How Deep Learning Networks could be Designed to Locate Mineral Deposits

Abstract

Whether using a shallow neural network with one hidden layer, or a deep network with many hidden layers, the training data must represent subgroups of the deposit type being explored to be useful. Published examples of neural networks have mostly been limited to one individual mineral deposit for training. Variation of geologic features among deposits within a type are so large that a single deposit cannot provide proper information to train a neural net to generalize and guide exploration for other deposits. Models trained with only one deposit tend to be academic successes but are not of practical value in exploration for other deposits. This is why it takes much experience examining many deposits to properly train an economic geologist—a neural network is not any different. Two examples of shallow neural networks are used to demonstrate the power of neural networks to possibly locate undiscovered deposits and to provide some suggestions of how to deal with missing data. The training data needs to include information spatially related to known deposits and hopefully information from many different deposits of the type. Lessons learned from these and other examples point to a proposed sampling plan for data that could lead to a generalized neural network for exploration. In this plan, 10 or more well-explored gold-rich porphyry copper deposits from around the world with 100 or more sample sites near and some distance from each deposit would probably capture important variability among such deposits and provide proper data to train and test a shallow neural network to predict locations of undiscovered deposits.

Keywords

porphyry copper / training neural networks / missing observations

References

[1] Abedi M, Norouzi G H. Integration of Various Geophysical Data with Geological and Geochemical Data to Determine Additional Drilling for Copper Exploration. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2012, 83: 35-45.

[2] Cameron E M, Hamilton S M, Leybourne M I, . Finding Deeply Buried Deposits Using Geochemistry. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 2004, 4(1): 7-32

[3] Cooke, D. R., Wilkinson, J. J., Baker, M., et al., 2015. Using Mineral Chemistry to Detect the Location of Concealed Porphyry Deposits—An Example from Resolution, Arizona. Proceedings of the 27th International Applied Geochemistry Symposium 2015, April 20–24, 2015, Arizona, USA. 1–6

[4] Cox D P, Singer D A. Mineral Deposit Models. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1986, 1693 379

[5] Hinton G E, Osindero S, Teh Y W. A Fast Learning Algorithm for Deep Belief Nets. Neural Computation, 2006, 18(7): 1527-1554.

[6] Masters T. Practical Neural Network Recipes in C⁺⁺, 1993, San Diego, California: Academic Press, Inc., 493

[7] Masters, T., 2013. Assessing and Improving Prediction and Classification. CreateSpace. 560

[8] Masters, T., 2016. Deep Belief Nets in C++ and CUDA C, Volume III: Convolutional Nets. CreateSpace. 207

[9] Rumelhart D, McClelland J the PDP Research Group Parallel Distributed Processing, 1986, Cambridge: MIT Press

[10] Sillitoe R H. Porphyry Copper Systems. Economic Geology, 2010, 105(1): 3-41.

[11] Singer D A, Kouda R. Application of a Feedforward Neural Network in the Search for Kuroko Deposits in the Hokuroku District, Japan. Mathematical Geology, 1996, 28(8): 1017-1023.

[12] Singer, D. A., Berger, V. I., Moring, B. C., 2008. ai]Porphyry Copper Deposits of the World: Database, Map, and Grade and Tonnage Models, 2008. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1155. [2020-12-2]. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1155/