Nanotechnology for Water Treatment: Is It the Best Solution Now?

Moustafa Gamal Snousy, Hassan Mohamed Helmy, Jianhua Wu, M. F. Zawrah, A. Abouelmagd

Journal of Earth Science ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5) : 1616-1620.

Journal of Earth Science ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5) : 1616-1620. DOI: 10.1007/s12583-023-1928-8
Viewpoint

Nanotechnology for Water Treatment: Is It the Best Solution Now?

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In conclusion, the role of nanotechnology in water treatment is overestimated; while advantages are not more than theoretical assumptions, while the disadvantages are almost certain. Waste waters stay toxic after treatment by nanomaterials. The problem arises from the use of very simplified-theoretical assumptions and laboratory results produced under controlled experimental conditions. In natural settings, the selectivity of contaminants removal as well as the properties of nanomaterial itself makes water treatment by nanomaterials questionable. During surface water-waste water-treatments, nanomaterials may interact with soil biota, up taken by plants and crops, kill targeted and un-targeted bacteria leading to sever problems to biodiversity. There is clear information deficiency about fate, transport, and bioavailability or bioaccumulation of nanomaterials in the complicated water environments. Long-term studies on the negative feedback of nanomaterials on human and ecological environments are urgently needed.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Moustafa Gamal Snousy, Hassan Mohamed Helmy, Jianhua Wu, M. F. Zawrah, A. Abouelmagd. Nanotechnology for Water Treatment: Is It the Best Solution Now?. Journal of Earth Science, 2023, 34(5): 1616‒1620 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-023-1928-8

References

Akil A, Hassan W. NANOMATERIALS: Global Research Publication, Research Quality, and Patent Trends, 2020, 2020: 229-248.
Ali I. New Generation Adsorbents for Water Treatment. Chemical Reviews, 2012, 112(10): 5073-5091.
CrossRef Google scholar
Aminiyan M M, Aitkenhead-Peterson J, Aminiyan F M. Evaluation of Multiple Water Quality Indices for Drinking and Irrigation Purposes for the Karoon River, Iran. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2018, 40(6): 2707-2728.
CrossRef Google scholar
Barton L E, Auffan M, Olivi L, . Heteroaggregation, Transformation and Fate of CeO2 Nanoparticles in Wastewater Treatment. Environmental Pollution, 2015, 203: 122-129.
CrossRef Google scholar
Brar S K, Verma M, Tyagi R D, . Engineered Nanoparticles in Wastewater and Wastewater Sludge—Evidence and Impacts. Waste Management, 2010, 30(3): 504-520.
CrossRef Google scholar
Brenner S A, Neu-Baker N M, Caglayan C, . Occupational Exposure to Airborne Nanomaterials: An Assessment of Worker Exposure to Aerosolized Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Semiconductor Wastewater Treatment. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2015, 12(7): 469-481.
CrossRef Google scholar
Carbajo J B, Petre A L, Rosal R, . Ozonation as Pre-Treatment of Activated Sludge Process of a Wastewater Containing Benzalkonium Chloride and NiO Nanoparticles. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 283: 740-749.
CrossRef Google scholar
Dong Y M, Yang H X, He K, . B-MnO2 Nanowires: A Novel Ozonation Catalyst for Water Treatment. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2009, 85(3): 155-161. 4
CrossRef Google scholar
Hu X, Ding Z H, Zimmerman A R, . Batch and Column Sorption of Arsenic Onto Iron-Impregnated Biochar Synthesized through Hydrolysis. Water Research, 2015, 68: 206-216.
CrossRef Google scholar
Jarvie H P, King S M. Just Scratching the Surface? New Techniques Show How Surface Functionality of Nanoparticles Influences Their Environmental Fate. Nano Today, 2010, 5(4): 248-250.
CrossRef Google scholar
Kar S, Bindal R C, Tewari P K. Carbon Nanotube Membranes for Desalination and Water Purification: Challenges and Opportunities. Nano Today, 2012, 7(5): 385-389.
CrossRef Google scholar
Khajeh M, Laurent S, Dastafkan K. Nanoadsorbents: Classification, Preparation, and Applications (with Emphasis on Aqueous Media). Chemical Reviews, 2013, 113(10): 7728-7768.
CrossRef Google scholar
Kim E S, Hwang G, Gamal El-Din M, . Development of Nanosilver and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Thin-Film Nanocomposite Membrane for Enhanced Water Treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 394: 37-48. 395
CrossRef Google scholar
Kuiken T. Cleaning up Contaminated Waste Sites: Is Nanotechnology the Answer?. Nano Today, 2010, 5(1): 6-8.
CrossRef Google scholar
Loo S L, Krantz W B, Fane A G, . Bactericidal Mechanisms Revealed for Rapid Water Disinfection by Superabsorbent Cryogels Decorated with Silver Nanoparticles. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(4): 2310-2318.
CrossRef Google scholar
Mueller N C, Nowack B. Nanoparticles for Remediation: Solving Big Problems with Little Particles. Elements, 2010, 6(6): 395-400.
CrossRef Google scholar
Neale P A, Jämting Å K, O’Malley E, . Behaviour of Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles in the Presence of Wastewater-Derived Organic Matter and Implications for Algal Toxicity. Environmental Science: Nano, 2015, 2(1): 86-93
Nyberg L, Turco R F, Nies L. Assessing the Impact of Nanomaterials on Anaerobic Microbial Communities. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(6): 1938-1943.
CrossRef Google scholar
Oves M, Arshad M, Khan M S, . Anti-Microbial Activity of Cobalt Doped Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Targeting Water Borne Bacteria. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 2015, 19(5): 581-588.
CrossRef Google scholar
Peralta-Videa J R, Zhao L J, Lopez-Moreno M L, . Nanomaterials and the Environment: A Review for the Biennium 2008–2010. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 186(1): 1-15.
CrossRef Google scholar
Posner J D. Engineered Nanomaterials: Where They Go, nobody Knows. Nano Today, 2009, 4(2): 114-115.
CrossRef Google scholar
Ranjit P, Jhansi V, Reddy K V. Conventional Wastewater Treatment Processes, 2021, Singapore: Springer, 455-479. 2021
Rashid A, Khattak S A, Ali L, . Geochemical Profile and Source Identification of Surface and Groundwater Pollution of District Chitral, Northern Pakistan. Microchemical Journal, 2019, 145: 1058-1065.
CrossRef Google scholar
Sealy C. Cleaning up Water on the Nanoscale. Nano Today, 2013, 8(4): 337-338.
CrossRef Google scholar
Sealy C. Freshwater Plants Break down Gold Nanoparticles. Nano Today, 2018, 23: 6-7.
CrossRef Google scholar
Sealy C. Nanostructured Wood Promises Eco-Friendly Desalination. Nano Today, 2019, 28: 100770
CrossRef Google scholar
Sibag M, Choi B G, Suh C, . Inhibition of Total Oxygen Uptake by Silica Nanoparticles in Activated Sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 283 841-846.
CrossRef Google scholar
Simate G S, Iyuke S E, Ndlovu S, . The Heterogeneous Coagulation and Flocculation of Brewery Wastewater Using Carbon Nanotubes. Water Research, 2012, 46(4): 1185-1197.
CrossRef Google scholar
Sun Y, Liang J, Tang L, . Nano-Pesticides: A Great Challenge for Biodiversity?. Nano Today, 2019, 28 100757
CrossRef Google scholar
Ustaoğlu F, Tepe Y. Water Quality and Sediment Contamination Assessment of Pazarsuyu Stream, Turkey Using Multivariate Statistical Methods and Pollution Indicators. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2019, 7(1): 47-56.
CrossRef Google scholar
Wang Y L, El-Deen A G, Li P, . High-Performance Capacitive Deionization Disinfection of Water with Graphene Oxide-Graft-Quaternized Chitosan Nanohybrid Electrode Coating. ACS Nano, 2015, 9(10): 142-157.
CrossRef Google scholar
Yang Y, Colman B P, Bernhardt E S, . Importance of a Nanoscience Approach in the Understanding of Major Aqueous Contamination Scenarios: Case Study from a Recent Coal Ash Spill. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(6): 3375-3382.
CrossRef Google scholar
Yeston J, Coontz R, Smith J, . A Thirsty World. Science, 2006, 313(5790): 1067
CrossRef Google scholar
Zhao W, Chen I W, Huang F Q. Toward Large-Scale Water Treatment Using Nanomaterials. Nano Today, 2019, 27 11-27.
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/