3D Coseismic Deformation and Fault Slip Model of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Sequence Constrained by GPS, ALOS-2 and Sentinel-1 Data

References

[1] AktugB, OzenerH, DogruA, et al.. Slip Rates and Seismic Potential on the East Anatolian Fault System Using an Improved GPS Velocity Field. Journal of Geodynamics, 2016, 94: 1-12

[2] BarbotS, LuoH, WangT, et al.. Slip Distribution of the February 6, 2023 M_W7.8 and M_W7.6, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey Earthquake Sequence in the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Seismica, 2023, 2(3): 1-17

[3] BayrakE, YılmazŞ, SoftaM, et al.. Earthquake Hazard Analysis for East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Natural Hazards, 2015, 76(2): 1063-1077

[4] BleteryQ, CavaliéO, NocquetJ M, et al.. Distribution of Interseismic Coupling along the North and East Anatolian Faults Inferred from InSAR and GPS Data. Geophysical Research Letters, 2020, 47(16): e2020GL087775

[5] Blewitt, G., Hammond, W., Kreemer, C., 2018. Harnessing the GPS Data Explosion for Interdisciplinary Science. Eos, 99, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018eo104623

[6] CakirZ, DoğanU, AkoğluA M, et al.. Arrest of the M_W6.8 January 24, 2020 Elaziğ (Turkey) Earthquake by Shallow Fault Creep. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2023, 608: 118085

[7] ChenC W, ZebkerH A. Phase Unwrapping for Large SAR Interferograms: Statistical Segmentation and Generalized Network Models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2002, 40(8): 1709-1719

[8] ChenW K, RaoG, KangD J, et al.. Early Report of the Source Characteristics, Ground Motions, and Casualty Estimates of the 2023 M_W7.8 and 7.5 Turkey Earthquakes. Journal of Earth Science, 2023, 34(2): 297-303

[9] CunninghamW D, MannP. Tectonics of Strike-Slip Restraining and Releasing Bends. Geological Society of London Special Publications, 2007, 290(1): 1-12

[10] DumanT Y, EmreÖ. The East Anatolian Fault: Geometry, Segmentation and Jog Characteristics. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2013, 372(1): 495-529

[11] FangN, SunK, HuangC, et al.. Joint Inversion of InSAR and Seismic Data for the Kinematic Rupture Process of the 2023 M_S6.2 Jishishan Earthquake. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2024(in Chinese with English Abstract)

[12] FialkoY, SandwellD, SimonsM, et al.. Three-Dimensional Deformation Caused by the Bam, Iran, Earthquake and the Origin of Shallow Slip Deficit. Nature, 2005, 435(7040): 295-299

[13] GaoH, LiaoM, FengG. An Improved Quadtree Sampling Method for InSAR Seismic Deformation Inversion. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(9): 1678

[14] GoldsteinR M, WernerC L. Radar Interferogram Filtering for Geophysical Applications. Geophysical Research Letters, 1998, 25(21): 4035-4038

[15] HeK F, WenY M, XuC J, et al.. Fault Geometry and Slip Distribution of the 2021 M_W7.4 Maduo, China, Earthquake Inferred from InSAR Measurements and Relocated Aftershocks. Seismological Research Letters, 2022, 93(1): 8-20

[16] HeL J, FengG C, XuW B, et al.. Coseismic Kinematics of the 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey Earthquake Sequence from InSAR and Optical Data. Geophysical Research Letters, 2023, 50(17): e2023GL104693

[17] HeP, WenY M, WangX H, et al.. The N-S Direction Strike-Slip Activities in the Pamir Hinterland under Oblique Convergence: The 2015 and 2023 Earthquakes. Geophysical Journal International, 2024, 238(2): 1150-1163

[18] HuJ, LiZ W, DingX L, et al.. Resolving Three-Dimensional Surface Displacements from InSAR Measurements: A Review. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 133: 1-17

[19] JiaZ, JinZ Y, MarchandonM, et al.. The Complex Dynamics of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, M_W7.8 - 7.7 Earthquake Doublet. Science, 2023, 381(6661): 985-990

[20] JiangK, XuW B, XieL. Unwrap Intractable C-Band Coseismic Interferograms: An Improved SNAPHU Method with Range Offset Gradients as Prior Information. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2024, 129(10): e2024JB028826

[21] JinZ Y, FialkoY. Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation due to the 2021 M7.4 Maduo (China) Earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 2021, 48(21): e2021GL095213

[22] JónssonS. Fault Slip Distribution of the 1999 M_W7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Estimated from Satellite Radar and GPS Measurements. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2002, 92(4): 1377-1389

[23] KanekoY, FialkoY. Shallow Slip Deficit Due to Large Strike-Slip Earthquakes in Dynamic Rupture Simulations with Elasto-Plastic Off-Fault Response. Geophysical Journal International, 2011, 186(3): 1389-1403

[24] KuskyT M, BozkurtE, MengJ N, et al.. Twin Earthquakes Devastate Southeast Türkiye and Syria: First Report from the Epicenters. Journal of Earth Science, 2023, 34(2): 291-296

[25] LiZ W, XuW B, HuJ, et al.. Partial Geoscience Parameters Inversion from InSAR Observation. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2022, 51(7): 1458-1475(in Chinese with English Abstract)

[26] LomaxAPrecise, NLL-SSST-Coherence Hypocenter Catalog for the 2023 M_W7.8 and M_W7.6 SE Turkey Earthquake Sequence. v3.0, 2023[Data Set]

[27] MaZ F, LiC L, JiangY, et al.. Space Geodetic Insights to the Dramatic Stress Rotation Induced by the February 2023 Turkey-Syria Earthquake Doublet. Geophysical Research Letters, 2024, 51(6): e2023GL107788

[28] MelgarD, GengJ H, CrowellB W, et al.. Seismogeodesy of the 2014 M_W6.1 Napa Earthquake, California: Rapid Response and Modeling of Fast Rupture on a Dipping Strike-Slip Fault. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2015, 120(7): 5013-5033

[29] Merryman BoncoriJ P. Measuring Coseismic Deformation with Spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Review. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2019, 7: 16

[30] NalbantS S, McCloskeyJ, SteacyS, et al.. Stress Accumulation and Increased Seismic Risk in Eastern Turkey. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2002, 195(3/4): 291-298

[31] OkadaY. Surface Deformation Due to Shear and Tensile Faults in a Half-Space. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1985, 75(4): 1135-1154

[32] Pousse-BeltranL, NissenE, BergmanE A, et al.. The 2020 M_W6.8 Elazığ (Turkey) Earthquake Reveals Rupture Behavior of the East Anatolian Fault. Geophysical Research Letters, 2020, 47(13): e2020GL088136

[33] ProvostF, KarabacakV, MaletJ P, et al.. High-Resolution Co-Seismic Fault Offsets of the 2023 Türkiye Earthquake Ruptures Using Satellite Imagery. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 6834

[34] ReilingerR, McCluskyS, VernantP, et al.. GPS Constraints on Continental Deformation in the Africa-Arabia-Eurasia Continental Collision Zone and Implications for the Dynamics of Plate Interactions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2006, 111(B5): B05411

[35] ReitmanN G, BriggsR W, BarnhartW D, et al.. Fault Rupture Mapping of the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye. Earthquake Sequence from Satellite Data, 2023

[36] SimãoN M, NalbantS S, SunbulF, et al.. Central and Eastern Anatolian Crustal Deformation Rate and Velocity Fields Derived from GPS and Earthquake Data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2016, 433: 89-98

[37] WangK, FialkoY. Space Geodetic Observations and Models of Postseismic Deformation due to the 2005 M7.6 Kashmir (Pakistan) Earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2014, 119(9): 7306-7318

[38] Wang, K., Xu, X. H., Hu, Y., 2024. Kinematics of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Doublet: Biased Near-Fault Data and Shallow Slip Deficit. Seismological Research Letters, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240062

[39] WangR, ParolaiS, GeM, et al.. The 2011 M_W9.0 Tohoku Earthquake: Comparison of GPS and Strong-Motion Data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2013, 103(2B): 1336-1347

[40] WeissJ R, WaltersR J, MorishitaY, et al.. High-Resolution Surface Velocities and Strain for Anatolia from Sentinel-1 InSAR and GNSS Data. Geophysical Research Letters, 2020, 47(17): e2020GL087376

[41] WernerC, WegmüllerU, StrozziT, et al.. Gamma Sar and Interferometric Processing Software. Proceedings of the Ers-Envisat Symposium, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2000, 1620: 1620

[42] WesselP, SmithW H F, ScharrooR, et al.. Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 2013, 94(45): 409-410

[43] XuC J, ZhouL X, YinZ. Construction and Geodesy Slip Inversion Analysis of 2013 M_S7.0 Lushan in China Earthquake’s Curved Fault Model. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2017, 42(11): 1665-1672(in Chinese with English Abstract)

[44] XuL, AokiY, WangJ Q, et al.. The 2023 M_W7.8 and 7.6 Earthquake Doublet in Southeast Türkiye: Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation, Faulting Model, and Potential Seismic Hazard. Seismological Research Letters, 2024, 95(2A): 562-573

[45] XuW B, FengG C, MengL S, et al.. Transpressional Rupture Cascade of the 2016 M_W7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake, New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2018, 123(3): 2396-2409

[46] XuW B, LiuX G, BürgmannR, et al.. Space Geodetic Evidence of Basement-Involved Thick-Skinned Orogeny and Fault Frictional Heterogeneity of the Papuan Fold Belt, Papua New Guinea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2022, 127(8): e2022JB024227

[47] XuX H, TongX P, SandwellD T, et al.. Refining the Shallow Slip Deficit. Geophysical Journal International, 2016, 204(3): 1867-1886

[48] ZhangY J, TangX W, LiuD C, et al.. Geometric Controls on Cascading Rupture of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Doublet. Nature Geoscience, 2023, 16: 1054-1060

[49] ZhaoL, XuW, XieL, et al.. Fault Geometry and Low Frictional Control of the Near-Field Postseismic Deformation of the 2021 M_W7.3 Maduo Earthquake. Tectonophysics, 2023, 863: 230000 in Chinese with English Abstract)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Part of Springer Nature