A stochastic model approach for optimisation of lowland river restoration works

Abstract

Over the course of centuries, river systems have been heavily trained for the purpose of safe discharge of water, sediment and ice, and improves navigation. Traditionally, dikes are used to be reinforced and heightened to protect countries from ever higher flood levels. Other types of solutions than technical engineering solutions, such as measures to increase the flood conveyance capacity (e.g., lowering of groynes and floodplains, setting back dikes) become more popular. These solutions may however increase the river bed dynamics and thus impact negatively navigation, maintenance dredging and flood safety. A variety of numerical models are available to predict the impact of river restoration works on river processes. Often little attention is paid to the assessment of uncertainties. In this paper, we show how we can make uncertainty explicit using a stochastic approach. This approach helps identifying uncertainty sources and assessing their contribution to the overall uncertainty in river processes. The approach gives engineers a better understanding of system behaviour and enables them to intervene with the river system, so as to avoid undesired situations. We illustrate the merits of this stochastic approach for optimising lowland river restoration works in the Rhine in the Netherlands.

Keywords

river restoration / flood protection / dredging / navigation / stochastic approach / Room for the River program

References

[1] Baptist M. J. Modelling Floodplain Biogeomorphology: [Dissertation], 2005

[2] Barneveld H. J., Kutschera G., Teurlincx R. Hydraulic Research after Drainage and Structural Improvements in the Lower Rhine in Germany, 2010

[3] Chang C., Yang J., Tung Y. Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of a Sediment Transport Model: A Global Approach. Stochastic Hydrology and Hydraulics, 1993, 7(4): 299-314.

[4] De Groot K. A New River for a New Colombia. Room for the River, Implementation in the Cauca Valley and Other Regions. Book of Abstracts International Conference Deltas in Times of Climate Change II, 2014, 195-196.

[5] De Groot K. A New River for a New Colombia: Room for the River, Implementation in the Cauca Valley and Other Regions. International Conference Deltas in Times of Climate Change II Abstracts, 2015, 195-196.

[6] Efron B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans, 1982 Philadelphia: Philadelphia Publisher, 92

[7] Gardner R. H., O’Neill R. V. Beck M. B., van Straten G. Parameter Uncertainty and Model Predictions: A Review of Monte Carlo Results. Uncertainty and Forecasting of Water Quality, 1983 Berlin: Springer-Verlag

[8] Groot S., Termes P. Room for the River Danube in Cat’s Bend Romania, 2009

[9] Hammersley J. M., Handscomb D. C. Monte Carlo Methods, 1964 London: Methuen and Co Ltd., 178

[10] Havinga H., van Adrichem R. The Aftermath of Room for the River and Restoration Works: Excessive Maintenance Dredging. Proceedings of the 35th IAHR World Congress 2013, 2013

[11] Huthoff F., van Vuren S., Barneveld H. J., . On the Importance of Discharge Variability in the Morphodynamic Modeling of Rivers. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics (River Flow 2010), 2010

[12] Jazwinsy A. H. Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory, 1970 New York: Academic Press

[13] Jesse, P., Kroekenstoel, D. F., 2001. 1-D Morfologisch Sobek Rijntakken Model (Tech. Rep. Nos. ISBN 9036953952, RIZA report 2001.040). RIZA, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat. Directoraat-Generaal Rijkswaterstaat (in Dutch)

[14] Kloeden P. E., Platen E., Schurz H. Numerical Solutions of Stochastic Differential Equations through Computer Experiments, 1994 Berlin: Spinger, 292.

[15] Leenaers H., Donkers H. De Bosatlas van Nederland Waterland, 2010

[16] Maurer M., Kelamener Y., Bechteler W. The Effects of Inaccurate Input Parameters on Deposition of Suspended Sediment. International Journal of Sediment Research, 1997, 12(3): 191-198.

[17] Meyer-Peter E., Müller R. Formulas for Bed Load Transport. Proceedings of the 2nd Congress International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research (IAHR), 1948, 39-64.

[18] Morgan M. G., Henrion M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, 1990 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[19] Ouypornprasert W. Adaptive Numerical Integration for Reliability Analysis, 1988

[20] RWS, 1995. Delta Plan Major Rivers. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management. Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management.

[21] Silva, W., Klijn, F., Dijkman, J., 2001. Room for the Rhine Branches in the Netherlands: What the Research has Taught us. RIZA, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Directorate-General for Public Works and Water Management, Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment and WL Delft Hydraulics, WL Delft Hydraulics Report R3294, RIZA Report 2001.031. ISBN 29036953855. 160

[22] Van der Klis H. Uncertainty Analysis Applied to Numerical Models of River Bed Morphology: [Dissertation], 2003 Delft: Delft University of Technology

[23] Van Stokkom H. T. C., Smits A. J. M., Leuven R. S. E. W. Flood Defense in the Netherlands: A New Era, a New Approach. Water International, 2005, 30(1): 76-87.

[24] Van Vuren S. Stochastic Modelling of River Morphodynamics: [Dissertation], 2005 Delft: Delft University of Technology

[25] Van Vuren S., Havinga H. Preparing Self Supporting River Systems: How to Cope with Excessive Maintenance Dredging. River Flow, 2012, 2 4.

[26] Wang S. Y., Wu W. M. River Sedimentation and Morphological Modelling—The State of the Art and Future Development, 2004 Yichang: Ninth International Symposium on River Sedimentation, 71-94.