A Practical Approach to Constructing a Geological Knowledge Graph: A Case Study of Mineral Exploration Data
Qinjun Qiu, Bin Wang, Kai Ma, Hairong Lü, Liufeng Tao, Zhong Xie
Journal of Earth Science ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5) : 1374-1389.
A Practical Approach to Constructing a Geological Knowledge Graph: A Case Study of Mineral Exploration Data
Open data initiatives have promoted governmental agencies and scientific organizations to publish data online for reuse. Research of geoscience focuses on processing georeferenced quantitative data (e.g., rock parameters, geochemical tests, geophysical surveys and satellite imagery) for discovering new knowledge. Geological knowledge is the cognitive result of human knowledge of the spatial distribution, evolution and interaction patterns of geological objects or processes. Knowledge graphs (KGs) can formalize unstructured knowledge into structured form and have been used in supporting decision-making recently. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that can extract the geological knowledge graph (GKG) from public reports relating to a modelling study. Based on the analysis of basic questions answered by geology, we summarize and abstract geological knowledge elements and then explore a geological knowledge representation model with three levels of “geological concepts-geological entities-geological relations” to describe semantic units of geological knowledge and their logic relations. Finally, based on the characteristics of mineral resource reports, the geological knowledge representation model oriented to “object relationships” and the hierarchical geological knowledge representation model oriented to “process relationships” are proposed with reference to the commonly used geological knowledge graph representation. The research in this paper can provide some implications for the formalization and structured representation of geological knowledge graphs.
mineral resource report / geological knowledge / knowledge graph / ontology / hierarchical knowledge representation model
4D Initiative Team, 2018. White Paper of the 4D Initiative: Deep-Time Data Driven Discovery. https://4d.carnegiescience.edu/sites/default/files/4D_materials/4D_WhitePaper.pdf. (Accessed 4 March 2020)
|
Alzaidy, R., Caragea, C., Giles, C. L., 2019. Bi-LSTM-CRF Sequence Labeling for Keyphrase Extraction from Scholarly Documents. WWW’19: The World Wide Web Conference. May 13–17, 2019, San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313642
|
|
Bauer, F., Kaltenböck, M., 2011. Linked Open Data: The Essentials. Mono/Monochrom. Vienna, Austria
|
|
Chen, Y., Goldberg, S., Wang, D. Z., et al., 2016. Ontological Pathfinding. The 2016 International Conference on Management of Data. 26 June 2016, San Francisco. https://doi.org/10.1145/2882903.2882954
|
|
Deng, C., Jia, Y. T., Xu, H., et al., 2021. GAKG: A Multimodal Geoscience Academic Knowledge Graph. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. November 1–5, 2021, Virtual Event, Queensland. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459637.3482003
|
Dong, X., Gabrilovich, E., Heitz, G., et al., 2014. Knowledge Vault: A Web-Scale Approach to Probabilistic Knowledge Fusion. The 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. August 24–27, 2014, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nickel, M., Tresp, V., Kriegel, H. P., 2011. A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bellevue
|
|
Noy, N. F., McGuinness, D. L., 2001. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. https://protege.stanford.edu/conference/2004/slides/Ontology101_tutorial.pdf
|
Powers, D. M. W., 1998. Applications and Explanations of Zipf’s lawProceedings of the Joint Conferences on New Methods in Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning-NeMLaP3/CoNLL’ 98. January 11–17, 1998. Sydney, Australia. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 1998: 151–160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singhal A. 2012. Introducing the Knowledge Graph: Things, not Strings. Google Blog. https://www.blog.google/products/search/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not/
|
Socher, R., Chen, D. Q., Manning, C. D., et al., 2013. Reasoning with Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems-Volume 1. New York
|
Sun, Z. Q., Deng, Z. H., Nie, J. Y., et al., 2019. RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Space. arXiv: 1902.10197. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10197
|
|
|
Wang, C. C., Cheng, P. J., 2018. Translating Representations of Knowledge Graphs with Neighbors. SIGIR’ 18: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. July 8–12, 2018, Ann Arbor. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210085
|
|
|
Wei, Z. P., Su, J. L., Wang, Y., et al., 2019. A Novel Cascade Binary Tagging Framework for Relational Triple Extraction. arXiv: 1909.03227. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03227
|
|
|
|
Zaslavsky, I., Valentine, D., Richard, S., et al., 2017. EarthCube Data Discovery Hub: Enhancing, Curating and Finding Data across Multiple Geoscience Data Sources. AGU Fall Meeting, New Orleans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |