 30, no. 11 (2024): 3129–3141, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03185-2.

[35] X. Tian, J. Gu, B. Li, et al., “DriveVLM: The Convergence of Autonomous Driving and Large Vision-Language Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online June 25, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.12289.

[36] W. Wang, J. Xie, C. Hu, et al., “DriveMLM: Aligning Multi-Modal Large Language Models With Behavioral Planning States for Autonomous Driving,” arXiv. Preprint posted online December 25, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.09245.

[37] C. Sima, K. Renz, K. Chitta, et al., “DriveLM: Driving With Graph Visual Question Answering,” arXiv. Preprint posted online January 16, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.14150.

[38] Z. Xu, Y. Zhang, E. Xie, et al., “DriveGPT4: Interpretable End-to-End Autonomous Driving Via Large Language Model,” arXiv. Preprint posted online November 9, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.01412.

[39] Q. Zhang, “Survey on the Development of AI Large Model,” Communications Technology, no. 3 (2023): 255–262, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0802.2023.03.001.

[40] S. B. Cooper and J. V. Leeuwen, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” in Alan Turing: His Work and Impact, eds. S. B. Cooper and J. V. Leeuwen (Elsevier, 2013), 551–621, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386980-7.50023-X.

[41] S. Chen, Z. Wu, K. Zhang, et al., “Exploring Embodied Multimodal Large Models: Development, Datasets, and Future Directions,” arXiv. Preprint posted online February 21, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.15336.

[42] A. Brohan, N. Brown, J. Carbajal, et al., “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control,” arXiv. Preprint posted online July 28, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.15818.

[43] DeepSeek-AI, A. Liu, B. Feng, et al., “DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report,” arXiv. Preprint posted online February 18, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.19437.

[44] DeepSeek-AI, X. Bi, D. Chen, et al., “Deepseek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models With Longtermism,” arXiv. Preprint posted online January 5, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.02954.

[45] DeepSeek-AI, A. Liu, B. Feng, et al., “DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model,” arXiv. Preprint posted online June 19, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.04434.

[46] S. Yin, C. Fu, S. Zhao, et al., “A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models,” National Science Review 11, no. 12 (2024): nwae403, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae403.

[47] C. Zhao, G. Zhu, and jinqiao Wang, “The Inspiration Brought by ChatGPT to LLM and the New Development Ideas of Multi-Modal Large Model,” Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery 7, no. 3 (2023): 26–35, https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.0216.

[48] C. Li, X. Han, R. Jiang, P. Yun, P. Hu, and X. Ban, “Application and Prospects of Large Models in Materials Science,” Chinese Journal of Engineering 2, no. 46 (2024): 290–305, https://doi.org/10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2023.09.20.002.

[49] S. Yang, J. J. Liu, F. Jin, and Y. Lu, “Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Materials Science: New Paradigms and Scientific Discoveries (In Chinese),” Chinese Science Bulletin 69, no. 32 (2024): 4730–4747, https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2024-0404.

[50] Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness, June 2011, https://www.mgi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/materials_genome_initiative-final.pdf.

[51] A. Kirillov, E. Mintun, N. Ravi, et al. “Segment anything,” arXiv. Preprint posted online April 5, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02643.

[52] J. Guo, A. S. Ibanez-Lopez, H. Gao, et al., “Automated Chemical Reaction Extraction From Scientific Literature,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 62, no. 9 (2022): 2035–2045, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00284.

[53] T. Gupta, M. Zaki, N. M. A. Krishnan, and Mausam, “MatSciBERT: A Materials Domain Language Model for Text Mining and Information Extraction,” npj Computational Materials 8, no. 1 (2022): 102, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00784-w.

[54] J. Zhao, S. Huang, and J. M. Cole, “OpticalBERT and OpticalTable-SQA: Text- and Table-Based Language Models for the Optical-Materials Domain,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 63, no. 7 (2023): 1961–1981: Published online, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01259.

[55] S. Huang and J. M. Cole, “BatteryBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Battery Database Enhancement,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 62, no. 24 (2022): 6365–6377, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00035.

[56] P. Shetty, A. C. Rajan, C. Kuenneth, et al., “A General-Purpose Material Property Data Extraction Pipeline From Large Polymer Corpora Using Natural Language Processing,” npj Computational Materials 9, no. 1 (2023): 52, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01003-w.

[57] L. P. J. Gilligan, M. Cobelli, V. Taufour, and S. Sanvito, “A Rule-Free Workflow for the Automated Generation of Databases From Scientific Literature,” npj Computational Materials 9, no. 1 (2023): 222, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01171-9.

[58] P. Liu, W. Yuan, J. Fu, Z. Jiang, H. Hayashi, and G. Neubig, “Pre-Train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing,” ACM Computing Surveys 55, no. 9 (2023): 1–35, https://doi.org/10.1145/3560815.

[59] J. Choi and B. Lee, “Accelerating Materials Language Processing With Large Language Models,” Communications Materials 5, no. 1 (2024): 13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-024-00449-9.

[60] J. Dagdelen, A. Dunn, S. Lee, et al., “Structured Information Extraction From Scientific Text With Large Language Models,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 1418, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45563-x.

[61] M. P. Polak and D. Morgan, “Extracting Accurate Materials Data From Research Papers With Conversational Language Models and Prompt Engineering,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 1569, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45914-8.

[62] M. P. Polak, S. Modi, A. Latosinska, et al., “Flexible, Model-Agnostic Method for Materials Data Extraction From Text Using General Purpose Language Models,” Digital Discovery 3, no. 6 (2024): 1221–1235, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4DD00016A.

[63] Z. Zheng, O. Zhang, C. Borgs, J. T. Chayes, and O. M. Yaghi, “ChatGPT Chemistry Assistant for Text Mining and Prediction of MOF Synthesis,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, no. 32 (2023): 18048–18062, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c05819.

[64] E. G. Lewars, “Introduction to Quantum Mechanics in Computational Chemistry,” in Computational Chemistry: Introduction to the Theory and Applications of Molecular and Quantum Mechanics,ed. E. G. Lewars (Springer International Publishing, 2024), 105–197, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51443-2_4.

[65] J. J. de Pablo, B. Jones, C. L. Kovacs, V. Ozolins, and A. P. Ramirez, “The Materials Genome Initiative, the Interplay of Experiment, Theory and Computation,” Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science 18, no. 2 (2014): 99–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2014.02.003.

[66] J. A. Warren, “The Materials Genome Initiative and Artificial Intelligence,” MRS Bulletin 43, no. 6 (2018): 452–457, https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2018.122.

[67] Y. Su and H. Fu, “Progress in Materials Genome Engineering in China,” Acta Metallurgica Sinica 56, no. 10 (2020): 1313–1323, https://doi.org/10.11900/0412.1961.2020.00199.

[68] S. Rühl, “The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD): A Tool for Materials Sciences,” in Materials Informatics (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2019), 41–54, https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527802265.ch2.

[69] J. E. Saal, S. Kirklin, M. Aykol, B. Meredig, and C. Wolverton, “Materials Design and Discovery With High-Throughput Density Functional Theory: The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD),” Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials Society 65, no. 11 (2013): 1501–1509, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4.

[70] A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, et al., “Commentary: The Materials Project: A Materials Genome Approach to Accelerating Materials Innovation,” APL Materials 1, no. 1 (2013): 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323.

[71] X. Geng, S. Wang, A. Ullah, G. Wu, and H. Wang, “Prediction of Hardenability Curves for Non-Boron Steels via a Combined Machine Learning Model,” Materials 15, no. 9 (2022): 3127, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093127.

[72] X. Huang, B. Zhang, Q. Tian, et al., “Machine Learning Study on Time–Temperature–Transformation Diagram of Carbon and Low-Alloy Steel,” Journal of Iron and Steel Research International 30, no. 5 (2023): 1032–1041, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-023-00932-6.

[73] Y. Li and W. Guo, “Machine-Learning Model for Predicting Phase Formations of High-Entropy Alloys,” Physical Review Materials 3, no. 9 (2019): 095005, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.095005.

[74] J. Xiong, T. Y. Zhang, and S. Q. Shi, “Machine Learning Prediction of Elastic Properties and Glass-Forming Ability of Bulk Metallic Glasses,” MRS Communications 9, no. 2 (2019): 576–585, https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2019.44.

[75] J. Xiong, S. Q. Shi, and T. Y. Zhang, “A Machine-Learning Approach to Predicting and Understanding the Properties of Amorphous Metallic Alloys,” Materials and Design 187, no. 108378 (2020): 108378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108378.

[76] A. Seko, H. Hayashi, K. Nakayama, A. Takahashi, and I. Tanaka, “Representation of Compounds for Machine-Learning Prediction of Physical Properties,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter 95, no. 14 (2017): 144110, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.144110.

[77] P. Reiser, M. Neubert, A. Eberhard, et al., “Graph Neural Networks for Materials Science and Chemistry,” Communications Materials 3, no. 1 (2022): 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-022-00315-6.

[78] C. W. Park and C. Wolverton, “Developing an Improved Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Network Framework for Accelerated Materials Discovery,” Physical Review Materials 4, no. 6 (2020): 063801, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.063801.

[79] Z. Dong, J. Feng, Y. Ji, Y. Li, “SLI-GNN: A Self-Learning-Input Graph Neural Network for Predicting Crystal and Molecular Properties,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 127, no. 28 (2023): 5921–5929, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c01558.

[80] A. Merchant, S. Batzner, S. S. Schoenholz, M. Aykol, G. Cheon, and E. D. Cubuk, “Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery,” Nature 624, no. 7990 (2023): 80–85, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9.

[81] Y. Yuan, Z. Chen, T. Feng, et al., “Tripartite Interaction Representation Algorithm for Crystal Graph Neural Networks,” Scientific Reports 14, no. 1 (2024): 24881, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76309-w.

[82] H. Du, J. Wang, J. Hui, L. Zhang, and H. Wang, “DenseGNN: Universal and Scalable Deeper Graph Neural Networks for high-performance Property Prediction in Crystals and Molecules,” npj Computational Materials 10, no. 1 (2024): 292, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-024-01444-x.

[83] J. Devlin, M. W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” arXiv. Preprint posted online May 24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805.

[84] A. N. Rubungo, C. Arnold, B. P. Rand, A. B. Dieng, “LLM-Prop: Predicting Physical and Electronic Properties of Crystalline Solids From Their Text Descriptions,” arXiv. Preprint posted online October 21, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.14029.

[85] A. Niyongabo Rubungo, C. Arnold, B. P. Rand, and A. B. Dieng, “LLM-Prop: Predicting the Properties of Crystalline Materials Using Large Language Models,” npj Computational Materials 11, no. 1 (2025): 186, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01536-2.

[86] A. M. Ganose and A. Jain, “Robocrystallographer: Automated Crystal Structure Text Descriptions and Analysis,” MRS Communications 9, no. 3 (2019): 874–881, https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2019.94.

[87] K. M. Jablonka, P. Schwaller, A. Ortega-Guerrero, and B. Smit, “Leveraging Large Language Models for Predictive Chemistry,” Nature Machine Intelligence 6, no. 2 (2024): 161–169, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00788-1.

[88] C. Chen, W. Ye, Y. Zuo, C. Zheng, and S. P. Ong, “Graph Networks as a Universal Machine Learning Framework for Molecules and Crystals,” Chemistry of Materials 31, no. 9 (2019): 3564–3572, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01294.

[89] K. Choudhary and B. DeCost, “Atomistic Line Graph Neural Network for Improved Materials Property Predictions,” npj Computational Materials 7, no. 1 (2021): 185, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00650-1.

[90] N. Walker, A. Trewartha, H. Huo, et al., “The Impact of Domain-Specific Pre-Training on Named Entity Recognition Tasks in Materials Science,” SSRN Journal (2021): Published online, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3950755.

[91] M. A. Farha and E. D. Brown, “Strategies for Target Identification of Antimicrobial Natural Products,” Natural Product Reports 33, no. 5 (2016): 668–680, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NP00127G.

[92] J. W. H. Li and J. C. Vederas, “Drug Discovery and Natural Products: End of an Era or an Endless Frontier?,” Science 325, no. 5937 (2009): 161–165, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168243.

[93] R. Jiao, W. Huang, P. Lin, et al., “Crystal Structure Prediction by Joint Equivariant Diffusion,” arXiv. Preprint posted online March 7, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.04475.

[94] T. Xie, X. Fu, O. E. Ganea, R. Barzilay, T. Jaakkola. “Crystal Diffusion Variational Autoencoder for Periodic Material Generation,” arXiv. Preprint posted online March 14, 2022, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.06197.

[95] J. Noh, J. Kim, H. S. Stein, et al., “Inverse Design of Solid-State Materials via a Continuous Representation,” Matter 1, no. 5 (2019): 1370–1384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2019.08.017.

[96] C. J. Court, B. Yildirim, A. Jain, and J. M. Cole, “3-D Inorganic Crystal Structure Generation and Property Prediction via Representation Learning,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 60, no. 10 (2020): 4518–4535, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00464.

[97] I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, et al., “Generative Adversarial Networks,” arXiv. Preprint posted online June 10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.2661.

[98] C. Zeni, R. Pinsler, D. Zügner, et al., “MatterGen: A Generative Model for Inorganic Materials Design,” arXiv. Preprint posted online January 29, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.03687.

[99] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, et al., “Attention Is all you Need,” arXiv. Preprint posted online August 2, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762.

[100] V. Bagal, R. Aggarwal, P. K. Vinod, and U. D. Priyakumar, “MolGPT: Molecular Generation Using a Transformer-Decoder Model,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 62, no. 9 (2022): 2064–2076, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00600.

[101] G. Landrum, RDKit: A Software Suite for Cheminformatics, Computational Chemistry, and Predictive Modeling, https://www.rdkit.org/RDKit_Overview.pdf.

[102] Y. Chen, X. Wang, X. Deng, et al., “MatterGPT: A Generative Transformer for Multi-Property Inverse Design of Solid-State Materials,” arXiv. Preprint posted online August 14, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.07608.

[103] J. Schmidt, L. Pettersson, C. Verdozzi, S. Botti, and M. A. L. Marques, “Crystal Graph Attention Networks for the Prediction of Stable Materials,” Science Advances 7, no. 49 (2021): eabi7948, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abi7948.

[104] Y. Wang, H. Zhao, S. Sciabola, and W. Wang, “cMolGPT: A Conditional Generative Pre-Trained Transformer for Target-Specific De Novo Molecular Generation,” Molecules 28, no. 11 (2023): 4430, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114430.

[105] H. Xiao, R. Li, X. Shi, et al., “An Invertible, Invariant Crystal Representation for Inverse Design of Solid-State Materials Using Generative Deep Learning,” Nature Communications 14, no. 1 (2023): 7027, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42870-7.

[106] N. C. Frey, R. Soklaski, S. Axelrod, et al., “Neural Scaling of Deep Chemical Models,” Nature Machine Intelligence 5, no. 11 (2023): 1297–1305, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00740-3.

[107] L. M. Antunes, K. T. Butler, R. Grau-Crespo, “Crystal Structure Generation With Autoregressive Large Language Modeling,” arXiv. Preprint posted online February 12, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.04340.

[108] M. Schilling-Wilhelmi, M. Ríos-García, S. Shabih, et al., “From Text to Insight: Large Language Models for Chemical Data Extraction,” Chemical Society Reviews 54, no. 3 (2025): 1125–1150, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CS00913D.

[109] B. Su, D. Du, Z. Yang, et al., “A Molecular Multimodal Foundation Model Associating Molecule Graphs With Natural Language,” arXiv. Preprint posted online September 12, 2022, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.05481.

[110] S. Liu, W. Nie, C. Wang, et al., “Multi-Modal Molecule Structure-Text Model for Text-Based Retrieval and Editing,” arXiv. Preprint posted online January 29, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.10789.

[111] P. Liu, Y. Ren, J. Tao, and Z. Ren, “GIT-Mol: A Multi-Modal Large language Model for Molecular Science With Graph, Image, and Text,” Computers in Biology and Medicine 171 (2024): 108073, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108073.

[112] J. Li, D. Zhang, X. Wang, et al., “ChemVLM: Exploring the Power of Multimodal Large Language Models in Chemistry Area,” arXiv. Preprint posted online March 5, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.07246.

[113] J. Li, D. Li, S. Savarese, S. Hoi, “BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-Training With Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online June 15, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.12597.

[114] A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, et al., “An Image Is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale,” arXiv. Preprint posted online June 3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929.

[115] D. Zhang, W. Liu, Q. Tan, et al., “ChemLLM: A Chemical Large Language Model,” arXiv. Preprint posted online April 25, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.06852.

[116] E. J. Hu, Y. Shen, P. Wallis, et al., “LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online October 16, 2021, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.09685.

[117] Z. Zhao, D. Ma, L. Chen, et al., “ChemDFM: A Large Language Foundation Model for Chemistry,” arXiv. Preprint posted online November 10, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.14818.

[118] Z. Zhao, D. Ma, L. Chen, et al., “Developing ChemDFM as a Large Language Foundation Model for Chemistry,” Cell Reports Physical Science 6, no. 4 (2025): 102523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102523.

[119] M. Bran A, S. Cox, O. Schilter, C. Baldassari, A. D. White, and P. Schwaller, “Augmenting Large Language Models With Chemistry Tools,” Nature Machine Intelligence 6, no. 5 (2024): 525–535, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00832-8.

[120] H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, et al., “LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online February 27, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.13971.

[121] Z. Wu, B. Ramsundar, E. N. Feinberg, et al., “Moleculen et: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learning,” Chemical Science 9, no. 2 (2018): 513–530, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC02664A.

[122] H. Touvron, L. Martin, K. Stone, et al., “Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online July 19, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.09288.

[123] R. Taylor, M. Kardas, G. Cucurull, et al., “Galactica: A Large Language Model for Science,” arXiv. Preprint posted online November 16, 2022, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.09085.

[124] Z. Cai, M. Cao, H. Chen, et al., “InternLM2 Technical Report,” arXiv. Preprint posted online March 26, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.17297.

[125] S. Kim, J. Chen, T. Cheng, et al., “PubChem 2023 Update,” Nucleic Acids Research 51, no. D1 (2023): D1373–D1380, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac956.

[126] D. Mendez, A. Gaulton, A. P. Bento, et al., “ChEMBL: Towards Direct Deposition of Bioassay Data,” Nucleic Acids Research 47, no. D1 (2019): D930–D940, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1075.

[127] A. M. Bran, S. Cox, O. Schilter, C. Baldassari, A. D. White, P. Schwaller, “ChemCrow: Augmenting Large-Language Models With Chemistry Tools,” arXiv. Preprint posted online October 2, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.05376.

[128] IBM RXN for Chemistry. Accessed March 13, 2025, https://rxn.res.ibm.com/rxn/robo-rxn/welcome.

[129] B. Yu, F. N. Baker, Z. Chen, et al., “ChemToolAgent: The Impact of Tools on Language Agents for Chemistry Problem Solving,” arXiv. Preprint posted online March 3, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.07228.

[130] S. Yao, J. Zhao, D. Yu, et al., “ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online March 10, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.03629.

[131] A. Ghafarollahi, M. J. Buehler, “SciAgents: Automating Scientific Discovery Through Multi-Agent Intelligent Graph Reasoning,” arXiv. Preprint posted online September 9, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.05556.

[132] S. Schmidgall, Y. Su, Z. Wang, et al., “Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants,” arXiv. Preprint posted online January 8, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.04227.

[133] Y. Ruan, C. Lu, N. Xu, et al., “An Automatic End-to-End Chemical Synthesis Development Platform Powered by Large Language Models,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 10160, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54457-x.

[134] T. Song, M. Luo, L. Chen, et al., “A Multi-Agent-driven Robotic AI Chemist Enabling Autonomous Chemical Research on Demand,” Chemrxiv. Preprint posted online July 30 2024, https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-w953h.

[135] N. Brown, M. Fiscato, M. H. S. Segler, and A. C. Vaucher, “GuacaMol: Benchmarking Models for De Novo Molecular Design,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 59, no. 3 (2019): 1096–1108, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00839.

[136] D. Polykovskiy, A. Zhebrak, B. Sanchez-Lengeling, et al., “Molecular Sets (MOSES): A Benchmarking Platform for Molecular Generation Models,” Frontiers in Pharmacology 11 (2020): 565644, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.565644.

[137] W. Zhang, Q. Wang, X. Kong, et al., “Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Chemical Text Mining,” Chemical Science 15, no. 27 (2024): 10600–10611, https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC00924J.

[138] M. Baker, “Academic Screening Goes High-Throughput,” Nature Methods 7, no. 10 (2010): 787–792, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1010-787.

[139] C. R. Oliver, W. Westrick, J. Koehler, et al., “Robofurnace: A Semi-Automated Laboratory Chemical Vapor Deposition System for High-Throughput Nanomaterial Synthesis and Process Discovery,” Review of Scientific Instruments 84, no. 11 (2013): 115105, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4826275.

[140] P. Nikolaev, D. Hooper, N. Perea-López, M. Terrones, and B. Maruyama, “Discovery of Wall-Selective Carbon Nanotube Growth Conditions via Automated Experimentation,” ACS Nano 8, no. 10 (2014): 10214–10222, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn503347a.

[141] J. Dunlop, M. Bowlby, R. Peri, D. Vasilyev, and R. Arias, “High-Throughput Electrophysiology: An Emerging Paradigm for Ion-Channel Screening and Physiology,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 7, no. 4 (2008): 358–368, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2552.

[142] T. Gebhardt, D. Music, T. Takahashi, and J. M. Schneider, “Combinatorial Thin Film Materials Science: From Alloy Discovery and Optimization to Alloy Design,” Thin Solid Films 520, no. 17 (2012): 5491–5499, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2012.04.062.

[143] S. Noda, Y. Tsuji, Y. Murakami, and S. Maruyama, “Combinatorial Method to Prepare Metal Nanoparticles That Catalyze the Growth of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes,” Applied Physics Letters 86, no. 17 (2005): 173106, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1920417.

[144] J. Li, Y. Lu, Y. Xu, et al., “AIR-Chem: Authentic Intelligent Robotics for Chemistry,” Journal of Physical Chemistry A 122, no. 46 (2018): 9142–9148, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b10680.

[145] S. Steiner, J. Wolf, S. Glatzel, et al., “Organic Synthesis in a Modular Robotic System Driven by a Chemical Programming Language,” Science 363, no. 6423 (2019): eaav2211, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2211.

[146] P. S. Gromski, J. M. Granda, and L. Cronin, “Universal Chemical Synthesis and Discovery With ‘The Chemputer,” Trends in Chemistry 2, no. 1 (2020): 4–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2019.07.004.

[147] F. Häse, L. M. Roch, C. Kreisbeck, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, “Phoenics: A Bayesian Optimizer for Chemistry,” ACS Central Science 4, no. 9 (2018): 1134–1145, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00307.

[148] T. Ha, D. Lee, Y. Kwon, et al., “AI-Driven Robotic Chemist for Autonomous Synthesis of Organic Molecules,” Science Advances 9, no. 44 (2023): eadj0461, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj0461.

[149] H. Tao, T. Wu, S. Kheiri, M. Aldeghi, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and E. Kumacheva, “Self-Driving Platform For Metal Nanoparticle Synthesis: Combining Microfluidics and Machine Learning,” Advanced Functional Materials 31, no. 51 (2021): 2106725, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202106725.

[150] L. Cao, D. Russo, K. Felton, et al., “Optimization of Formulations Using Robotic Experiments Driven by Machine Learning DoE,” Cell Reports Physical Science 2, no. 1 (2021): 100295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100295.

[151] A. Slattery, Z. Wen, P. Tenblad, et al., “Automated Self-Optimization, Intensification, and Scale-Up of Photocatalysis in Flow,” Science 383, no. 6681 (2024): eadj1817, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj1817.

[152] B. Burger, P. M. Maffettone, V. V. Gusev, et al., “A Mobile Robotic Chemist,” Nature 583, no. 7815 (2020): 237–241, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2442-2.

[153] Q. Zhu, Y. Huang, D. Zhou, et al., “Automated Synthesis of Oxygen-Producing Catalysts From Martian Meteorites by a Robotic AI Chemist,” Nature Synthesis 3, no. 3 (2023): 319–328, https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-023-00424-1.

[154] Q. Zhu, F. Zhang, Y. Huang, et al., “An all-round AI-Chemist With a Scientific Mind,” National Science Review 9, no. 10 (2022): nwac190, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwac190.

[155] T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, et al., “Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners,” arXiv. Preprint posted online July 22, 2020, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165.

[156] X. Chen, N. Zhang, X. Xie, et al., “KnowPrompt: Knowledge-Aware Prompt-Tuning With Synergistic Optimization for Relation Extraction,” in Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, (2022), 2778–2788, https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3511998.

[157] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “ImageNet Classification With Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,” Communications of the ACM 60, no. 6 (2017): 84–90, https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386.

[158] A. L. Maas, “Rectifier Nonlinearities Improve Neural Network Acoustic Models,” (2013), https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Rectifier-Nonlinearities-Improve-Neural-Network-Maas/367f2c63a6f6a10b3b64b8729d601e69337ee3cc.

[159] D. P. Kingma, J. Ba, “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” arXiv. Preprint posted online January 30, 2017, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980.

[160] Y. You, J. Li, S. Reddi, et al., “Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 Minutes,”2019, https://openreview.net/forum?id=Syx4wnEtvH.

[161] Z. Du, Y. Qian, X. Liu, et al., “GLM: General Language Model Pretraining With Autoregressive Blank Infilling,” arXiv. Preprint posted online March 17, 2022, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.10360.

[162] J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, et al., “Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online January 10, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903.

[163] Y. Wang, Y. Kordi, S. Mishra, et al., “Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models With Self-Generated Instructions,” arXiv. Preprint posted online May 25, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.10560.

[164] S. Yao, D. Yu, J. Zhao, et al., “Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving With Large Language Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online December 3, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.10601.

[165] D. A. Boiko, R. MacKnight, B. Kline, and G. Gomes, “Autonomous Chemical Research With Large Language Models,” Nature 624, no. 7992 (2023): 570–578, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06792-0.

[166] P. Patel, “AI Chemist Performs Complex Experiments Based on Plain Text Prompts,” C&EN Global Enterprise Journal 102, no. 1 (2024): 7, https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10201-scicon4.

[167] N. Yoshikawa, M. Skreta, K. Darvish, et al., “Large Language Models for Chemistry Robotics,” Autonomous Robots 47, no. 8 (2023): 1057–1086, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-023-10136-2.

[168] S. H. M. Mehr, M. Craven, A. I. Leonov, G. Keenan, and L. Cronin, “A Universal System for Digitization and Automatic Execution of the Chemical Synthesis Literature,” Science 370, no. 6512 (2020): 101–108, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc2986.

[169] K. Darvish, M. Skreta, Y. Zhao, et al., “ORGANA: A Robotic Assistant for Automated Chemistry Experimentation and Characterization,” Matter 8, no. 2 (2025): 101897, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2024.10.015.

[170] N. Roy, I. Posner, T. Barfoot, et al., “From Machine Learning to Robotics: Challenges and Opportunities for Embodied Intelligence,” arXiv. Preprint posted online October 28, 2021, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.15245.

[171] J. Duan, S. Yu, H. L. Tan, H. Zhu, and C. Tan, “A Survey of Embodied AI: From Simulators to Research Tasks,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence 6, no. 2 (2022): 230–244, https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2022.3141105.

[172] A.B.-World-Contributors, Bu Q., Cai J., et al., “AgiBot World Colosseo: A Large-Scale Manipulation Platform for Scalable and Intelligent Embodied Systems,” arXiv. Preprint posted online April 30, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.06669.

[173] A. Brohan, N. Brown, J. Carbajal, et al., “RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale,” arXiv. Preprint posted online August 11, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.06817.

[174] D. Driess, F. Xia, M. S. M. Sajjadi, et al., “PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model,” arXiv. Preprint posted online March 6, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.03378.

[175] S. Belkhale, T. Ding, T. Xiao, et al., “RT-H: Action Hierarchies Using Language,” arXiv. Preprint posted online June 1, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.01823.

[176] O. X. E. Collaboration, A. O'Neill, A. Rehman, et al., “Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models,” arXiv. Preprint posted online June 1, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.08864.

[177] T. Z. Zhao, V. Kumar, S. Levine, C. Finn, “Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation With Low-Cost Hardware,” arXiv. Preprint posted online April 23, 2023, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.13705.

[178] Team A. 2, J. Aldaco, T. Armstrong, et al., “ALOHA 2: An Enhanced Low-Cost Hardware for Bimanual Teleoperation,” arXiv. Preprint posted online February 7, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.02292.

[179] C. Chi, Z. Xu, C. Pan, et al., “Universal Manipulation Interface: In-The-Wild Robot Teaching Without In-The-Wild Robots,” arXiv. Preprint posted online March 6, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.10329.

[180] K. Black, N. Brown, D. Driess, et al., “$Π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control,” arXiv. Preprint posted online November 13, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.24164.

[181] P. Intelligence, K. Black, N. Brown, et al., “$π_{0.5}$: A Vision-Language-Action Model With Open-World Generalization,” arXiv. Preprint posted online April 22, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.16054.

[182] A. Mandlekar, S. Nasiriany, B. Wen, et al., “MimicGen: A Data Generation System for Scalable Robot Learning Using Human Demonstrations,”2023, https://openreview.net/forum?id=dk-2R1f_LR.

[183] Z. Xue, S. Deng, Z. Chen, Y. Wang, Z. Yuan, H. Xu, “DemoGen: Synthetic Demonstration Generation for Data-Efficient Visuomotor Policy Learning,” arXiv. Preprint posted online February 24, 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.16932.

[184] L. Yao, Z. Chu, S. Li, Y. Li, J. Gao, and A. Zhang, “A Survey on Causal Inference,” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 15, no. 5 (2021): 74, https://doi.org/10.1145/3444944.

[185] D. Ha, J. Schmidhuber, “Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolution,” arXiv. Preprint posted online September 4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.01999.

[186] X. K. Yang, Y. Y. Xu, and L. Chen, “AI for Science:Ai Enabled Scientific Facility Transforms Fundamental Research,” Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences 1, no. 39 (2024): 59–69, https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20230820004.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). Materials Genome Engineering Advances published by Wiley-VCH GmbH on behalf of University of Science and Technology Beijing.