Importance of Modeling Heterogeneities and Correlation in Reservoir Properties in Unconventional Formations: Examples of Tight Gas Reservoirs

Abstract

We present lithofacies classifications for a tight gas sandstone reservoir by analyzing hierarchies of heterogeneities. We use principal component analysis (PCA) to overcome the two level of heterogeneities, which results in a better lithofacies classification than the traditional cutoff method. The classical volumetric method is used for estimating oil/gas in-place resources in the petroleum industry since its inception is not accurate because it ignores the heterogeneities of and correlation between the petrophysical properties. We present the importance and methods of accounting for the heterogeneities of and correlation between petrophysical properties for more accurate hydrocarbon volumetric estimations. We also demonstrate the impacts of modeling the heterogeneities and correlation in porosity and hydrocarbon saturation for hydrocarbon volumetric estimations with a tight sandstone gas reservoir. Furthermore, geoscientists have traditionally considered that small-scale heterogeneities only impact subsurface fluid flow, but not impact the hydrocarbon resource volumetric estimation. We show the importance of modeling small-scale heterogeneities using fine cell size in reservoir modeling of unconventional resources for accurate resource assessment.

Keywords

heterogeneity / petrophysical property correlations / Simpson’s paradox / porosity / gas saturation / hydrocarbon volumetrics / change of support problem

References

[1] Alqahtani, A. A., Tutuncu, A. N., 2014. Quantification of Total Organic Carbon Content in Shale Source Rocks: An Eagle Ford Case Study Proceedings of the 2nd Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. August 25–27, 2014. Denver, Colorado, USA. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2014-1921783

[2] Cao R Y, Ma Y Z, Gomez E. Geostatistical Applications in Petroleum Reservoir Modeling. South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2014, 114: 625-629.

[3] Chiles J P, Delfiner P. Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty, 2012, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 699

[4] Cluff S G, Cluff R M, Hallau D G, . Petrophysics of the Lance and Upper Mesaverde Reservoirs at Pinedale Field, Sublette County, Wyoming, USA. AAPG Memoir, 2004, 107: 351-416.

[5] Cressie N. Statistics for Spatial Data, 1993, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 900

[6] Delfiner P. Three Statistical Pitfalls of Phi-K Transforms. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2007, 10(6): 609-617.

[7] Ehsan M, Gu H M, Akhtar M M, . Identification of Hydrocarbon Potential of Talhar Shale: Member of Lower Goru Formation Using Well Logs Derived Parameters, Southern Lower Indus Basin, Pakistan. Journal of Earth Science, 2018, 29(3): 587-593.

[8] Fitch P J R, Lovell M A, Davies S J, . An Integrated and Quantitative Approach to Petrophysical Heterogeneity. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2015, 63: 82-96.

[9] Fylling, A., 2002. Quantification of Petrophysical Uncertainty and Its Effect on In-Place Volume Estimates: Numerous Challenges and Some SolutionsAll Days. September 29-October 2, 2002. San Antonio, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2118/77637-ms

[10] Gotway C A, Young L J. Combining Incompatible Spatial Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2002, 97(458): 632-648.

[11] Holditch S A. Tight Gas Sands. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2006, 58(6): 86-93.

[12] Isaaks E H, Srivastava R M. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics, 1989, Oxford: Oxford University Press

[13] Jennings J W Jr.. How Much Core-Sample Variance should a Well-Log Model Reproduce?. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1999, 2(5): 442-450.

[14] Kennedy M. Practical Petrophysics. Elsevier, Amsterdam Lake, L. W., Jensen, J. L., 1991. A Review of Heterogeneity Measures Used in Reservoir Characterization. In Situ, 2015, 15(4): 409-439

[15] Li J Q, Zhang P F, Lu S F, . Scale-Dependent Nature of Porosity and Pore Size Distribution in Lacustrine Shales: An Investigation by BIB-SEM and X-Ray CT Methods. Journal of Earth Science, 2019, 30(4): 823-833.

[16] Li S L, Gao X J. A New Strategy of Crosswell Correlation for Channel Sandstone Reservoirs—An Example from Daqing Oilfield, China. Interpretation, 2019, 7(2): T409-T421.

[17] Li S L, Zhang Y, Ma Y Z, . A Comparative Study of Reservoir Modeling Techniques and Their Impact on Predicted Performance of Fluvial-Dominated Deltaic Reservoirs: Discussion. AAPG Bulletin, 2018, 102(8): 1659-1663.

[18] Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C, . Spectrum of Pore Types and Networks in Mudrocks and a Descriptive Classification for Matrix-Related Mudrock Pores. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6): 1071-1098.

[19] Lucia J F. Carbonate Reservoir Characterization, 2007 2nd Edition Berlin: Springer

[20] Ma Y Z. Error Types in Reservoir Characterization and Management. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2010, 72(3/4): 290-301.

[21] Ma Y Z. Lithofacies Clustering Using Principal Component Analysis and Neural Network: Applications to Wireline Logs. Mathematical Geosciences, 2011, 43(4): 401-419.

[22] Ma Y Z. An Accurate Parametric Method for Assessing Hydrocarbon Volumetrics: Revisiting the Volumetric Equation. SPE Journal, 2018, 23(5): 1566-1579.

[23] Ma Y Z. Quantitative Geosciences: Data Analytics, Geostatistics, Reservoir Characterization and Modeling, 2019, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 640

[24] Ma Y Z. Three-Dimensional Modeling of Mineral/Elemental Compositions for Shale Reservoirs. SPE Journal, 2020, 25(4): 2067-2078.

[25] Ma Y Z, Gomez E. Sampling Biases and Mitigations in Modeling Shale Reservoirs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2019, 71: 102968

[26] Ma Y Z, Gomez E. Uses and Abuses in Applying Neural Networks for Predictions in Hydrocarbon Resource Evaluation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015, 133 66-75.

[27] Ma Y Z, Holditch S A. Preface: Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources Handbook., 2016, Amsterdam: Elsevier, xi-xiv.

[28] Ma, Y. Z., Moore W. R., Gomez, E., et al., 2016. Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs, Part 1: Overview and Lithofacies. Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources Handbook, Science Direct. 405–427

[29] Matheron G. Estimating and Choosing—An Essay on Probability in Practice, 1989, Berlin: Springer-Verlag

[30] Moore W R, Ma Y Z, Urdea J, . Uncertainty Analysis in Well Log and Petrophysical Interpretations. In: Ma, Y. Z., LaPointe, P., eds., Uncertainty Analysis and Reservoir Modeling. AAPG Memoir, 2011, 96: 17-28.

[31] Moore W R, Ma Y Z, Pirie I, . Ma Y Z, Holditch S, . Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs, Part 2: Petrophysical Analysis and Reservoir Modeling. Unconventional Resource Handbook: Evaluation and Development, 2016, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 429-449.

[32] Murtha J, Ross J. Uncertainty and the Volumetric Equation. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2009, 61(9): 20-22.

[33] Pearl J. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, 2000, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 384

[34] Prensky S E. Use of Gamma-Ray Log for Locating Cretaceous-Tertiary Unconformity, Pinedale Area, Northern Green River Basin, Wyoming: Abstract. AAPG Bulletin, 1984, 68(7): 946-946

[35] Robinson W S. Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals. American Sociological Review, 1950, 15(3): 351

[36] Saraji S, Goual L, Piri M, . Wettability of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide/Water/Quartz Systems: Simultaneous Measurement of Contact Angle and Interfacial Tension at Reservoir Conditions. Langmuir, 2013, 29 23 6856-6866.

[37] Slatt R M. Cubitt J. Stratigraphic Reservoir Characterization for Petroleum Geologists, Geophysicists, and Engineers. Handbook of Petroleum Exploration and Production, 2006, Amsterdam: Elsevier

[38] Tiab D, Donaldson E C. Petrophysics: Theory and Practice of Measuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties, 2003 2nd Edition Oxford: Gulf Professional Pub.

[39] Wang G C, Carr T R. Marcellus Shale Lithofacies Prediction by Multiclass Neural Network Classification in the Appalachian Basin. Mathematical Geosciences, 2012, 44(8): 975-1004.

[40] Wu Z R, He S, Han Y J, . Effect of Organic Matter Type and Maturity on Organic Matter Pore Formation of Transitional Facies Shales: A Case Study on Upper Permian Longtan and Dalong Shales in Middle Yangtze Region, China. Journal of Earth Science, 2020, 31(2): 368-384.