Machine learning-enabled prediction of oxide glasses’ dielectric constants via augmented data and physicochemical descriptors

Zeyu Kang , Yi Cao , Lu Liu , Wenkai Gao , Jianhao Fu , Junfeng Kang , Yunlong Yue

Materials Genome Engineering Advances ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) : e70035

PDF
Materials Genome Engineering Advances ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) :e70035 DOI: 10.1002/mgea.70035
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Machine learning-enabled prediction of oxide glasses’ dielectric constants via augmented data and physicochemical descriptors
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Precise tuning of dielectric constants (εr) in oxide glasses is critical for high-frequency devices in 5G/6G systems, where εr directly governs signal propagation efficiency. A machine learning framework combining data augmentation and physicochemical descriptor integration is developed to address data scarcity. Validated pseudo-labels are generated via ensemble learning, expanding the dataset from 1503 to 11,029 compositions without distributional shift. The XGBoost model trained on the augmented dataset achieved superior accuracy, with an R2 of 0.96 and an MSE of 0.14. For prediction tasks on unseen data, it reduced the error rate by 48% compared to the non-augmented model and improved generalization performance by 43% over GlassNet. B2O3 and SiO2 are identified as εr suppressors and BaO and TiO2 as enhancers through SHAP analysis, aligning with network former/modifier roles. Cation-specific polarizabilities are derived via Clausius–Mossotti regression (R2 = 0.909). Integration of physicochemical descriptors (coordination number and bond strength) enables transferable predictions for Y2O3 and La2O3 containing glasses, with mean deviation 2.46%–4.76%. Crucially, structural descriptors dominate polarizability with 69.9% feature importance, establishing network engineering as the optimal design paradigm. A data-driven pathway for rational dielectric glass development is thus established.

Keywords

Clausius–Mossotti model / dielectric properties / machine learning / oxide glass

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zeyu Kang, Yi Cao, Lu Liu, Wenkai Gao, Jianhao Fu, Junfeng Kang, Yunlong Yue. Machine learning-enabled prediction of oxide glasses’ dielectric constants via augmented data and physicochemical descriptors. Materials Genome Engineering Advances, 2025, 3(4): e70035 DOI:10.1002/mgea.70035

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ahmad I, Kumar T, Liyanage M, Okwuibe J, Ylianttila M, Gurtov A. Overview of 5G security challenges and solutions. IEEE Comm Stand Mag. 2018;2(1):36-43.

[2]

Cai L, Wu J, Lamberson L, et al. Glass for 5G applications. Appl Phys Lett. 2021;119(8):082901.

[3]

Chen S, Kang S. A tutorial on 5G and the progress in China. Frontiers Inf Technol Electronic Eng. 2018;19(3):309-321.

[4]

Jang D, Kong NK, Choo H. Design of an on-glass 5G monopole antenna for a vehicle window glass. IEEE Access. 2021;9:152749-152755.

[5]

Xiang H, Yao L, Chen J, Yang A, Yang H, Fang L. Microwave dielectric high-entropy ceramic li(Gd0.2Ho0.2Er0.2Yb0.2Lu0.2)GeO4 with stable temperature coefficient for low-temperature cofired ceramic technologies. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;93:28-32.

[6]

Qin J, Liu Z, Ma M, Li Y. Machine learning approaches for permittivity prediction and rational design of microwave dielectric ceramics. J Materiomics. 2021;7(6):1284-1293.

[7]

Qin J, Liu Z, Ma M, Li Y. Optimizing and extending ion dielectric polarizability database for microwave frequencies using machine learning methods. Npj Comput Mater. 2023;9(1):132.

[8]

Viegas JI, Thomas S, Gontijo RN, Righi A, Moreira RL, Dias A. Vibrational spectroscopy and intrinsic dielectric properties of Sr2RE8(SiO4)6O2 (RE = rare Earth) ceramics. Mater Res Bull. 2022;146:111616.

[9]

Kadathala L, Park Y-O, Oh M-K, Han W-T, Kim BH. Analysis of the dielectric properties of alkali-free aluminoborosilicate glasses by considering the contributions of electronic and ionic polarizabilities in the GHz frequency range. Materials. 2024;17(6):1404.

[10]

Lanagan MT, Cai L, Lamberson LA, Wu J, Streltsova E, Smith NJ. Dielectric polarizability of alkali and alkaline-earth modified silicate glasses at microwave frequency. Appl Phys Lett. 2020;116(22):222902.

[11]

Gerace KS, Lanagan MT, Mauro JC. Dielectric polarizability of SiO2 in niobiosilicate glasses. J Am Ceram Soc. 2023;106(8):4546-4553.

[12]

Shannon RD. Dielectric polarizabilities of ions in oxides and fluorides. J Appl Phys. 1993;73(1):348-366.

[13]

Chen L, Kim C, Batra R, et al. Frequency-dependent dielectric constant prediction of polymers using machine learning. Npj Comput Mater. 2020;6(1):61.

[14]

Lin B-N, Shih Y-T. Temperature and frequency-dependent dielectric properties prediction of oxide glasses by machine learning. Ceram Int. 2024;51(16):S0272884224056359.

[15]

Bhattoo R, Bishnoi S, Zaki M, Krishnan NMA. Understanding the compositional control on electrical, mechanical, optical, and physical properties of inorganic glasses with interpretable machine learning. Acta Mater. 2023;242:118439.

[16]

Cassar DR. GlassNet: a multitask deep neural network for predicting many glass properties. Ceram Int. 2023;49(22):36013-36024.

[17]

Kang Z, Wang L, Li X, et al. Interpretable machine learning accelerates development of high-specific modulus glass. Comput Mater Sci. 2025;246:113482.

[18]

Deng B. Machine learning on density and elastic property of oxide glasses driven by large dataset. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2020;529:119768.

[19]

Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825-2830.

[20]

Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM; 2016:785-794.

[21]

Bergstra J, Yamins D, Cox DD. Making a science of model search: hyperparameter optimization in hundreds of dimensions for vision architectures. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 28 (ICML'13). JMLR.org; 2013:I–115–I–123.

[22]

Chicco D, Warrens MJ, Jurman G. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021;7:e623.

[23]

Jēkabsons G, Lavendels J, Sitikovs V. Model evaluation and selection in multiple nonlinear regression analysis. Math Model Anal. 2007;12(1):81-90.

[24]

Shorten C, Khoshgoftaar TM. A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning. J Big Data. 2019;6(1):60.

[25]

Goodfellow IJ, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial nets. In: Ghahramani Z, Welling M, Cortes C, Lawrence N, Weinberger KQ, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc.; 2014. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2014/file/f033ed80deb0234979a61f95710dbe25-Paper.pdf

[26]

Kingma DP, Welling M Auto-encoding variational bayes. 2013.

[27]

Jimenez Rezende D, Mohamed S, Wierstra D. Stochastic backpropagation and approximate inference in deep generative models. In: Xing EP, Jebara T, eds. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR; 2014:1278-1286. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v32/rezende14.html

[28]

Zhou Z-H. Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms. 0 ed. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2012.

[29]

Chapelle O, Scholkopf B, Zien A. Semi-supervised learning (Chapelle, O. et al., eds.; 2006) [book reviews]. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2009;20(3):542.

[30]

Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2019:4171-4186.

[31]

Lundberg SM, Lee S-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc.; 2017:4768-4777.

[32]

Lundberg SM, Erion G, Chen H, et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat Mach Intell. 2020;2(1):56-67.

[33]

Rodriguez-Cano R, Clark NL, Mauro JC, Lanagan MT. Borosilicate glass with low dielectric loss and low permittivity for 5G/6G electronic packaging applications. AIP Adv. 2024;14(11):115105.

[34]

Hsieh CH, Jain H, Kamitsos EI. Correlation between dielectric constant and chemical structure of sodium silicate glasses. J Appl Phys. 1996;80(3):1704-1712.

[35]

Li B, Yue Z, Zhou J, Gui Z, Li L. Low dielectric constant borophosphosilicate glass–ceramics derived from sol–gel process. Mater Lett. 2002;54(1):25-29.

[36]

Sheikholeslam SA, López-Zorrilla J, Manzano H, Pourtavakoli S, Ivanov A. Relationship between atomic structure, composition, and dielectric constant in zr–SiO2 glasses. ACS Omega. 2021;6(43):28561-28568.

[37]

Welch RS, Salrin TC, Greiner T, Bragatto CB, Mauro JC. Molecular dynamics simulations of magnesium aluminosilicate glass structure: high-coordinated alumina and oxygen tricluster formation. J Am Ceram Soc. 2024;107(4):2155-2171.

[38]

Zhang X, Yue Y, Wu H. Effects of MgO/CaO on the structural, thermal and dielectric properties of aluminoborosilicate glasses. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2013;24(8):2755-2760.

[39]

Mentel L. mendeleev—a python resource for properties of chemical elements, ions and isotopes. version 1.1.0. 2014. https://github.com/lmmentel/mendeleev

[40]

Haynes WM, Lide DR, Bruno TJ, eds. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. 97th ed. CRC Press; 2016.

[41]

Sun K. Fundamental condition of glass formation*. J Am Ceram Soc. 1947;30(9):277-281.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Materials Genome Engineering Advances published by Wiley-VCH GmbH on behalf of University of Science and Technology Beijing.

PDF

14

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/