Fuzzy Modeling of Surficial Uranium Prospectivity in British Columbia (Canada) with a Weighted Fuzzy Algebraic Sum Operator

Emmanuel John M. Carranza

Journal of Earth Science ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2) : 293-309.

Journal of Earth Science ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2) : 293-309. DOI: 10.1007/s12583-021-1403-5
Special Issue on Digital Geosciences and Quantitative Exploration of Mineral Resources

Fuzzy Modeling of Surficial Uranium Prospectivity in British Columbia (Canada) with a Weighted Fuzzy Algebraic Sum Operator

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper demonstrates knowledge-guided fuzzy logic modeling of regional-scale surficial uranium (U) prospectivity in British Columbia (Canada). The deposits/occurrences of surficial U in this region vary from those in Western Australia and Namibia; thus, requiring innovative and carefully-thought techniques of spatial evidence generation and integration. As novelty, this papers introduces a new weighted fuzzy algebraic sum operator to combine certain spatial evidence layers. The analysis trialed several layers of spatial evidence based on conceptual mineral system model of surficial U in British Columbia (Canada) as well as tested various models of evidence integration. Non-linear weighted functions of (a) spatial closeness to U-enriched felsic igneous rocks was employed as U-source spatial evidence, (b) spatial closeness to paleochannels as fluid pathways spatial evidence, and (c) surface water U content as chemical trap spatial evidence. The best models of prospectivity created by integrating the layers of spatial evidence for U-source, pathways and traps predicted at least 85% of the known surficial U deposits/occurrences in >10% of the study region with the highest prospectivity fuzzy scores. The results of analyses demonstrate that, employing the known deposits/occurrences of surficial U for scrutinizing the spatial evidence layers and the final models of prospectivity can pinpoint the most suitable critical processes and models of data integration to reduce bias in the analysis of mineral prospectivity.

Keywords

fuzzy logic / mineral systems / surficial uranium / fuzzy algebraic sum

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Emmanuel John M. Carranza. Fuzzy Modeling of Surficial Uranium Prospectivity in British Columbia (Canada) with a Weighted Fuzzy Algebraic Sum Operator. Journal of Earth Science, 2021, 32(2): 293‒309 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-021-1403-5

References

Agterberg F P, Bonham-Carter G F. Measuring the Performance of Mineral-Potential Maps. Natural Resources Research, 2005, 14(1): 1-17.
CrossRef Google scholar
An P, Moon W M, Rencz A. Application of Fuzzy Set Theory for Integration of Geological, Geophysical and Remote Sensing Data. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics, 1991, 27: 1-11.
Bardossy, G., Fodor, J., 2003. Geological Reasoning and the Problem of Uncertainty. In: Cubitt, J., Whalley, J., Henley, S., eds., Modeling Geohazards: IAMG2003 Proceedings, Portsmouth UK. Portsmouth University, UK, September 7–12, 2003
Bonham-Carter G F. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists, Modelling with GIS, 1994, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 398 Ontario
Bonnetti C, Cuney M, Bourlange S, . Primary Uranium Sources for Sedimentary-Hosted Uranium Deposits in NE China: Insight from Basement Igneous Rocks of the Erlian Basin. Mineralium Deposita, 2017, 52(3): 297-315.
CrossRef Google scholar
Boyle D R. The Formation of Basal-Type Uranium Deposits in South Central British Columbia. Economic Geology, 1982, 77(5): 1176-1209.
CrossRef Google scholar
Boyle, D. R., 1984. The Genesis of Surficial Uranium Deposit. IAEA-TECDOC-322, Report of the Working Group on Uranium Geology Organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna. 45
Cameron E. The Yeelirrie Calcrete Uranium Deposit, Western Australia, IAEA-TECDOC-322, 1984, Vienna: IAEA, 157-164
Carlisle D. Surficial Uranium Occurrences in Relation to Climate and Physical Setting, IAEA-TECDOC-322, 1984, Vienna: IAEA, 25-35
Carranza E J M. Improved Wildcat Modelling of Mineral Prospectivity. Resource Geology, 2010, 60(2): 129-149.
CrossRef Google scholar
Carranza E J M. Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS, 2008, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 351
Carranza E J M, Hale M. Geologically Constrained Fuzzy Mapping of Gold Mineralization Potential, Baguio District, Philippines. Natural Resources Research, 2001, 10: 125-136.
CrossRef Google scholar
Chabiron A, Cuney M, Poty B. Possible Uranium Sources for the Largest Uranium District Associated with Volcanism: The Streltsovka Caldera (Transbaikalia, Russia). Mineralium Deposita, 2003, 38(2): 127-140.
CrossRef Google scholar
Coyan J A, Zientek M L, Mihalasky M J. Spatiotemporal Analysis of Changes in Lode Mining Claims around the McDermitt Caldera, Northern Nevada and Southern Oregon. Natural Resources Research, 2017, 26(3): 319-337.
CrossRef Google scholar
Cui, Y., Katay, F., Nelson, J. L., et al., 2013. British Columbia Digital Geology, BCGS Open File 2013-04, British Columbia Geological Survey (http://www.empr.gov.bc.ca/mining/geoscience/publicationscatalogue/openfiles/2013/pages/2013-4.aspx)
Cui, Y., Miller, D., Schiarizza, P., et al., 2017. British Columbia Digital Geology. British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, British Columbia Geological Survey Open File 2017–8, Victoria, B.C.
Culbert R R, Leighton D G. Young Uranium. Ore Geology Reviews, 1988, 3(1/2/3): 313-330.
CrossRef Google scholar
Culbert R R, Boyle D R, Levinson A A. Surficial Uranium Deposits in Canada. Surficial Uranium Deposits, 1984, Vienna: IAEA, 179-191
Cunningham C G, Ludwig K R, Naeser C W, . Geochronology of Hydrothermal Uranium Deposits and Associated Igneous Rocks in the Eastern Source Area of the Mount Belknap Volcanics, Marysvale, Utah. Economic Geology, 1982, 77(2): 453-463.
CrossRef Google scholar
IAEA Methods of Exploitation of Different Types of Uranium Deposits IAEA-TECDOC-1174, 2000, Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 75
Joly A, Porwal A, McCuaig T C, . Mineral Systems Approach Applied to GIS-Based 2D-Prospectivity Modelling of Geological Regions: Insights from Western Australia. Ore Geology Reviews, 2015, 71: 673-702.
CrossRef Google scholar
Kazanskiy V I, Laverov N P, Tugarinov A I. Sources of Ore Material in Endogenic Uranium Deposits. International Geology Review, 1977, 19(3): 283-294.
CrossRef Google scholar
Khoury H N. Geochemistry of Surficial Uranium Deposits from Central Jordan. Jordan Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 2014, 6: 11-22.
Kreuzer O P, Markwitz V, Porwal A K, . A Continent-Wide Study of Australia’s Uranium Potential. Ore Geology Reviews, 2010, 38(4): 334-366.
CrossRef Google scholar
Kreuzer O P, Miller A V M, Peters K J, . Comparing Prospectivity Modelling Results and Past Exploration Data: A Case Study of Porphyry Cu-Au Mineral Systems in the Macquarie Arc, Lachlan Fold Belt, New South Wales. Ore Geology Reviews, 2015, 71: 516-544.
CrossRef Google scholar
Lindsey D A. Tertiary Volcanic Rocks and Uranium in the Thomas Range and Northern Drum Mountains, Juab County, Utah, 1982, Washington D.C: United States Government Printing Office
CrossRef Google scholar
Lisitsin V A, González-Álvarez I, Porwal A. Regional Prospectivity Analysis for Hydrothermal-Remobilised Nickel Mineral Systems in Western Victoria, Australia. Ore Geology Reviews, 2013, 52: 100-112.
CrossRef Google scholar
McCuaig T C, Beresford S, Hronsky J. Translating the Mineral Systems Approach into an Effective Exploration Targeting System. Ore Geology Reviews, 2010, 38(3): 128-138.
CrossRef Google scholar
Misra A, Pande D, Kumar K R, . Calcrete-Hosted Surficial Uranium Occurrence in Playa-Lake Environment at Lachari, Nagaur District, Rajasthan, India. Current Science, 2011, 101: 84-88.
Nykänen V, Groves D I, Ojala V J, . Reconnaissance-Scale Conceptual Fuzzy-Logic Prospectivity Modelling for Iron Oxide Copper-Gold Deposits in the Northern Fennoscandian Shield, Finland. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2008, 55(1): 25-38.
CrossRef Google scholar
O’Callaghan J F, Mark D M. The Extraction of Drainage Networks from Digital Elevation Data. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 1984, 28(3): 323-344.
CrossRef Google scholar
Occhipinti S A, Metelka V, Lindsay M D, . Multicommodity Mineral Systems Analysis Highlighting Mineral Prospectivity in the Halls Creek Orogen. Ore Geology Reviews, 2016, 72: 86-113.
CrossRef Google scholar
Page R W. Chronology of Magmatism, Skarn Formation, and Uranium Mineralization, Mary Kathleen, Queensland, Australia. Economic Geology, 1983, 78(5): 838-853.
CrossRef Google scholar
Porwal A K, Kreuzer O P. Introduction to the Special Issue: Mineral Prospectivity Analysis and Quantitative Resource Estimation. Ore Geology Reviews, 2010, 38(3): 121-127.
CrossRef Google scholar
Porwal A, Carranza E J M, Hale M. A Hybrid Fuzzy Weights-of-Evidence Model for Mineral Potential Mapping. Natural Resources Research, 2006, 15(1): 1-14.
CrossRef Google scholar
Porwal A, Carranza E J M, Hale M. Knowledge-Driven and Data-Driven Fuzzy Models for Predictive Mineral Potential Mapping. Natural Resources Research, 2003, 12: 1-25.
CrossRef Google scholar
Porwal A, Das R D, Chaudhary B, . Fuzzy Inference Systems for Prospectivity Modeling of Mineral Systems and a Case-Study for Prospectivity Mapping of Surficial Uranium in Yeelirrie Area, Western Australia. Ore Geology Reviews, 2015, 71: 839-852.
CrossRef Google scholar
Sanusi S O, Amigun J O. Logistic-Based Translation of Orogenic Gold Forming Processes into Mappable Exploration Criteria for Fuzzy Logic Mineral Exploration Targeting in the Kushaka Schist Belt, North-Central Nigeria. Natural Resources Research, 2020, 29(6): 3505-3526.
CrossRef Google scholar
Stamoulis V. ASTER Night-Time Thermal Infrared Data: Interpreting Subsurface Features from High Resolution Data. MESA Journal, 2006, 43: 36-39.
Thakur, S., Chudasama, B., Porwal, A., González-Álvarez, I., 2016. Sub-Surface Paleochannel Detection in DeGrussa Area, Western Australia, Using Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing, Proceedings SPIE 9877, Land Surface and Cryosphere Remote Sensing III, 98772C (May 5, 2016), https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2223626.
Thole U, Zimmermann H J, Zysno P. On the Suitability of Minimum and Product Operators for the Intersection of Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1979, 2(2): 167-180.
CrossRef Google scholar
Tixier K, Beckie R. Uranium Depositional Controls at the Prairie Flats Surficial Uranium Deposit, Summerland, British Columbia. Environmental Geology, 2001, 40(10): 1242-1251.
CrossRef Google scholar
Yousefi M, Carranza E J M. Fuzzification of Continuous-Value Spatial Evidence for Mineral Prospectivity Mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 2015, 74: 97-109.
CrossRef Google scholar
Zadeh L A. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-353.
CrossRef Google scholar
Zadeh L A. Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1973, SMC-31: 28-44.
CrossRef Google scholar
Zadeh L A. The Role of Fuzzy Logic in the Management of Uncertainty in Expert Systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1983, 11(1/2/3): 199-227.
CrossRef Google scholar
Zielinski R A. Uranium Abundances and Distribution in Associated Glassy and Crystalline Rhyolites of the Western United States. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1978, 89(3): 409-414.
CrossRef Google scholar
Zielinski R A. Tuffaceous Sediments as Source Rocks for Uranium: A Case Study of the White River Formation, Wyoming. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1983, 18(3): 285-306.
CrossRef Google scholar
Zimmerman H -J. Fuzzy Set Theory—And Its Applications, 1991, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/